Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

No to Space Capitalism

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk have a vision of space that serves the narrow interests of capitalists. But we don’t want to be indentured servants on a Martian colony — we want solar exploration that benefits humanity as a whole.

The space billionaires — Musk and Jeff Bezos foremost among them — have little stake in the well-being of the majority of the population. Their space visions are designed for wealthy people like themselves, with little mention of where the working class would fit in. They’ve built their wealth on exploitation, and their visions of the future are little more than an extension of their present actions.

These space barons made their billions through the exploitation of their workers and came from well-off backgrounds made possible from resource extraction. When digging into their visions for a future in space, it’s clear that they seek to extend these conditions into the cosmos, not challenge them in favor of space exploration for the benefit of all.

The Future They Want
Musk and Bezos are the leading drivers of the modern push to privatize and colonize space through their respective companies, SpaceX and Blue Origin. Their visions differ slightly, with Musk preferring to colonize Mars, while Bezos has more interest in building space colonies in orbit.

In 2016, Musk claimed he would begin sending rockets to Mars in 2018. That never happened, but it hasn’t ended his obsession. Musk is determined to make humans a multi-planetary species, framing our choice as either space colonization or the risk of extinction. Bezos says that Earth is the best planet in our solar system, but if we don’t colonize space we doom ourselves to “stasis and rationing.”

These framings serve the interests of these billionaires, and make it seem like colonizing space is an obvious and necessary choice when it isn’t. It ignores their personal culpability and the role of the capitalist system they seek to reproduce in causing the problems they say we need to flee in the first place.

Billionaires have a much greater carbon footprint than ordinary people, with Musk flying his private jet all around the world as he claims to be an environmental champion. Amazon, meanwhile, is courting oil and gas companies with cloud services to make their business more efficient, and Tesla is selling a false vision of sustainability that purposely serves people like Musk, all while capitalism continues to drive the climate system toward the cliff edge. Colonizing space will not save us from billionaire-fueled climate dystopia.

But these billionaires do not hide who would be served by their futures. Musk has given many figures for the cost of a ticket to Mars, but they’re never cheap. He told Vance the tickets would cost $500,000 to $1 million, a price at which he thinks “it’s highly likely that there will be a self-sustaining Martian colony.” However, the workers for such a colony clearly won’t be able to buy their own way. Rather, Musk tweeted a plan for Martian indentured servitude where workers would take on loans to pay for their tickets and pay them off later because “There will be a lot of jobs on Mars!”

Bezos is even more open about how the workforce will have to expand to serve his vision, but has little to say about what they’ll be doing. His plan to maintain economic “growth and dynamism” requires the human population to grow to a trillion people. He claims this would create “a thousand Mozarts and a thousand Einsteins” who would live in space colonies that are supposed to house a million people each, with the surface of Earth being mainly for tourism. Meanwhile, industrial and mining work would move into orbit so as not to pollute the planet, and while he doesn’t explicitly acknowledge it, it’s likely that’s where you’ll find many of those trillion workers toiling for their space overlord and his descendants.

Space Shouldn’t Serve Capitalists
In 1978, Murray Bookchin skewered a certain brand of futurism that sought to “extend the present into the future” and desired “multinational corporations to become multi-cosmic corporations.” Much of this future thinking obsesses about possible changes to technology, but seeks to preserve the existing social and economic relations — “the present as it exists today, projected, one hundred years from now,” as Bookchin put it. That’s at the core of the space billionaires’ vision for the future.

Space has been used by past US presidents to bolster American power and influence, but it was largely accepted that capitalism ended at the edge of the atmosphere. That’s no longer the case, and just as past capitalist expansions have come at the expense of poor and working people to enrich a small elite, so too will this one. Bezos and Trump may have a public feud, but that doesn’t mean that their mutual interest isn’t served by a renewed US push into space that funnels massive public funds into private pockets and seeks to open celestial bodies to capitalist resource extraction.

This is not to say that we need to halt space exploration. The collective interest of humanity is served by learning more about the solar system and the universe beyond, but the goal of such missions must be driven by gaining scientific knowledge and enhancing global cooperation, not nationalism and profit-making.
Yet that’s exactly what the space billionaires and American authoritarians have found common cause in.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
You've been watching too much science fiction
Gloomy · F
@HoraceGreenley We are not too far away from space tourism. Bezos and Musk layed the foundation for the arrival of capitalism in space which is fueled by the expansionary logic of capital accumulation. Outer space serves as a spatial fix, allowing capital to transcend its inherent terrestrial limitations.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy Nothing wrong with capitalism
Gloomy · F
@HoraceGreenley So you are ok with unlimited growth on the back of the working class and our environment?
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy How is growth "on the back of the working class?"
Gloomy · F
@HoraceGreenley Profit making by exploiting the workforce through bad conditions, little pay and an unfair compensation of their labor, in the US no such things as maternity leave or sick days, ....
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy Ok comrade
Gloomy · F
@HoraceGreenley A quote is no substitute for an actual counter argument
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy It is when the predicate argument is ridiculous.
Gloomy · F
@HoraceGreenley https://youtu.be/OvGp3vl9P3o
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy So a whack job makes a video. So what?
Gloomy · F
@HoraceGreenley You could engage with it but apparently you are hell bent on defending the US system and worker laws that are poorly especially in comparison to other countries.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy Try reading Hayek and Milton Friedman and then get back to me.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy I don't see too many places in the world wher people risk their lives to enter the country illegally like they do in the US.

Maybe it's not so bad afterall.
Gloomy · F
@HoraceGreenley only if you read Marx, Keynes and Picketty.
Gloomy · F
@HoraceGreenley Don't know in what way that has anything to do with my argument but maybe because trading an repressive exploitative system for a less repressive exploitative system sounds like a decent deal. Also considering the geographical location and size of the US there are not many different options.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy I have.

Marx was responding to monarchies and not capitalism. Since monarchies were on their way out he reframed his message. But Marxism is an abject failure. It was only embraced by those that wanted to use if for totalitarian political control.

Keynes was ultimately proven wrong by experience and people like Friedman.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy If you lived in America you'd realize how wrong you are
Gloomy · F
@HoraceGreenley Marx whole work is an analysis of the Capitalist system and historical materialist conditions.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@Gloomy Superficially yes, but you must remember Capitalism was in its infancy then and he was really responding to mercantilism.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@HoraceGreenley Have watched Rise of the Billionaires?
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@justanothername No. Never heard of it
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Gloomy marx did raise some good points about capitalism but his answer was to centralise all. He is an advocate for central banks. And although we are told we have "capitalism" its not free market capitalism. We are !iving in a very state controlled version of capitalism. Imo opinion, no good can come from any form of large centralisation of power
Gloomy · F
@gol979 You raise a good point but his intention was that through centralisation people should be able to democratically participate in decision making regarding the economy and the material conditions under which they have to live.

In the US state control is incredibly limited in the economy compared to lets say in Germany for example it is much stronger and I would say society wise Germany is better off. Either way even under a free market, power would be centralized through monopolies and the people on the top of corporate hierarchies with small businesses being unable to compete and being forced out of business I am afraid.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Gloomy us state control is limited? Have you seen the "public" budget of the us?

And no doubt people and institutions would try and monopolise in a free market but you ignore that to have a genuine free market that works on a fair societal level there would have to be a huge change in societal stories/myths. You cant have a free market with government interference. Just one big point, economically, would be no tax. Not a chance society would agree with zero tax, at this point in time.

If this ever happened (commuinty democracy and economics), the "working class" would have the nous to see and have mechanisms in place to render monoplies almost impossible. We are on a journey to our past.....we lived without these controlling terms and ideologies before and can again.
Peaceandnamaste · 26-30, F
@Gloomy Capitalism in a nutshell shown in a cartoon.

A Sad reality.

[media=https://youtu.be/2eXU2p982GQ]