Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is withholding information equivalent to lying? 🤔

Top | New | Old
fun4us2b · M
Great question! Many times I keep my mouth shut because I feel that if I feel that in telling the person something they will later either use it against me or make me regret it....so that's not really lying, it's self-preservation.
JustNik · 51-55, F
I tend to feel intent matters here. If information is withheld for the selfish purpose of deception, it’s an equivalent to lying, as the only difference there is that you left a blank rather than filling it in with fiction.

If I know Ted in Accounting has a crush on you and I don’t tell you, that feels more like minding my own beeswax than lying.
GuyWithOpinions · 31-35, M
Well sometimes there a reasons for that.

Maybe a person knows how someone will reacting to hearing a certain bit of info so they're protecting them from themselves.

Maybe its not the right time. Maybe they need to see or do something before its the right time to find out?

During a sort of interigation, maybe i dont want you to know what i know until you say what i need you to say?

Thier are sometimes good reasons to withhold informtaion.

Lying is blatantly giving the wrong information to either hide or trick someone, usually for personal gain or to get out of a situation.
It depends on the context. If it is information that no other party has the right to know and which doesn't affect anyone else adversely then it's in no way equivalent to lying. Withholding information could be described as privacy in that context.
I should also add that the law protects your right to withhold information in a particular context, such that you do not need to make any kind of statement or answer questions when interviewed by the police on suspicion of a crime. That is not equivalent to lying to the police. You have the right not to incriminate yourself. Saying nothing is not being dishonest in that context, it's a fundamental right.
Magenta · F
@UBotMate Nailed it.
Withholding info is my thing 😇
There's a reason you "swear to tell the truth, the WHOLE truth, and nothing but the truth" in Court.
SUPERVlXEN · F
Context is of matter, even if it's not lying it could be obstruction in fact finding and thereby suppress truth.
Magenta · F
No. We are under no obligation to tell knowledge to anyone just because they want it. Even the law states.. "you have the right to remain silent".
Yourwildestdreams · 51-55, M
@Magenta Got it 😀
Magenta · F
@Yourwildestdreams 😄 But it's not black and white.
I have found most things that get revealed only create problems, judgments, skewed perceptions and more..
Yourwildestdreams · 51-55, M
@Magenta 🤐
No further comment, I have the right to remain silent 😉
YoMomma ·
Yeah it's dishonest .. as my uncle would say "a half truth is a whole lie"
scooogy · 31-35, MVIP
Only when asked for, in my opinion
smiler2012 · 61-69
@CourtneyL🤔no as you have not directly told a lie you have witheld information that maybe more betrayal
MarineBob · 56-60, M
Only answer what they ask and be vague
Sidewinder · 36-40, M
Witholding information is different from lying.

Lying is giving false and/or misleading information, whereas witholding information constitutes as not offering any information of any kind at all.
nobodyishome · 31-35, F
How is withholding any information that the entity the information is about asked not to leak anywhere equivalent to lying?
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
If the intent is to deceive, yes.
Iwillwait · M
Withholding or not disclosing is the same.
reubles · 41-45, M
It's called lying through omission
Neoerectus · M
Lack of Candor is half a scootch from lying in my book.
WaryWitchWandering · 36-40, F
Lying by omission…Intent matters here.
WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M
It’s dishonest certainly.
trash · 31-35, M
it's Dishonest which is Lying's twin
just like outright lying....... its deception

 
Post Comment