Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. I Corinthians 6: 9-10
@Entwistle Nope. Nice try though. The Kingdom of Heaven is having the Will of Yahweh triumph in your life. Thus the meaning of the word "KINGDOM". It is not a manufactured mental state. It is a Spiritual existence.
People still live just fine loving whoever the fuck they want. 🤷♀️ The bible doesn't mean shit, and has zero effect on reality. Your religion is fucked up. Look at yourself. You got married too young, and had children before you were even an adult. You get on your high horse and look down upon other people for not believing in that hateful God of yours. You think the bible stands for goodness, but all you've been doing is using it to spread hate. Shame on you. You're a self-righteous hypocrite. Your children are unlucky. They'll grow up becoming just as bigoted as their mother.
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination…End of debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God’s Laws and how to follow them.
1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?
2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness – Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don’t agree. Can you settle this? Are there ‘degrees’ of abomination?
7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?
8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn’t we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I’m confident you can help.
Thank you again for reminding us that God’s word is eternal and unchanging.
Your adoring fan,
Anonymous
(It would be a damn shame if we couldn’t own a Canadian.)
(from elsewhere on the internet, I can't take the credit)
@SpiritualMan you are changing the meaning of supernatural to something that you see fit. But that doesn't change the fact you are overreacting.
As for Obama, I think that's a lie. I never heard of it. That's something only Trump would say. Hell, if there's a nuclear war, Trump would be reason for it. He's the Antichrist you should be worried about.
The bible says that "Satan appears as a false angel of light", and "his ministers transform themselves into ministers of righteousness"...meaning they teach SOME good things to sound good to people, but then twist other key things so that true and false doctrines are mixed, and people are twisted into denying the gospel of salvation by grace through faith or twisted into mixing doing good and bad per what they have been taught.
Lol. That's what happening with all religions. Religious leaders teach lies and blind beliefs to people to distract from reality and with good words, they gain power over them.
@JBird And you happen to be right, even in many churches, many churches are twisting and abandoning the core doctrines of Christianity and the bible. Indeed the solution is based on recent prophecies I have heard, where God's judgment is increasing falling on institutional churches, a smaller number of godly churches that meet in buildings will be left over in the aftermath, and many more people will meet in homes, storefronts, etc....
@SatanBurger I contend that polygamy is not a sin in the New Testament age or the Old Testament age. In regards to incest in the bible, it explicitly says God allowed them to marry sisters AT THAT TIME, this is because conditions on the earth were more pristine before the flood of Noah, and thus there were no genetic consequences of children born from a brother and sister back then. After the flood the human genome started to deteriorate where it was becoming a problem. Abraham was married to his half sister Sarah and it wasn't a problem. Later when we get to Moses it had become a problem and thus God had to ban it.
Regarding polygamy, marriage laws would make that difficult...except if we do away with legal marriage.
I will say this CLEARLY. I believe the bible is the TRUTH. WHILE I believe that, in regards to our freedoms regarding US laws and the Constitution I believe in religious freedom, and that the US can and should be a melting pot. If everyone trusted Christ for salvation I think that would be great, but it MUST be a choice and the Holy Spirit illuminates the heart.
@Mountainlady16 I guess I don’t understand the connection between your stated concerns— homosexuality being a fabrication of some LBGT agenda that harms society— and your action, which was to attack a random woman. I don’t see how that addresses any of your concerns.
@Mountainlady16 Quite honestly, I don’t find your religious views all that exceptional or interesting. I’ve been in the Deep South for 30+ years. I really don’t find your take on my (and others) religious views very interesting either. Heard it all. I get along just fine with my friends and neighbors here.
Only reason I am challenging you, and I suspect many others, is that you used your beliefs to at least justify, who knows, maybe motivate, attacking an innocent bystander here. That’s my problem here.
Your hate for others is an abomination. In 2020, try some love for other people, including immigrants, the LGBTQ community, and those of other faiths, including Muslims.
John 13:34 A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another.
1 Corinthians 13:13 So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love.
1 John 4:7-8 Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God, and whoever loves has been born of God and knows God. Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love.
@Reverend One thing you need to remember is that the chapters of Revelation are not describing a Chronological order. Many of the sections reiterate information from a different angle, like the book of Daniel, where chapters 2 and 7 repeat the same sequence, but with added information and from a different perspective.
@BiblicalWarrior I think Revelation has "after this" or "after theses things" written ten times in its context of 22 chapters. That would tell me there is some Chronological order to it. I think it tells the same story twice, adding details each account.
@Harriet03 Pfuzy Logic has blocked me for exposing him as a religious freak who won’t condemn throwing gay people off buildings, what a big baby he is 🤷♂️
girl you should be glad this isn’t fb, do you know how many homosexuals there is in Atlanta. That’s probably why you do it here because it’s anonymous @Mountainlady16
The same book says that eating shellfish (prawns,crayfish etc) is an abomination. It also says that people who wear clothing made from 2 different materials is an abomination. Weirdly it also says that a man can sell his daughter into slavery. Go figure...
@fairefoutre For someone that is a Christian, you have yet to confess that you are saved by grace or that the Holy Spirit has you sealed until the day of Judgement. Until you confess Jesus as Lord, I don’t consider you to be of the invisible church of Christ but more a “member” of something seen.
@SW-User Closed. Thank GOD! ;-) Don't care to see a bunch of old danglies and private bits from strangers. 🤢 I'm not of these desperate SW dudes, type.
@anoriginalgentleman now in 2015 there was another were with a judge you could marry at 15 if deemed in your best interest usually pregnant. 16 is the minimum marriage age in ga
@SpiritualMan I don't care if you've got a (R) or a (D) after your name, if you are having sex with children you should go to prison for a very long time..
@Harriet03 Oh and I agree 100%. In fact according to prophecies and if Q is real, Q, BOTH Dems and Repubs are guilty and are going to go down for this kind of stuff. Even worse they are not just having sex with kids, but involved in trafficking, which magnifies their crimes. I have seen no evidence Trump is guilty, but other Republicans, who and how many, I don't know. I have my suspicions on some, some now out of office, and a few still in. I have to think some people in Congress and the Senate are not guilty of these things and are truly in the fight, Trump can't fight this battle on his own, he needs allies in it.
@Mountainlady16 "Do not lay with a mas as you would a woman" IS an Old Testament law! You're just like every other Christian - cherry-picking the verses that best suit you when you don't even follow your own teachings. Disappointing
@Mountainlady16, please reread that part of the Bible you don't personally like.
Matthew 7:3-5 New International Version (NIV) 3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
@Mountainlady16 Part of America used to be the Mexican's "own damn country" - and most of the HISPANICS that you see are legally resident and born in the United States just like you. Most of them are also Christian by faith, and very family oriented. Why are you such an uninformed imbecile when facts are readily available to educate you? And "partly?" I'm betting the other part is because your uncle, like you, is a bigot. These things tend to run in the family in your part of the world. I'm amazed your husband isn't related to you before marriage.
why don't Mexicans just stay in rheir own damn country. Theres not alot partly cause during Obama's time alot mills were closed down but there are a few carpet mills which mostly employs Mexican and pilgrims pride mills that mostly employs blacks. There is a sawmill owned by my uncle that mostly employs whites but thats partly because he won't employ non Americans.
Now I KNOW your real motivation for posts like this. You simply use scripture to hate. How sad that so many people have abandoned ALL faith because of talk like this. It truly makes me sad.
The terms in Greek that are translated to mean “homosexuality” actually generally refer to “pederasty”. Men sexually exploiting young boys. Some terms seem to refer to sexual rites performed in pagan temples as part of worship.
Now I know you. You are just continuing to rub Chantou’s face in it. Because that’s the level of personal integrity that you work at.
I’ve seen scant evidence in the Greek that seems to condemn committed monogamous homosexual relationships. You can talk KJV all you want. I don’t accept it. I also don’t accept it as I had 5 years of classics. Sue and Jane making a casserole and cuddling while they NetFlix and chill was not on the radar of any Biblical author. Why do I say that? Because in late Rome they were fucking little boys like it was nothing. It corroborates the language used.
@Pfuzylogic There are believers who believe they are to accept OT law in its entirety as well as NT law. Others believe some parts of OT apply to them, and others only apply to Jews— but of course, also NT law. Others believe that NT law supersedes OT law entirely. There are reasons for that. I’m not the one throwing around OT law here. So it’s not my burden to have to explain why I hold some parts and discard others. I am of the later view. Which is why my comments referred to Greek terminology. You insist the OT is entirely clear. Maybe. I have never gone into the Hebrew. I have had a rabbi explain the Torah actually makes no reference to lesbians. So whatever. It’s really not the apologetics I object to. It’s bashing a young woman for the sheer jollies from what I can tell.
@CopperCicada I don’t see her Post referring to a woman. It refers to a man. You assigned incorrect scripture to try to “rebuke” her. The important part of Christian Religon is Salvation and the role of the Trinity in that. It is easy to see incorrect scripture application once you do some serious study on the Holy Bible.
It could be argued that this also prohibits men having anal and oral sex with women. Which is how I was brought up. Leviticus 18:23 is actually banning all non-procreative sex. Which would include, among other things, oral and anal sex between men and women as those acts are non-procreative.
delights watching religious fundamentalists defend booty sex and blow jobs
@SpiritualMan Okay. Bur what were the prophecies? I mean, what gives the Bible more validity than other texts? And how do you definitively know just as many other prophecies haven't come true from other books?
Plain and simple, then there are those who say hey it is right to sin don't hurt our feelings or you will be punished. What's right is wrong and what's wrong is right in this day and age, No, God's word is plain and simple take it or leave it, there will be judgment in the end. You were all forewarned. I love you all!
@SW-User so because i oppose sexual immorality i have a low iq
SW-User
God is love not judgement. As you have the right not to do it you also have no right to spread hate. Do you think Jesus doesn’t love all people?@Mountainlady16
@SW-User, I never understood these sort of posts coming from Christians. If they want to harp on the verse about homosexuality, they cannot downplay the one about correcting others of perceived sin.
I seem to recall, Jesus was pretty adamant about how we need to remove the log from our own eye before trying to remove a speck from someone else's.
I think he was on to something, knowing that many Christians would use his words to slap down others.
Um no it isn't.. animals in the wild do it.. and people have been doing it since time began.. Perhaps even, it's an abomination to persistently pretend otherwise.
@Mountainlady16 That's where you're wrong, the bible being outdated is important because the people back then had no understanding of psychology or what made us human. You don't understand because you've never attempted to understand those you criticize, that's a careless position to take and frankly, quite intellectually lazy.
here you go judging people but you don’t want anyone to talk about your teen marriage and you being a parent. You’re truly a hypocrite and the fact that you think it’s ok to quote that dumb shit from the Bible, yet commit another sin, shows how much of an idiot you really are
@Fantasyproject unless you are emicpated yes you dohave to be 18 to be held legal responsible for your actions if you google search what's the age you are considered an adult in the US it says 18.
@Fantasyproject you are the one arguing that you are not an adult legally until 21. There was even a few things i can do now that i couldn't do as an emicpated minor
@SpiritualMan So there should be no penalty for homosexuality, either. But if homosexuality is a crime, it can't be a "sin" since the civil authorities don't punish "sin."
If you wanna talk about what’s LEGAL NOW, we can. In the eyes of the law, you weren’t old enough to consent to sex with a 16 year old so your husband would be in jail for statutory rape. You weren’t old enough to drink so your parents would be in jail for child neglect and you probably would’ve been arrested for underage drinking 🤷🏾♀️
Sweetheart there is no if both are 18 and 4 years apart and if anyone would’ve known you were pregnant at 14 and he was 16 and told the police, the state would press charges and arrest him even if your parents didn’t. Like you said, the laws have changed. I’m done going back and forth with you though, goodnight @Mountainlady16
@Fantasyproject yes there is if you actually read the whole part of the law. Why do you think instead of arresting the guy until last year marriage was allowed in case of pregnancy at 15.
@Mountainlady16 I was taught that as well. Though the smoke of fire and brimstone rained down on sodom and Gamorah goes up forever and ever. Perish to me means.. perish. Cease to exist
What a shame god said you can only love some people, that there is no fee will for some who like their own gender. Clearly he did not understand true love. Only love if it fits a limited gender.
7 “Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you. 3 Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye. Matthew 7:1-5 English Standard Version (ESV)
Also, it is common courtesy to cite scripture. Some may not know whether these are your words or those of scripture.
@Pinkstarburst I didn’t post this but the origin of this is in Leviticus 18 and 20 and the sentence at the time was death in the nation of Israel. At the time Israel was considered a nation of Priests that witnessed to the rest of the world that was without God’s presence.
SW-User
"In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety, not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; but with good works." - I Timothy 2:9–10
No more doing your hair, no more jewelry or accessories of any kind. It's New Testament so you have to do it or you're going against god!
Whosoever ... hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God. For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous, Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded, Or crookback, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken ... He shall not go in unto the vail, nor come nigh unto the altar, because he hath a blemish; that he profane not my sanctuaries. Leviticus 21:17-23 KJV
But I don't really see the danger in the idea that certain people advocate for a world governement. That idea has been around for a long time, if that idea would ever happen, we are not going to see it unless something really weird is going to happen.
The UN is an organisation where all the memberstates are there out of their free will. They make legal deals with eachother. But a lot of times the legal contracts aren't followed by the memberstates. In a normal governemental program you should be able to enforce stuff. And sometimes that happens, but sometimes... it doesn't. Because it has verry little to no power if the bigger member states aren't in agreement. So a reason to get things done is to give it more power... but if there is something countries don't like to do it's giving up sovereign power. So the idea that the UN should get more power isn't that "abnormal".
The Bible says a lot... Greeks and Jews shouldn't eat together, a woman menstruating is unclean, etc... How come you get to pick and choose what to follow?
Yeah well we've already gone over this, the Bible also says slaves should accept both kind and cruel masters.
So unless you believe in slavery, I'd quit seeing the Bible as law. I mean maybe you do believe in slavery you don't sound that bright to be honest but to give you the benefit of the doubt.
@LeopoldBloom Shrimp and pork were part of the ceremonial law and no longer applŷ but the New Testamant has verses that state that homosexual sex is still a sin.