Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

You know who isn't getting paid right now? ICE

And many of them are on government travel using government travel credit cards that will likely max out and go delinquent unpaid in less than a month.

Who would love to see them walking off the job homeless and stranded in cities they've been temporarily assigned to, as they hitchhike home. When all this happens, Trump isn't gonna give a dam about them.
Top | New | Old
Trump didnt shut the government down. It was about 12 Dems that chose not to vote to extend a budget package by trying to blackmail the govt into spending hundreds of millions of extra dollars on trans gender agenda and healthcare outside our current budget for illegals. Three Dems voted in support for the bill. The rest put Partisan politics ahead of the good of their own constituents.

Also ICE is considered essential for security reasons. They will see less than 10% of employees furloughed.

https://www.foxla.com/news/ice-immigration-operations-during-government-shutdown

https://www.masslive.com/news/2025/10/will-ice-agents-continue-working-during-the-government-shutdown.html

Facts matter.
Interesting thought, but Trump does reward loyalty someimes, with pardons, or with others people's money, e.g., the Ashley Babbit settlement on the tax player's dime.

It's still an inconvenience and a cash flow problem, but there's no shortage of businesses and individuals for him to file frivolous lawsuits against and then "settle" to pay off his loyalist thugs with extorted funds.

Granted, like most of Trump's schemes, most people will end up getting screwed over, but that's true of his entire Presidency as well.
@BrandNewMan

First, let me note that I "lost it" with Trump long before now, at least as far back as his first Republican debate, if not even further back when as a private citizen he was taking it ads, defrauding people and using bankruptcy, frivolous litigation and other Roy Cohen type stuff.

Second, as to your point that it could be worse, i.e., that Trump has been somewhat restrained, I'll confess that earlier today I almost posted something similar.

I'm not surprised he's "dishing it back," even though I'm appalled and horrified about how he's doing it and at what the costs and consequences might be.

The thing is Trump isn't really a true modern day Hitler, imo, any more then he's a true conservative.

IMHO, Conway (a lifetime Republican until Trump like so many) nailed Trump as a Malignant Narcissist with sociopathic tendencies. Of course, that really just categorizes the biggest problem I have with Trump.

He doesnt care about anyone or anything but himself. He speaks, mostly from his gut or the reptilian part of his brain, solely with regard to how what he says will benefit him.

There's no concerns about dishonesty, long term or even short term consequences for others, no respect for institutions, ideologies, norms, etc.

Remember his embrace of the LBGT community? That's the same kind of BS as tearing down Obamacare without any thought or intention of replacing it with something "better."

I get how speaking from his lower digestive tract is appealing, and I get the appeal of throwing a huge monkey wrench into the system and draining a nasty swamp feels good.

But he's got no intention, much less the expertise or capability to turn it into something better. He's just interested in profiting from draining it, making room for his cronies and those who will do him favors and give him money.

There's reasons people "hate" Trump and why legitimate banks and investors stopped doing business with him, why the NFL wouldn't touch him, and why he could never go public with anything and report to a Board of Directors.

I know, he says he's a conservative now, and that anyone who opposes him is a RINO, communist, leftist radical, etc, but he's not running his con on the "other." They don't buy it. His suckers are those who think they'll get "a piece of his action" because he says they're "special people" and only he can save them.
@MistyCee .. Lol .. never said there arent some valid issues with Trump. There are with every politician. Yet .. the Dems could not field a candidate to beat him. He's in the office and you are not going to change that short of what was attempted already. Killing him to do so is more morally reprehensible than any issue with him.

I saw lots of issues w Obama and then Biden .. wanted the best for the county under them through out. Never wanted to see the country suffer to thwart them. Dems cant say the same and you are proving that with each response. As are things like Dems shutting down the govt over the huge additional spending they are prioritizing.
@BrandNewMan I'm proving what?

Are you saying I'm approving of the Democrat's approach to the shutdown?

Surely you're not accusing me of wanting to hurt the country?

I may have a different idea about what's best for it, but the whole zero sum us vs them thing is pretty deplorable in my view, regardless of whether I'm an us or them according to whoever's playing that game.

So is ad hominem stuff, tbh. I'm not saying I dont ever engage in it, but I try not to, and definitely don't want to play that game.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
Wrong.

Federal contingency planning and recent reporting indicate that most U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) employees classified as "essential" would continue working during a government shutdown and are likely to be paid, though the timing and legal basis vary. Department of Homeland Security guidance and contemporary reporting say ICE and Customs and Border Protection operations largely continue because many positions are funded through mandatory, advance, or law-enforcement exceptions to shutdown rules [1]. Legislative proposals like the Pay Our Homeland Defenders Act of 2026 would explicitly guarantee pay for DHS law-enforcement personnel during funding lapses, reflecting ongoing policy attention [2]. Reporting around the shutdown notes federal operational continuity for essential personnel, while nonessential staff face furlough or layoff risks [3] [4].
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Handfull1 "they"? I thought you were personally affected?
Handfull1 · 61-69, F
@SumKindaMunster They in general. Personally doesn’t have to mean just me. It could be family, etc. I have never been able to discuss much as security is involved. The way of the world unfortunately. Sigh
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Handfull1 I understand what "personally" means. So in this circumstance it isn't you, but someone you know?
MarineBob · 56-60, M
Wrong again . Big beautiful bill took care of their pay
@MarineBob Military should just walk off the job and refuse to do whatever it is they do
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@MasterLee Why work if you don't know when or if you will be paid?
They still taxing you?

They ain’t shut down
From your lips...
MasterLee · 56-60, M
We need to stop paying congress and tie success to their pay. No voting pay raises, term limits, must use Medicare, payroll caps, no bonuses, no stock trading for themselves or family
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Ice is essential
JoyfulSilence · 51-55, M
They can always take over the jobs of those they deported!
This message was deleted by its author.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Alabamarednek you waiting:
come2gether · 46-50, M
@Alabamarednek lol! How low is your limit on your credit cards?
@come2gether He might only have debit cards ..
ron122 · 41-45, M
The democrats shut the government down. Go whine to them.

 
Post Comment