Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do we need God for Morality? [Spirituality & Religion]

Obviously the secular answer is a resounding NO.
But if you're a theist who says "yes", i want to hear your reasoning.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
As time goes on and we evolved to know more things about the human brain, it's proven with more knowledge comes more secularism and humanism. We don't do some of the things they used to do to people compared to what they did back then. It's obvious we don't need God for this reason, [b]as we know more, we grow more.[/b]

Moralism is largely a bunch of crap because it changes depending on your perception and experience. BUT that doesn't change the fact that morals can actually use the same applied logic as above in the first paragraph, as we know more, we grow more. As we know more, our morals change because our experiences do, this is probably why slavery is generally frowned upon even though it's arguable that we still have corporate slavery and wage slavery, fully legal.

If let's say, we never had technology and the Catholic church still ruled, me and you (Pikachu) would probably be totally different people. I could have participated in a witch burning for all I know.

And I probably wouldn't have noticed that what I was doing was wrong to be honest 🤔

Thus the problem of morals and God.
@Speedyman I’ve been asking the question of @GodSpeed63 and he’s afraid to answer. But I’ll ask you.
Do you read and follow every word of the bible?
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Yes I read every word in the Bible. I try and read it about once a year following a plan. Of course I don’t follow every word in the Bible as although the recording of the Bible I believe is inspired not all parts of the Bible are equally relevant. So there are parts of the old Testament which have now passed away having been fulfilled in Christ such as the sacrificial system. There were laws pertaining to the theocracy of Israel which now do not apply to the democracy of the west although of course the 10 Commandments are a very good guide to life.
For the Christian he starts at the new Testament and uses the old Testament of the background. So the teaching of Christ in the apostles is of prime importance. Does that help you?@wilderflower
@Speedyman That’s a very honest answer. Thank you.
I am a scientific minded person, I do not personally believe in any deities. With that being said I do believe the concept of god is indeed needed to instill morality in some people. All religions have a punishment/reward system that gives people a reason to be good (going to heaven for Christians) and some form of eternal punishment (going to hell for Christians). This is meant to incentivize moral behavior based upon a set of rules established by the religion. Without this fear I believe that many people would be more likely to become violent, aggressive psychotics, much like what we are seeing in the world today. It seems "biblical" at times to see the violence and hatred permeating society these days and to some degree it actually is biblical, as our society steps away from religion many who are perhaps on the edge already lose that fear of "going to hell" because they lose their belief in its existence and thus are more likely to act upon their more base desires, whether that be sexual perversion or mass murder. So to make a long story short...yes in some people a belief in some sort of "god" is necessary for morality.
JBird · F
@Speedyman 🤣🤣🤣 dumb speedy.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
JBird · F
@Speedyman 😴😴😴😪😪😪😪
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@Pikachu Sounds good.
Reverend · M
@Bushranger Block away, I could honestly care less. Im honored to be the first! Another prime example of top grade morality. No consequences for actions. Check✅
@Reverend I think the sanctity of life is an all or nothing thing. It has to be so, as our attitude towards life is reflected in all of our actions and choices. We have a society that has no respect for life, no value for life. Not just for humans but all living things.

I would agree with you that abortion is murder. I believe capital punishment is murder. That war is murder. That depriving people of healthcare is murder. And that our destruction of the environment is suicide.

I don’t say that to normalize abortion. I say it simply to speak the truth. Our contempt for life is such that overturning Roe v. Wade will not end abortion. We will continue to have abortion through illicit channels. Making something illegal does not end it. Look at illicit drugs.

If one really wishes to end abortion, then one must simultaneously wish to end capital punishment and even war, though defending our interests is a reality just like a police officer using deadly force to protect life. We have to simultaneously wish to end lives cut short through starvation, a lack of healthcare. That may sound ridiculous, but that is what makes us value life again.

I have known abortion providers. People who did OB-GYN for a living. There are certainly some who use abortion as contraception. There are also many more who used it to escape desperate situations. It is to value life to work to end those situations. When a woman says she got an abortion because she was scared the father would abuse her or the child— that is about a disregard for life. Who abuses a child, a woman? When a woman says she got an abortion because she couldn’t care for the child— that is about a disregard for life. Who won’t help feed and clothe a baby? When a woman says she had to abort to keep her job— that too is about a disregard for life. What boss has a problem with a mother? a baby?

I’m with you ethically and spiritually. But I can’t go down this road and put the burden on women and women alone. And force them to make the same choices to abort in dangerous unclean and unregulated environments like before Roe. I’d rather start with the culture that has no regard for life.

BTW: the rate of abortion per capita peaked a few years after Roe, and has been steadily in decline since. There is a lesson there.
I can think of nothing more offensive and disgusting than the premise that religion is the basis for morality. That the only reason I don't rape and murder women is my religious beliefs. That only the existence of God keeps me from that. Repeat for any number of horrors.

I believe religion is utterly meaningless without the foundation of basic human goodness. A capacity for love and compassion. Without that, religion just becomes a tool of the ego. It gives us new ways to hurt people.
Carazaa · F
I am a human I am flawed! God is God who died for my sins, who saved, me took me out of darkness to his glorious light and he helps me, gives me everything I need and he helps my family! I repent and I don't deserve God! I know God is a just and moral God! @Pikachu
@Carazaa

As you wish 🙂
This message was deleted by its author.
Carazaa · F
For those people who believe other religions believe in the Golden rule. Let me just inform you that The Bible was before all of the ones that “ proclaim” to be loving. The Bible was thousands of years before. The 10 commandments were written about 4000 years ago (1,600 before the year of our Lord) .
Buddah lived 600 years BC foreinstance. They all borrow from the Bible!
Buddah was so frustrated with his family that he left them for 2 years to meditate??
We can all say we are moral but who acts moral? Jesus was tortured for us who don’t love him. That is our God! He is moral and that is how we are required to act!
Carazaa · F
@Bushranger they trusted in God! They weren’t a church at all!
Carazaa · F
@Bushranger it’s been interesting discussing this with you! Have a nice evening!
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@Carazaa I don't know if it was pointed out yet. There are actually several different resurrection stories way before Christianity and there were several different religious groups before the bible.
SW-User
Not a theist my answer is a no.

I had an amazing conversation once with a very devout lady friend. She told me that she could not believe morality was separated from a belief in God and his punishment at the judgment day if you'd sinned.

She was amazed I didn't need that. The final bit was very weird as I said to her "So you think without your faith you'd be totally immoral?". She basically said yes.... Very weird
Speedyman · 70-79, M
I’m not surprised I can’t grasp the subject matter as I have a great deal of trouble grasping incorrect arguments as you are making. You are just plain wrong in your definition. I am not wrong. You are. Survival instinct is not morality. Even the most basic animals have it. Just admit you are totally lacking in any form of logic instead of making silly noises @Pikachu
@Speedyman

[quote]Survival instinct is not morality[/quote]

lmao 😂😭

Yup. Already agreed to that.
So sad that this discussion flew so far above your head.
So sad that you're so [i]desperate[/i] to be right that you can't even remember what has been said to you.

Better luck next time, speedy🤦🏻
Speedyman · 70-79, M
No it just flew above your intellect as you just haven’t the intelligence to see you are completely wrong. Anyone with sense or intelligence would see it. Not you

. @Pikachu
@AnonymousJSS I love your responses to him.
AnonymousJSS · 22-25, F
@wilderflower Aw, thanks 😜
@AnonymousJSS You’re welcome 😝
ozgirl512 · 26-30, F
It's always intrigued me how lawless we were before someone invented God
Budwick · 70-79, M
@ozgirl512 [quote]how lawless we were before someone invented God[/quote]

Yeah, cuz now it's all sunshine and lollipops.
Yet god does nothing@Budwick
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
I pity people who need a God to be good!! 🤷‍♀️
@GodSpeed63 It still sounds kinky, but hey to each their own.
Do you read and follow every word of the bible?
JBird · F
@GodSpeed63 so we can hurt people because they already sinned, right? You're digusting and so is your faith and religion
Your God is not innocent for allowing this. He is cruel just like rest of us. Fortunately, he isn't real.
Reverend · M
@JBird oh my word!! No!!
carsonfry · 22-25, M
Sounds like Pikachu knows there is a God, and does not want to admit or know how to learn more about Him. God is the foundation of everything. He gives meaning and logic to everything. The Christian God. He gives meaning and logic and truth to all that we experience as humans, before now, now, and in the future. The Bible explains it all. Other books portray a different God, don't be confused because they are false prophets, and their logic does not work. I hope you will take 10 minutes or more to study this. You can start at Genesis 1.1.
BiblicalWarrior · 51-55, M
@Pikachu The scientific method has not always existed. It's a relatively recent way of looking at the world. This article refutes that statement.

https://explorable.com/history-of-the-scientific-method
BiblicalWarrior · 51-55, M
@Sharon Truth is NEVER popular, and especially not now in the age of fake news.
Sharon · F
@BiblicalWarrior Why are you avoiding the question? Where is the [b]real[/b] evidence?
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
One of the greatest tragedies of mankind, was when morality was highjacked by religion!
@GodSpeed63

[quote]No YOU!😡[/quote]

lol ooo somebody is getting upset.

I'm happy to explain why she's right and then you will show the same level of integrity and explain why you believe she's wrong.

Do you agree? Yes or no?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]ooo somebody is getting upset. [/quote]

Yeah, I can see the look on your face and the tone in your voice. Calm down and clear your head before you give me an answer.
@GodSpeed63

lol hit too close to home, did i?

This is the same situation we have in the other thread, little boy.\
I'm happy to explain why she is right if you agree to then explain why she's wrong.

Do you accept this challenge or do you back down.
Do you accept?
Yes or no....
JBird · F
Only people who can't understand right and wrong need God to help them out, who ironically punish people who don't agree with him. 🤣🤣🤣
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@JBird Do you believe in an object form of "morality" then?
JBird · F
@Kwek00 I want to say certain humans. But not every human can be moral all the time.
Abstraction · 61-69, M
I'm a theist who says no. Morality can be socially derived.

What's really interesting to me is -
1. how much our basic principles of right and wrong, in essence, can be agreed across cultures. (eg, human rights are pretty universal. Those who say 'it isn't part of our culture' are usually ruling class people.) Of course details differ here and there.
2. that this includes people who insist there is no morality - not during their third-glass-of-wine-party-discussion, but through their outrage when these 'wrong' things that don't exist are done to them.
3. how consistently all humans fail to live up to their own morality.
4. that the attempt to deal with guilt or psychological impact by rationalising behaviour, often doesn't stop the damage in terms of broken relationships, etc.
Whilst I'm a theist, I observed these same things as an agnostic.
@Abstraction

Very well said. This ubiquity of certain fundamental moral concepts among cultures beyond and before the abrahamic religions seems to show that morality is not dependent on these religious teachings.
Abstraction · 61-69, M
@Pikachu This universality can be consistent with both agnostic view and Christian view. It was this exploring this puzzle (in a lot more depth) that was one of the reasons CS Lewis embraced Christianity.

I think lots of christians only half understand the arguments and try to argue that there's no basis for morality apart from God. Demonstrably wrong. The full argument though, is interesting.
@Abstraction

It is interesting. I've watched a few debates on this subject and it appears usually to come down to whether there can be an objective standard for morality that we should care about.
Of course this question is not actually answered by saying that a god is the standard.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
In fact this mythical 'god's' actions are morally questionable
@MasterLee

Couldn't agree more lol
Carazaa · F
Yes! Because there is no accountability to God otherwise. God sees everything. People who don't believe in Jesus slander and treat people nice who have been nice to them but not their enemies or those who haven't been nice. That's low class, , Satanic, evil, and makes the world greedy, dog eat dog world! Not like Jesus taught to love everyone. To treat people the way we want to be treated regardless of how they treat us. It makes for a more lovely world!
Carazaa · F
@Pikachu
No I didn't yet but I will!
@Carazaa

lol do it now. It'll take literally 30 seconds. It's a one page short list of other religions who have a version of the "golden rule".
JBird · F
@Carazaa [quote]
But it is highly unusual for non Christians to be kind to a rapist or a murderer!
[/quote]
So we should be kind to people who have hurt others. Right, is that why most pastors are found to be rapists?
Morality requires choice to be meaningful. If there are no pigs, then I'm really not engaging in moral action if my vow isn't to eat pigs.

It is the same with the religious argument that we can't be moral without a fear of being punished by God. It's not much of a choice. It is much like not engaging in something because of fearing imprisonment or of catching a beating.

To not hurt a person (as an example) because I might catch a beating or go to prison or have God punish me-- is barely ethical. It is risk management. It is selfish.
@kodiac Well. That morality only comes from the fear of God model has a frightening flip side...

... the person who claims that is tacitly admitting they will do anything to you if they feel God demands it.
@CopperCicada That is exactly why that mentality scares me. It is them saying if it wasn't for God I'd kill you. I can't deal with that kind of instability.
Also laying down your life for another gets brought up a lot. I for one would do so if I could save people. Even an enemy. Religion isn't needed for any of that.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@canusernamebemyusername I've heard people say that before actually, it scares me too.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
You don’t wanna hear any reasoning you just wanna hear your own bigoted point of you
Yulianna · 22-25, F
@Speedyman i do not give a "view of history". i give you facts.

these facts are inconvenient for your world view, so you choose to ignore them.

that is ok. you are ignorant and you are stupid. your unfounded arrogance and lack of humility in the face of overwhelming evidence are profoundly unchristian.

if it gives you any twisted satisfaction to tell me i am wrong, you are free to do so. there is clearly no point in my wasting any more time on you.

i wish only that you spend what is left of your life in quiet reflection on your sins and seeking forgiveness from your god.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Sorry but you are totally ignorant of history . I give you facts not theories but you choose to ignore them. You are another example of my theory that atheism is based on ignorance not knowledge and is based on emotionalism and not reasoning. Your last statement is hilarious in asking me to ask forgiveness of sins from my God when you don’t believe in God yourself. It just proves how emotionally wound up you are@Yulianna
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@Yulianna Also atheists weren't allowed to join the SS. It's well documented, the Nazis said so themselves. The modern day Nazis are still evangelical.
SW-User
I know a lot of "Christians" who talk about how much they love Jesus, but they ignore the golden rule.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
If you are just a bunch of chemicals then why is one morality any more relevant than another? It is the atheist who has to give the answer. As Nietzsche said, It’s a Christian God is dead, so is Christian morality. His words prove prophetic in the bloodbath of the 20th century
JBird · F
@Speedyman [quote]
You are the one who believes in the logical process that irrational forces can produce rational beings and that non-personality can produce personality and you are the one who is getting yourself.
[/quote]

Show me where I told you this.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
If you are an atheist you believe this@JBird
JBird · F
@Speedyman if you don't have any idea about atheism, please don't talk about it before you make yourself look like fool. Well, you already proven that. 🤣🤣🤣

Another tip, we don't think universe came from nothing. I know it's no use for you idiots to tell you this over and over again because you have low memory capacity. You are not good with big data. 😂
I just thought of this but didn't we get morality from eating of the tree of good and evil? I mean if you believe that story.
"Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil."
Doesn't that suggest that morality became part of our nature and does not come from following God's laws. In fact morality seems to have come from NOT listening to God in this case.
Just a thought I had when I remembered that scripture.
BiblicalWarrior · 51-55, M
@Carazaa The tree they were forbidden to eat before the fall was the Tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil. It was not until after they disobeyed that they were then barred from the Tree of Life, so as to prevent there ever being an immortal sinner.
Carazaa · F
@BiblicalWarrior I am not sure about that I'll have to study it again!
Reverend · M
@BiblicalWarrior Yes, you are correct!
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Yulianna · 22-25, F
@Sharon i am not sure that we disagree - i do not dispute anything you say so far. my reference to the love of the christ was about the hypocrisy of his self claimed chriatian views. he cannot even follow his own god!

i am if anything atheist - but i believe in god as a human construct.
Sharon · F
@fairefoutre But if it took the form of a monkey you wouldn't worship it. Or would you worship it anyway and hold yourself in contempt?
Yulianna · 22-25, F
a resounding NO!
Penny · 46-50, F
yes people are wretched self-indulgent undisciplined opportunists. (may be talking about myself here) who need someone to be held accountable to
Penny · 46-50, F
@Pikachu I'm not a theist btw, but i do think the bible or other christian and also non christian teachings are valuable educational tools
@Penny

How can you not be a theist but believe that jesus is the only way to know god?
Penny · 46-50, F
@Pikachu i didnt read that in a book. someone told me that. maybe they got it from a book though. who knows? oh, i thought theist meant something else. (just looked it up) i suppose i am a theist then - noun: theist; plural noun: theists
a person who believes in the existence of a god or gods, specifically of a creator who intervenes in the universe.
Northwest · M
I would argue the opposite. God, manifests itself through religions/tribes, and these religions/tribe compete, violently for control, setting morality aside, or redefining morality, to be whatever fits these religions/tribes objectives. Fear of God keeps religions/tribes in control.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Northwest [quote]God, manifests itself through religions/tribes, and these religions/tribe compete, violently for control, setting morality aside, or redefining morality, to be whatever fits these religions/tribes objectives. Fear of God keeps religions/tribes in control.[/quote]

You got it backwards, @Northwest. God hates man made organized religion more than we ever could. Just read Matthew 23. One more thing, it's not about religion, never has been or ever will be about religion. It's a relationship with God and His creation through Jesus Christ by His Holy Spirit.
Northwest · M
@GodSpeed63 In other words, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and others, are screwed.
@Northwest

There certainly is a lot of god-based justification that goes on for violence and cruelty.
Chevy454 · 46-50, M
Obviously don’t need god for anything,since he doesn’t exist.
@TheeOriginalAmazingsEXLover How fo we know you’re not lying?
@Sharon
@LeopoldBloom
I could be, no one has any reason or legality to trust me, as I'm a complete stranger to everyone on here. I am no liar and I have zero reason to lie to y'all! There was a voice like thunder that boomed, I was an extremely great runner and it was uncommon for me to not be able to catch another runner ahead of me!
Sharon · F
@TheeOriginalAmazingsEXLover [quote]There was a voice like thunder that boomed,[/quote]
Sounds like it could have been Thor.
SW-User
Because there is no morality without God. Morality would become flexible and fluid and would only be based on popular or personal opinion and each opinion on what is right and wrong would be considered equal. This has been the entire reason people invented philosophy and other logical fields to use reason to discover what is "right" and what is "wrong." Now we see several different systems and moral standards, like Utilitarian, Deontological, Virtue Based, and so many other models. ALL of equal respect and value because all humans and ideas are equal, unless one wants to say that one may be better than another 🤔
Which goes against popular opinion of today
SW-User
@Pikachu clearly, I'm speaking and my words are not making sense to you. Read my response just above, first because I took the time to explain it.

If we are all equal, what is morality? What if we all agree or disagree? How can we gauge what's right and what's wrong? Our individual minds? And just agree together on what makes the most sense? It all boils down to what we agree on and that's ad populum. That, or we agree that SOMEONE is above the rest and we follow a leader and that leader can tell us what is best.

Either all ideas are the same in moral correctness or they're not. If what is moral to me is not moral to you, WHO is right? If you got a group of people agreeing with you, does that make ALL of you more correct based on numbers? What would make it right?
@SW-User Correct, which is why we need an objective moral standard. You can say "that's what God is," but the problem with that is accessing it. Many people claim to know what God wants; none, so far, have managed to prove conclusively that they speak for God, and aren't just engaging in the appeal to authority fallacy. Every religious leader of every denomination claims to speak for God; they can't all be right.

I would propose a better objective standard of morality, based on suffering and thriving. That which promotes thriving and/or diminishes suffering is moral; that which promotes suffering and/or diminishes thriving is immoral. The advantage of this is that suffering and thriving are at least theoretically quantifiable, unlike nebulous concepts like "human dignity" or "divine authority" or what have you. You reduce a moral question to a number and pick the highest one.
@SW-User

[quote]How can we gauge what's right and what's wrong? [/quote]

Well i'd answer but HazelMotes summed it up pretty well.

A system based on well being gives us an objective measure for morality. So it doesn't matter if what you think differs from what i think if what i think promotes well being and what you think doesn't.
That's the standard. Placing god as that standard gets us nowhere unless god hisownself actually shows up to administrate it in person.

So it's not really logically true to say that morality can only come from god, is it?
MasterLee · 56-60, M
No it is unneeded and wrong attributing morality to a myth.
Carazaa · F
I have one more thing to say about morality! Morality is for me absolute! For others not!
I pray and I take all my instruction from God! To me that is moral! I was saved as a child and my mom thought I was stupid for loving God! She would mock me spit in my face ignore me. Turn siblings against me and even hit me. God says to honor our parents, so I turned the other cheek as Jesus tells us to do. I have loved her and helped her with everything.
Because I know pain I have dedicated my life to help others who are hurting!
When my husband left I seeked Gods advise what to do if I should marry or stay single! It says whoever marries a divorced woman committs adultery. So I decided to dedicate my life to my kids and my job! I have gotten many proposals throughout the years but I am committed to God and stay single. I had some weak moments after the divorce and dated some but I am committed to God primarily. One Godly man wanted to buy me a house and picked it out but I refused it because I thought it to be immoral for me to take such a gift and not marry him. I have crucified the flesh my entire life!
The world has one standard and it is to be happy, but Gods standards is to please him and obey. And it gives me great joy! I have peace that all is well with my soul!
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@Carazaa Morality for you is absolute? Would you steal food to help feed a starving baby?
Carazaa · F
@Entwistle yes!
@Carazaa

You sound like a very principled person, carazaa. Congratulations.
Be nice to hear from a theism that isn't Christianity for once. Even Islam or Judaism would be a nice change. But I think only the Abrahamic religions make God the origin of morality. Which is weird cause I don't remember the Bible specifically saying the origin of morality. It can probably be inferred. But most of it just seems to be rules and laws and to follow them is considered moral. But not the origin of morality itself. In fact the closest I could find was Romans 2:14–16 which says the law (morality) is written on the heart of man. That is, their conscious, and that Jesus will judge based on what is in the heart even though they be gentiles without the law and Pagan. That supports the secular argument that morality is something outside of religion and God since even the godless pagans have morality.
SW-User
NEED him, no doesn't work like that. It started with Adam and Eve when they partook of the tree of good and evil, when we were not suppose to. Then they became aware they were naked after doing so. They had awareness of morality after that. That's where it began - humans always do it to themselves. We are weak and give in to temptation. Many humans are good at a semblance of morality or kindness but it's self serving
SW-User
@Pikachu Haha, it's not preaching, it's fact.
Sharon · F
@SW-User [quote] it's not preaching, it's fact.[/quote]
If it be fact, you can show us the evidence to prove it. Otherwise it is just your opinion and you're preaching.
@SW-User

[quote]it's not preaching, it's fact.
[/quote]

I acknowledge that, that is what you believe to be true.
But it's not an argument for why we need god for morality. It's just a claim about how an abrahamic morality began.
Do you understand the distinction?

And i would appreciate an answer to my second question.
You said that i'm no different from a religious zealot. So can you validate that claim or was it just something you said in the heat of the moment with no legitimate justification?
Straylight · 31-35, F
My main problem with religion in general is that morality seems very flexible. Love and forgive? Help the poor? Be a good member of your community? That's all in most religions sure. Persecution based 9n gender, ethnicity and sexual orientation? Also in there if that's the way you want to go with. The problem with getting a moral compass from an inflexible dogma is that it has, historically, done more harm than good.
This message was deleted by its author.
Straylight · 31-35, F
@Spoiledbrat Thats pretty much the same thing I said. I just added that many people use their religious views to self justify their abhorrent morals.
Straylight · 31-35, F
@Spoiledbrat Yes, exactly, wanting well and not trying to control others.
Reverend · M
No, there are many moral people on the planet that has zero belief in God, in fact some of them are far more moral than self proclaimed religious people.
Fuck no! If you can't figure out morality without a bunch of rules and a supreme being, you're a dumb fuck.
Keepitsimple · 51-55, F
Always let your conscious be your guide.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Keepitsimple Who constructs the framework in which your concious operates?
Keepitsimple · 51-55, F
Each person I suppose. Some people can do things easily with no regard of anybody else or guilt that I wouldn’t be able to live with myself. 🤷🏻‍♀️ @Kwek00
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Keepitsimple Your concious is a part of your identity. And your identity is forged by external and internal elements. If you grow up in a patriarchical society where women need to be in the kitchen and not do annything wrong. And that it's the mans' duty to keep them in check for the benefit of everyone. Then your concious will tell you to take out the belt when it's nescessary.

In our liberal communities, we are tought, that this is the wrong thing to do. That women are equal and have the right to find their own happiness. In our communities, most people will argue that taking out the belt to keep your woman in check is wrong.

That's the diffrence... In history, you'll find attrocities done by people that all believed they were doing the right thing. Because conciouss, your heart, love... what ever, it all get defined by where you grow up, in what time frame, and what ideas are dominant in your life. The idea that attrocities only get commited by heartless bastards that don't have a concious is (at least for me) a fairy tale that we tell ourselves to feel better about our own morality.
Carazaa · F
If someone is a born again Christian they will not have a business and rip you off, like those who believe that there is no God who sees what they're doing or will punish them if they charge too much!
@Carazaa

[quote]We feel guilty and stop our ongoing sinning[/quote]

Nah bud. Christians feel guilty and try not to sin...and keep doing it and keep feeling guilty and keep asking for forgiveness.
But guess what? That's just what the atheist does as well.

[quote] God killed his baby I believe for his sin of adultery![/quote]

lol the morality of murdering a child for the sins of the parent is a totally different topic.
Carazaa · F
@Pikachu
Atheists ask God for forgiveness? Have you ever done that?
@Carazaa

lol no. But they do ask for earthly forgiveness.
What do you think of the idea of an objective standard of morality, based on suffering and thriving?

That which promotes thriving is moral.
That which promotes suffering is immoral.

The value of this is that it allows us to dispense with nebulous concepts like "the dignity of man," or subjective standards like "what God wants." Theoretically, suffering and thriving could be measured, and moral decisions could be based on a number.
Not at all, morality is a very pliable term, it's a different definition for each individual!
@Speedyman You're not just an arrogant swine, you're also ignorant. You apparently haven't noticed that there's no consensus on the "teachings of Jesus Christ," since there are thousands of Christian denominations, many of which hold views diametrically opposed to each other.

But I wouldn't expect you to know this since you have never ventured out of the craphole town you grew up in, and assume the miserable little church you attend is representative of the entire world.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
The consensus on the teachings of Jesus is found in the new Testament. In fact the denominations do not hold diametrically opposed views and if you knew anything you would know that. They might differ on the lesser things but they unite on the fact that Jesus Christ came into the world to save sinners. You live in your own little world I know but some of us have travelled the world and seen Christians all over the world. Amazing how people like you who live in the shelter of a democracy want to try and lecture me who is been in places you never dare go@LeopoldBloom
@LeopoldBloom
Well, your "modern" acceptance of everything, anything and anyone into church faith despite fundamental values
SW-User
I was dating a very Christian girl, and she dragged me to a "Debates in Christianity" session at her college.

One group (the one my girlfriend and I were in) how we know good and evil exist without God or the bible. The other group had to prove how God helps us understand why good and evil exist.

My group was first... I channeled "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle" maintenance, which I had read a few years earlier. Talking about how we can tell some bridges are of good quality, and some are of lousy quality just by looking at them. We don't need anything else (like God) to point out what is "bad." The moderator was impressed.

The moderator then turned to the other group, and this was their sentence: "We can tell God exists because when you kill a person, you feel bad." First, the moderator said, "What?" Then he asked them if they wanted to try again. They were quite content with their response.
Peaches · F
No we don't. You either are or not.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
I'm a theist that says no. You get moral atheists and immoral theists.
SW-User
You're not one bit different than the religious zealots. You've created your own religion and this is it.
Darci ·
Lol no. I learnt that a long time ago...
SW-User
Yes! If there is noone to tell us what is right and wrong, how are we to figure it out?

That sucks, we don't have free will, do we...

Oh wait, we do.

Now I'm confused.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@SW-User I'm a big fan of evolutionary morality of which mythology is actually apart of ironically:

[b]https://www.pnas.org/content/107/Supplement_2/9015[/b]

Like Aesop's fables, which isn't particularly religious and relating to God but still works the same way.
Reverend · M
It would appear after much speculation miss, we do need God for morality. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
@Reverend I pity people who need a God to be good!! 🤷‍♀️
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@Harriet03 Yeah it's scary I think, it's like saying basically you'd kill someone if you could get away with it, the only thing that stops you is God where as in real life the only thing that stops you is the police. Yikes..
Ryannnnnn · 31-35, M
No but an argument could be made that religions set the foundations for the kinds of laws we have that were made to somewhat embody that idea of morality. So you can do objective "good" or "bad" regardless but perhaps if they aren't defined into our psyche by the narrative of good and evil then we would still do what we do but not percieve it by those two definitions.
@Ryannnnnn

I get ya. These moral instincts were sort of codified in religion.
Ryannnnnn · 31-35, M
@Pikachu Yeah and then built upon and given more complexity over time. Its a bit of a semantical argument but I think its important to define it.

It just depends on whether you define an instinctual response as moral or whether you think it depends on the actual act of decision made by the person cognitively. I think I lean more towards the latter as there seems to be more merit in making the choice. Its in making the choice between something negative and something positive that makes a positive choice moral imo.
@Ryannnnnn

I agree that it's a moral choice only if it is a choice. It still may be a good action but i think the morality comes from the recognition of the two options and choosing the good one.
SW-User
My instinct is to say no, but how does one argue against moral relativism without religious morality?

Like obviously I don't think everyone would be raping each other without the Bible. Lots of societies around the world that believe in all kinds of different gods but have similar ideas about morality. I mean in a more abstract sense, it seems that atheists often have to resort to moral relativism in the absence of morality coming from an eternal source.
@SW-User

Because moral relativism depends on what a particular culture might value at any given time.

But if we take something as the goal: eg> human well being, then we have an objective measure of what is moral and what is not.
A culture may deem it permissible to own another human being as property but if we look to human well being, we see that this value is not consistent with morality in respect to that goal.

So how do we know that we should pursue human well-being?
Well dependence on a faith-based origin for morality doesn't answer that question either. How do we know that this god-given model for morality is worth pursuing?
In both cases, the answer is simply "because we decide that it is so".
Penny · 46-50, F
so i suppose a question could be where does our inner knowledge of morality come from?
Penny · 46-50, F
@Pikachu do you really want more of my stoned and caffeinated bs? lol. ants have a purpose in the ecological order. they help decompose things. they have a purpose. again, where does the other human being get their knowledge or guidance? like where does it originate? if not from God or the concept of a God, then where? one could say "themselves" but that would assume they have intelligence. so then where does our intelligence come from? its an easy answer to say it comes from God and I personally think there is truth to that statement. I suppose it depends on what your definition of God is though, God is not some fairy in the sky. He is a concept of a higher power invested in our interests as his creation.
@Penny

lol yeah it's fun.

Ant's play a role in the ecosystem. This is distinct from a purpose which implies a mindful intention.

[quote]? if not from God or the concept of a God, then where? [/quote]

Well that's what i was talking about before: from evolution as a social species.
A predisposition towards behaviours which allow successful group living which in turn leads to more advantages.
If even monkeys have a sense of fair treatment, can we say that morality must need a god as a source?
I dunno, maybe god thought it was important that monkeys understand when they're being treated unfairly lol
Speedyman · 70-79, M
‘Go to the ant thou sluggardl. Consider his ways and be wise!’ Perhaps teaching people the wisdom of a God. Just look at what they can do and think if blind forces could make them. If you do they have more brains than you perhaps! 🤣🤣’ @Pikachu

 
Post Comment