Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

No to Space Capitalism

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk have a vision of space that serves the narrow interests of capitalists. But we don’t want to be indentured servants on a Martian colony — we want solar exploration that benefits humanity as a whole.

The space billionaires — Musk and Jeff Bezos foremost among them — have little stake in the well-being of the majority of the population. Their space visions are designed for wealthy people like themselves, with little mention of where the working class would fit in. They’ve built their wealth on exploitation, and their visions of the future are little more than an extension of their present actions.

These space barons made their billions through the exploitation of their workers and came from well-off backgrounds made possible from resource extraction. When digging into their visions for a future in space, it’s clear that they seek to extend these conditions into the cosmos, not challenge them in favor of space exploration for the benefit of all.

The Future They Want
Musk and Bezos are the leading drivers of the modern push to privatize and colonize space through their respective companies, SpaceX and Blue Origin. Their visions differ slightly, with Musk preferring to colonize Mars, while Bezos has more interest in building space colonies in orbit.

In 2016, Musk claimed he would begin sending rockets to Mars in 2018. That never happened, but it hasn’t ended his obsession. Musk is determined to make humans a multi-planetary species, framing our choice as either space colonization or the risk of extinction. Bezos says that Earth is the best planet in our solar system, but if we don’t colonize space we doom ourselves to “stasis and rationing.”

These framings serve the interests of these billionaires, and make it seem like colonizing space is an obvious and necessary choice when it isn’t. It ignores their personal culpability and the role of the capitalist system they seek to reproduce in causing the problems they say we need to flee in the first place.

Billionaires have a much greater carbon footprint than ordinary people, with Musk flying his private jet all around the world as he claims to be an environmental champion. Amazon, meanwhile, is courting oil and gas companies with cloud services to make their business more efficient, and Tesla is selling a false vision of sustainability that purposely serves people like Musk, all while capitalism continues to drive the climate system toward the cliff edge. Colonizing space will not save us from billionaire-fueled climate dystopia.

But these billionaires do not hide who would be served by their futures. Musk has given many figures for the cost of a ticket to Mars, but they’re never cheap. He told Vance the tickets would cost $500,000 to $1 million, a price at which he thinks “it’s highly likely that there will be a self-sustaining Martian colony.” However, the workers for such a colony clearly won’t be able to buy their own way. Rather, Musk tweeted a plan for Martian indentured servitude where workers would take on loans to pay for their tickets and pay them off later because “There will be a lot of jobs on Mars!”

Bezos is even more open about how the workforce will have to expand to serve his vision, but has little to say about what they’ll be doing. His plan to maintain economic “growth and dynamism” requires the human population to grow to a trillion people. He claims this would create “a thousand Mozarts and a thousand Einsteins” who would live in space colonies that are supposed to house a million people each, with the surface of Earth being mainly for tourism. Meanwhile, industrial and mining work would move into orbit so as not to pollute the planet, and while he doesn’t explicitly acknowledge it, it’s likely that’s where you’ll find many of those trillion workers toiling for their space overlord and his descendants.

Space Shouldn’t Serve Capitalists
In 1978, Murray Bookchin skewered a certain brand of futurism that sought to “extend the present into the future” and desired “multinational corporations to become multi-cosmic corporations.” Much of this future thinking obsesses about possible changes to technology, but seeks to preserve the existing social and economic relations — “the present as it exists today, projected, one hundred years from now,” as Bookchin put it. That’s at the core of the space billionaires’ vision for the future.

Space has been used by past US presidents to bolster American power and influence, but it was largely accepted that capitalism ended at the edge of the atmosphere. That’s no longer the case, and just as past capitalist expansions have come at the expense of poor and working people to enrich a small elite, so too will this one. Bezos and Trump may have a public feud, but that doesn’t mean that their mutual interest isn’t served by a renewed US push into space that funnels massive public funds into private pockets and seeks to open celestial bodies to capitalist resource extraction.

This is not to say that we need to halt space exploration. The collective interest of humanity is served by learning more about the solar system and the universe beyond, but the goal of such missions must be driven by gaining scientific knowledge and enhancing global cooperation, not nationalism and profit-making.
Yet that’s exactly what the space billionaires and American authoritarians have found common cause in.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
Your rendition is a bit off and in no way real-world functional. Military exploitation has been traditionally off-limits to space although that sadly has become in question. Capitalism has always been a part of space exploration and really is what will give it the fuel it needs to achieve the scope of human achievements we all want.

Just like the ideal of capitalism moved empire building, frontier building, and prosperity within the reach of all in the past, so too will it push space exploration past new limits for the benefit of all.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@MarkPaul [quote]Capitalism has always been a part of space exploration [/quote]

So, okay, back before you were born, there was this place called the Soviet Union...
Gloomy · F
@MarkPaul I never said it is real world functional yet but private companies and billionaires try to create a foundation for it and profit seems to come before exploration and the common good.
Capitalism hasn't been the driving force. Curiosity has been the driving force and got financed during the space race.

The ideal of Capitalism never moved anything in the past. Empires and buildings were moved by slaves in feudal times and by exploited masses under Capitalism.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@basilfawlty89 And, back when you should have been learning about such things, the Soviet Union lost the space race, in part, because of ... capitalism.
Gloomy · F
@MarkPaul not because of Capitalism but because of Korolevs death
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Gloomy You make it seem that "capitalism" is some evil, breathing monster. It's a tool. A way for a society to move forward and a way that has a pretty astounding track record. Does it need to be moderated? Yes. Should it be worshipped? Of course not. But, it builds the resources to satisfy and sustain human curiosity. Without it, we would just be posting idealistic rants on the Internet (which wouldn't exist without capitalism either).
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@MarkPaul um no... Americans just landed on the moon. Meanwhile the USSR had the first person in space, the first woman in space and US astronauts docked at the Soyuz station. How did you win the space race?

That's like saying you lot won WWII ehrh you know full well the liberation of Poland and Germany was under the Red Army.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Gloomy You have a lot of space history to learn, young lady. And, take off your rose and red tinted glasses.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@MarkPaul the internet wasn't invented by capitalists either, it was government and university funded.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@basilfawlty89 You are the first out of the starting gate in a foot race. I suppose, in addition to a participation trophy, you want a first place ribbon for being first out of the gate... even though you came in last at the finish line.
Gloomy · F
@MarkPaul It's a system we no longer need and that should have been regulated a long time ago. Also industrialization came at a great cost.

Like you said it's a tool of organization. The people are who build the resources and put in the labor and energy and knowlegde.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@basilfawlty89 ... by capitalist and democratically oriented governments supported by and through capitalism.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@MarkPaul lol? Saying "we did one thing so we're superior when the other side did more" is far more participation trophy than winning most of the first placed on space.

Next you're gonna claim you're a qualified historian and astronomer too.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@MarkPaul state university and taxation isn't capitalism. Try again.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@basilfawlty89 LMAO... and you're going to claim I'm not because you're on the Internet and you have no proof of anything.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@basilfawlty89 State Universities get their funding from _______________? Taxation comes from ________________? Keep trying until you are able to do better.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Gloomy · F
@MarkPaul also how come you believe there is no profit under Socialism? Workers owning the means of production or the state owning the means of production leads to profit as well and taxation is not exclusive to Capitalism.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Gloomy It never works out that way. Socialism as a way of life is a fool's dream. Sure, socialistic applications not only make sense, but can help a society thrive. Consider public roadways, social safety nets, etc. as examples. And, when applied under a capitalist umbrella, everyone benefits. But, "too much" socialism like "too much capitalism" is no good. It becomes destructive.

Workers owning the means of production is a textbook definition of socialism. It doesn't really mean anything in practical terms. As a worker, knowing I own 1/10 of 1/4 of 1/5 of an assembly line doesn't make me feel empowered. It makes me feel like a cog.
Do you want to feel like a cog?
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@basilfawlty89 And workers and the middle class (it's interesting you consider those 2 separate things) earn their income from [u]capitalism[/u]. And, that's what paid for the Internet, space exploration that includes the moon landing, exploration of Mars, etc.

You know, you can choose [u]not[/u] to be an idiot. How would you get started on that.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Gloomy It's a system that will carry us far into the future and expand the bounty of Western Democracy.