@Joseph8284 trump doesn't even understand himself. He has a selection of stock phrases that he tosses out and if the reaction isn't quite right he simply tries another one. He has basic rules that keep him safe from discovery e.g. no details (never offer details): push anything deliverable as far into the future as possible and even then keep it vague: steal the credit for other people's work and blame others for your own incompetence and failures: never give a lengthy, comprehensive, answer - dodge and weave at all times. And remember - never any details
Says a whole lot more about his audience expectations...
Former President Donald Trump is often noted for his speaking style, which some analyses suggest operates at a 4th to 6th grade reading level. This characteristic is defined by several key aspects:
Simplicity of Vocabulary
Trump frequently uses basic words and phrases, opting for straightforward language that can be easily understood by a wide audience. Short Sentences
His sentences tend to be concise, avoiding complex structures that might confuse listeners.
Repetition
Trump often repeats key phrases or slogans, which not only makes his points clearer but also aids in memorability.
Directness
His communication style is typically direct and unambiguous, which can resonate well with his supporters and create a sense of urgency or enthusiasm.
These elements contribute to his distinctive approach to public speaking and media interaction.
Me: So his audience expectations are very limited. . GPT-4o mini
Yes, Trump's communication style suggests that his audience expectations may be tailored to a broader, more general demographic.
By speaking at a lower reading level, he makes his messages accessible to a wider range of people, including those who may not have advanced education.
2. Engagement
Keeping language simple allows for quick engagement; audiences can easily grasp his points without requiring deep analysis.
3. Emotional Connection
His style often relies on emotional appeal rather than complex arguments, resonating with audiences on a personal level.
Conclusion
This approach likely reflects an understanding of what resonates with his supporters, emphasizing clarity and directness over nuanced or complex rhetoric.
@Roundandroundwego a testament to daddy's money and influence. I wonder what was 'donated. It would have been a bigly gift because nobody knows more about gifting than King Donald, nobody in the whole world thing, and in fact the gifting experts are amazed and they say 'Sir, how come you know so much about gifting, more than even us?' And perhaps it's because he's a stable genius and he even read that on a postal note written using a sharpie or a crayon or whatever those things are called - writing sticks? - There are experts who can answer that but not as well as King Donald who is the world authority on writing sticks and doesn't know how but it's really amazing how much he understands about writing sticks, and tariffs, and immunology, and Epstein was bad very bad never liked Epstein and now look but don't look too much and putin is a good friend and if not one single day then two weeks or maybe three months but perhaps two weeks we'll get it done and he never, ever, speaks like a mature, educated, rational, adult... because he can't.
@HoeBag I tried looking for more information, but I couldn't find more research information at that time, at least not that graded music lyrics based on grade levels.
@sstronaut I know some music from back then was definitely more intelligent.
Songs like "Time" (and other ones) by Pink Floyd.
Another that immediately stands out is Kansas's "No one together". Part of it -
Lo, the horn of plenty is bursting at the seams The harvest of the world will be our prize We claim to know the secrets, all the answers have been found But how can one fool make another wise?
There's nothing better than it used to be To live and die is still a mystery We take away and we give nothing back We just consume it all and still we lack
@Roundandroundwego Yep. Sometimes they’ll point out a specific- like the sombrero troll which I agree is beneath the president- but mostly it’s just “But Trump!!”. It gets tiresome.
@joe438 I guess you've not been paying attention to arguments based upon provable facts (formerly known as "facts") and actual logic (formerly known as "logic").
@Joseph8284 Actually, my writing has stood me in very good stead, and has fed into many things.
He's still a bully who
• could have been educated, but wasn't • could have told the truth, but didn't • could have asked us to be better, but hasn't • could strengthen our democracy and others, but won't • could wield power for the "We, the People", but is unable, • could listen to the brightest and best, but cannot
He's been part of the planned assassination of our country. It's quite disturbing.
@sunsporter1649 Tony Schwartz wrote the book... I doubt trump can even read the title. Schwartz called ghost-writing the book his "greatest regret in life, without question," and both he and the book's publisher, Howard Kaminsky, alleged that Trump had played no role in its writing. Trump has given conflicting accounts(i.e. he lies) on the question of authorship.
