Are there any GOP running that are NOT 2020 election deniers?
My #1 criteria for deciding who to vote for. If the candidate believes the 2020 election was illegitimate, I see no reason to vote for that person, because I would then believe elections are pointless.
Right now all the Rs on my ballot are election deniers. So I guess I am voting all D.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TDS is real and impacts people in some very harsh ways. The awakening to the corruption is what really has stirred people. That's where the separation begins. Once you're able to see the corruption, you realize that establishment GOP is essentially the same as Dems. They are two sides of the same coin. And that is why you're able to shift so easily from one to the other.
@easterniowegin Hilariously, TDS has backfired. It now refers to the mental illness where people ignore treason and crimes committed by trump. Ignoring a traitorous douch who squandered top secret documents to show to his Russian and Saudi friends because you believe you can save .30 per a gallon of gas is a rather low bar to set
@BohemianBabe If you think the two parties are the same, ask yourself if Hillary had won in 2016 if she would have appointed the same unqualified Federalist Society hacks to the Supreme Court that Trump appointed. If she'd won, we'd have a 6-3 liberal majority and wouldn't have to worry about whether our vote will be nullified in 2024.
@LeopoldBloom That's why I have very little patience for "Enlightened Centrists" these days. For the most part, they're just morons who think bothsidesing makes them smart.
@LeopoldBloom Trump's SCOTUS appointments are often disappointingly liberal in their decisions. Not one Clarence Thomas amongst them. Liberals hate blacks and their treatment of Clarence Thomas is simply more evidence of their racity race racism.
@TrashCat Please list the crimes, because Mueller spent three years and thirty trillion dollars investigating Trump and admitted he's the most ethical President since Washington.
@SomeMichGuy Yes. Those investigations found a lot that the Democrat controlled justice department refused to act on, which is why Hillary was scared shitless.
@SomeMichGuy The President doesn't choose who gets locked up in a functional Republic. You either failed your freshman Civics class or you have brain damage. So sorry for your case, either way.
@IronHamster But if what *you* claimed *were* true--that all kinds of things were found about Hillary which were *only* blocked from being prosecuted by Democrats--then HOW could Trump NOT have delivered on "lock her up", with Republicans installed in the DoJ?
Oh, but you DID get this right:
The President doesn't choose who gets locked up in a functional Republic.
...which destroys your own claim of Dems/libs preventing Hillary from being prosecuted, right?
BUT...you're wrong, because Trump chose to free people who even admitted and detailed their crimes in open court...so *your* "President" DID choose who gets locked up...by pardoning people who ADMITTED their crimes.
Face it, your position is inconsistent and the Republicans actually DON'T want "law and order" unless it's for OTHERS.
@SomeMichGuy Two issues. First, there is pressure to not go after political adversaries, because it makes us look like a banana republic like we are now. Second, does the name Jeff Sessions ring a bell?
@IronHamster Your position is inconsistent and the Republicans are no longer for law & order.
The Republican party is largely controlled by domestic terrorists or those ok with/sympathetic to domestic terrorism...in the furtherance of Republican power.