Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
reflectingmonkey · 51-55, M
no, I support informal, anarchist economy. doing a job and getting paid cash, poor people selling food to make a few extra bucks. marginal economy is important. also how are beggars going to survive?

caPnAhab · 26-30, M
I don't want. I don't think we should rely on technology so hard.
Nimbus · M
@caPnAhab Agreed!
NO! The gov already has too much control.
Nimbus · M
@UnderLockDown They are greedy and want more!
Fairydust · F
Absolutely not, it’s the end if we do.

Full control of us, never forget what they did to the Canadian truckers.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Fairydust Well you have the Chinese social credit as the model..😷
Fairydust · F
@whowasthatmaskedman

That’s what they want here.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Fairydust And while I know thats stroking the fur backward on every"freedom loving" , gun toting American, it is a great war of getting people to conform and perform, as compared to say, shooting them and locking them up. I want to make it clear I not advocating it. even in China. Just commenting on the results.. Remember, China has ten times the population to keep in line and overall they seem to be doing a pretty good job.😷
Alababy · 36-40, F
No. I don’t support it. It discriminates against the poor and those who are distrustful of banks.
Nimbus · M
@Alababy Good point.
Musicman · 61-69, M
I am totally against it! Once you have a cashless society the government owns you. You can't even eat without their approval.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@Musicman The Osage Indians that lived in Oklahoma a century ago became very wealthy due to the oil that was discovered on their land. They had so much money from royalties that they built mansions and bought expensive imported cars. There were no mechanics to repair them and if they had major problem they’d go buy another car just like them. Word got out and it made other not-as-rich people extremely wealthy. They accused them of squandering their wealth. And they influenced Congress to pass a bill where any Indians with 50% or more Indian blood would have to have a White guardian to do any business transactions. Some of the women married white men, who suddenly were attracted to this tribe, and the men were made guardians over the women’s business transactions. Some of those women were murdered and made to look like accidents so their white husbands would get everything that they owned including their money. There is a movie made about it recently called [b]Killers of the Flower Moon[/b]…it’s been popular here.

Nowadays the oil royalties in various tribes are being withheld for many decades. Those Indians think that they can take legal action and get their money back but it seems like a pipe dream. I worked with a Kiowa woman whose mother was owed about $2 million in oil royalties from the oil taken from her property and that was over several decades. She didn’t see a penny of it even though her daughter was hopeful that they would get it. She died in an accident when rushing water swept the van and 2 other relatives in swept the van off the bridge and that was about 16 years ago. As far as I know the family still hasn’t received those oil royalties and probably never will. So the government is still screwing with the Indians and this is just one example.
@Musicman I like your first sentence. Look at Eric Adams, mayor of NYC. Stopped by the FBI, had his phone taken. All because he crossed the angry, power hungry and vindictive Joe Biden. There’s your “ threat to democracy”
Musicman · 61-69, M
@soar2newhighs Exactly! Could you imagine having $100k in your bank account and because you spoke against the Democrats having your bank freeze your bank account and not even being allowed in a restaurant even if your friend is paying because your "social credit score" was to low. 😡😡😡
AbbeyRhode · F
NO! It's one more way the government wants to exercise control over our lives.
Nimbus · M
@AbbeyRhode Exactly!
No. It stinks.
Nimbus · M
@PhoenixPhail I concur.
Nimbus · M
@MrBrownstone We might not have much choice :(
Zaphod42 · 46-50, M
No. I enjoy paying cashlessly almost everywhere, but there are some things I still want to pay for with cold hard untraceable cash 😉
Nimbus · M
@Zaphod42 Yea, that IS the current situation but will our overlords be happy with that?
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Zaphod42 Agreed. I am also fortunate to be running at a small profit with income exceeding outgoings and not having it show is helpful..😷
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
They can track everything you purchase with the cashless system…if meat is considered environmentally unfriendly for example, and you purchase it with a cashless account you could get punished in some way. Including freezing your account if they don’t like how you spend it. Buy too many clothes and accessories they will consider you wasteful. They’d have their fat noses in all of our private business. How much gas we buy or if we buy liquor (even for a gift or a holiday), etc. Think it’s ludicrous? Well those store loyalty cards do just that. They can sell the information about what you buy to health insurance companies. If you are a non-smoker and tell them that and if they see that you’ve been buying tobacco they will assume it’s for your own personal consumption even if it’s for a spouse or your boss sent you to get smokes for him etc. Same with liquor, sugary foods, and whatever OTC meds you buy. They can use their AI to assume you are not taking care of yourself and are a high risk and not sell you insurance based on that. This has been going on for about 2 decades from what I gathered after watching a show about it. The possibilities for overreach and control are endless with this system.
WillaKissing · 56-60
Nope not at all, that is when they will have total control over your existence.
Nimbus · M
@WillaKissing That's true.
joe438 · 61-69, M
Nope. No one should want the government scrutinizing every transaction they do.
AuRevoir · 36-40, M
No. It's like being a blind person with money at that point. And then having someone else tell you everything to know about your money instead of you knowing anything yourself. As they have complete control. It's almost a findom fetish in a way.

At least with banking as it currently stands you can at any time request to get your money into your own two hands physically. Once the physical nature is removed, remove your largest safety net and tie in with it.

All it takes is one brilliant hacker and the world is screwed. And we've already seen hackers do damage before.
nedkelly · 61-69, M
@AuRevoir My great grandmother was blind, and could tell the amount of money due to the size of the Australian pound currency - all different sizes in Australia
AuRevoir · 36-40, M
@nedkelly Yeah when she herself was managing it. As I referenced it would be like being blind, and trusting someone else to tell you everything about your own money... It creates a system of easy robbery within the system.
IM5688 · 61-69, M
Not at all. It will lead us into a one world gov't.
ArcAngel · 61-69, M
It is the mark of the Beast world economic system. Read Revelation chapter 13.
ArcAngel · 61-69, M
@Fairydust
Oh yes, and it is nice to hear from you again, you are my favorite person on this site!
Fairydust · F
@ArcAngel

Aw that’s kind of you, I just pay attention 😌 like yourself.
ArcAngel · 61-69, M
@Fairydust
You and I are the rare ones who do, like Jesus said only the few will find the straight and narrow path.
I like cash....

And keep in mind that when the proverbial "defecation hits the rotating oscillator" no one is going to be accepting $100 or $50 dollar bills as payment. So if you plan on stashing some cash..... make the pile out of smaller bills...nothing bigger than a $20
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
It wouldn't affect me much since I use credit cards all the time, but I wouldn't exactly welcome it either.

It's nice to have choices.
Nimbus · M
@MsSwan It is but will we have a choice in the matter?
@Nimbus Of course not. 😑
Rolexeo · 26-30, M
No, they'd have full control. Banks can ban you from using them as is. You can get fired for whtat you say online. It'd effectively be a social credit score.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Yup. I was a fan of Jacques Fresco long before an idea like that took hold. My reasoning is that we have the technology, but certain biases hold us back. There's things like patents and other things that keep us from having tech in the first place. That's kinda why there's no real cures to diseases by now. But I'm also not for removing checks and balances, that's another conversation for another time.

So my reasoning for a cashless society is for lots of reasons. One of those reasons is to advance tech wise and go to another era of evolution.

In order to advance to a more technological society you would have to do away with cash because there would still be plenty of jobs but the need for some jobs more than others would arise. So there has to be another system in order for us to advance in the first place to take care of all people. One solution could be cashless society.

I'm not saying that we wouldn't own businesses anymore or anything but at the same time, the structure would be different.

Trading, borrowing has served us well but the paradox of advancement would be that in order to advance you'd have to get rid of the current system.

......

Another reason is that it does create a lot of waste, money and paper. Going cashless in favor of other things potentially saves millions of dollars and could be very effective.
@SatanBurger There are other ways of dealing with the more-trash problem. There is [i]infinitely[/i] more paper being sent to me as junk mail, than I'll [i]ever[/i] have as currency. Let's stop the junk mail.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@PhoenixPhail I still support cashless if reasons for technological advancement. They will take some of our jobs, with other solutions tho, people don't need to work that much anyways. The 14 hour work day is economic issues that aren't being fixed.
@SatanBurger It will give the powers that be even more control over us.
HumanEarth · 56-60, M
No freaking way
HumanEarth · 56-60, M
Go back on the gold standard
gol979 · 41-45, M
Cashless is a tool of control. Listen to what they are saying about CBDCs. As per the BIS, we can monitor all transactions and stop any we do not approve.

Also they are talking about expiry dates on CBDCs. As in its not your choice when to spend your earned money. And they can programme in timed devaluation/interest to further force you to part with your money.

And we have to ask ourselves why get rid of physical currency/cash?

I reject cashless and all the bribes that will come shortly. I imagine that now the unelected EU blob will start to give cashless money to fill up the "digital wallet" thats just been "given" to people in the EU. Hopefully enough people will reject this too and render this agenda obsolete.
TexChik · F
No, not in the least.
Carissimi · 70-79, F
No. Someone I know is having problems having no cash because their bank card will no longer work at ATMs, and they can only use it for purchases with the card. They need cash tomorrow, but can’t get any.
Nimbus · M
@Carissimi Oh my!
TexasDude · 31-35, M
Not at all. It's horrifying really. A corrupt government could freeze assets of "undesirables" at will. So could a corrupt bank. Or a computer virus or anything could go wrong. Nothing like that can happen to cash
I could be wrong but the concept of one world governance is not necessarily something at least China will be part of.
China has been ascending for years, has not forgotten when it was subjugated by other nations…The Boxer Rebellion and it being put down. The opium wars with Britain, the occupation by foreign militaries.
You realize the idea that all will be equal in a new world order is a fallacy. There is always the Alpha male mentality. Someone, should this new world governance ever come to be, my guess the one calling the shots will be China.
Caveat: If recent developments in Taiwan have repercussions, it is possible that a NWO, Great reset will be in the shitter!!
ABCDEF7 · M
More than 95% of my transactions are done cashless. It solves a major problem of counterfeit currency, which is termite for any economy.
Nimbus · M
@ABCDEF7 That's one positive.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
[b]NO ![/b]

[b]NOR this cr@p supporting internet banking ![/b]
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@Nimbus What will happen is children will move back in with their parents and the parents will leave the house to their children.
So that kills the care home debacle where residents give their house proceeds to fund their care.
That also kills the housing market because their children won't want to move. There'll be plenty of properties available but a shrinking number of folk who will want to buy.
That in turn will see the over-priced value given to a home plummet.
Putting all financial institutions including the Bank of England (and others in other countries if they follow suit) in jeopardy of being worthless.
And the whole house of cards topples.
Nimbus · M
@Picklebobble2 Kinda seems like a retrograde step.
What do they get out of such a thing apart from control?
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@Nimbus Governments have nothing left to sell.
Political parties as we know them will soon become irrelevant.
In order for government as we currently know it to survive, they think they can buy and sell their populace to the big corporations of the world because they will pay for that !
Beautifully demonstrated by the American drug industry regularly.
Beautifully demonstrated by Trump's attempt to get the UK and Europe to buy their 'Bleached chicken' etc.

Corporate ideas rejected because the Johnson government knew we wouldn't buy it due to strict rules surrounding food production in Europe.

Politics is dying. Traditional parties are so clueless at the moment look at the extremes of leadership we have all over the world.
If this plan to eradicate cash is allowed to go through, we, the customers, lose [b]all choice[/b] !
No matter [b]which[/b] company you [b]choose[/b] to do business with, you [b]won't[/b] be able to play one company off against another to get the best price for the job/service you want.

Europe and the UK especially, really needs to up it's game in the world of 'Big pharma' too.
You can't have four companies making 90% of the drugs we use.
FreestyleArt · 31-35, M
Not sure if that's really gonna happen. Close, but no cigar especially with China becoming a ticking time mad bomb.
Nimbus · M
@FreestyleArt Exactly.
Thodsis · 51-55, M
Not at all. Look at how the Post Office fucked people over with their system.
smiler2012 · 56-60
@Nimbus 🤔being a thieving scouse pick pocket will not be worth it any more nimby as all you will end up with is a wallet of credit cards 😆
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
No and I wonder where these supposed data came from because I highly doubt Eastern Europe would welcome it.
nedkelly · 61-69, M
Only in Liverpool, sadly it appears that very soon it will become a cashless society
AlchemyFox · 36-40, F
I don't know. I wish I could trade beaver fur for maize and smoke
Nimbus · M
@AlchemyFox Good luck with that ;)
Nitedoc · 51-55, M
No. That would be a big mistake on several levels.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Nope. No internet, no money..No thanks..😷
Nimbus · M
4meAndyou · F
As I recall, keeping cash on your person at all times made you a target for theft. No one ASKED me if I wanted to go cashless, but it was gradually imposed on us, for "convenience".
4meAndyou · F
@cherokeepatti I see people being mugged on television all the time, and whenever I get out of my car, I look all around me, because I know that I could be a target.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@4meAndyou You can get mugged even without any cash on you. They’ll come up and grab your purse. Put the cash somewhere else like in your sock if it’s that bad where you live. You don’t want your credit or debit cards stolen either. They can also hack them when you are standing in line or filling up with gas at a gas pump. It happened to somewhere here last month. They went home and checked their bank balance within a couple hours and already 6 debits had been made after the hack.
4meAndyou · F
@cherokeepatti Scary what can happen.
SW-User
Cash is still king.
LG153 · 61-69
No, I am against it 100%
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Nimbus · M
@SW-User lol, interesing ;)
gol979 · 41-45, M
@SW-User yep. The fiat currency, fractional reserve banking scam is coming to an end and cashless is the pivot to even more control from the very same people who sold you "bits of paper"
What purpose would it serve?
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@MrBrownstone Exactly
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@SW-User we can still do that in given situations if we can have some cash as well. It takes time and haggling skills to do it.
WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M
I’m not going to lie. Fiddly coins for parking meters is bullshit. A quick swipe of my phone and I’m off.
Nimbus · M
@WintaTheAngle That's one advantage :)
WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M
@Nimbus It also gives you a reason to walk past charity collectors, sales people and the homeless.
Nimbus · M
@WintaTheAngle Good point :)
Ontheroad · M
Im all for a mostly cashless society, not 100%, but something approaching that.
Nimbus · M
@Ontheroad It's fastly approaching that surely?
Ontheroad · M
@Nimbus It's a long, long way from that and until we get banks out of it, or get the fees they charge for every transaction out of it, and give the less affluent the means to have access to a wireless economy, then it will never get a whole more cashless than it is now.
Nimbus · M
@Ontheroad I hope so.
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
I welcome the move towards a fairer and equal opportunity society
@Guitarman123 Now THAT would be something.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Guitarman123 and how is a cashless system going to implement "a fairer and equal opportunity society"?
Steve42 · 56-60, M
Nope. Just as soon as we get a big enough solar flare it all goes to the bit bucket.

 
Post Comment