DayattheBeach · 36-40, F
Nope...
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
I genuinely don't and I remember predicting a war with Russia when Hillary Clinton ran against Trump. We just got it under Biden when he got in.
Ukraine is in a tug of war between NATO and Russia and has slowly flipped over to the EU/NATO side of things, losing Russia a subject state that they could rely upon.
To be clear, Russia is an evil warmongering state. But Russia didn't invade Ukraine apropos of nothing, they invaded after a decade of work from NATO/EU to move Ukraine into their sphere of influence. The push from Biden to get Ukraine into NATO was what triggered the war.
But ultimately, Russia are the ones who invaded a sovereign state and are killing civilians. I think it is insane for people who see the problems in NATO to just cheer for Russia.
Sometimes the only good guys are the innocents trying to stay safe in a horrible war.
Ukraine is in a tug of war between NATO and Russia and has slowly flipped over to the EU/NATO side of things, losing Russia a subject state that they could rely upon.
To be clear, Russia is an evil warmongering state. But Russia didn't invade Ukraine apropos of nothing, they invaded after a decade of work from NATO/EU to move Ukraine into their sphere of influence. The push from Biden to get Ukraine into NATO was what triggered the war.
But ultimately, Russia are the ones who invaded a sovereign state and are killing civilians. I think it is insane for people who see the problems in NATO to just cheer for Russia.
Sometimes the only good guys are the innocents trying to stay safe in a horrible war.
View 6 more replies »
G7J2O · M
@CountScrofula But the main condition of peace is that Ukraine surrenders territory that Russia isn't even controlling. That's not acceptable.
Ukraine joining NATO is irrelevant to Putin. He knows it will never happen.
Ukraine joining NATO is irrelevant to Putin. He knows it will never happen.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@CountScrofula Thanks to putin's bungling russia's border with NATO has now more than doubled 😂
ElwoodBlues · M
@CountScrofula says
Essentially, Ukraine agreed to give up all its nuclear weapons to Russia in exchange for safety from a U.S. or Russian invasion. Russia's invasion of Ukraine violates that treaty. And as a signatory to that 1994 Budapest Memorandum, the U.S. has a definite interest in righting Putin's current wrongs.
Again, given this history, do you have any confidence whatsoever that Russia will honor its end of a treaty, even if conditions are met?
a condition of peace throughout this war is ...
Do you have any confidence whatsoever that Russia will honor its end of a treaty, even if conditions are met? Let me remind you of a three-way treaty known as the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.Essentially, Ukraine agreed to give up all its nuclear weapons to Russia in exchange for safety from a U.S. or Russian invasion. Russia's invasion of Ukraine violates that treaty. And as a signatory to that 1994 Budapest Memorandum, the U.S. has a definite interest in righting Putin's current wrongs.
In the final version of the deal, Russia promised not to attack Ukraine. While the U.S. and the U.K. assured Ukraine they would aid if it was attacked by Russia, that promised aid did not guarantee military support like a NATO country would receive.
In 2009, Russia and the U.S. announced that the assurances in the Budapest Memorandum would continue to remain in effect in the future.
https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/global-conflicts/ukraine-agreed-to-give-up-nukes-in-exchange-for-safety-from-russia-invasion-attack-budapest-memorandum-treaty/536-8748a51f-10ee-47f0-be30-b4088750ee44In 2009, Russia and the U.S. announced that the assurances in the Budapest Memorandum would continue to remain in effect in the future.
Again, given this history, do you have any confidence whatsoever that Russia will honor its end of a treaty, even if conditions are met?
robertsnj · 56-60, M
yeah the motivation may have been more economic as opposed to political alignments. Ukraine has a lot of oil and natural gas. For supply chaining it is a key spot for internal trade logistics for Russia.
actually almost all wars are economic and or religious. If you wonder "why" on any war the place to start is economics of the region contested followed by religious propensity of the area and invading area.
actually almost all wars are economic and or religious. If you wonder "why" on any war the place to start is economics of the region contested followed by religious propensity of the area and invading area.
ItsMeMorgue · 46-50, F
@robertsnj I'd go a little further and say even most religious wars have an economic reason behind them. Religion is used as an excuse by the same old people who want more land, more power, and more mineral resources. Long before America became an expansionist empire under the guise of spreading freedom and democracy, Rome did it under the guise of spreading christianity.
robertsnj · 56-60, M
@ItsMeMorgue depends, for examples, the Bosnian war had little economic value but high value for for the Chrisitan Islam class, Rwanda also a Christian Islam clash had little economic gain. The Armenian genocide (by Turkey) had little economics attached to it. Sri Lanka has violence from Buddhist seperatists and the Phillapines has the same friction from Muslim seperatists
ZulXeroth · 31-35, M
Yes.
Every war for the next 100 years minimum is going to be for control of technologically significant minerals. Ukraine has Minerals. That's what the Fanta Fascist wanted in exchange for helping Ukraine. It's the same thing Putin is after. Petrodollar is going to die in the next 20 years, minerals are what will replace it. It's the same reason US was making threats towards Denmark over Greenland.
Every war for the next 100 years minimum is going to be for control of technologically significant minerals. Ukraine has Minerals. That's what the Fanta Fascist wanted in exchange for helping Ukraine. It's the same thing Putin is after. Petrodollar is going to die in the next 20 years, minerals are what will replace it. It's the same reason US was making threats towards Denmark over Greenland.
meJess · F
Putin is collecting natural resources using the same excuses Hitler used for living space.
Unfortunately Putin was trained by the KGB and understands western politics. The identity of the president is irrelevant, the make up of their government is the only interest.
Unfortunately Putin was trained by the KGB and understands western politics. The identity of the president is irrelevant, the make up of their government is the only interest.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@meJess Your entire premise is an American State Department talking point. It is objectively false. And you completely ignore all facts that don't fit your narrative.
And again, trying to resort to emotional manipulation by creating false comparisons to Hitler when Ukraine actually is a place where descendents of the Waffen SS and OUN thrive.
Where Canada honours Nazi war criminals in support of Ukraine.
And you made both claims that Russia supposedly wants space and resources when there is zero evidence of that. In fact Ukrainian resources have been plundered by the West. Zelensky violated the Ukrainian constitution to sell of their farm land to American and European Agricultural conglomerates. The US and UK are fighting over Ukrainian mines so the only side that fits your WW2 fantasy is the west here.
Russia needs natural resources about as much as Saudi Arabia needs sand.
And again, trying to resort to emotional manipulation by creating false comparisons to Hitler when Ukraine actually is a place where descendents of the Waffen SS and OUN thrive.
Where Canada honours Nazi war criminals in support of Ukraine.
And you made both claims that Russia supposedly wants space and resources when there is zero evidence of that. In fact Ukrainian resources have been plundered by the West. Zelensky violated the Ukrainian constitution to sell of their farm land to American and European Agricultural conglomerates. The US and UK are fighting over Ukrainian mines so the only side that fits your WW2 fantasy is the west here.
Russia needs natural resources about as much as Saudi Arabia needs sand.
meJess · F
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow wow is everything about Nazis for you?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Alyosha · 36-40, M
Yes.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
Oh yes.
President Putin did not care who was president of which other country anywhere; though he might genuinely have not thought President Trump would ever be a sort of ally, albeit a very ambivalent one.
He thought Ukraine would be a push-over...
President Putin did not care who was president of which other country anywhere; though he might genuinely have not thought President Trump would ever be a sort of ally, albeit a very ambivalent one.
He thought Ukraine would be a push-over...
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
No, I don't think they would have.
Supposedly Russia was worried Ukraine was going to join NATO.
Considering USA can block that, and Trump seems to be Putin's pawn, I think Putin could of stopped Ukraine without having to invade as Trump would of done whatever his buddy wanted...
So no, but that's mainly because Trump is Putin's b****
Considering USA can block that, and Trump seems to be Putin's pawn, I think Putin could of stopped Ukraine without having to invade as Trump would of done whatever his buddy wanted...
So no, but that's mainly because Trump is Putin's b****
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@sstronaut I'd be careful charging in with facts. You're likely to annoy @PicturesOfABetterTomorrow.
22Michelle · 70-79, T
Of course. Trump is Putin's lapdog. Putin wants to re-establiish the Russian empire / USSR. If, as it looks likely, Trump helps Putin take chunks of Ukraine then Putin will be back for the rest. And every country thst used to be part of the Russian Empire / USSR is looking to rearm, to join NATO. If that country is in Central Asia then their choices are more limited. Will they look to China?
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@LordShadowfire Lying again. And that again is not what a strawman means. 😂
ItsMeMorgue · 46-50, F
@LordShadowfire He sure has a funny way of saying he has no evidence.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@ItsMeMorgue He sure does.
TexChik · F
Absolutely. The Biden regime was motivated only by greed. They were more concerned with laundering money intended to aid Ukraine against Russia and enriching themselves instead of using it to strengthen the American Military. The UN was a joke, as was NATO, which was happy to allow the US to pay to protect them from Russia while buying Russian energy to power their factories and heat their homes. Kamala Harris would have done nothing to change any of that as long as her share of the proceeds kept rolling in.
TexChik · F
Like you would know?
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
No. Right before Putin ‘invaded’
Zelinskeyy signed a decree to try and retake the crimea… and no way he would have signed that if trump were in charge..
but Biden and the EU. Love antagonising Putin to react…
Zelinskeyy signed a decree to try and retake the crimea… and no way he would have signed that if trump were in charge..
but Biden and the EU. Love antagonising Putin to react…
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
@ItsMeMorgue you say invade. Sane ppl say the liberation of pro Russian Ukrainians being slaughtered
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout I can't sp[eak for Biden but the neither the EU nor any of its two dozen constituent, separate countries wanted to "antagonise" Putin at all. Indeed, one, Hungary, is even rather pro-Putin.
That idea is just anti-European, US propaganda.
That idea is just anti-European, US propaganda.
ItsMeMorgue · 46-50, F
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout
you say invade. Sane ppl say the liberation of pro Russian Ukrainians being slaughtered
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
They wouldn't have needed to invade.
america is now aligned with russia and trump (through the traitor witkoff) is betraying Ukraine and the Free World, and trying to give Ukraine to russia... for a share of the spoils.
The modern version of the von Ribbentrop-Molotov pact is the Witkoff-Ushakov Pact.
america's shame in the eyes of the world, and global distrust, will endure for a very long time.
america is now aligned with russia and trump (through the traitor witkoff) is betraying Ukraine and the Free World, and trying to give Ukraine to russia... for a share of the spoils.
The modern version of the von Ribbentrop-Molotov pact is the Witkoff-Ushakov Pact.
america's shame in the eyes of the world, and global distrust, will endure for a very long time.
G7J2O · M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow provide links to actual evidence to back up your claims then, including this live-streaming on Facebook, instead of shrieking. I’ll wait. Unless of course “they” have removed all vestiges of it…
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@G7J2O I have provided sources. You have provided exactly none. Just declared your opinions are supported by "experts" that apparently don't exist.
And the comment about a livestream was to point out the absurdity of you having an issue with statements being made by someone who was actually there being past tense.
That is literally how all individual accounts of historical events happen.
So you are just looking to invalidate anything that doesn't fit your ideology no matter how flimsy and silly the dismissal.
And the comment about a livestream was to point out the absurdity of you having an issue with statements being made by someone who was actually there being past tense.
That is literally how all individual accounts of historical events happen.
So you are just looking to invalidate anything that doesn't fit your ideology no matter how flimsy and silly the dismissal.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@G7J2O Yet another Ukrainian government official comes out clearly stating Boris Johnson killed the Istanbul accords and threatened Zelensky with isolation (sanctions) if they did not walk away and fight Russia.
And both Merkel and Hollande both admitted that the Minsk Agreements were signed in bad faith to build up an army in Ukraine for a war with Russia.
[media=https://youtu.be/wVMtikBfP7Q]
And both Merkel and Hollande both admitted that the Minsk Agreements were signed in bad faith to build up an army in Ukraine for a war with Russia.
[media=https://youtu.be/wVMtikBfP7Q]
Army1970 · 51-55, M
Donald Trump couldn't run his own bath ... let alone stop any wars . Puzzles me why he even thinks he'll get the Noble peace prize . Not like he ever gives out fake news on socal media!!!!! . Wow this will certainly cause a back lash ....freedom of speech!!!!
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
It's not possible for anyone to understand that the Russians did nothing wrong or illegal. Just don't bother! Keep up the unity. No root causes ever existed that you could not deny! Western minds erased all the root causes of everything.. but keep fighting!
ItsMeMorgue · 46-50, F
@Roundandroundwego Wow, okay! The invading Russians who took over Ukraine and almost blew up a nuclear power plant did nothing wrong!
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@ArishMell UN rules and international law allow Russ to invade Ukraine to protect civilians. Which they did.
That's understandable for everyone but russo-phobes
That's understandable for everyone but russo-phobes
ItsMeMorgue · 46-50, F
@Roundandroundwego Okay. So sending troops in to relocate Ukrainian citizens within Russia, take over a nuclear power plant and almost blow it up, and claim huge parts of Ukraine for Russia with all for the protection of their civilians. Great job. I'm sure your medal from Putin is in the mail.
Captainjackass · 31-35, M
Considering how he supports russia and Ukraine was already warring with russia for years I think it’s obvious they still would have.
Yes, but with less resistance.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Nope putin even stated it
TurtlePink · 51-55, M
It was gonna happen regardless who was president and that’s just based off of Russia’s internal factors like it’s politics and it’s economy.
TurtlePink · 51-55, M
@Roundandroundwego that’s what you did
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@TurtlePink echoes. Sad.
4meAndyou · F
Putin WAITED until wishy-washy-weak-sister Biden was in office before he began his aggressions.
Anyone who didn't NOTICE the timing is not paying much attention to anything at all.
Trump made it obvious to the entire WORLD, when he bombed Syria, and casually mentioned it to Xi at dinner, that he is a crazy ballsy loose cannon...someone to be FEARED.
With Trump gone, it was ON.
Anyone who didn't NOTICE the timing is not paying much attention to anything at all.
Trump made it obvious to the entire WORLD, when he bombed Syria, and casually mentioned it to Xi at dinner, that he is a crazy ballsy loose cannon...someone to be FEARED.
With Trump gone, it was ON.
SarahTheHooker · 26-30, F
The crazy thing is that 'The Duck' is such a loose cannon that you can't have a clue whether he would have or not, or would he have sided with Russia to let them OR Putin go "This guy's nuts! He'll start a nuclear war. Let's not."
I know that I wouldn't trust him, let's put it that way.
Sarah 💋
I know that I wouldn't trust him, let's put it that way.
Sarah 💋
ItsMeMorgue · 46-50, F
Do you not?
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
In a hot heartbeat.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Yep. He's not done anything now and Putin isn't scared of him.
Seriously?
This is going on before DT. You should read some history first.
This is going on before DT. You should read some history first.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow So, the fact that Russian troops now occupy huge parts of Ukraine and aren't letting them go, that means it wasn't an invasion?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Vin53 · M
Well he sure as hell isn't uninvading it now is he?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
GuidanceCounselor · 56-60, M
No
BohoBabe · M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
FeetAreFantastic · 41-45, MVIP
Yep
NativePortlander1970 · 51-55
No






































