Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should democratic states and counties pay welfare to republican states and counties

Democratic states and counties are in generell signficantly more educated and wealthier than republican ones thus federal and state taxes payed in by democratic states and counties subsidies republican ones is this fair.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
If you organise it on a federal level, then "states" aren't important. You tax individuals according to what ever regime is agreed upon, and then individuals that are eligble for welfare get what they should. Where those individuals live is of no importance, neither is their political affiliation. It's just nation taking care of it's inhabitants, ussually with the goal to create equal opportunities for its citizens.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Ynotisay You can keep saying that I'm wrong, but I'm still waiting on why I'm wrong. Just saying "you are wrong" doesn't really advance the conversation. And pointing to some abstract idea like "being diffrent" doesn't make it anymore concrete.

But I'm afraid that once you are going to explain how your governement works, we are going to come to a point where the federal governement raises a treasury by taxing some entity that is under it's rule. And then that some entities are eligble of getting a part of the federal pot, and thus the federal governement distributes it. The moment we come to that point I'll ask you if that isn't what I've been talking about from the start of the conversation. And if you say "no" and you can't explain why, I'm going to laugh my socks off. Not because it's funny, but because of the incredible sadness that is just hiding around the corner. But I'll give you a fair chance to explain to me that it's not that way, but don't make me loose my sox. Thanks.
Ynotisay · M
@Kwek00 Dude? I could argue with specifics all day long. But it's pointless. And to tell you the truth? I tend to get a little fired by outsiders telling me the way my town, state and country operates. Or should. So maybe you need to stay in your lane.

Side note. Your country owes the U.S. about $470 million. Maybe you can focus up on having your country pay us back. Thanks in advance.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Ynotisay Then why are you even here? You should have fucked off the moment you read that I was from Belgium. You don't have to be here.

I guess you are not going to the specifics of what we are talking about, but we are going to do specifics about things we aren't talking about. Not because you are unable too of course, but because these conversations turn you into tribalistic dipshit which makes it hard for you to hold up a conversation. I understand, good luck with your life.
Republicans stress that people should "pull themselves up by [b]their own[/b] bootstraps" so they wouldn’t possibly accept money from "liberals". ☺️

Would they ? 😉
@bijouxbroussard They would! absolutely! Nothing Republicans like more than getting money on the backs of those less well off!!
@SHREKPage Ironic that so many of those less well off are Republicans now.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@bijouxbroussard Thats actually a pivotal point that most people miss in this discussion. The Republican theory is one of short term profit for a few, but long term decline of the whole. The more progressive platform of the Democrats does tend to grown the whole through developing the infrastructure and educating the workforce. Thie encourages new industries to move to the area, even if they have to pay more taxes, because they can draw on local skills and sell into a better local market.😷
It's done everyday. One of the largest hand-out grabbing states in America is Texas. look it up. Check this..."According to MoneyGeek, just over a quarter of Texas’ budgetary revenues come from federal monies, and its federal tax dollar return is $0.88 for every dollar."

In other words Texas' hand is out so far getting socialism from Uncle Sam....for every dollar paid in taxes to the government.....Texas gets back .88 cents of it back. Yet they are the state that screams the loudest how bad socialsim is. That is the sound of hypocrisy at work.
Ynotisay · M
@anythingoes477 You nailed it. And a great example is how their power grid failed, due to their own policies, and the federal government was forced to declare a major disaster which their 'real 'murican' governor screamed for. That unleashed a shitload of taxpayer dollars to help. Pretty much sums it up.
@Ynotisay Another example.....Kentucky. 8 times Rand Paul has gone into a tirade in front of congress and TV cameras about socialism when other states had natural disasters and FEMA and Federal Aid was suggested. Where was he when the 200 mile tornado hit Kentucky?? In Congress telling them how great socialism is...IN KENTUCKY. McTurtle has cancelled and trash canned 36 bills sent to him...PASSED...from the House that deal with climate change. Then a 200 mile tornado hits Kentucky...IN DECEMBER. Both of those hypocrites immediately had their hands out. Climate change denial had fingerprints all over the damage in Kentucky....but if a flood hits another state...or a forest fire hit again in a Blue state.........get ready to hear more of their bullshit about "the gov should never help them...screw them...let those Blue states figure it out without socialism."
Ynotisay · M
@anythingoes477 Yep. You're on the money with that one. Where it gets tough for me is that there's a little bit of "Well, screw Kentucky. You get what you deserve and vote for." But that's not fair to people in need. I'd like to think that people are smart to recognize that hypocrisy and those lies and act accordingly. But they don't. I think they've been systematically brainwashed to act against their own best interests. And we all end up paying for that.
Topping the list of welfare recipients is the great state of Kentucky, where, per capita, the state receives an average of $14,000 more than they pay in taxes! That's for every man, woman, and child, so a family of four benefits to the tune of $56,000!

In 2019, The excess of federal payments to KY (after subtracting all KY federal payments) was [i]$63 billion[/i] - about 30% of the state's GDP that same year. In other words, KY's biggest industry, by far, is receiving various forms of federal payments!

Yes, there are 6000 coal miners and 5000 in the distilling industry, but that's all dwarfed by the 250,000 working in health care & social assistance. The social safety net in Kentucky is alive and well, busily netting that $14,000 per capita.

These details come from economist Paul Krugman's 12/14 column.
Ynotisay · M
Already do. Blue states tend to be donor states with their taxes. They give more than they receive. Red states suck at the government teat. They take more than they give. The irony is fascinating to me.
Significantly more productive, too!


Yeah, I think we should continue to pay them welfare. But it would be nice if once in a while they would say "thank you."
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues This picture shows the counties though... not states. Like in the blue part you see:

Harris, TX
Tarrant, TX
Finnelas, FL
Duval, FL

And in the red parts the few things you can make out are:

Nassay NY
Suffolk, NY
Kern, CA

Which sould smash the illusion that some people in here create, that a state is either homogenous democratic or homogenous republican. But if the conversation goes on about the county, which is also asked, then you get even more of a divide, and we are talking about another level of power. And if we are going to look even more closely, on the indiviudal leve, we'll probably find red and blue voters in all of the counties too. Because they are ussually also not homogenous. As I said in my message on this post: [i]"[...] there is nothing more destructive for a welfare system organised on a federal level, then citizens and political actors talking about specific groups or territory that get more then others."[/i].

The language that I find in this post [i](not from you, but from others)[/i], is the same language that is used in Catalonia (Spain) and Flanders (Belgium) by groups that use it as an an argument to secede their "state" from their federal governement.
BlueVeins · 22-25
Yeah, they already do. Democrat-run states are donor states on average. The relationship between income and political affiliation is fairly weak at the state level, to my best understanding, but it's definitely there.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Its a double edged sword. As this redistribution of wealth is a form of Socialism, I would think the Republican states would refuse to accept the money. But on the other hand, the Democratic states as progressive really are obliged to offer it up. In the long term it is to their benefit not to have a basket case economy in the next state. You dont want that kind of refugee problem.😷
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
This is the reverse of most countries, certainly traditionally.

It just shows how much the culture war dominates US politics that working class white people lean so much to the right.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Burnley123 And speaks even more that the rest of the world used to look to America for social leadership and now most shake their heads and turn away.😷
firefall · 61-69, M
@Burnley123 There's no shortage or working class tories, either.
how did it work out for California,with the Dems in office,people leaving to go to the Republican states,,🐰
@jackrabbit10 Texas has been fucked up for years, just another one of the Shit Hole States
@independentone As soon as enough Californians move there, Texas will improve.
@LeopoldBloom Texas is hot, humid and has bugs. Weather sucks there
They already do. Blue states pay more in taxes than they receive back from the federal government. They basically subsidize the red states.
No we shouldn't be forced to support the lazy deadbeats in the red states. If they can't be productive and support themselves, it isn't my problem nor should I be forced to support them.

I think the productive States (Blue States) should triple the price of services and goods for conservatives, might as well profit as much as possible from the poor, white trash republicans.
ron122 · 41-45, M
Most people on welfare are democrats.
@ron122 Yet most Red States take more in Federal money than they pay in. Seems Red States are all welfare states.
@ron122 In fact that is not true....or even close. The highest per capita county..97% on welfare is in Kentucky. Two counties over from where McTurtle lives. They are his District....and yet when he rants how bad socialism is...they vote for him again. Too clueless and uneducated to know their handouts is what McTurtle wants to end. Look up Red states vs Blue states for welfare dollars. Do it. Learn something.
Eternity · 26-30, M
Honestly the USA should split into 3 separate countries with a shared military.

The Republicans can have the deep south, the Democrats can have the Northern most states, and the moderates get the states in the middle.

That way we can just see whose policies make for the best quality of life.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@Eternity You'd think it'd make more sense to split them into west coast, midwest/south, and northeast, since that's roughly how the political parties are divied up as-is. I somewhat doubt it'd help much with testing policies, considering that all kinds of countries already have policies that either party is advocating for. If that's your angle, I'd go one step further and enshrine more states' rights into law. Get a whole political laboratory going.
@Eternity The divide isn’t red and blue states, but blue cities and red rural areas.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
Given that the educated sophisticated democrats can't keep a civilized society intact those 'uneducated bumpkin' republicans will have to continue to financially support the democrats failed policies.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
? The worse school districts in the US are in heavy duty Democrat areas. As are the zip codes in the deepest economic despair.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
They already do.
Spotpot · 41-45, M
@AthrillatheHunt But democratis signficantly out of proportion support republican failed policies
RedBaron · M
What a stupid concept.

 
Post Comment