Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

No to Space Capitalism

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk have a vision of space that serves the narrow interests of capitalists. But we don’t want to be indentured servants on a Martian colony — we want solar exploration that benefits humanity as a whole.

The space billionaires — Musk and Jeff Bezos foremost among them — have little stake in the well-being of the majority of the population. Their space visions are designed for wealthy people like themselves, with little mention of where the working class would fit in. They’ve built their wealth on exploitation, and their visions of the future are little more than an extension of their present actions.

These space barons made their billions through the exploitation of their workers and came from well-off backgrounds made possible from resource extraction. When digging into their visions for a future in space, it’s clear that they seek to extend these conditions into the cosmos, not challenge them in favor of space exploration for the benefit of all.

The Future They Want
Musk and Bezos are the leading drivers of the modern push to privatize and colonize space through their respective companies, SpaceX and Blue Origin. Their visions differ slightly, with Musk preferring to colonize Mars, while Bezos has more interest in building space colonies in orbit.

In 2016, Musk claimed he would begin sending rockets to Mars in 2018. That never happened, but it hasn’t ended his obsession. Musk is determined to make humans a multi-planetary species, framing our choice as either space colonization or the risk of extinction. Bezos says that Earth is the best planet in our solar system, but if we don’t colonize space we doom ourselves to “stasis and rationing.”

These framings serve the interests of these billionaires, and make it seem like colonizing space is an obvious and necessary choice when it isn’t. It ignores their personal culpability and the role of the capitalist system they seek to reproduce in causing the problems they say we need to flee in the first place.

Billionaires have a much greater carbon footprint than ordinary people, with Musk flying his private jet all around the world as he claims to be an environmental champion. Amazon, meanwhile, is courting oil and gas companies with cloud services to make their business more efficient, and Tesla is selling a false vision of sustainability that purposely serves people like Musk, all while capitalism continues to drive the climate system toward the cliff edge. Colonizing space will not save us from billionaire-fueled climate dystopia.

But these billionaires do not hide who would be served by their futures. Musk has given many figures for the cost of a ticket to Mars, but they’re never cheap. He told Vance the tickets would cost $500,000 to $1 million, a price at which he thinks “it’s highly likely that there will be a self-sustaining Martian colony.” However, the workers for such a colony clearly won’t be able to buy their own way. Rather, Musk tweeted a plan for Martian indentured servitude where workers would take on loans to pay for their tickets and pay them off later because “There will be a lot of jobs on Mars!”

Bezos is even more open about how the workforce will have to expand to serve his vision, but has little to say about what they’ll be doing. His plan to maintain economic “growth and dynamism” requires the human population to grow to a trillion people. He claims this would create “a thousand Mozarts and a thousand Einsteins” who would live in space colonies that are supposed to house a million people each, with the surface of Earth being mainly for tourism. Meanwhile, industrial and mining work would move into orbit so as not to pollute the planet, and while he doesn’t explicitly acknowledge it, it’s likely that’s where you’ll find many of those trillion workers toiling for their space overlord and his descendants.

Space Shouldn’t Serve Capitalists
In 1978, Murray Bookchin skewered a certain brand of futurism that sought to “extend the present into the future” and desired “multinational corporations to become multi-cosmic corporations.” Much of this future thinking obsesses about possible changes to technology, but seeks to preserve the existing social and economic relations — “the present as it exists today, projected, one hundred years from now,” as Bookchin put it. That’s at the core of the space billionaires’ vision for the future.

Space has been used by past US presidents to bolster American power and influence, but it was largely accepted that capitalism ended at the edge of the atmosphere. That’s no longer the case, and just as past capitalist expansions have come at the expense of poor and working people to enrich a small elite, so too will this one. Bezos and Trump may have a public feud, but that doesn’t mean that their mutual interest isn’t served by a renewed US push into space that funnels massive public funds into private pockets and seeks to open celestial bodies to capitalist resource extraction.

This is not to say that we need to halt space exploration. The collective interest of humanity is served by learning more about the solar system and the universe beyond, but the goal of such missions must be driven by gaining scientific knowledge and enhancing global cooperation, not nationalism and profit-making.
Yet that’s exactly what the space billionaires and American authoritarians have found common cause in.

SatyrService · M Best Comment
it is good to recall that many many people cut their ethical teeth on ([i]older[/i]) [b]Star Trek[/b] a post scarcity world, where each got what they needed to be what they choose to be, where starvation and privation were no longer a part of the world.


“The economics of the future is somewhat different. You see, money doesn’t exist in the 24th century. The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in our lives. We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity” — Captain Jean-Luc Picard

in a world without money the only wealth is that which makes things better. so much of what we leanred putteing humans in space, hos come done to earth to make our lives better.
just look in an ICU ion any hospital. that tech started in the space program

there is Real Wealth in space, enough for all
@Gloomy thank you for that honor
GeistInTheMachine · 31-35, M
@SatyrService To me that is just some odd sci fi utopianism. This post scarcity thing... Seems like the far left inverse of the corporate capitalist cancerous mindset of magical infinite growth in a finite world.

And there are too many people on the planet. Something has to give. We cannot keep producing and reproducing forever.
@GeistInTheMachine[b] Ido not deny your concern about the carrying capacity of the planet.[/b]
but look what happens when a nations gets richer, they start having fewer children and those children the get the lions share of values and assets.
"far left" is a meaningless term, i reject the term as worse than useless.
as tho all social and political thought could be classified as only one of two choices.
left and right
do you know the ORIGIN of that terminology? go study the french revolution where those terms were first used.
one of the utopist ideas that space has given us is
The entire contents of a critical care unit at any hospital, the ability to predict weather in great detail, to track changes across the planet. These things INCREASE overall wealth, and thus can have effect on that planetary collapse you mentioned. wealth is not money, wealth that that which increases the practical value of human effect life, thriving safety
wealth goes up? reproduction is more considered, the quality of those children's lives increase, they get better education and thus create more Real Wealth.
as long as you throw the idea of utopia out there.
we live in a [i]Oligarchist Utopia[/i] now. ma system that gives complete advantage to those that strip wealth from economies for their own limited personal gain . it is a utopia of theft, and massive privilege. the system is working perfectly and it's result is the destruction of our economic and physical well being.
how Utopist is that?

badminton · 61-69, MVIP
The wealthy want another planet to go to in case things get too hot for them here on Earth. In case us peasants get mad at the way they have damaged our environment, exploited the poor, started wars, etc.
Slade · 56-60, M
@badminton Yawn
@badminton silly people we are as far now from getting another planet for the rich as we were while still in caves

but for a nice treatment? i recommend a movie..

Elysium
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
You've been watching too much science fiction
Gloomy · F
@gol979 You raise a good point but his intention was that through centralisation people should be able to democratically participate in decision making regarding the economy and the material conditions under which they have to live.

In the US state control is incredibly limited in the economy compared to lets say in Germany for example it is much stronger and I would say society wise Germany is better off. Either way even under a free market, power would be centralized through monopolies and the people on the top of corporate hierarchies with small businesses being unable to compete and being forced out of business I am afraid.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Gloomy us state control is limited? Have you seen the "public" budget of the us?

And no doubt people and institutions would try and monopolise in a free market but you ignore that to have a genuine free market that works on a fair societal level there would have to be a huge change in societal stories/myths. You cant have a free market with government interference. Just one big point, economically, would be no tax. Not a chance society would agree with zero tax, at this point in time.

If this ever happened (commuinty democracy and economics), the "working class" would have the nous to see and have mechanisms in place to render monoplies almost impossible. We are on a journey to our past.....we lived without these controlling terms and ideologies before and can again.
Peaceandnamaste · 26-30, F
@Gloomy Capitalism in a nutshell shown in a cartoon.

A Sad reality.

[media=https://youtu.be/2eXU2p982GQ]
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
capitalism isn't what will doom space exploration, "wokeism" will...

the first colonists on mars (assuming it ever actually happens) won't be selected based on qualifications, experience, etc.

it'll be a clusterfuck of different ethnicities, queers, transvestites, etc. put there just so some politicians can claim fame for their political agendas (after all, nasa has already made it a point to send a black woman to the moon in the name of "diversity").

and when it inevitably fails and they all die, I'm sure they'll blame it on "white supremacists" 92 million miles away on earth...


As if we don't have enough idiots on this planet to worry about, they want to send them out to other planets to infest them as well? 🤔
Slade · 56-60, M
@Gloomy Waaaaaa! cope harder.
Gloomy · F
@Slade cope if not used in slang term means to overcome ones problems and to take action. I am a politically active person therefore yes I do cope.

Keep deluding yourself with backwards patriotism.
Slade · 56-60, M
@Gloomy Who does your hair?!
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Without capitalism we woukd be living in grass huts.
pianoplayingsteve · 31-35, M
@Gloomy Yes, it does, because capitalism literally simply refers to any economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit.
Gloomy · F
@pianoplayingsteve You gotta accept that Feudalism is not Capitalism but if you actually want to argue in that way you have to defend not only its immorality but also its fatal flaws
pianoplayingsteve · 31-35, M
@Gloomy I'd like you to address the responses I've given you in the other comments, please.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
Your rendition is a bit off and in no way real-world functional. Military exploitation has been traditionally off-limits to space although that sadly has become in question. Capitalism has always been a part of space exploration and really is what will give it the fuel it needs to achieve the scope of human achievements we all want.

Just like the ideal of capitalism moved empire building, frontier building, and prosperity within the reach of all in the past, so too will it push space exploration past new limits for the benefit of all.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Gloomy It never works out that way. Socialism as a way of life is a fool's dream. Sure, socialistic applications not only make sense, but can help a society thrive. Consider public roadways, social safety nets, etc. as examples. And, when applied under a capitalist umbrella, everyone benefits. But, "too much" socialism like "too much capitalism" is no good. It becomes destructive.

Workers owning the means of production is a textbook definition of socialism. It doesn't really mean anything in practical terms. As a worker, knowing I own 1/10 of 1/4 of 1/5 of an assembly line doesn't make me feel empowered. It makes me feel like a cog.
Do you want to feel like a cog?
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@basilfawlty89 And workers and the middle class (it's interesting you consider those 2 separate things) earn their income from [u]capitalism[/u]. And, that's what paid for the Internet, space exploration that includes the moon landing, exploration of Mars, etc.

You know, you can choose [u]not[/u] to be an idiot. How would you get started on that.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Gloomy It's a system that will carry us far into the future and expand the bounty of Western Democracy.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M
If it weren't for capitalists we wouldn't be anywhere near space, it's their project to exploit. Massive hoards of wealth to fund such ventures do not exist otherwise. And no, the likes of Musk and Bezos are not seeking to escape climate, it's the sun that concerns us all. It will die and I'd rather some of us get off this rock and continue humanity than none of us. Humanity can worry about flourishing when it has solved the extinction ultimatum currently on us.
redredred · M
Yeah, because communism has worked so well on earth.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
You will be replaced by robots.
carpediem · 61-69, M
What a nut.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
Screw that. I'll do what I think is right with the money I got. Be it how I wipe my butt after I drop a commie into the bowl or how I hope to expand the horizons of the human race.

You might THINK you have entitlement to the things I build, but that's because you never build anything but long sentences and hot air.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@SteelHands [quote]You might THINK you have entitlement to the things I build[/quote]

Are you under the impression that people like Elon and Bezos physically design, build and test their rockets? The workers do that, sonny Jim.
Oneofthestormboys · 100+, M
I agree with you. Money is all that matters. It controls, takes over and brainwashes.
When the planet is too f**ked to live in, all the mega wealthy will flee, leaving the wreckage to others. I truly think this will happen at some point in the future.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Oneofthestormboys Thanks for sharing your defeatist attitude. It means a lot and accomplishes nothing.
Oneofthestormboys · 100+, M
@MarkPaul Happy days then 👍🏻
Hardly surprised reading this that Bezos has the more practical plan given the number of Asteroids out there with the rare earths we need and other stuff. musk is all MARS and it's like that doesn't help us with asteroid mining.
Gloomy · F
@BetweenKittensandRiots Musk is pretty much detached from reality rich given his failure with Twitter while Bezos is an actual evil fucker.
@Gloomy Yeah but Bezos is an Evil Genius and musk is just an idiot who got lucky who everyone thinks is smart because he grifted off other peoples actual intellectial work.
revenant · F
Too many mangas around.
val70 · 51-55
@revenant スイスで?
Gloomy · F
@revenant why not 🤷‍♀️ after all working class people are mentioned in my post.

Also if you meant to criticise me for being unrealistic I disagree.
The text discusses the vision billionaires have for the future and steps they have already taken so far.
revenant · F
@Gloomy Take your nose out of the book and go in the garden🙂
Spot on and beautifully written 💙
familyfunguy · 56-60, M
If you didn't get paid to write an article, then I don't understand why you would. (copied?)

I've heard someone say that the movie Moonraker is ever more relevant during these times, but I never saw it. Does anyone agree?
Too late.
Space force is a thing already.
Murka mighty might killed democracy.
We don't get a vote and we can not say it's a war at all!

Booooom!
GeistInTheMachine · 31-35, M
I love this! Very well written. You should write a manifesto. Haha.

I worked for Amazon for a while... Never again. I was treated like human garbage.
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
I am pro-multiplanetary species myself. Earth is always at risk, even without the consumerist carbon footprint. I was actually a supporter of SpaceX endeavors early on. We could all be wiped out by an asteroid or a particularly violent explosion from the sun or any number of things that have nothing to do with what we do here on earth itself. I would have preferred space habitation being a global cooperative effort, but it wasn't. So supporting rich capitalist endeavors was the only real path. This was also before Musk revealed his need for hero-worship and utter inability to share the spotlight with others, and before I knew what shitty conditions he put his employees through. I really want to like his goals, but he is such a garbage person.

We really need The Federation from Star Trek, not The Galactic Empire from Star Wars.
Disposal · 36-40, M
interesting read, though the picture speaks volume
ravenwind43 · 51-55, F
This is funny as hell and I didn't even read it all. 👌
specman · 51-55, M
That sounds like Musk’s and Bezo’s pipe dreams.
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
GeistInTheMachine · 31-35, M
@Emjay Yeah? I'm skeptical of the whole quantum mechanics is so random therefore anything goes, infinite multiverses, space reincarnation thing, but I'm not going to act like I'm above someone intellectually just because they think my ideas are weird.

Continue to stroke yourself off so you can feel superior for being a sperg.

You're just being a vauge pretentious git on purpose.
This message was deleted by its author.

 
Post Comment