Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

No to Space Capitalism

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk have a vision of space that serves the narrow interests of capitalists. But we don’t want to be indentured servants on a Martian colony — we want solar exploration that benefits humanity as a whole.

The space billionaires — Musk and Jeff Bezos foremost among them — have little stake in the well-being of the majority of the population. Their space visions are designed for wealthy people like themselves, with little mention of where the working class would fit in. They’ve built their wealth on exploitation, and their visions of the future are little more than an extension of their present actions.

These space barons made their billions through the exploitation of their workers and came from well-off backgrounds made possible from resource extraction. When digging into their visions for a future in space, it’s clear that they seek to extend these conditions into the cosmos, not challenge them in favor of space exploration for the benefit of all.

The Future They Want
Musk and Bezos are the leading drivers of the modern push to privatize and colonize space through their respective companies, SpaceX and Blue Origin. Their visions differ slightly, with Musk preferring to colonize Mars, while Bezos has more interest in building space colonies in orbit.

In 2016, Musk claimed he would begin sending rockets to Mars in 2018. That never happened, but it hasn’t ended his obsession. Musk is determined to make humans a multi-planetary species, framing our choice as either space colonization or the risk of extinction. Bezos says that Earth is the best planet in our solar system, but if we don’t colonize space we doom ourselves to “stasis and rationing.”

These framings serve the interests of these billionaires, and make it seem like colonizing space is an obvious and necessary choice when it isn’t. It ignores their personal culpability and the role of the capitalist system they seek to reproduce in causing the problems they say we need to flee in the first place.

Billionaires have a much greater carbon footprint than ordinary people, with Musk flying his private jet all around the world as he claims to be an environmental champion. Amazon, meanwhile, is courting oil and gas companies with cloud services to make their business more efficient, and Tesla is selling a false vision of sustainability that purposely serves people like Musk, all while capitalism continues to drive the climate system toward the cliff edge. Colonizing space will not save us from billionaire-fueled climate dystopia.

But these billionaires do not hide who would be served by their futures. Musk has given many figures for the cost of a ticket to Mars, but they’re never cheap. He told Vance the tickets would cost $500,000 to $1 million, a price at which he thinks “it’s highly likely that there will be a self-sustaining Martian colony.” However, the workers for such a colony clearly won’t be able to buy their own way. Rather, Musk tweeted a plan for Martian indentured servitude where workers would take on loans to pay for their tickets and pay them off later because “There will be a lot of jobs on Mars!”

Bezos is even more open about how the workforce will have to expand to serve his vision, but has little to say about what they’ll be doing. His plan to maintain economic “growth and dynamism” requires the human population to grow to a trillion people. He claims this would create “a thousand Mozarts and a thousand Einsteins” who would live in space colonies that are supposed to house a million people each, with the surface of Earth being mainly for tourism. Meanwhile, industrial and mining work would move into orbit so as not to pollute the planet, and while he doesn’t explicitly acknowledge it, it’s likely that’s where you’ll find many of those trillion workers toiling for their space overlord and his descendants.

Space Shouldn’t Serve Capitalists
In 1978, Murray Bookchin skewered a certain brand of futurism that sought to “extend the present into the future” and desired “multinational corporations to become multi-cosmic corporations.” Much of this future thinking obsesses about possible changes to technology, but seeks to preserve the existing social and economic relations — “the present as it exists today, projected, one hundred years from now,” as Bookchin put it. That’s at the core of the space billionaires’ vision for the future.

Space has been used by past US presidents to bolster American power and influence, but it was largely accepted that capitalism ended at the edge of the atmosphere. That’s no longer the case, and just as past capitalist expansions have come at the expense of poor and working people to enrich a small elite, so too will this one. Bezos and Trump may have a public feud, but that doesn’t mean that their mutual interest isn’t served by a renewed US push into space that funnels massive public funds into private pockets and seeks to open celestial bodies to capitalist resource extraction.

This is not to say that we need to halt space exploration. The collective interest of humanity is served by learning more about the solar system and the universe beyond, but the goal of such missions must be driven by gaining scientific knowledge and enhancing global cooperation, not nationalism and profit-making.
Yet that’s exactly what the space billionaires and American authoritarians have found common cause in.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
capitalism isn't what will doom space exploration, "wokeism" will...

the first colonists on mars (assuming it ever actually happens) won't be selected based on qualifications, experience, etc.

it'll be a clusterfuck of different ethnicities, queers, transvestites, etc. put there just so some politicians can claim fame for their political agendas (after all, nasa has already made it a point to send a black woman to the moon in the name of "diversity").

and when it inevitably fails and they all die, I'm sure they'll blame it on "white supremacists" 92 million miles away on earth...


As if we don't have enough idiots on this planet to worry about, they want to send them out to other planets to infest them as well? 🤔
Gloomy · F
@wildbill83 If by "wokism" you refer to rainbow Capitalism I agree that is part of the problem.
I'm highly critical of affirmative action but deem it a nescessity as long as women and minorities with the same qialification as their co-workers are not being treated equally.
Do you think queer people or people of different ethnicities do not have qualifications or experience in fields like Astrophysics?
It is nice to feel represented though, so maybe a black woman in space, who I am sure qualified for the mission, might be someone people of color, especially young girls could look up to as a role model?

We do have lots of idiots on this planet and lots of horrible systems in place that we do not need to expand to the Universe but rainbow Capitalism is not based on a belief in equality but purely a stunt to create good optics. After all a majority are in favor of equality as a concept.
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
@Gloomy I'm not saying that those "different people" don't have qualifications in applicable fields; I'm saying that's not the reason they're chosen...

Take our VP for instance... do you think they chose her based on her experience & qualifications? And even it wasn't, and they just wanted a minority female VP...Kamala? seriously?

Pretty much a kick in the face to every minority female in the country, literally thousands of candidates that would be better/more qualified than her (hell, they could scoop some random person off the street that would be a better pick)


No, everything is about identity politics; if the world had a modern day Albert Einstein in female form, and she happened be be a white conservative, she'd be ignored, dismissed, and even ridiculed; she could discover the cure for cancer, or develop working free energy technology; but she'd be discredited & disavowed as a fraud, just because she's white, and her great great great great great great great grandfather owned slaves...

oh, but moochelle obama, isn't she just beautiful? what a perfect example of an empowered black woman? what a role model for all women?
all you have to do is look like patrick ewing in a wig, become a lawyer & get disbarred, wear $10,000 outfits that look like window drapes, and marry some narcissistic loser and hope be becomes president...

Or how about Kamala? all you have to do is be a braindead buffoon that does what your superiors tell you, cackle like a clown on TV, and suck every dick in DC, and you can be woman of the year... what an accomplishment, an example to all women... 🤦‍♂️
Gloomy · F
@wildbill83 Kamala Harris is a perfect example of what I mentioned. Capitalism and Classism trying to put up a nice front so that people support it.

I am going to dismantle your argument with my initial criticism of Capitalism. If anyone, no matter who found a cure for Cancer or develop working free energy they would be shut down before they could make their work public because it goes against the profit interest of the Capitalist elites.

Woman of the year celebrations and other such events are inbred events of rich famous people blowing smoke up each others butts.

I consider women like Angela Davis or Valentina Tereshkova true role models.
Slade · 56-60, M
@Gloomy

[i]Angela Davis[/i]

That commie shit?! 🤮 How many rats are nestled in that planet sized 'fro?
Gloomy · F
@Slade Aww are you triggered doggo?
Slade · 56-60, M
@Gloomy Your kind always comes back with approved talking points. Predictable and stupid

Unlike you, I don't idolize domestic enemies of my country
Gloomy · F
@Slade I'm not american and yeah the way your country works is not only a threat to its own citizens but to the global community.
Slade · 56-60, M
@Gloomy Waaaaaa! cope harder.
Gloomy · F
@Slade cope if not used in slang term means to overcome ones problems and to take action. I am a politically active person therefore yes I do cope.

Keep deluding yourself with backwards patriotism.
Slade · 56-60, M
@Gloomy Who does your hair?!