Are there any GOP running that are NOT 2020 election deniers?
My #1 criteria for deciding who to vote for. If the candidate believes the 2020 election was illegitimate, I see no reason to vote for that person, because I would then believe elections are pointless.
Right now all the Rs on my ballot are election deniers. So I guess I am voting all D.
I have always voted for members of all parties for almost 50 years. Republicans, Democrats, Conservatives, Green, etc., depending on the qualifications of those running for office. That was true until this past election, when it became clear that voting Republican was choosing to destroy democracy. It was the first election I did not vote for a single Republican, and I will not until the current MAGA/Trump Cult goes away.
@marke And anonymous witnesses aren't testifying against defendants and convicting them. Where do you get this crap? Do you just make it up as you go along?
And anonymous witnesses aren't testifying against defendants and convicting them. Where do you get this crap? Do you just make it up as you go along?
Of course Schiff and the democrats had to prevent anyone from finding out the anti-American commie Vindman was the whistleblower. The hearsay evidence of the anonymous whistleblower would not have been admissible in a real trial operating under due process laws.
@marke Wherever and whenever life originated on earth, evolution and geologic processes have continued to occur, as proven by the fossil record. Denial and tortured reasoning by you and other science deniers won't change the facts.
it's ok to not have all the answers to all the questions yet. But it's not ok to immediately jump to the default conclusion that because we don't, there must be a God.
God is not a default conclusion but there is no other scientifically plausible conclusion apart from God.
Something I hate about Liberals is that they'll say there's a civil war in the GOP between Trumpian Fascists and "Real Conservatives." Then you actually look at the numbers, and like 95% of the GOP has fully embraced Trumpism and the Big Lie.
I'm sure there are two or three Republicans who aren't election deniers, but the party is so hardcore fascist now, those people don't matter.
Post one time where trump told putin to get out of Crimea.
Post one time where Biden told anyone to do anything and they did what he told them (except for his sycophant supporters in weaponized democrat government agencies, of course.)
@marke hey sucker how many times are gonna fall for the same lie?
In 2016, after Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) won the Republican primary in Iowa, Trump accused him of stealing the election. “Ted Cruz didn’t win Iowa, he stole it,” Trump wrote. “That is why all of the polls were so wrong and why he got far more votes than anticipated. Bad!”
You left out the most violent annihilation of all: Revelation 20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
TDS is real and impacts people in some very harsh ways. The awakening to the corruption is what really has stirred people. That's where the separation begins. Once you're able to see the corruption, you realize that establishment GOP is essentially the same as Dems. They are two sides of the same coin. And that is why you're able to shift so easily from one to the other.
Bible-believing Christians like me do not support republican rhinos, proud boys, Marxist BLM gangsters, Muslim terrorists, baby killers, or any other evil person or organization.
But you support Trump, who in NO WAY reflects the Person or Character of Christ.
Hillary openly declared that she despised them. Source?
Hillary Clinton Transcript: 'Basket of Deplorables' Comment | Time • POLITICS • READ HILLARY CLINTON'S 'BASKET OF DEPLORABLES' REMARKS ABOUT DONALD TRUMP SUPPORTERS Read Hillary Clinton's 'Basket of Deplorables' Remarks About Donald Trump Supporters Hillary Clinton on Trump's Supporters BY KATIE REILLY
UPDATED: SEPTEMBER 10, 2016 12:27 PM ET | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 10, 2016 9:32 AM EDT Speaking at a fundraiser in New York City on Friday, Hillary Clinton said half of Donald Trump’s supporters belong in a “basket of deplorables” characterized by “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic” views. “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”
Are there any Dem's running that, support Biden 'effing up our country for four more years? This, I assume would be the more salient question.
The old sot has stated he's actually going to run again! Hah.....arrogance /ignorance reaches new levels in the stratosphere kids! I mean, it's telling us that, even though, the curtain has been pulled back displaying his teleprompting facade, ala Wizard of Oz....the corrupt, doddering auld hair-sniffing idiot actually believes he has a sliver of a chance in the next cycle? Holy shit.....I'm making a deep bowl of dip and buying huge bags of chips and pulling up my chair to watch this hysterical fiction play out. Shit.....this has become better than Monday Night Football.
There is a big difference between handing someone cash and building a nuclear reactor in their back yard. NK agreed to give up their reactor project in exchange for having our allies build one. Building the reactor gave us control over the fuel rods - very valuable; the point of the whole exercise.
Clinton gave NK nuclear reactors. Obama gave Iranian terrorist thugs $1.7 billion in cash (less his cut) and they are building WMDs with which to murder Jews and westerners. Just because these guys got elected does not mean they have good sense.
Lawless Americans continue to commit voter fraud so concerned Americans should encourage lawmakers to install common sense restrictions to try to make it much harder for crooks to get away with it.
Factual documents don't try to use persuasion to convince someone that an opinion is fact.
Try again.
Democrats desperately want to hide the fact they lied to the FISA court to get an illegal warrant to spy on Trump and associates for Hillary and her mob. They cannot disprove the facts so they ridicule anyone who points out the facts.
Democrats desperately want to hide the fact they lied to the FISA court to get an illegal warrant to spy
You're mistaking eye-rolling with desperation. That part you said, which I have quoted, is not true. That means you've lied (again). That makes you (still) a liar.
This was, again, the firm hired to investigate the Democrat National Committee servers and computer network to find out who did it, to find out who hacked them. The president of CrowdStrike told Schiff's committee they didn't know. They couldn't find out. They couldn't learn. They couldn't say for certain the Russians had hacked the DNC server.
They could not say for sure that the Russians were involved in letting Podesta's emails out. Well, now, folks, for crying out loud, that is only the entire basis for the entire Russian collusion claim! That the FBI was refused permission to see the DNC server, they hired CrowdStrike, CrowdStrike was said to... They didn't publicly say it, the DNC said this, that the people they had hired, CrowdStrike, demonstrated that their servers were hacked by Russia. And so that was part of this two-year, never-ending pack of lies about this story. It turns out that the president of CrowdStrike couldn't figure out who had hacked the DNC server.
I have a question: is it the first time in the history of the American republic that the losing party claims the election was stolen because they lost? Is it unprecedented?
Let's have that citation with full video and transcript, thanksomuch!
Sadly, Gore was just another run-of-the-mill secular politician who boasted of things he claimed to have accomplished that were exaggerations of the truth at best.
So where did it come from? In a March 9, 1999 interview on CNN, Wolf Blitzer asked the candidate to describe what distinguished him from his Democratic challenger, New Jersey Sen. Bill Bradley. Here is how the exchange went:
Blitzer: "Why should Democrats, looking at the Democratic nomination process, support you instead of Bill Bradley?"
Gore: I'll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be. But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.
There was no evidence about JFK stealing the election either.
JFK didn't steal the election, democrats did. However, LBJ had a long history of election fraud and while JFK was a rather innocent newcomer in some respects, LBJ was not a novice at corruption.
I think, until the tumor has been removed, voting R means you are either voting in an outright denier, or someone who
a) actually IS one, but won't admit it publicly/in mixed political company,
OR
b) is NOT, but will say what needs to be said in order to get elected.
The former are idiots, the latter are cowards.
But I'll consider Kinzinger(? sp) et al. who have stood for the truth before I'll ever vote for a McConnell, Cruz, etc. (Not that I *ever* would have considered these latter.)