Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
MarieUK · 36-40, F
the workers own the means
of production now but we sold
it for a wage too Employers

That's always turned out well 😂😂😂

I'll stick to being moderate Labour thanks.
SW-User
@BritishFailedAesthetic I agree. The selling off of council housing to private landlords in many countries is part of the reason that so many people are struggling.
@SW-User Couldn't agree more, and more need to be built, to be fair @Gloomy did a great post on this.
SW-User
@BritishFailedAesthetic I shall read it
revenant · F
Will never happen. Even animals have hierarchies
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@val70 founder of the British labour party and wrote a biography of Karl marx
val70 · 51-55
@Guitarman123 Yes, that the Independent Labour Party in 1893. Ramsey Macdonald had the advantage of him because Hardie was always happier in nationwide agitation rather than in the pedestrian detail of House of Commons politics
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@val70 indeed so which was why hardie stepped down which although understandable was a shame as he's a great figure
KioCo · M
Yes, because we know how that ends up each time its attempted xD
KioCo · M
@Gloomy we were talking about literal animals. Social Darwinism is the misconception that people are able to corectly determine what is an evolutionary advantage, which we cannot.

Evolution is based on reproduction, while they tend to add their own subjective standards and preted they are in line with evolution.

And then there is the godawful fact that historically genocide has been the go to method for conquest. We are the first generation that have rightfully rejected that.

An example of this is the slave trade. At least an equitable amount of slaves were captured from Africa and sent to the Arab peninsula as were sent over the atlantic. However only the Americas (all of them) still have their descendents there today. The reason is that the Arab slave trade of the time only dealt with castrated slaves. (Genocide)

And this was pretty much the norm until not long ago. Its a very bitter pill but one that is true nonetheless.

Finally, as I mentioned before cooperation is only applicable within tribes or other smaller organisational forms. Kropotkin has done nothing to prove why this would be applicable to large populations, and especially not ones that have different cultural characteristics.
@KioCo [quote] An example of this is the slave trade. At least an equitable amount of slaves were captured from Africa and sent to the Arab peninsula as were sent over the atlantic. However only the Americas (all of them) still have their descendents there today. The reason is that the Arab slave trade of the time only dealt with castrated slaves. (Genocide)
[/quote]

The Arabs and the Europeans raped enslaved women. This is why several of the slaves’ descendants have both European and North African DNA.
empanadas · 31-35, M
@KioCo [quote]However only the Americas (all of them) still have their descendents there today. The reason is that the Arab slave trade of the time only dealt with castrated slaves. (Genocide) [/quote] have you ever met a Yemeni before? There are many black communities in the middle east like in Iran and even Palestine that come from descendants of slaves. You are referring mainly the ottomans because alot of Arabs mixed with the slaves, by choice or without choice. The ottomans mostly did the castration.
deadgerbil · 22-25
What will the armed forces look like in a state turned stateless?
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@deadgerbil ok sunshine, if that helps you feel better about yourself. I advocate no only for workers owning the means of production but a Co operative society where we all work together to improve our conditions and way of living.
deadgerbil · 22-25
@Guitarman123 ok guess what 💀 I want improved conditions of living and less corporate greed, for the workers to actually benefit, environmental protections, etc too. And no, a country adopting a stateless no military 'ideal' is not realistic at all. IF Ukraine were to do this tomorrow, all of its new stateless people would be taken over.

I'm not going to sit here and have some mf'er put words in my mouth that I never said. No patience at all. Clear as day that I never said that Ukraine rn is socialist or that Putin is. You can't read(?), on your effing self to sort yourself out.

What a effin inbred headache you are 💀
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@deadgerbil I'm not saying it will happen overnight,unlikely will even happen in my lifetime but it's still an idea I support as regular working class people are struggling to survive in this current system and have done so for decades but thanks to spectacular images and entertainment media we are too pacified to attempt to make any kind of changes for the better.
How about you take the necessary steps to get there? Democratization. Lolz. Democracy and Murka? You definitely wants one only!
Too bad "nobody" is with us on that. "Here" in "online reality". We're never going towards democracy. Jokes rule. Memes stick it to the Marxists.
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@Roundandroundwego put workers in control of the means of production and work towards Co operative societies
@Guitarman123 well, if people agreed that we have to take control away from the corporatocracy, they'd have a lot of problems in their way, lots of insurmountable issues to first deal with on the road to social democracy, and I doubt they're talking about the stateless future first.
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@Roundandroundwego nothing is achieved overnight nor goes smoothly. Most people by their nature aren't caged animals and like to have control over their own destinies and in This current system that just isnt the case
Heartlander · 80-89, M
And also take all the risks of failure?
helenS · 36-40, F
@Gloomy [quote]Arendt was a vile and selfish individual [/quote]
Are you sure you don't confuse her with Ayn Rand?
Gloomy · F
@helenS Yes I did sorry
helenS · 36-40, F
@Gloomy 🌷
Alyosha · 31-35, M
And how will you do that?
@Alyosha it's important to know. Democracy is a phase, and keeping class systems from being a problem certainly takes work. We have to work today for equality this evening.
Adogslife · 61-69, M
Thanks, but I’d rather control my own success. There’s no such thing as a classless society.
Adogslife · 61-69, M
@Guitarman123 Then it wouldn’t be classless my friend.
@Adogslife the caste system should not be a burden on everything and everyone.
Adogslife · 61-69, M
@Roundandroundwego Ok, so if you were one of the Dalits/Untouchables, you would be ok? You wouldn’t be a burden?

So you believe it’s possible to be blissfully poor?

I don’t.
val70 · 51-55
It's a dream. Make Darwin disappear and you'll perhaps have a chance
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@val70 I'm not saying he's wrong, I'm saying that's not the only way that humans and animals have survived for as long as we have
SW-User
@val70 making Darwin disappear, won’t change the science.
val70 · 51-55
@SW-User I meant it as mental exercise. Like ban out of our decisions
Eternity · 26-30, M
States and classes arent the issue, it is the way wealth and power and property are aligned in our current societal structures.

Believe it or not you can have societies where wealth and property do not go hand in hand with power.

The indigenous tribes that lived in the southern portion of what is now California were a great example of this
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@Eternity what you're reffering to is mutual aid
Eternity · 26-30, M
@Guitarman123 that, and having a culture where greed is shameful, inheritance doesn't exist, and honing of the self through hard work and discipline is the paragon of virtue.
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@Eternity or was held at bay better thanks to mutual aid being stronger
helenS · 36-40, F
It's interesting that Dr. Marx [u]never[/u] published a "theory of classes". There's chapter 52 in vol. 3 of his "Capital", but that's just one page, ending in "[Here the manuscript breaks off.]"
Of course, vol. 3 is based on manuscripts which were compiled by Engels. It's not something Dr. Marx published himself.
ravenhill · M
no thanks, let's not, i am happy with how things are.
Sidewinder · 36-40, M
There was a sociopolitical movement like that long ago in Russia. It was called Communism. Established by Anti-Czarist revolutionaries who were collectively known as Bolshieviks.
Sidewinder · 36-40, M
@Roundandroundwego I was just telling what I know.
@Sidewinder this audio gets right to the history of where communism actually was founded.
https://youtu.be/Ie2YI79d-Rg.
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@Roundandroundwego great book
Ceinwyn · 26-30, F
Classless yes. Stateless no.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
We have no class!
SnowedIn · 46-50, M
This only works when all parties agree. Many classes don't want to give up their class. So you end up beating people into submission and forcing them to agree with the stateless classless society.
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@SnowedIn that's same as saying people like to be exploited and follow a hierarchy
hunkalove · 61-69, M
Si, Comrade!
gol979 · 41-45, M
Sloganised Doublespeak. Unless you mean voluntaryism? Which imo is the natural societal make up for humans, who are now (mostly) beyond instinct
MarineBob · 56-60, M
Yes, because if the company doesn't make money the worker doesn't
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@MarineBob even if a company makes money in today's society, no guarantee that workers wages will improve
Gloomy · F
@MarineBob The workers will be the company
ArcticDave · M
No chance comrade. Free markets and free markets expression are the way forward.
Musicman · 61-69, M
Even in your one world government the people will never own the means of production.
after you finish toking, pass it around.
SW-User
We already live in a classless society
Like2play · M
What part of Russia are you from?
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@Like2play when did Russia have a stateless and classless society?
SW-User
Let's all love one another.

😀
RedBaron · M
How boring.
DDonde · 31-35, M
Workers can and should own more of production but totally stateless and classless is a pipe dream.
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@DDonde maybe so but it's better than just accepting things as they are
DDonde · 31-35, M
@Guitarman123 We absolutely shouldn't accept things as they are I agree with that
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@DDonde I have no doubt that such a society where no state exists won't happen in my lifetime but if I can do my bit to improve my corner of the world then that's a start
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment