Top | Newest First | Oldest First
1-50 of 84
BlueVeins · 22-25
People will say 'no' to this but then pay for the mass-killing of animals and consume their flesh, just because it's legal and socially accepted in our current society. Just for sensory pleasure.
View 27 more replies »
calabaciteh · 36-40, F
@BlueVeins eh... I'd say basic nutrition comes before "sensory pleasure" lol
Also, did you just compare eating meat with slavery? Haha jeez
Also, did you just compare eating meat with slavery? Haha jeez
BlueVeins · 22-25
@SatanBurger I think this happens due to a confluence of factors.
While veganism can be functional as a diet, it is by definition an elimination diet. People who are inclined towards restrictive eating due to eating disorders have a tendency to adopt veganism (irrespective of morals), but obviously, those tendencies don't stop there. A lot of times, these people will end up as frugivores, raw vegans, or otherwise adopt goofy restrictions that make nutrition difficult or impossible. Thus, it eventually runs their body into the ground and when they recover, they stop eating plant-based as well.
Most people here in the developed world have been eating animal products for generations, and as a consequence of that, we have a pretty well-developed cultural understanding of how to eat and meet our nutritional needs. For most vegans, by contrast, they don't have that knowledge and have to learn nutrition from the ground up. A lot of them go online looking for answers, but the online nutrition space is bursting at the seams with quacks and cranks preaching bullshit theories about health and nutrition.
I'd like to note that both of these things happen with omnivorous diets, but they're not talked about as failures of carnism (if you'll permit the term). If some guy falls ill from subsisting on an all-nuggies diet for months or years, that's not talked about as "a man getting sick from being an omni", but if some guy falls ill from subsisting on kale, you'll see all kinds of headlines about how a vegan diet almost killed them. It's an asymmetry that exists for understandable reasons, but it definitely skews our perception on the issue.
Also warrants mentioning that the people who make the most noise about giving up their vegan diets are content creators, who tend to cultivate audiences of vegans. When a content creator abandons veganism for any reason, a small but extraordinarily bothersome minority of vegans (who tend to congregate in these sorts of communities) will react very, very negatively to that. The content creator therefore seeks to justify their decision and/or pivot to cultivate a new audience. Thus, they have an incentive to play up any problems they've been having or draw spurious correlations in order to make themselves appear more morally upright and appeal to a more anti-vegan/alt-right crowd.
This is getting woefully long, but I guess this is what I want to get across. There's no such thing as "the vegan diet;" the options are endless even without incorporating sentient life into the mix. If someone is legitimately having a problem, there's typically something they can change without incorporating animal products that'll make a night-and-day difference, and probably the biggest thing people can do for themselves is being attentive to their bodies and addressing problems as they come up rather than thinking they can power through it. Nutrition isn't magic. It's just chemistry, and if you give your body the chemicals it needs, you're typically all good, regardless of how you get them.
While veganism can be functional as a diet, it is by definition an elimination diet. People who are inclined towards restrictive eating due to eating disorders have a tendency to adopt veganism (irrespective of morals), but obviously, those tendencies don't stop there. A lot of times, these people will end up as frugivores, raw vegans, or otherwise adopt goofy restrictions that make nutrition difficult or impossible. Thus, it eventually runs their body into the ground and when they recover, they stop eating plant-based as well.
Most people here in the developed world have been eating animal products for generations, and as a consequence of that, we have a pretty well-developed cultural understanding of how to eat and meet our nutritional needs. For most vegans, by contrast, they don't have that knowledge and have to learn nutrition from the ground up. A lot of them go online looking for answers, but the online nutrition space is bursting at the seams with quacks and cranks preaching bullshit theories about health and nutrition.
I'd like to note that both of these things happen with omnivorous diets, but they're not talked about as failures of carnism (if you'll permit the term). If some guy falls ill from subsisting on an all-nuggies diet for months or years, that's not talked about as "a man getting sick from being an omni", but if some guy falls ill from subsisting on kale, you'll see all kinds of headlines about how a vegan diet almost killed them. It's an asymmetry that exists for understandable reasons, but it definitely skews our perception on the issue.
Also warrants mentioning that the people who make the most noise about giving up their vegan diets are content creators, who tend to cultivate audiences of vegans. When a content creator abandons veganism for any reason, a small but extraordinarily bothersome minority of vegans (who tend to congregate in these sorts of communities) will react very, very negatively to that. The content creator therefore seeks to justify their decision and/or pivot to cultivate a new audience. Thus, they have an incentive to play up any problems they've been having or draw spurious correlations in order to make themselves appear more morally upright and appeal to a more anti-vegan/alt-right crowd.
This is getting woefully long, but I guess this is what I want to get across. There's no such thing as "the vegan diet;" the options are endless even without incorporating sentient life into the mix. If someone is legitimately having a problem, there's typically something they can change without incorporating animal products that'll make a night-and-day difference, and probably the biggest thing people can do for themselves is being attentive to their bodies and addressing problems as they come up rather than thinking they can power through it. Nutrition isn't magic. It's just chemistry, and if you give your body the chemicals it needs, you're typically all good, regardless of how you get them.
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@BlueVeins You do have points so I'll take into consideration, thanks for keeping it civil. My main point was that there's other issues to consider other than taste pleasure when I bring up physical issues. Vegans always assume that it's because it tastes good but there's may be other reasons is what I'm saying.
I'll consider your comment though, I been vegan too for a few years straight but ultimately went back due to being hungry all the time. I find steak simply more satiating than starch. Protein digests up to eight hours vs starch which is only like an hour.
I'll consider your comment though, I been vegan too for a few years straight but ultimately went back due to being hungry all the time. I find steak simply more satiating than starch. Protein digests up to eight hours vs starch which is only like an hour.
HumanEarth · 56-60, F
Parts of my family were once white slaves. See not all slaves were black.
HumanEarth · 56-60, F
Well its against the law to homeless. They kill in the USA with force vaccination if homeless so you slowly die with some cancer.
You can't say no vaccines and be free. Because your a dangerous human.
You can't say no vaccines and be free. Because your a dangerous human.
bijouxbroussard · F
@HumanEarth It is not against the law to be homeless.
Ironically, if it were, the homeless would instantly be given shelter, if only via incarceration. Some acts like public defecation, aggressive panhandling and sleeping on the street, are what is illegal. For years I volunteered at a shelter that provided beds, meals and facilities for bathing, washing clothes and using the restroom.
Ironically, if it were, the homeless would instantly be given shelter, if only via incarceration. Some acts like public defecation, aggressive panhandling and sleeping on the street, are what is illegal. For years I volunteered at a shelter that provided beds, meals and facilities for bathing, washing clothes and using the restroom.
SomeMichGuy · M
@HumanEarth This is crazy tripe
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Considering where my politics stand today (which is radical left) I'm comfortable saying I'd be an abolitionist in a slave economy.
teenrob · M
I am Italian... I have a slave (sort of...) my mother! LOL
SisterShadow · F
@teenrob thats rough
teenrob · M
@SisterShadow not my fault! LOL
Cloud7593 · 46-50, F
@SisterShadow His mother can say no if she doesn't want to be a slave.
DearAmbellina2113 · 41-45, F
It is not in my nature to force someone to do something. So no.
Justmeraeagain · 56-60, F
To keep someone in bondage to serve me doesn't appeal to me in any way.
Carlam · 70-79, F
If slavery were legal, it would still be morally abhorrent and a violation of basic human rights. Consent and respect for autonomy are fundamental in any ethical interaction.
It needs to be clarified what exactly you mean by legal. Let us assume a corner case.
In BDSM, individuals engage in consensual role-play that may involve power dynamics, but this is based on mutual agreement, trust, and respect for boundaries. Partners can choose to explore aspects of their dynamic beyond role-play, integrating elements of dominance, submission, and other practices into their relationship with ongoing consent and clear communication. It's important to distinguish between consensual adult activities, where rights are upheld and choices respected, and slavery, which involves coercion and denies basic rights and freedoms.
It needs to be clarified what exactly you mean by legal. Let us assume a corner case.
In BDSM, individuals engage in consensual role-play that may involve power dynamics, but this is based on mutual agreement, trust, and respect for boundaries. Partners can choose to explore aspects of their dynamic beyond role-play, integrating elements of dominance, submission, and other practices into their relationship with ongoing consent and clear communication. It's important to distinguish between consensual adult activities, where rights are upheld and choices respected, and slavery, which involves coercion and denies basic rights and freedoms.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
There are more slaves in the world today than at any other time in history.
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
@Entwistle absolutly zero anti slave ppl are too concerned about 80,000 missing children from across the border in 3 years...
nope.. slaves from 200 years ago get all our sympathy...
nope.. slaves from 200 years ago get all our sympathy...
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Indeed.
My comment was referring to globally and presently.
I believe Mauritania only recently outlawed slavery.
My comment was referring to globally and presently.
I believe Mauritania only recently outlawed slavery.
SW-User
Indentured servitude is still a common practice in many cultures, like working to pay of a financial or criminal debt for example. Or mostly foreigners being scammed as in England recently, having their passports taken and such.
[image/video deleted]
Wait a minute, i'm in that picture and I don't like it😒
Badmaster · 61-69, M
@SisterShadow I have kept and would again but they volunteer for that
RedBaron · M
@SW-User “Vile Jew sorcery?”
You know that’s offensive don’t you, and not funny even as a joke?”
You know that’s offensive don’t you, and not funny even as a joke?”
SW-User
@RedBaron meh, I thought Jews were supposed to think critically about religion. After all, that's why Yahweh keeps the devil around, to question us.
Lostpoet · M
no, because it's not moral
NiteRaven93 · 31-35, M
Definitely not. If you can't do it yourself, there's no hope for you
Convivial · 26-30, F
No... Anything not given under free will i find useless
JRVanguard · 26-30, M
Current me no
In a hypothetical world where it’s been so normalized all around me that’s harder to say definitively but I’d genuinely like to believe I would recognize it’s wrong and not participate
In a hypothetical world where it’s been so normalized all around me that’s harder to say definitively but I’d genuinely like to believe I would recognize it’s wrong and not participate
V1lla1nous · 41-45, M
Yes. Absolutely. What possible reason would anyone have not to own slaves if it was legal?
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@V1lla1nous Morality, empathy, human compassion . .
SlaveEt · 36-40, F
@V1lla1nous
Ooo, aren't you just a lil brown paint stick? 😉🤣
Ooo, aren't you just a lil brown paint stick? 😉🤣
calabaciteh · 36-40, F
@V1lla1nous the same reason that made it illegal in the first place, perhaps? Plus a bunch of others
No but a sex submissive and dominant thing might be hot if consensual
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@userfawkes1105 I can get with that but not the slavery that happens when people are too lazy to do anything for themselves and want to force others to do it for them.
@SatanBurger I agree it’s an equality and empathetic connection if you view it from the collectives perspective
Matt85 · 36-40, M
No way man.
I can't afford it.
I can't afford it.
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
What makes you think you wouldn't be a slave? Slaves aren't slaves by choice, if slavery were legal, it's because they'd make a certain group of people or something some way work for free using either coercion or force.
But to answer your question, no I wouldn't have slaves. Partially because being physically and intellectually lazy doesn't seem like a good way to go.
If I was a forced slave, not by choice, for someone, I'd slowly poison them over time or something.
But to answer your question, no I wouldn't have slaves. Partially because being physically and intellectually lazy doesn't seem like a good way to go.
If I was a forced slave, not by choice, for someone, I'd slowly poison them over time or something.
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@calabaciteh No but I wouldn't force slaves to do it for me. If I had to, I would. I've worked for 16 hours daily, three days a week for three years. And on my days off I drove GoPuff delivery for 3 hours daily. That's all because I needed money to save.
If I had to have people pick something I would treat it like any other job.
In an ideal world, I would have harnessed technology and fixed poverty already with simple actions so that people wouldn't have to do things like that in many other parts of the world but this is not an ideal world.
A lot of poverty is man made due to generational poverty of historical events, colonization, corruption, bad political policies and religious theocracies, dictatorships etc. So understand that slavery comes from manmade problems in the first place.
If I had to have people pick something I would treat it like any other job.
In an ideal world, I would have harnessed technology and fixed poverty already with simple actions so that people wouldn't have to do things like that in many other parts of the world but this is not an ideal world.
A lot of poverty is man made due to generational poverty of historical events, colonization, corruption, bad political policies and religious theocracies, dictatorships etc. So understand that slavery comes from manmade problems in the first place.
calabaciteh · 36-40, F
@SatanBurger Right, so by your logic you would also be one of the lazy ones.
You would only do it if you "had to", for some reason, yet you don't really have to do anything.
I think the idea that "fixing poverty is simple, really, we just haven't got around to doing it yet", is borderline conspiratorial thinking at best. Actively ignorant of economics at worst.
You would only do it if you "had to", for some reason, yet you don't really have to do anything.
I think the idea that "fixing poverty is simple, really, we just haven't got around to doing it yet", is borderline conspiratorial thinking at best. Actively ignorant of economics at worst.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Stephie · 22-25, F
I would keep one but as a free slave because I am against forced slavery.
I would give her the option to leave if she believes that I mistreat her of if she has the feeling that she can find somebody more suitable.
You can treat a person with respect and not treat that person as a slave but simply keep the title for the sake of whatever intention you have for wanting to call that person a slave.
I would give her the option to leave if she believes that I mistreat her of if she has the feeling that she can find somebody more suitable.
You can treat a person with respect and not treat that person as a slave but simply keep the title for the sake of whatever intention you have for wanting to call that person a slave.
GuyWithOpinions · 31-35, M
Slavery was just a regular thing for thousands of years. You lost a war, captured on a long walk, pissed off a noble? Now your working the fields till you die. But then we invented machines so we dont need slaves. So now its wrong.
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
bijouxbroussard · F
@GuyWithOpinions It was much more complicated, and only certain people were seen as fit to enslave based upon who they were, where they were born, or what they didn’t have.
That was what made it ultimately wrong. 🥺
That was what made it ultimately wrong. 🥺
Ontheroad · M
I want to say no, but what if it were legal for centuries and completely socially acceptable? Would I then say no?
This is a difficult question to answer, but I know and feel it to be reprehensible, so no I wouldn't.
This is a difficult question to answer, but I know and feel it to be reprehensible, so no I wouldn't.
Ontheroad · M
@bijouxbroussard oh, I agree, enslavement is reprehensible, but my point was would it be if we had been enslaving people for hundreds and hundreds of years and it was accepted as being okay?
Would I, if I had grown up in a household where we had a slave or two, think ill of it?
I can say now I wouldn't... couldn't, but what if?
Would I, if I had grown up in a household where we had a slave or two, think ill of it?
I can say now I wouldn't... couldn't, but what if?
bijouxbroussard · F
@Ontheroad Or perhaps you would’ve been like those who grew up seeing that reality all their lives and still became abolitionists. 🥹
Ontheroad · M
@bijouxbroussard I want to believe I would, but it makes me wonder. Makes me want to understand more about abolitionists and how/why they started down that path.
plungesponge · 41-45, M
We gonna have AI slaves soon so we can let go of all the fleshy ones
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
What could go wrong?
SisterShadow · F
@Tastyfrzz who is that ?
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
@SisterShadow Cylon robot Zoe-A (number 6) from battlestar Galactica. The character is portrayed by Canadian actress and model Tricia Helfer
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
Seriously though. I have a close friend in the philippines that desperately wants to get out of there. Low wages, climate change, natural disasters, and other family members to care for. Not a lot of options for how to get here and I'm not sure they'd like it much more. We have other problems here.
Medoesnotcare · 22-25, F
I think I’d like to be one
Fluffybull · F
Husbands are cheaper 🤣😂🤣
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
No. I have difficulty enough reconciling myself with the fact that natural assets like water or trees can be privately owned. The concept of humans owning other humans is too ridiculous for words.
SlaveEt · 36-40, F
Probably not. They are very expensive to keep. Besides, there are plenty of folks interested in being willing slaves, why chose someone who doesn't want to be owned?
Ducky · 31-35, F
No
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
No.
craig7 · 70-79, M
NO.
PoetryNEmotion · F
No. I can do things by myself. I don't believe in slavery.
Cloud7593 · 46-50, F
@PoetryNEmotion Ya I could never treat someone like that, too much of a conscience.
PoetryNEmotion · F
@Cloud7593 A man may never OWN another. That is wrong. Thank you.
Vin53 · M
Incidentally folks, this is the epitome of a rhetorical question.
PetalsOfLilac · F
The craziest question I've seen on here lol
PetalsOfLilac · F
@PetalsOfLilac but also yes
Filipinalez · 18-21, F
Na I want someone to be with me willingly
Theyitis · 36-40, M
Considering BlueVeins’s comments, I can imagine if the South had won the Civil War and slavery was still acceptable today that maybe I would; however, given the timeline of the universe we live in, if slavery were to suddenly become legal today, no, I would not go out and buy slaves.
SW-User
Slavery is legal
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
It worked in Ancient Rome. Some people who had no other option could put themselves in Slavery. Their owners would have to feed them and pay for their up keep. But they had no rights as individuals... Kind of like employing Backpackers today...
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
No... I know better.
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
just 1x?
vetguy1991 · 51-55, M
No i wouldn't
Bleak · 36-40, F
Nopes.
Katie01 · F
A white one yes, a black one no
BohemianBabe · M
@Katie01 How about a cute Asian Baby Girl?
Katie01 · F
@BohemianBabe What's a baby gonna do for me
BohemianBabe · M
Within reason... they'd be treated better than some of the slaves I see in other countries.
They'd get their share of downtime, weekends off - and the ability to leave if they want to.
They'd get their share of downtime, weekends off - and the ability to leave if they want to.
Panamared · 70-79, M
Never
Adrift · 61-69, F
No.
AngelKrish · 26-30, M
No
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
Only if it's an Orion Slave Girl from Star Trek
[image/video - please log in to see this content]
Once you go green you never go back
Straylight · 31-35, F
@HoraceGreenley Don’t do it! It’s a trap!
ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 51-55, M
@HoraceGreenley but are you sure it'd be that one? Half the series offer one. Even a fan production
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP
I hadn't given it that much thought
I hadn't given it that much thought
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
No
Spoiledbrat · F
No
SomeMichGuy · M
1) "were"
but
2) it is still legal in certain situations and
3) you can willingly agree to be a consensual slave (BDSM)...and people *do*
but
2) it is still legal in certain situations and
3) you can willingly agree to be a consensual slave (BDSM)...and people *do*
1-50 of 84