@ShadowWorker the ecosystem demands it. Too bad it's not your cup of tea. Sadistic people won't allow the ecosystem.

@NoahB Face your youth, your inexperience, your ignorance. I don't know who the "he" your're referring to, my post was a response to your original message!

@notyouraveragedummy oh! Fair enough lol

@NoahB I don't think you'd enjoy living in your pajamas after a month or so. Perhaps you'd find a job that you actually do like.

@BlueVeins oh I'd have a job alright. But it wouldn't be THIS shit lol

@TheDeathOfOzymandiaz i'm working on it! these people aren't biting lol

@DeluxedEdition I applaud your answer, DE. So many single women manage their children in a poverty cycle. They cannot upgrade their education. They cannot afford daycare. Their jobs often end up paying a minimum wage which is not a living wage. They have no benefits so they cannot afford meds for themselves or their children. Men can complain about paying child support but these same men are not living in poverty. It is sad lives these women lead. Desperation and worry and stresses shorten their lifespans. And their children pay the price too.

@NoahB I’m sorry I just wanted that to be said 😭

@PoetryNEmotion you said it very well I’m glad we were able to shed some light on this horrific issue today

@MethDozer bro i'm trying to sleep in a hammock all day and send the hoe to work but everyone is fighting against my vision of a better world

@NoahB Just throwing this out there. If we both had UBI she could also stay home and give you hammock handies.

@MethDozer oh Alright,,,,,

@NoahB Because you like paying huge taxes and getting no services? That is Canada at the moment. If you get sick don't plan on going to the hospital and certainly don't plan on using an ambulance. Both services are very badly over used and under served.

@hippyjoe1955 if it works out in America I’ll move back. Hedging my bets lol

@NoahB Yeah I would be going the other way. I have lived under a low tax regime and an ever increasing high tax regime. The lower taxes made for a much more civilized society. The loss of economic and individual freedoms as the taxes increased was palpable. Not at all pleasant. And for the higher taxes we gained no benefit. The hospitals are no better the roads are worse the schools are a mess and the only people getting rich are corrupt government workers. Harmless activities I did as a kid are now banned or strictly regulated. The excellent care I would get at a hospital is long gone. The family cohesion as husband and wife worked together to raise their children doesn't exist any more as spouses are treated like disposable goods. He spilled the milk this morning so I will serve him with divorce papers. She burned the toast today so divorce is the only solution. Those who have kids put them in warehouses as they rush off to meaningless jobs that serve no purpose other than self gratification. Kids growing up knowing their high priced daycare workers better than their own Mom or Dad.

@MarkPaul I’m having fun

@NoahB 🤨 It's not just about having fun and collecting stimulus money. You need to be responsible. Damn it.

@MarkPaul Couldn't have said it better myself.

@hippyjoe1955 don't pull off my legs

@NoahB Yeah those things aren't related man. Nobody saw COVID coming.

@Djac17 I did. I said it would happen if trump lowered taxes and nobody listened. now look at us

@BohemianBabe Look kid... we're giving you a platform to express yourself. Don't squander this opportunity.

@MarkPaul But I want to!

@BohemianBabe 🤨

In the States there are a ton of resources for the homeless (depending on region), so starvation or dying on the street is mostly not a realistic concern unless you refuse to follow the rules (which are not unreasonable rules for the most part, except some of the super religious organizations that require conversion/practice) of those facilities/agencies, which offer shelter, food, semi-permanent housing, toiletries, case management to help Connect with employment/training/education etc, Child care, State insurance etc. @BlueVeins

@WhateverWorks Fair, but you get the point. People spend like, half their waking hours at work; it shouldn't be something you just suffer through to avoid food insecurity and homelessness, you know? There should be some form of utility a regular person can get from it to at least make it tolerable.

I think we need more pathways for people to find vocations that they feel are existentially meaningful that are also within their skill set or potential skill set, but without that I don’t think a little extra money would help the stagnation cost you’re talking about long-term. It’s my biggest grievance with all the social programs in the States presently offer: they discount the significance of people feeling like they are living a meaningful life. They offer people a myriad of options that are dead ends then we act surprised when many people sit in complacency on programs, more willing to acclimate to having less, learning to not mind than the prospect of working for meaninglessness. @BlueVeins

@GJOFJ3
If they’re a couple already and he wants to be a stay at home dad 2 checks to the wife wouldn’t change that. It’d just increase their
Income buttttt
ooooo got me on the gay couple thing. Checkmate there lmao.

@Pinkstarburst I didn't specify. Was thinking all women

@chrisCA i do. And I know. And I think from the knee jerk reaction in the replies at even the implications you’ll see why it sucks for women so hard here 😂

@Morrigan nobodies budging. But refills are on me

@NoahB @Entwistle If someone is disabled and needs constant care from others for their daily needs, it is not wise to have kids.

There can be exceptions on a case to case basis.

I choose not to have kids for similar reasons.

@SW-User Many disabled people don't need constant care.

@SW-User i respect your decision but i think thats a choice for the individual to make. either way i see no reason to keep the money from disabled women

@smileylovesgaming It's when everyone gets annual free money from the government.

@BohemianBabe small amount would be fine. Just enough to fill up your gas tank or buy groceries for a week.

@smileylovesgaming Yeah, I think it should be a grand a month. With that amount, people would still have to work.

@NoahB It matters because it gives the woman more agency, even before she gets married. And what if there's a divorce?
Besides, most working-class people are suffering. We should be helping all of them, not only some of them based on gender or race or whatever.

Also, I don't think most men are dead set on having a stay at home wife. But even if that was the case, that should be up to the couple. All the government should do is give everyone the same social programs, then let them figure it out.

@BohemianBabe thats a good thing
what if there is? who cares. There are divorces with this dynamic all the time already.
this would help them.
I said gender specifically. Don't muddle this up.

@NoahB Why is it a good thing that women have more agency than men?

And why would it be better to help working-class women as opposed to working-class people?

@Starcrossed His point is to put conservatives into a tight spot with their inconsistencies

@MethDozer Yes. Some states are forcing women to give birth.

@Penny We'll always have inequality, but we can reduce it as much as possible depending on the situation.

@NoahB men wouldnt allow that i am quite sure

@Penny i think your right judging by their reaction to my post lol

@Ontheroad And equal pay is what women get today for equal work.

@Spotpot I guess you believe what you wrote and that is exactly the problem, or a large part of it. It is true that in certain industries and in certain countries women of today earn closer to what men earn when doing the same job. However, globally and in spots and certain industries (globally) women are still far behind men in getting equal pay for equal work/job performance. In no country is there absolute parity.

@Ceinwyn its all about marketing. Just call it the "Family and Home for Americans Restructuring Act" and they'll eat it up

@NoahB Nonsense.

@Ceinwyn Such is the state of politics

@LeopoldBloom If the mother wants to work she'll get two checks. More income shouldn't have any baring on the fathers decision to be a stay at home husband

@Carissimi yeah well news flash, it’s never been equal lol

@Elessar and?

@NoahB And UBI becomes universal again 🙌

@Elessar lmao

@SW-User fair point

@YourMomsSecretCrush UBI doesn't actually encourage people to not work. It encourages them to actually work. Welfare is what discourages working since often the jobs available to those on it don't offer much growth and a lose of their check.

@DDonde straight to the point. I like it

@SW-User yeah no sorry lol. Biden’s not my dad and neither is trump. My dad is my dad and he’s a very good man

@NoahB Bye now.

@SW-User see ya!

@empanadas partial shadowban.

@NoahB So would UBI but it would make more sense.

@empanadas I think this stunt account might also have something to do with it. Andrew and Nuno are humorless

@BlueVeins my mexican ass is having mucho kids

@Darksideinthenight2 lol my post is about having kids but somehow your post got tagged as fetish. Something not adding up