Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
DesiDudeJ04 · 26-30, M
Ban is never an option in the case of books. Chaos spreads from misunderstandings.

Renaci · 36-40
@Thevy29 True. I have books that offend me but I love books too much to ban even those.
These days remind me of a time when I was in middle school. My mom was a member of the public library’s parent group. They would read books to determine the age group to place them in.

I had one of the books at school that I would read on the playground. It was a ‘coming of age’ about a young girl being raised by her sister in poverty. There was a scene about here sister having her baby in their bathroom because they couldn’t afford to go to the hospital and the baby died. She cleaned up the bathroom while here sister buried the baby.

I was called to the principal’s office and was met by him and and a teacher. I had accidentally left my book in a classroom. They started yelling at me about being trash to their school and asked me where I got it. When I told them from my mother gave it to me and what she was doing, they stared blankly at me speechless, handed me my book, and sent me back to class.

My guess is that’s all those two read…completely out of context.

I am so thankful my mom shared that book with me…every book with me. More so due to the fact that she was never a big reader. BUT she knew I was and had the good sense to understand her child more than a narrow-minded school system did.
WanderlustCat · 36-40, M
Historically book bans/burnings have served no purpose other than controlling free thought. They are almost always politically/ theologicaly motivated.
@WanderlustCat And just call more attention to the books banned!
exexec · 61-69, C
Purpose? In states like Texas, it gets a politician a lot of votes from some people.
TheGreatestEver123 · 41-45, M
@exexec if you weren’t such an ideologue, you would have the intellectual curiosity to look for yourself.
exexec · 61-69, C
@TheGreatestEver123 Whoa! You don't know a thing about me, so let's take it easy on being judgmental. I have nothing else to say to you.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
akindheart · 61-69, F
I think you might have missed the point. as long as the parents are buying them, ok but to have them open for others who might not be ready for them, not ok.
Puppycat23 · F
@akindheart I don't think there is a point. Instead of banning a book, wouldn't it better to not read it?
akindheart · 61-69, F
@Puppycat23 i think this has to do with children and having inappropriate books with porn in it. I saw a video that an 11 year old was reading from a book in his library. it was very sexually explicit with bad language. he didn't know until he checked it out. that was what i was trying to say.
Well the point of banning books in public libraries is to get people used to the idea of book bans in general. Eventually, if the Republicans control congress, they'll start banning books from private companies too.
@Musicman So here is what actually happened.
The company that owns Dr Seuss' work decided to stop publishing five of his books. That's all. Nobody banned those books, you can still buy them online, the company just isn't making new copies of those five books anymore. And it had nothing to do with the Democrats. This was a decisions made by a private company.

See, this is what happens when you get your news from right-wing media.
Musicman · 61-69, M
@BohemianBoo LMAO!!! 😂😂😂 You can't possibly actually believe that! Have a goodnight.
@Musicman Show me evidence that the Democrats banned Dr Suess books or STFU.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
Most importantly, who should exercise control over what others read? Saying parents need to decide is just another way to promote fascism. If the parents aren't exposed to literature when they are taught, how can they then decide what their children should read? Most parents that are opposed to some books, admit to never having read the very books they seem to ban. I remember struggling over Huck Finn, delving deeply into it. Have those than want it banned? There are so many "banned" books that are fundamental to education.
Disgustedman · 61-69, M
Well that's to let the people who want their children to read about gay sex and oral sex and maps and other perversions so they can this way the Christian family doesn't have to deal with that garbage.
Disgustedman · 61-69, M
@ArishMell Google is your friend
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Disgustedman Not sure about it being anyone's "friend"! :-)

Basically I was just explaining why I think the book bans totally wrong and dangerous, probably politically-driven.
Renaci · 36-40
@Disgustedman The "christian family" is already full of MAPS. They don't want children reading about pedos cause they want them to fall victim to church sex abuse easier.

"You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye." - Matt 7:5
Northwest · M
This applies to libraries, schools and public institutions. Don't tell DeSantis about the Amazon loophole though. Or the whole Internet thing.
Musicman · 61-69, M
Book bans are usually by the Government. The purpose is to keep people from finding out the truth about something they want to oppress.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@jshm2 criminality? As in exploring ideas?
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@jshm2 All that is true to a point but are all the proscribed books written to encourage breaking the law by inciting, say, racism or violence, or burglary or drugs-dealing? Or they proscribed merely for showing social views not to the censors' personal tastes or agreement? Difficult, delicate social questions have always been a mainstay of the arts, and trying to hide them does not help them.

If the latter, if this about the bans in some American state education systems I am very surprised it can goes as far as a massive great American company like Amazon being affected or taking any notice of it - except perhaps by launching a legal action against the ban. If it did, that would probably become very awkward and embarrassing abroad for the self-styled "Leader of the Free World".

What would be the position of someone in such a State buying it privately, in a shop, if not locally then perhaps in another State, or on a holiday abroad? Or receiving it as a gift? Or existing ownership? What would - or could - a school do if some pupil or parent tells it, "Oh we've all read that at home and think it's a great book!"

.
It goes beyond the USA, by also affect the reputations and livelihoods of foreign writers.

Some while ago when all this blew up, a British author among the proscribed ones said in an essay she gave about it on BBC Radio Four that one US writer has offered to buy bona-fide students their own copies for them!

I forget writer and title and I have not read her book that incensed the censors, but it is about, or at least contains a theme of, the love between two women of colour.

.

I wonder if [i]1984[/i], [i]Fahrenheit 451[/i] and [i]The Handmaid's Tale [/i]are proscribed - for their censorship and control themes?
I think the school book bans are done by right-wingers to make it easier to groom kids into the right-wing mindset. They need to stamp out compassion for people of other colors and other ways of life in any way they can.

Some books banned in Florida schools
[b]https://www.theledger.com/story/news/state/2022/04/26/florida-school-book-bans-these-library-titles-being-reviewed-school-boards/9542938002/[/b]

"From July 2021 to June 2022, PEN America’s Index of School Book Bans lists 2,532 instances of individual books being banned, affecting 1,648 unique book titles."

[b]https://pen.org/report/banned-usa-growing-movement-to-censor-books-in-schools/[/b]

Also see https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/book-bans-florida-public-schools/


I don't know WHY Florida banned so many math books, but they did.
[quote] May 6, 2022 — A Florida Department of Education review of 132 math books has led to the banning of more than 40% of them.[/quote]
[b]https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/news/2022/05/06/florida-bans-more-than-40--oif-math-books-after-review[/b]


Florida passed a law in 2022 that said educators could be prosecuted for 3rd degree felony if they display any unapproved books.

And nobody knows what's been approved.

So the only safe way for educators to stay out of jail is to HIDE ALL THE BOOKS!!!


ArishMell · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues Well, the Binomial Theorem is very subversive and Pi just porn you know...

Seriously though, are the maths books simply caught in a queue caused by assumed guilt making [i]all[/i] books wrong until "approved" (by whom on what criteria?); and perhaps some sort of "approving" by subject?

Consequently having gone through the fiction, the next category just happened to be Mathematics? So perhaps Geography or French text-books would be the next?

Do the censors explain their choices?

When you see this going on in a supposedly liberal (small 'l') nation from a foreign but also democratic (small 'd'!) country, it really is baffling. It's the sort of thing you'd associate with North Korea, which does allow a tiny chink of Western literature in, apparently including plays by Ibsen and Shakespeare, and the Harry Potter novels!

Schools, public libraries and book-sellers here (UK) do try to ensure children are not exposed to books that really are not suitable for them, but they don't resort to politically-driven, draconian laws on displaying and selling them.

I can just imagine what my rather larger-than-life 5th-Form Maths teacher would have said about banning maths books!
@ArishMell I don't know why they banned so many math books. Suggesting the Earth wasn't created in 4004 BC? Who knows.

For school libraries, Florida has created a new system that might be called "freedom of suppression." If a parent complains about a book to someone at a school, that school will remove the book.

BTW, teachers are fleeing Florida in droves. When DeSantis took office they had 2000 open jobs; now it's almost 11,000. FL even changed the rules so not all teachers need a college degree, but they're still desperate for teachers. SAD!!
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues I followed the link you cited, and it would seem some of the books' exercises are politically biased.... In the wrong way, or at all? Plus one of the authors has the wrong political views.

The journalist also said they object to referring to climate-change. Maybe from fear, I thought....

The guv'nors also dislike something they call "social-emotional learning". I don't know what they mean by that. I wonder if they do?

I wonder if other States are similarly losing teachers; but looking at that map, where can they go?

Freedom of suppression..... So it seems. It's your land and only you who live there have the right to sort it out, but from a foreign country it all looks very worrying indeed.
TrashCat · M
They start book bans by denying access to young people. This is to control what they learn. Florida and Texas are perfect examples. They want children to learn that the US civil war was about states rights. What they don't want children to know is that it was about states rights [b]to[/b] [b]have slaves. [/b]
Slade · 56-60, M
@TrashCat Buffoon
TrashCat · M
@Slade Cry about it! 😂
In melodramatic tones, novels such as Fahrenheit 451
underscore the hazards of descending that slippery slope of censorship:

ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SethGreene531 Sorry Seth - I assume you're making a joke but don't get it :-)

I realised the first photo is from that film but the little video clip means nowt.

Different countries maybe so I don't know your inspiration?
@ArishMell No joke intended. Banning books in this modern age, is tantamount to the campaign of burning that was carried out in this 1966 fiction, Fahrenheit 451.
An act intended to protect and control citizens; has real life parallels to efforts by the Gestapo in WWII, and the NVM against intellectuals and artists in Vietnam.

And the ongoing campaign today, in schools and public libraries. Against LQBTQ, and religiously controversial publications.


Thankfully, Independent and online self publishing houses do not bend as easily to the push for censorship. Their content is readily accessible and disseminated world wide. They are not bound by regions.
Ensuring free thought and expression remains intact.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
therighttothink50 · 56-60, M
reading off of a screen is extremely detrimental to one’s eyes.

Have you heard of the Carrington event? It happened and will undoubtedly happen again. Not to mention another factor, the possibility of an EMP occurrence/attack upon our electrical grid.

When you are raised by google, you think technology is the answer to everything.

Unfortunately that is often a real misconception and fallacy that most people I pray don’t ever come to realize is true. if this electrical grid ever goes down for a long period of time, I fear most people won’t be able to handle it.
Mcmarie90 · 31-35, F
There is a difference between banning a book and restricting it's access to minors in a place where the parent can't control it.
Renaci · 36-40
@Mcmarie90 Then by all means continue to raise victims... I mean children.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
Absolutely no reason other than to say the book was removed from one specific location.

Like you say, you can order them on Amazon at your convenience.
exchrist · 31-35
The point, I'm pretty sure, Is to stop the next generation from gaining access to it so it isn't even a thing in a few generations
Fishy · 36-40, F
But... How long will it be available on Amazon after the ban? 🤔
Slade · 56-60, M
@Fishy Forever
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
Dont know but lefties tried to ban TOM SAWYER
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Musicman but not officially banned, and most school boards are non-political. Please cite the ones you are reporting, Dr. Seuss?
Musicman · 61-69, M
@samueltyler2 Nope! No matter what I sent you, you would never believe it. Google it yourself. I am not going to spend the night having a argument.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Musicman as usual, you made a claim and refuse to cite your sources. In fact the state of VA clarified that the Loudin schools did not ban Dr. Seuss. What happened was that the publisher stated it will stop printing some of the books that the publisher and author's family felt might be called racist. You can find the clarification in many media, printed and electronic. I am not spending time countering your claims, based on false interpretation of what actually happened.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Not many children will seek out or have the ability to purchase on amazon.

We don't want them in the school library.
Puppycat23 · F
@MasterLee They are. However, I'm not going to argue. Don't like what I said, then move on.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
Do not underestimate the accessibility difference between free and $5

There is no total book ban. It is just removal from publicly free access via libraries.

That isn't really a new thing. Books deemed inappropriate or dangerous have always been kept out of public and school libraries. The argument is really about what constitutes inappropriate and dangerous material versus what is being kept out of libraries as a way to reduce exposure to ideas as a means of cultural erasure and ostracization.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@ViciDraco in some places, a bookstore can be fined for selling a banned book.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Fahrenheit 451
@NightsWatch If the next book burning involves burning that book, I hope we'll at least enjoy the humor of the situation.
@BohemianBoo well at least we're all on the right page
ArishMell · 70-79, M
The would-be censors are probably just trying to make a point, think they are Doing Good and like to make themselves look oh-so-virtuous.

I expect these people secretly know they can't stop anyone buying their own copies, but are hardly likely to admit that and back down.
Slade · 56-60, M
You completely destroyed your premise of a book ban when you admitted the books can be acquired anywhere.

HAHAHAHAHAHA
Puppycat23 · F
@Slade Well yeah, that's what I'm getting at. So what's even the point of people banning books when those books can be acquired anywhere?
Slade · 56-60, M
@Puppycat23

[b]no books are banned if you can get them anywhere[/b]. A restriction within a school is called that by hysterical ninnies (and mendacious troublemakers) to ridiculously make Nazi terror comparisons.

In the early blog days we'd invoke Godwin's Law on those fools and they'd be deemed the thread loser immediately.

There are no book bans in the USA. Stop this nonsense
Puppycat23 · F
@Slade
[quote]no books are banned if you can get them anywhere[/quote]

Then what's the point of banning them? My former high school banned two LGBT books from their library when they didn't have to do that.
Renkon · 36-40, M
What are some of the banned books? Just being curious?
Renkon · 36-40, M
@samueltyler2 Thank you
Puppycat23 · F
@Renkon
Gender Queer: A Memoir by Maia Kobabe
All Boys Aren't Blue by George M. Johnson
The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison
The hate you give by Angie Thomas
The Kite runner by Khaled Hosseini
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Renkon it is important for everyone to understand just how bad this is and worse, how, in the past, one of the first steps totalitarian governments takes, is book banning. With ebooks proliferating, what will happen now is anyone's guess.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
And you have the old "Banned In Boston" factor that publishers used to crave to get for the publicity and the boost in sales.
TrashCat · M
@dancingtongue Yep. I'm a Bostonion by birth until my mid twenties. I always found the "Bannned in Boston" monika hilarious. Slap that on anything at got fred publicity. I believe a comedy album was released of Lenny Bruce called Banned in Boston. This guy (like Larry Flynt) love him or not, was a hero for free speech
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
No need to even buy most of them. Practically everything in print can be downloaded from Anna's Archive: https://annas-archive.org/

Book bans are very easy to circumvent now.
originnone · 61-69, M
Amazon isn't supported by taxes.
originnone · 61-69, M
@Slade The idea is that you can get to books if you want to buy buying them. But when the government funds the enterprise as with a public library or school library, the people who fund them (ie taxpayers) are within their rights to determine what the enterprise does including what book it stocks.
Slade · 56-60, M
@originnone yes and they have spoken

Next
originnone · 61-69, M
@Slade I'm very much against banning books, but I'm not against a publicly supported organization setting standards. I think the idea of a public school library requiring parental consent or having age restrictions on certain books is fine. Amazon doesn't receive public funding, so they can do whatever they want provided it's legal.
SnailTeeth · 36-40
I just wish they'd cut to the chase and ban the internet
MarineBob · 56-60, M
It all started with banning the bible from public schools
Little kids at school won't have them.
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
You realize they are now taking away access to free ebook sources for kids?

Lets not pretend these bans don't have dire consequences just because we can't think past our noses to figure out what the consequences are beyond "they can still get them online"
Most poor people read books from libraries and kids have access only to where their parents take them. They cant go buy books online by themselves. We are talking about kids..not adults.
Puppycat23 · F
@JaggedLittlePill I agree, these bans do have dire consequences and that's why I don't support them. I'm in favor of putting a book down that's deemed too controversial/ inappropriate and reading something else instead of going the extra mile to ban them when the book that's banned can still be found and bought elsewhere. That's why I find this whole book ban nonsense, nonsense. And of course a child might not be able to buy a book online or at a bookstore but their parents can if they so desired and have the money.
People with money will continue to be better educated.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
Shut up cat
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This message was deleted by its author.
TrashCat · M
@SnailTeeth be more specific
This message was deleted by its author.
TrashCat · M
@SnailTeeth be more precise

 
Post Comment