Capitalism's corporate grifts enabled by democratic "equal rights" advocacy.
There are others but I'll mention just a couple of them here.
1. Labor statistics are flawed severely. Over the last 60 years an increase if females entering the work force was never factored into employment numbers or the unemployment rate.
2. Since mothers were previously the primary household and child care providers, the reduction in that full time occupation was switched into a daycare part time with limited days for mothers, and added hours of work for husbands that now shared those household duties without a corresponding increase in income. That translates to lowering discretionary time without pay. Bureau of labor doesn't get to add this work into the employment calculations. It also doesn't amortize these hours into FICA quarterly qualification scores.
Socialism, which is just the economic sales pitch for communism, is so flawed that only a full on fantasy follower would think its a good thing so suffice it to say that it pretends to eliminate classess but really creates poverty for the masses and an ultra elite that rules over them at gunpoint.
Unless you're in the inner circle and often as not, even if you are your political leanings mean nothing to a real leftist.
You're just a temporary useful idiot under the socialist system. A necessity depleter that better have an important use or its off to siberia. And leave the coat.
@SteelHands I'm not bothered about what Soviets thought of the proletariat as they deviated greatly from the communist revolution and I'm more into the works of Karl marx, friedrich engels, guy debord and erich fromm
Anybody that's more interested in finding things out to a greater extent than deciding which kind of ideologue they want to become doesn't make the conversational approaches that you do.
You might think that your extremism for the lies you embrace fit reality but you fail to understand that you are and have been mostly blind to reality all your life.
Fascism is fascism because it's what it is and that's the name for it. Not new. Not something else. Not catch all for other things. No professor's vapid stretches of faulty reasoning can change that.
Yep. It is definitely lies by omission. Also when tallying the death tolls of communist leaders the numbers seem to go up magically by 10s or 100s of millions out of nowhere.
The Black book of Communism which is referenced here and seems to be referenced by every anti communist online is also a total joke.
Half the contributors have disavowed it because the person who compiled the book was cooking the numbers and determined to come up with numbers in the 100s of millions even if they had to fabricate the numbers.
I mean, this is a somewhat unfair argument because it has flaky causality BUT it does highlight that the "killed by socialism," arguments also have flaky causality, assuming that the the USSR and Mao's China were even socialist.
@CestManan Now that we're getting to be good buddies, at least of the online variety, you should know that a huge part of the reason that sort of talk upsets me isn't so much that you're putting other people at risk with your behavior. It's that you're putting yourself at risk, all the while thinking you're playing it safe.
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I deleted this content since you've decided to harrange the other thread. You might as well erase your half of the above as useless reading.
