Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk have a vision of space that serves the narrow interests of capitalists. But we don’t want to be indentured servants on a Martian colony — we want solar exploration that benefits humanity as a whole.
The space billionaires — Musk and Jeff Bezos foremost among them — have little stake in the well-being of the majority of the population. Their space visions are designed for wealthy people like themselves, with little mention of where the working class would fit in. They’ve built their wealth on exploitation, and their visions of the future are little more than an extension of their present actions.
These space barons made their billions through the exploitation of their workers and came from well-off backgrounds made possible from resource extraction. When digging into their visions for a future in space, it’s clear that they seek to extend these conditions into the cosmos, not challenge them in favor of space exploration for the benefit of all.
The Future They Want Musk and Bezos are the leading drivers of the modern push to privatize and colonize space through their respective companies, SpaceX and Blue Origin. Their visions differ slightly, with Musk preferring to colonize Mars, while Bezos has more interest in building space colonies in orbit.
In 2016, Musk claimed he would begin sending rockets to Mars in 2018. That never happened, but it hasn’t ended his obsession. Musk is determined to make humans a multi-planetary species, framing our choice as either space colonization or the risk of extinction. Bezos says that Earth is the best planet in our solar system, but if we don’t colonize space we doom ourselves to “stasis and rationing.”
These framings serve the interests of these billionaires, and make it seem like colonizing space is an obvious and necessary choice when it isn’t. It ignores their personal culpability and the role of the capitalist system they seek to reproduce in causing the problems they say we need to flee in the first place.
Billionaires have a much greater carbon footprint than ordinary people, with Musk flying his private jet all around the world as he claims to be an environmental champion. Amazon, meanwhile, is courting oil and gas companies with cloud services to make their business more efficient, and Tesla is selling a false vision of sustainability that purposely serves people like Musk, all while capitalism continues to drive the climate system toward the cliff edge. Colonizing space will not save us from billionaire-fueled climate dystopia.
But these billionaires do not hide who would be served by their futures. Musk has given many figures for the cost of a ticket to Mars, but they’re never cheap. He told Vance the tickets would cost $500,000 to $1 million, a price at which he thinks “it’s highly likely that there will be a self-sustaining Martian colony.” However, the workers for such a colony clearly won’t be able to buy their own way. Rather, Musk tweeted a plan for Martian indentured servitude where workers would take on loans to pay for their tickets and pay them off later because “There will be a lot of jobs on Mars!”
Bezos is even more open about how the workforce will have to expand to serve his vision, but has little to say about what they’ll be doing. His plan to maintain economic “growth and dynamism” requires the human population to grow to a trillion people. He claims this would create “a thousand Mozarts and a thousand Einsteins” who would live in space colonies that are supposed to house a million people each, with the surface of Earth being mainly for tourism. Meanwhile, industrial and mining work would move into orbit so as not to pollute the planet, and while he doesn’t explicitly acknowledge it, it’s likely that’s where you’ll find many of those trillion workers toiling for their space overlord and his descendants.
Space Shouldn’t Serve Capitalists In 1978, Murray Bookchin skewered a certain brand of futurism that sought to “extend the present into the future” and desired “multinational corporations to become multi-cosmic corporations.” Much of this future thinking obsesses about possible changes to technology, but seeks to preserve the existing social and economic relations — “the present as it exists today, projected, one hundred years from now,” as Bookchin put it. That’s at the core of the space billionaires’ vision for the future.
Space has been used by past US presidents to bolster American power and influence, but it was largely accepted that capitalism ended at the edge of the atmosphere. That’s no longer the case, and just as past capitalist expansions have come at the expense of poor and working people to enrich a small elite, so too will this one. Bezos and Trump may have a public feud, but that doesn’t mean that their mutual interest isn’t served by a renewed US push into space that funnels massive public funds into private pockets and seeks to open celestial bodies to capitalist resource extraction.
This is not to say that we need to halt space exploration. The collective interest of humanity is served by learning more about the solar system and the universe beyond, but the goal of such missions must be driven by gaining scientific knowledge and enhancing global cooperation, not nationalism and profit-making. Yet that’s exactly what the space billionaires and American authoritarians have found common cause in.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
it is good to recall that many many people cut their ethical teeth on ([i]older[/i]) [b]Star Trek[/b] a post scarcity world, where each got what they needed to be what they choose to be, where starvation and privation were no longer a part of the world.
“The economics of the future is somewhat different. You see, money doesn’t exist in the 24th century. The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in our lives. We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity” — Captain Jean-Luc Picard
in a world without money the only wealth is that which makes things better. so much of what we leanred putteing humans in space, hos come done to earth to make our lives better. just look in an ICU ion any hospital. that tech started in the space program
@SatyrService To me that is just some odd sci fi utopianism. This post scarcity thing... Seems like the far left inverse of the corporate capitalist cancerous mindset of magical infinite growth in a finite world.
And there are too many people on the planet. Something has to give. We cannot keep producing and reproducing forever.
@GeistInTheMachine[b] Ido not deny your concern about the carrying capacity of the planet.[/b] but look what happens when a nations gets richer, they start having fewer children and those children the get the lions share of values and assets. "far left" is a meaningless term, i reject the term as worse than useless. as tho all social and political thought could be classified as only one of two choices. left and right do you know the ORIGIN of that terminology? go study the french revolution where those terms were first used. one of the utopist ideas that space has given us is The entire contents of a critical care unit at any hospital, the ability to predict weather in great detail, to track changes across the planet. These things INCREASE overall wealth, and thus can have effect on that planetary collapse you mentioned. wealth is not money, wealth that that which increases the practical value of human effect life, thriving safety wealth goes up? reproduction is more considered, the quality of those children's lives increase, they get better education and thus create more Real Wealth. as long as you throw the idea of utopia out there. we live in a [i]Oligarchist Utopia[/i] now. ma system that gives complete advantage to those that strip wealth from economies for their own limited personal gain . it is a utopia of theft, and massive privilege. the system is working perfectly and it's result is the destruction of our economic and physical well being. how Utopist is that?
