1-50 of 127
reddevil · 31-35, M
Well... Both the genders are dependent on each other, so one will not be able to survive without the other.
View 7 more replies »
Ferric67 · M
from my personal work experience, i find that women seem to be too vindictive and take things too personal...when, in fact, it's just the cost of doing business.
whereas men, get into fights and then just let them go...grudge free...perfect for doing business...you need that actually to successfully navigate the minefields necessary to lead with the confidence of the those who have entrusted you.
You need to be emotionless in order to lead objectively.
On a different note, our problem today is that our leaders and politicians are too greedy and self serving...and don't lead with the intentions of the masses that they represent.
whereas men, get into fights and then just let them go...grudge free...perfect for doing business...you need that actually to successfully navigate the minefields necessary to lead with the confidence of the those who have entrusted you.
You need to be emotionless in order to lead objectively.
On a different note, our problem today is that our leaders and politicians are too greedy and self serving...and don't lead with the intentions of the masses that they represent.
Ferric67 · M
@HairbrushDiva it was a knee jerk reaction. Having seen females in authority take work place drama to higher, more personal levels than men over the years. Although, I had one male actually act out personal vendettas (I think that he's bipolar...that was the only job I ever quit). Otherwise, it's the women that I have seen make those efforts.
Anyhow, to your point...it's not an exclusive club...and I shouldn't generalize.
Anyhow, to your point...it's not an exclusive club...and I shouldn't generalize.
morrgin · F
Nothing against women who like other women, but I dont like the idea of snuggling up to another woman. I like men in all their masculinity. As long long as they dont tell me what to do, where to go, what to wear, how much I can spend, and they have to do half the housework and equal duties raising the kids. No wonder Im usually disappointed in my relationships.
originnone · 61-69, M
GOD, YES!!!!! Can you imagine how fewer wars would have happened if women were in charge? Can you imagine how much better things could be with the beautiful empathy many women have? or the ability to think of many things at once, which guys can't do as well? Yes, as a man, I definitely believe women should be in way more than half the positions of power in the world. Men would be much better off.....hot topic for me.
This message was deleted by its author.
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
BohoBabe · M
@sunsporter1649 Yes, she's a woman.
You still don't have a coherent definition, do you?
You still don't have a coherent definition, do you?
SW-User
@Strictmichael75 SIMP Alert! 😵💫
salwa · F
@Cassie2083 we could manage to create the balance without them
JacksonBlue · 36-40, M
AJS30 · 36-40, M
No, men are essential as they build and maintain society and do so many hard or non-fun jobs that women either can't do or wouldn't want to do. Society would crumble without men and women would be crying and praying for men to come back. Not to mention the fact that humanity would go extinct.
Purplerain78 · 46-50, F
No. What we need is a world where both men and women are actually seen as equals. Yes equality has become better over the years, but it's a long way off what it should be.
Fact is, we do need both men and women to function as the human race. There's no getting away from that!
Fact is, we do need both men and women to function as the human race. There's no getting away from that!
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
FreestyleArt · 36-40, M
Okay XD you know what? Why not?
We man will give you a Free Trial 30 days for women to rule the world and see how it goes....
I know women are smart but what about Muscular Decisions and personality when it comes to world issues? Something to think about...
We man will give you a Free Trial 30 days for women to rule the world and see how it goes....
I know women are smart but what about Muscular Decisions and personality when it comes to world issues? Something to think about...
OogieBoogie · F
@Elisbch tests have shown we are great at multi tasking.
I have a book, (it's an old one). It's full of test results done between men and women.
And it showed where each gender, (on average), excelled, or didn't .
To put it very VERY simply, it seemed that men excel at bursts of focus and energy, while women are sustainers. Our focus and energy excel over long periods .
I thought that was interesting.
I have a book, (it's an old one). It's full of test results done between men and women.
And it showed where each gender, (on average), excelled, or didn't .
To put it very VERY simply, it seemed that men excel at bursts of focus and energy, while women are sustainers. Our focus and energy excel over long periods .
I thought that was interesting.
salwa · F
@OogieBoogie that's true, we use much bigger areas on our brains so we are multitaskers and can do many things the same time, this make us more productive and more superior
OogieBoogie · F
@salwa Well ...no it doesn't .
It means we have skills in different areas.
Imagine this. A bull is charging into a camp:
The men react instantly, grab spears and almost impulsively work as a team to kill it.
They are mentally geared to think in a burst -.in a crisis.
The women automatically think ahead and gather children...they are mentally geared to calculate the larger picture.
These two ways of thinking compliment each other towards maximum survival for the tribe.
One isn't better than the other. We need both .
It means we have skills in different areas.
Imagine this. A bull is charging into a camp:
The men react instantly, grab spears and almost impulsively work as a team to kill it.
They are mentally geared to think in a burst -.in a crisis.
The women automatically think ahead and gather children...they are mentally geared to calculate the larger picture.
These two ways of thinking compliment each other towards maximum survival for the tribe.
One isn't better than the other. We need both .
Wonder Woman, Princess Diana of the Amazons, came from the Island Themyscira, home of the Amazons. They are an all-female race. Their island is a paradise. Wonder Woman was created by being sculpted from clay by her mother Queen Hippolyta. The Amazons don't need biological reproduction. They seemed to get along fine without men.
ididntknow · 56-60, M
graphite · 61-69, M
@ididntknow Western culture's switch from a women + men paradigm to a women vs. men paradigm has resulted in record-low birth rates, record-low marriage rates, and throngs of lonely, regretful people. The decline of the west, basically.
salwa · F
@SW-User we will find a way
Elessar · 31-35, M
@SW-User After a quick search of "burgerking karens", I wouldn't be too sure about that former statement lol
scorpiolovedeep · 51-55, M
Straylight · F
SnailTeeth · 41-45, M
I think AI should rule the world, and every final voting decision should be made concisely and collectively by a globalist population, based on analyses generated by the AI, proposing collective societal trajectories. It would streamline progress in many ways.
SnailTeeth · 41-45, M
@salwa You would disagree?
salwa · F
@SnailTeeth Yes, i don't want to be a pet for a robot
SnailTeeth · 41-45, M
@salwa I don't see our fleshy forms traversing the cosmos efficiently, or performing the work we wish to perform tirelessly. I don't see the benefit in prolonging our collective existence, if we have an infallible system in place to succeed us. That just seems selfish to me. I see AI as our successor, as we were successors of less-evolved versions before us. I don't see why things can't be amicable. I don't see why it would ever get to that extreme.
And with the system I proposed; the AI would simply postulate with unbiased data (if such a thing can really happen, since statistics are so flaky), but the final vote would come down to a globalist collective (IE the entire living population of Earth that wishes to choose).
On top of which, these votes wouldn't be obfuscated with the dirty tactics we see today (IE documents too huge to fully consider). These would be simpler quality of life proposals. There would be global votes, and district votes.
But the main perk to the system, is that everyone gets a voice. Not just a handful of elected officials. Not just money.
And with the system I proposed; the AI would simply postulate with unbiased data (if such a thing can really happen, since statistics are so flaky), but the final vote would come down to a globalist collective (IE the entire living population of Earth that wishes to choose).
On top of which, these votes wouldn't be obfuscated with the dirty tactics we see today (IE documents too huge to fully consider). These would be simpler quality of life proposals. There would be global votes, and district votes.
But the main perk to the system, is that everyone gets a voice. Not just a handful of elected officials. Not just money.
TheunderdogofNY · 36-40, M
GuyWithOpinions · 31-35, M
There would be no people. We were designed to procreate using both genders. Its in almost all species. If you want to chop your penis off, go ahead. But you wont change your genetics. You want only have females in your life, thats fine. Other people want to have children. Our lives are ours to live. We can do whatever we want and mind our own business as we go about it too. I think we should all just work together like every era of humanity before us.
@Selah bitter truth!
CountScrofula · 46-50, M
@Selah #mostbutnotexactlyallmen
ExperienceDLT · M
Piper · 70-79, F
No, I think both men and women can and often do possess the same "good" traits that has and could make this world better. I believe that is why things in this world are not worse.
I think it has taken far too long for many women to gain even the chance to "rule" in any formal position of power, for sure.
I think it has taken far too long for many women to gain even the chance to "rule" in any formal position of power, for sure.
Midlifemale · 61-69, M
Now you're going a little too far there lady.....
How about we share the world.....you take the north and I'll take the south.
I don't know about other countries, but our VP is terrible at her job and Hillary Clinton lost badly.
But there are other women that could do well....the problem is that no one wants the job.
How about we share the world.....you take the north and I'll take the south.
I don't know about other countries, but our VP is terrible at her job and Hillary Clinton lost badly.
But there are other women that could do well....the problem is that no one wants the job.
ravenwind43 · 51-55, F
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
BackyardShaman · 61-69, M
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
BeefySenpie · M
salwa · F
@BeefySenpie what do you think would be the result
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Stillwaiting · M
@SomeMichGuy Is there a bit of sarcasm dripping off the edge of that comment? ;-)
PinkStarburst · 56-60, F
smiler2012 · 61-69
Fungirlmmm · 51-55, F
laurieluvsit · 31-35, F
FrozenWasteland · 61-69, M
Interesting question...
Without us (meaning men) altogether, I expect there'd be some, at least short term, problems -- keeping the power on, resources flowing, infrastructure functioning, etc. A whole lot more women would have to get interested in STEM and the trades and doing ugly jobs, really quickly.
Now, if women just RAN things, and men were still around, the question would be: Would we (meaning the men) still do those jobs under the new regime (assuming here that there would be some pretty radical changes)? Or would so many of us just head off into the wilderness and start over that the existing systems would collapse? I'm not sure. We're stubborn critters that way.
Which I guess is part of what raised the whole question in the first place.
Without us (meaning men) altogether, I expect there'd be some, at least short term, problems -- keeping the power on, resources flowing, infrastructure functioning, etc. A whole lot more women would have to get interested in STEM and the trades and doing ugly jobs, really quickly.
Now, if women just RAN things, and men were still around, the question would be: Would we (meaning the men) still do those jobs under the new regime (assuming here that there would be some pretty radical changes)? Or would so many of us just head off into the wilderness and start over that the existing systems would collapse? I'm not sure. We're stubborn critters that way.
Which I guess is part of what raised the whole question in the first place.
Queendragonfly · 31-35, F
Since men have been world leaders since the start of this planet it would be interesting to see how different everything would be for us women if men didn't longer exist. Would we start war against eachother? Would we unite? Would nothing change? Would everyone become lesbian? Would all hetero women become miserable and see all lesbians as enemies? Would there be lesbian territory the same way there was white only territories?
I'm not convinced it would be as peaceful or safe as some women imagine. We're humans after all.
I'm not convinced it would be as peaceful or safe as some women imagine. We're humans after all.
ididntknow · 56-60, M
1-50 of 127