Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

THE GREAT CHROMOSOME SHITSHOW

GENDER HAS BEEN MENTIONED ONLINE.

EVERYONE WITH A WIFI CONNECTION IS NOW A BIOLOGIST.

PLEASE COLLECT YOUR PHD FROM THE COMMENTS SECTION.

CRAYONS ARE PROVIDED.
Top | New | Old
tenente · 36-40, M Best Comment
Best TedTalk Evar


It's about time I was recognized!! 😤
Magenta · F
IKR! The worlds greatest experts exist on social media. <<< I used my crayons
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
My pickup truck has a chromosome bumper.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
Can i fit a whole pack of crayons up my bum?
WolfGirlwh0r3 · 36-40, T
Is green available?
@WolfGirlwh0r3 GREEN IS AVAILABLE.

BUT PLEASE STOP EATING THEM.

THIS IS WHY THE MINISTRY CAN’T HAVE NICE THINGS.
WolfGirlwh0r3 · 36-40, T
@skeletor -spits out gnawed on crayon-
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Jake966 · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues if someone is born with both genitalia, whatever gender is the strongest and most prevalent is what they shouldconsider themselves to be,
@Jake966 says
if someone is born with both genitalia, whatever gender is the strongest and most prevalent is what they shouldconsider themselves to be,

Thanks! Personally I like that method for hermaphrodites; I especially like the way it gives agency to the person to make their own choice.

I also must point out that your method contradicts tRump's Executive Order 14168 by basing the decision on developed phenotype while EO 14168 bases the decision entirely on genotype.

Your method also agrees with Aristotle, at least during the period before the person makes their choice. Aristotle (fourth century BCE) in Poetics 21, identified three genders: masculine, feminine, and “in between” (μεταξύ). Of course the in-between gender, even if it's temporary, contradicts EO 14168.

Since my goal here was to point out the flaws in EO 14168, I think we've achieved a meeting of the minds.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
TheHammer · M
HAHA

AND OF COURSE YOU KNOW ABOUT CHROMOSOMES OLD BUDDY

😄😄😄

YOU HAVENT ANSWERED MY FRIENDS REQUEST YET
IM THINKING YOU DONT REALLY LIKE ME. ☹
Jake966 · 56-60, M
Why do you need to be a biologist to determine gender? It is simple boy girl that’s it.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 Nice attempt at deflection, sunstroke. I'm talking about how your two simple categories don't actually fit all the complexity that occurs in nature. But keep trying to deflect; it's amusing🤣😂

My point is that hermaphrodites & XXY don't fit into either of your two simple categories, do they?? Nature is more complex than just boy-girl, isn't it??
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@sunsporter1649
TexChik · F
So you are saying what ? 2 genders or 67??
You're just sitting back like...
Aren't you?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
LordShadowfire · 51-55, M
Okay, I can't tell which side of the gender debate you're on from this. I'm a bit concerned.
@LordShadowfire YES.

YOU PEOPLE.

THE ONES WHO WERE GIVEN CRAYONS AND IMMEDIATELY FORMED A FUCKING SENATE.

PLEASE RETURN TO YOUR ENCLOSURE.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@skeletor If you will pardon the question, what is your understanding of gender as it relates to non-conforming individuals?
@CorvusBlackthorne MY UNDERSTANDING OF GENDER?

SIR, I AM A NAKED BLUE SKELETON IN A PURPLE HOOD.
MY PRONOUNS ARE NYEH/HEH/HEH. MY SEX IS UNAVAILABLE DUE TO STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE. AND MY GENDER IS FUCKING EVIL. YOU SENTIENT CORDUROY TROUSER.
lissah · 36-40, F
You're acting like a teacup

 
Post Comment