Top | Newest First | Oldest First
1-50 of 127
Lostpoet · M
Women are just as ruthless as us men.
View 7 more replies »
Pinkstarburst · 51-55, F
@salwa
@LostNForgotten do u think that?, most of crimes committed by men not women
Not really…women just don’t get caught 😏
Ferric67 · M
from my personal work experience, i find that women seem to be too vindictive and take things too personal...when, in fact, it's just the cost of doing business.
whereas men, get into fights and then just let them go...grudge free...perfect for doing business...you need that actually to successfully navigate the minefields necessary to lead with the confidence of the those who have entrusted you.
You need to be emotionless in order to lead objectively.
On a different note, our problem today is that our leaders and politicians are too greedy and self serving...and don't lead with the intentions of the masses that they represent.
whereas men, get into fights and then just let them go...grudge free...perfect for doing business...you need that actually to successfully navigate the minefields necessary to lead with the confidence of the those who have entrusted you.
You need to be emotionless in order to lead objectively.
On a different note, our problem today is that our leaders and politicians are too greedy and self serving...and don't lead with the intentions of the masses that they represent.
Ferric67 · M
@HairbrushDiva it was a knee jerk reaction. Having seen females in authority take work place drama to higher, more personal levels than men over the years. Although, I had one male actually act out personal vendettas (I think that he's bipolar...that was the only job I ever quit). Otherwise, it's the women that I have seen make those efforts.
Anyhow, to your point...it's not an exclusive club...and I shouldn't generalize.
Anyhow, to your point...it's not an exclusive club...and I shouldn't generalize.
HairbrushDiva · 31-35, F
@Ferric67 You wouldn't dare generalise like that if you lived in my neighbourhood. You'd never hear the end of it.
AnnSteve · C
@HairbrushDiva in general hes right. There are always exceptions to everything, but the numbers dont lie
morrgin · F
Nothing against women who like other women, but I dont like the idea of snuggling up to another woman. I like men in all their masculinity. As long long as they dont tell me what to do, where to go, what to wear, how much I can spend, and they have to do half the housework and equal duties raising the kids. No wonder Im usually disappointed in my relationships.
@morrgin irony...
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
@morrgin Keep looking, it’s possible
SW-User
smh, what a stupid question
originnone · 61-69, M
GOD, YES!!!!! Can you imagine how fewer wars would have happened if women were in charge? Can you imagine how much better things could be with the beautiful empathy many women have? or the ability to think of many things at once, which guys can't do as well? Yes, as a man, I definitely believe women should be in way more than half the positions of power in the world. Men would be much better off.....hot topic for me.
This message was deleted by its author.
graphite · 61-69, M
@originnone https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men
Who waged war in the Falkland Islands in 1982? Margaret Thatcher.
Who waged war in the Falkland Islands in 1982? Margaret Thatcher.
@graphite Queen Elizabeth
SW-User
Yes I do. I'd miss me though :D
AJS30 · 31-35, M
No, men are essential as they build and maintain society and do so many hard or non-fun jobs that women either can't do or wouldn't want to do. Society would crumble without men and women would be crying and praying for men to come back. Not to mention the fact that humanity would go extinct.
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
I would like to see more women in top management jobs as have a different point of view
Can be more professional than a lot of men
The workplace would gain a lot
Can be more professional than a lot of men
The workplace would gain a lot
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
BohemianBabe · M
@sunsporter1649 Yes, she's a woman.
You still don't have a coherent definition, do you?
You still don't have a coherent definition, do you?
Slade · 56-60, M
@Strictmichael75 SIMP Alert! 😵💫
No, it wouldn't. What's needed is balance, and how could we have that if there were only one of the two genders?
salwa · F
@Cassie2083 we could manage to create the balance without them
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Stillwaiting · M
@SomeMichGuy Is there a bit of sarcasm dripping off the edge of that comment? ;-)
Stillwaiting · M
This kinda stuff is what is wrong with the world. Idiotic generalizations used to justify an agenda with no basis in fact. Women are every bit as human .. meaning they can have character flaws, make mistakes, have lapses in judgement, be irrational, be narcissistic, etc, .. as any man. Some women would make better leaders than many men, but as many are as wholly unfit as many man. To believe otherwise is utter lunacy.
BlueVeins · 22-25
kinda yeah
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
Have you ever worked in a setting that has 90% female staff?
JacksonBlue · 36-40, M
It'd be different. Better in some ways and
worse in others.
worse in others.
Oster1 · M
So many women today, are put into leadership, because they portray things like nurturing, motherhood and protection, etc. Guess what? They can carry out the dirty work even more viciously and many tend to overcompensate.
@Oster1 truth!
Oster1 · M
@WhisperinAngelic101 You are very wise! Have a wonderful weekend!
🙂🌺
🙂🌺
@Oster1 thanks! you too dear!
Purplerain78 · 46-50, F
No. What we need is a world where both men and women are actually seen as equals. Yes equality has become better over the years, but it's a long way off what it should be.
Fact is, we do need both men and women to function as the human race. There's no getting away from that!
Fact is, we do need both men and women to function as the human race. There's no getting away from that!
FreestyleArt · 31-35, M
Okay XD you know what? Why not?
We man will give you a Free Trial 30 days for women to rule the world and see how it goes....
I know women are smart but what about Muscular Decisions and personality when it comes to world issues? Something to think about...
We man will give you a Free Trial 30 days for women to rule the world and see how it goes....
I know women are smart but what about Muscular Decisions and personality when it comes to world issues? Something to think about...
OogieBoogie · F
@Elisbch tests have shown we are great at multi tasking.
I have a book, (it's an old one). It's full of test results done between men and women.
And it showed where each gender, (on average), excelled, or didn't .
To put it very VERY simply, it seemed that men excel at bursts of focus and energy, while women are sustainers. Our focus and energy excel over long periods .
I thought that was interesting.
I have a book, (it's an old one). It's full of test results done between men and women.
And it showed where each gender, (on average), excelled, or didn't .
To put it very VERY simply, it seemed that men excel at bursts of focus and energy, while women are sustainers. Our focus and energy excel over long periods .
I thought that was interesting.
salwa · F
@OogieBoogie that's true, we use much bigger areas on our brains so we are multitaskers and can do many things the same time, this make us more productive and more superior
OogieBoogie · F
@salwa Well ...no it doesn't .
It means we have skills in different areas.
Imagine this. A bull is charging into a camp:
The men react instantly, grab spears and almost impulsively work as a team to kill it.
They are mentally geared to think in a burst -.in a crisis.
The women automatically think ahead and gather children...they are mentally geared to calculate the larger picture.
These two ways of thinking compliment each other towards maximum survival for the tribe.
One isn't better than the other. We need both .
It means we have skills in different areas.
Imagine this. A bull is charging into a camp:
The men react instantly, grab spears and almost impulsively work as a team to kill it.
They are mentally geared to think in a burst -.in a crisis.
The women automatically think ahead and gather children...they are mentally geared to calculate the larger picture.
These two ways of thinking compliment each other towards maximum survival for the tribe.
One isn't better than the other. We need both .
Torsten · 36-40, M
the world would be much worse without both sexes in it. To claim otherwise, im sorry but its just foolish. We could piss off all those made up genders though. That would surely make the world a better place again
Wonder Woman, Princess Diana of the Amazons, came from the Island Themyscira, home of the Amazons. They are an all-female race. Their island is a paradise. Wonder Woman was created by being sculpted from clay by her mother Queen Hippolyta. The Amazons don't need biological reproduction. They seemed to get along fine without men.
Queendragonfly · 31-35, F
Since men have been world leaders since the start of this planet it would be interesting to see how different everything would be for us women if men didn't longer exist. Would we start war against eachother? Would we unite? Would nothing change? Would everyone become lesbian? Would all hetero women become miserable and see all lesbians as enemies? Would there be lesbian territory the same way there was white only territories?
I'm not convinced it would be as peaceful or safe as some women imagine. We're humans after all.
I'm not convinced it would be as peaceful or safe as some women imagine. We're humans after all.
SW-User
Hell ya! ♡
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@SW-User Good luck having babies 👶
graphite · 61-69, M
@ididntknow Western culture's switch from a women + men paradigm to a women vs. men paradigm has resulted in record-low birth rates, record-low marriage rates, and throngs of lonely, regretful people. The decline of the west, basically.
salwa · F
@SW-User i think i have found my twin mind 😂
SW-User
The crime rate worldwide would definitely decrease… but I we’d go extinct.
salwa · F
@SW-User we will find a way
Elessar · 26-30, M
@SW-User After a quick search of "burgerking karens", I wouldn't be too sure about that former statement lol
scorpiolovedeep · 51-55, M
They should coexist.
Both have strengths and must be acknowledged and respected equally.
Both have strengths and must be acknowledged and respected equally.
GuyWithOpinions · 31-35, M
There would be no people. We were designed to procreate using both genders. Its in almost all species. If you want to chop your penis off, go ahead. But you wont change your genetics. You want only have females in your life, thats fine. Other people want to have children. Our lives are ours to live. We can do whatever we want and mind our own business as we go about it too. I think we should all just work together like every era of humanity before us.
Pinkstarburst · 51-55, F
Nope. Gotta have men to make women. Plus, men aren’t so bad. They have chest hair and kill bugs.
TheunderdogofNY · 36-40, M
I imagine without men the world would lack many things that are taken for granted daily. So I'm going to say no.
Straylight · 31-35, F
I think marginalizing people for the way they were born has historically been a bad thing.
SnailTeeth · 36-40
I think AI should rule the world, and every final voting decision should be made concisely and collectively by a globalist population, based on analyses generated by the AI, proposing collective societal trajectories. It would streamline progress in many ways.
SnailTeeth · 36-40
@salwa You would disagree?
salwa · F
@SnailTeeth Yes, i don't want to be a pet for a robot
SnailTeeth · 36-40
@salwa I don't see our fleshy forms traversing the cosmos efficiently, or performing the work we wish to perform tirelessly. I don't see the benefit in prolonging our collective existence, if we have an infallible system in place to succeed us. That just seems selfish to me. I see AI as our successor, as we were successors of less-evolved versions before us. I don't see why things can't be amicable. I don't see why it would ever get to that extreme.
And with the system I proposed; the AI would simply postulate with unbiased data (if such a thing can really happen, since statistics are so flaky), but the final vote would come down to a globalist collective (IE the entire living population of Earth that wishes to choose).
On top of which, these votes wouldn't be obfuscated with the dirty tactics we see today (IE documents too huge to fully consider). These would be simpler quality of life proposals. There would be global votes, and district votes.
But the main perk to the system, is that everyone gets a voice. Not just a handful of elected officials. Not just money.
And with the system I proposed; the AI would simply postulate with unbiased data (if such a thing can really happen, since statistics are so flaky), but the final vote would come down to a globalist collective (IE the entire living population of Earth that wishes to choose).
On top of which, these votes wouldn't be obfuscated with the dirty tactics we see today (IE documents too huge to fully consider). These would be simpler quality of life proposals. There would be global votes, and district votes.
But the main perk to the system, is that everyone gets a voice. Not just a handful of elected officials. Not just money.
Templar2x · 46-50, M
No. Because I do offer value to the world and I’m a kind and caring person and the world needs more of that.
Elisbch · M
no, i think the world would be better without women that think that way. 🤷🤣👍🏻
looping · 18-21
i personally believe the world would be better without people in general
IWasCallingYaLarry · 26-30, M
I mean you can think that but it would fall apart way quicker without us. There things women cannot do as well as men and vice versa. Plus, a majority of things built were built by men, and building things is hard physical labor. Many women have a hard time working together because of being too emotional and drama, and also women have smaller bone density and aren't as physically strong as men. Yes, bodybuilding women exist, of course, but most women aren't strong that way. We'd fall apart a lot sooner without men and the whole feminism thing going on just continues to prove that. Let's face it, men and women need each other. I know that sounds like an insane idea, but it's true. So don't think women are any different. You're not. Women are just as shitty as men are, because human beings are shitty. There's a reason the aliens have skipped over with meeting us on our planet. They're laughing at us destroying ourselves.
Selah ·
Only like 80% of men. Yeah
@Selah bitter truth!
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
@Selah #mostbutnotexactlyallmen
Midlifemale · 61-69, M
Now you're going a little too far there lady.....
How about we share the world.....you take the north and I'll take the south.
I don't know about other countries, but our VP is terrible at her job and Hillary Clinton lost badly.
But there are other women that could do well....the problem is that no one wants the job.
How about we share the world.....you take the north and I'll take the south.
I don't know about other countries, but our VP is terrible at her job and Hillary Clinton lost badly.
But there are other women that could do well....the problem is that no one wants the job.
FrozenWasteland · 61-69, M
Interesting question...
Without us (meaning men) altogether, I expect there'd be some, at least short term, problems -- keeping the power on, resources flowing, infrastructure functioning, etc. A whole lot more women would have to get interested in STEM and the trades and doing ugly jobs, really quickly.
Now, if women just RAN things, and men were still around, the question would be: Would we (meaning the men) still do those jobs under the new regime (assuming here that there would be some pretty radical changes)? Or would so many of us just head off into the wilderness and start over that the existing systems would collapse? I'm not sure. We're stubborn critters that way.
Which I guess is part of what raised the whole question in the first place.
Without us (meaning men) altogether, I expect there'd be some, at least short term, problems -- keeping the power on, resources flowing, infrastructure functioning, etc. A whole lot more women would have to get interested in STEM and the trades and doing ugly jobs, really quickly.
Now, if women just RAN things, and men were still around, the question would be: Would we (meaning the men) still do those jobs under the new regime (assuming here that there would be some pretty radical changes)? Or would so many of us just head off into the wilderness and start over that the existing systems would collapse? I'm not sure. We're stubborn critters that way.
Which I guess is part of what raised the whole question in the first place.
Piper · 61-69, F
No, I think both men and women can and often do possess the same "good" traits that has and could make this world better. I believe that is why things in this world are not worse.
I think it has taken far too long for many women to gain even the chance to "rule" in any formal position of power, for sure.
I think it has taken far too long for many women to gain even the chance to "rule" in any formal position of power, for sure.
ExperienceDLT · M
Dildo sales would spike for sure 😁
ravenwind43 · 51-55, F
Absolutely not
graphite · 61-69, M
Who's going to build the buildings, mine the needed minerals, build and run the sewage treatment plants and water collection systems, collect the garbage, invent the computers and everything else, and on and on?
Benjr134 · M
Some of the worst scenarios I’ve ever seen were from women. Men aren’t great but women aren’t any better either. Even in a micro situation I’ve seen how horribly they can treat each other. My sister had a best friend and they were friends for over 10 years. A rumour started that my sister slept with a guy who her friend had a crush on. Despite the fact that my sister didn’t do it(the guy was gay and didn’t like any women) another girl who had just joined their friend group said she did. They didn’t talk for almost 3 years. I have never seen that happen in my guy friends. At the end of the day it takes all kinds to make things run. Get rid of one piece and you will quickly see where that piece was needed. Like a puzzle.
Rolexeo · 26-30, M
Women need a second opinion on everything, they're indecisive and too emotional. Them running a country would be a disaster.
Rolexeo · 26-30, M
@oldercanuck1 anecdotes don't disprove a rule, cuck boy
oldercanuck1 · 70-79, M
@Rolexeo oh are we not showing how smart we are with words
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
Kilary?
TexChik · F
Mine would not. And in about 40 years the human race would start to disappear with no way to reproduce.
BackyardShaman · 61-69, M
I honestly think women should have way more political and social power as males at a minimum. Equal pay equal rights across the board. This would help things in my country at least.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Sure... And how long before you want the furniture moved, the trash taken out or a spider removed from the bath.? Behind every great man is a woman, pointing out his faults...😷
Fluffybull · F
Well, this one made a right b******s of running Scotland and we're glad to get rid of her 😆😆👏👏👍
Fluffybull · F
@whowasthatmaskedman I'm Scottish too. 🤬
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Fluffybull Then you understand my point. My wife is Glaswegian, so I get to say things like that..😷
Fluffybull · F
@whowasthatmaskedman What's the reason for the stupid mask emoji? 🙄 You don't "get to say things like that" I feel sorry for your wife 🤡
MrAverage1965 · 61-69, M
Have you ever seen two women fighting they can be as vicious and brutal as any man.
BohemianBabe · M
@MrAverage1965 But when women fight, they just slap and try to rip off each other's clothes.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@MrAverage1965 Worse actually. They try for damage, rather than to end the fight quickly..😷
Elisbch · M
I saw two women fight once.
In the beginning they were just basically slapping and scratching and pulling hair but eventually they started ripping at each other's clothes and before they got separated, both were shirtless and braless all the girls were hanging out and swinging ..LOL.. and it was getting to be quite the show to sit back and just watch. ... (.)(.)
👀 🤣 .. @MrAverage1965
In the beginning they were just basically slapping and scratching and pulling hair but eventually they started ripping at each other's clothes and before they got separated, both were shirtless and braless all the girls were hanging out and swinging ..LOL.. and it was getting to be quite the show to sit back and just watch. ... (.)(.)
👀 🤣 .. @MrAverage1965
BeefySenpie · M
I’d love to see this theory tested with a few million women in a small country. The results would probably shock you
salwa · F
@BeefySenpie what do you think would be the result
Adogslife · 61-69, M
The world wouldn’t exist without men. That said, women can certainly lead. They have the skill set. Most lead their homes as it is now, perhaps just not overtly.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
1-50 of 127