Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

MAGA and what it means

Make America Great Again


This is not asked in order to jeer, really I wondered exactly what section to post this in.

But I'm asking :- WHEN was America GREAT?

I'd like to know just what those in MAGA hats see as "greatness", what age are we talking about.

(I'm in the UK and often those who voted for Brexit seemed to have some sort of idea of a golden age in the past that was lost, and needed to be regained. The days of Empire! The spirit of the blitz!)

Was it when "men were men"? An age when someone born the very lowest could yet reach the very highest? Do we go back to the Wild West?

I read once a biography of Harry Truman. I was greatly impressed by the man. Maybe others would not agree.

Well, I'm rambling a bit, but my question remains - and I have genuine interest. Not looking for disputes and mud slinging.

Just asking. When exactly was America great, and of what did such greatness consist?

Thanks
The good old days were inevitably the bad old days for someone else. It really means "Make America White Again". It sprung out of the fear that white men were losing their edge over women and minorities and becoming irrelevant. It's fear manifested into hate and anger.
@Reason10 says
That's why Unelected Joe needed voter fraud to overturn his landslide LOSS in 2020.
Still waiting for any shred of evidence to support your ludicrous claim, dude.

Trump brought SIXTY ONE court cases at different levels in different states with different teams of lawyers, and NONE of them found any evidence of significant election fraud. NONE of them.

Trump also asked his attorney general (and one of his staunchest allies), William Barr, to have the 112,000 member Dept of Justice look into election fraud. I don't know how many members were assigned to look for fraud, but with 112,000 members they have plenty of resources. Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

But wait! There's more!!

In the days after his 2020 loss, Trump's campaign commissioned two different independent firms to look into 2020 election fraud: Simpatico Software, headed by Ken Block, and Berkeley Research Group. Neither found any significant fraud.

In the months after Biden took power, the republican states of Arizona and Georgia carried out very careful hand recounts and examinations of voter rolls, including the notorious Arizona "Cyber Ninja" hand count. Both found no significant fraud and no signs of funny business.

Ariz. hand count https://azsos.gov/election/2020-general-election-hand-count-results
Georgia signature audit https://www.ajc.com/politics/no-fraud-georgia-audit-confirms-authenticity-of-absentee-ballots/QF2PTOGHLNDLNDJEWBU56WEQHM/
Georgia Independent machine audit https://www.wrcbtv.com/story/42925055/no-sign-of-foul-play-found-in-audit-of-georgias-voting-machines
Mich: https://www.michigan.gov/som/0,4669,7-192-47796-553386--,00.html
Georgia: https://www.ajc.com/politics/no-fraud-georgia-audit-confirms-authenticity-of-absentee-ballots/QF2PTOGHLNDLNDJEWBU56WEQHM/
Arizona https://apnews.com/article/technology-biden-cabinet-arizona-phoenix-elections-b59f85b6e917e91a40dc8e99bcab480a
Penn https://www.inquirer.com/news/pennsylvania/spl/pa-election-results-risk-limiting-audit-results-limitations-20210310.html

But wait! There's more!!

Additional "rigged election" claims have evaporated under scrutiny.

(1) Mike Lindell? Lost to his own "prove me wrong" thing.
(2) Mark Meadows? Recanted under oath.
(3) Sydney "Kracken" Powell? Recanted under oath.
(4) Kenneth Chesebro? Recanted under oath.
(5) Rudy Giuliani? Convicted of defamation.
(6) Vote counting machines? They match hand counts.
(7) 2000 Mules? Source "True the Vote" refuses to back up any of their claims in court, despite subpoenas.
(8) Fox News paid out $787,500,000 because they couldn't support their claims of election fraud. $787,500,000 - that ain't pocket change. A business doesn't pay out $787,500,000 for defamation without first spending millions to see if there might be a shred of support for what its people said; to find some excuse for why it's not defamation.

Source info for all points available upon request.

So there you have it, .. There's no rational reason to believe Trump's lies about a "rigged" or "stolen" election. Evidence for it doesn't exist. Now I know all these investigations won't change the minds of cvlt members, but an immunity to evidence is one of the ways you know you're in a CVLT!!!


@LesDawsonsPiano
Reason10 · 61-69, M
@ElwoodBlues In other words, you throw up a bunch of NAZI sites and think you're impressing anyone?
@Reason10 In other words, you've got ZERO evidencel nothing but childish insults. Do you think you're impressing anyone?
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@ElwoodBlues Thanks, I never knew the evidence against fraud in 2020 election was so comprehensive. That some still claim fraud reveals something in such people - I'm not sure what, perhaps its the actual reality of "thinking for oneself" in a strange perverted sort of wsy!
trollslayer · 46-50, M
They won’t answer, but basically: when everyone acted “white” and women were basically “homemakers”.

That means:
1) English was clearly the language of the land.
2) Non-heterosexuals were neither seem nor heard
3) women were wives and homemakers first
4) minorities would strive to “assimilate” to “white American” culture in language, dress, cuisine, what names they give their kids, etc.
5) American global arrogance was acceptable and needed no apology.

In short, maga folks feel very offended that their local wendys closed and a mexican takeout opened in its place.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
It's a good question (and one I've asked), but I wouldn't expect to get a coherent answer that's anything more than personal opinion.

When Reagan said it, it was vague.

This time around, it seems likethere are much stronger articulated negative regressive motivations behind it, like eliminating DEI, immigration, "liberal" education, separation of Church and State, the deep state, etc, but its still vague and almost anything that's based on anger, grievance, greed or sociopathy can be included.

The biggest common denominator really seems to taken from the movie Network:

"I'm mad as hell and not going to take it anymore."

There's less agreement on what "it" is and even less on what to do about "it".
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Reason10 · 61-69, M
@MistyCee Let's look at your items:

church and state separation,
That item appears in ZERO founding documents. It is a fallacy because there is a Capitol Hill chapel, which is funding by tax dollars. The First Amendment was designed to prevent the establishment of a national religion.

Roe v Wade

Bad law, not based on any constitutional principles. Abortion on demand was unpopular and DemoNazis could NOT get it on any Congressional ballot (even when they controlled both houses and the White House.) Roe basically overturned DEMOCRACY. Roe was a edict from an unelected Supreme Court.

The combined Justices of the Bushes and Trump managed to read the Constitution and overturn Roe, sending the decision to the states where it can be DEMOCRATICALLY voted on by each state. Oh, and since Roe was overturned, the DemoNazis in Congress had plenty of time (and a Senile Pedophile who would have signed Charles Manson's pardon if that animal was still alive) to pass a national abortion on demand bill into law.

affirmative action,


Same thing as Jim Crow. It is racist and it violates the Civil Rights Act.
@Reason10 But, right or wrong, none of those things was around before Obama, which is why I mentioned them.
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
As a passing wave to HippyJoe, regarding the arc of history, the Church on a Hill, together with mention of Darwin.

Just to say in my own defence, that many moons ago (I was about 30) I traced the current "arc of history" to Copernicus (not Darwin) It was the heliocentric proposition that shifted "Man" from the centre to the periphery and all its associated, subsequent angst.

My poem, written back then, a tad satirical but with a serious core.

Enjoy, or not.......

Oh! I wish I'd been born before Bacon
When the sun still moved in the sky,
When hope was in more than a daydream
And beauty in more than the eye.

When the Great Chain of Being had God at the top
And Old Nic down below in his lair,
When people were burnt for love of their souls
And not just because they were there.

Back in those days before Auschwitz
When there was still trust to betray,
Before Symbol and Myth became Number
And the Cross became DNA.

Oh! I wish I'd been born before Bacon
When Saints trod the Pilgrim's Path,
When people still jumped at a bump in the night
And not at a bump in a graph.

When Crusades were fought for Truths believed
And Faith was the Devils hammer,
Nothingness only the clay God used,
The Absurd a Bishop's stammer!

When Man was seen as something more
Than atoms swirling in air,
Before the face of the Risen Christ
Became the face of despair.

Yes, I wish I'd been born before Bacon
Though there's not much to choose in the end;
But I might have had serfs and a castle
And I might have had Christ as a friend.


HippyJoe, eat your heart out!

😀
@Reason10 says
WRONG on all counts. Those are bogus numbers from a far left rag.
Now is your chance to PROVE it!!

Here are the numbers in question.

JOB CREATION
Reagan 16.5 million
Clinton 18.6 million
Bush 5.8 million
Obama 8.9 million
Trump NEGATIVE 3 million

YEARLY DEFICIT
Reagan $79 billion to $152 billion
Clinton lowered our deficit from 255 billion to a $126 billion SURPLUS in 2001
Bush raised deficit from 0 to 1412 billion
Obama lowered deficit from 1412 billion to 585 billion
Trump raised from 585 billion up to ~4000 billion

DJIA
Jan 20 1981, Reagan takes office 946;
Jan 20 1989, Reagan leaves office 2235;
Up 136% or 11.3% growth per year.
Jan 20 1993, Clinton takes office 3242;
Jan 20 2001, Clinton leaves office 10588;
up 227%, or 15.92% growth per year.
Jan 20 2001, Bush takes office 10588;
Jan 20 2009, Bush leaves office 7949;
NEGATIVE 3.5% per year.
Jan 20 2009, Obama takes office 7949;
Jan 20 2017, Obama leaves office 19827;
up almost 150% over 8 years, or 12.1% per year (1.121^8=2.49).
Jan 20 2017, Trump takes office 19827;
Jan 20 2021, Trump leaves office 30,930;
up 56% over 4 years, or 11.76% growth per year.

I'm gonna use stock market growth as a proxy for overall economic growth (if you prefer a different stat, feel free to supply it)
"From 1952 through June 2020, annualized real stock market returns under Democrats have been 10.6% compared with 4.8% for Republicans." https://www.forbes.com/sites/sergeiklebnikov/2020/07/23/historical-stock-market-returns-under-every-us-president/#51469926faaf

So go ahead, @Reason10, look up your own numbers cite your sources, and prove me wrong!!

Or were you just bluffing??
Reason10 · 61-69, M
@ElwoodBlues KKKlinton's jobs?
https://www.epi.org/blog/nafta-twenty-years-disaster/
Instead, NAFTA directly cost the United States. a net loss of 700,000 jobs. The surplus with Mexico turned into a chronic deficit. And the economic dislocation in Mexico increased the the flow of undocumented workers into the United States.

Obama's jobs?
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/obama-democrats-dismal-record-on-jobs-since-2008
The 5.9 percent unemployment rate is a fraud. The percentage of adults working or seeking employment is the lowest since women began entering the labor force in larger numbers in the 1970s.
The economy is creating too many low paying jobs in industries like retailing and hospitality, but industries where men find good paying jobs are languishing. Since Obama took office, manufacturing has shed 400,000 jobs and construction nearly 500,000.

Unelected Joe's jobs?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-slammed-over-preposterous-claim-he-created-more-jobs-in-2-years-than-any-president-in-4

Claremont Institute Communications Director Nick Short tweeted, "72% of all job gains since 2021 were simply jobs that were being recovered from the pandemic, not new job creation.

"Prior to the pandemic, job creation under Trump was 6.7 million—3 million more jobs than the current President.


You lose again.
@Reason10 Your quote about Clinton's job numbers doesn't mention job growth at all!! Instead, it pretends that in some alternate non-NAFTA universe, there would be even more jobs🤣😂

Truth is, under Clinton 18.6 million jobs were actually created - 2 million more than Reagan. This data is from the same source Trump used to tout, the Bureau of Labor Statistics. You lose again.





Your source on Obama, foxnews.com/opinion is an OPINION piece!! My source for data, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), is exactly the same source tRump touted so proudly. If Obama's unemployment data is "a fraud" then so is tRump's. You lose again.





And you quote "Prior to the pandemic, job creation under Trump was ..." So your new rule is to only cite numbers when things are going smoothly?? You didn't extend that courtesy to Obama, now did you?? Sorry, we rate all presidents with the same methodology. According to that methodology tRump's record, including his badly botched pandemic response, resulted in an overall job loss of THREE MILLION. You lose again.


UPDATE
And you respond with nothing but an opinion piece and childish insults. Do you think you're impressing anyone?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
Well, reading through the thread (I would not advocate this if you have a weak heart) at least I now have a better idea of what the MAGA folk mean by "thinking for themselves" - it means totally ignoring all the copious evidence that exists for anything counter to their own opinion, and instead to keep insisting upon the contrary.

😀
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@hippyjoe1955 Good grief man! Quote me. PLEASE.

Why on earth are you talking about Darwin? What on earth do you know about me to say that I have no idea about where I came from or where I am going to?

Not to believe in your own "Church on a Hill" (whatever you mean by that) simply does not justify your claims about myself.

Just go away.

One more unwarranted personal attack and I will simply block you.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@LesDawsonsPiano You truly are lacking in the understanding of the arc of history aren't you. Amazing. I thought the British were reasonably educated. I guess I was wrong.
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@hippyjoe1955 Yet another totally unsubstantiated accusation. I have never mentioned anywhere anything at all about what may be, or may not be, the "arc of history'.

Then yet another insinuation that I am uneducated.

Really mate, you take the biscuit (as we say in the UK) You are not quite my cup of tea (as we also say)

I'll forgo the dubious pleasures of hearing more from you about "the Church on a Hill", and will now block you.

Sincerely, all the best. Goodbye.
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!


Was it perhaps when the vast majority of Americans could read this and not laugh at its sentiments? WAS there ever such an age?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@jackjjackson The totally free movement of people.

That would sort it out.

People would then REALLY have to start thinking for themselves.


😀
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
O borders then. How is that working out in Europe? @LesDawsonsPiano
@Reason10 says
Joe's policies did NOT bring in new jobs
DEAD WRONG!! As usual!!

There are more than 5,000,000 (FIVE MILLION) more people employed now than during the peak under Trump. Just read the graph.

AND,

For the first time in literally GENERATIONS, real wages are growing for the lower quintile of US workers. And they're growing FASTER under Biden than they did under Obama or Trump. For the first time in GENERATIONS, the lower half of workers are sharing in our economic growth!


And the number unemployed is historically low!

Inflation? The pandemic deflation was followed by worldwide inflation; that is now gone.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Every generation, the Right says we need to go back to when things were great, back before that new thing came along and ruined everything. The time they're referring to is usually about twenty years ago.

This is why the Right is so vulnerable to conspiracy theories. They need an explanation as to what caused that new thing which ruined everything, and that lends itself to some wacky thinking about a nefarious outside force that now poisons our country.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Reason10 · 61-69, M
[quote]But I'm asking :- WHEN was America GREAT?
[/quote]
During the times of peace when the American economy was booming. Mostly Republican led booms.
[quote]
Just asking. When exactly was America great, and of what did such greatness consist?
[/quote]
To be more specific, I'd have to go back to the President Reagan model. He inherited the worst economy of the time, along with the Soviet Union about to threaten the world with a nuclear holocaust. The weakness of the last president (carter) allowed a criminal regime in Iran to commit an international act of WAR, by taking our hostages. Reagan wisely got them home safe and did not escalate the situation. Because of Reagan's military buildup, the Berlin Wall fell and the Soviet Union ceased to exist. Planetary extinction of all human life was averted.

Americans experienced the greatest prosperity of all time.
Here are Reagan's numbers.
https://www.heritage.org/taxes/report/the-real-reagan-economic-record-responsible-and-successful-fiscal-policy
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@Reason10 Of course they are!!!!!! You get the "true" ones from Right-wing rags!

😀
Reason10 · 61-69, M
@LesDawsonsPiano What right wing tags? I speak for most of America. That's why Unelected Joe needed voter fraud to overturn his landslide LOSS in 2020.
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@Reason10 Rags!

Speak for most of America? No you don't, surely as one who "thinks for themselves" you only speak for yourself?

And there was no fraud. You LOST. Accept it.

Rather sad.
Spotpot · 41-45, M
It means going backwards instead of forwards MAGA regressive and reactionary thank you for confirming what i knew.
Reason10 · 61-69, M
@Spotpot What is regressive about world peace and the greatest prosperity of all time in AMerica. THAT was MAGA.
kodiac · 22-25, M
It was a hell of a lot better 4 years ago ,when people could still think for themselves and not be🐑 following their leader off the cliff.
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@kodiac Hi there, one of the "sheep" has now blocked you.
@LesDawsonsPiano lmao, good riddance. Admitting he's in a cult but acting like that's mutually exclusive from being a mindless follower? 🤣
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@kodiac
Rather be in a cult than a herd.

Irony is lost to Trump supporters.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
Good question; How do they define great? What time period does "again" refer to? A slogan like this is a bit of practical psychology. Frustrated, angry, frightened people project their desires onto the vague slogan.
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@badminton Myself, I tend to see various individuals as "great" rather than any nation at a particular time. Also, "greatness" comes in various shapes and forms (I don't really like the word myself, it always seems to suggest someone up above the rest of us, which for me -paradoxically - takes away any thought of "greatness")
@kodiac @Reason10 says
The economy was recovering from the OBAMA virus.
If you believe that, I've got a challenge for you! It's called

!!! Spot the Trump Miracle !!!

Here's ten years of job creation data. Ignore the drop of 22 million jobs when the pandemic started and concentrate on how job creation changed starting in Dec 2017 when Trump introduced his trillion dollar tax cut.

Do you see a "Trump miracle"? Do you see any change in jobs? Do you see any difference whatsoever between job creation rates under Obama and Trump? I surely don't.


Here's monthly rate of job growth in thousands; it's effectively the derivative of the above; it would show any changes in rate of job growth if changes had occurred. See any "Trump miracle"? Me neither!
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
Yes, it's the "Again" part that is problematic. Unless there is widespread consensus over the greatness of the era that he is trying to reconstruct, it is little more than nostalgia. Divisive nostalgia at that.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
America was great leading into WW2. But really emerged from that war as a global giant. Based largely on its industrial might and progress. And assisted by establishing corporate footprints in so many countries. America was the future in a time where anything seemed possible. And that lasted up until the Apollo moon landings. The Soveit Union was a military rival. But didnt have the global trade reach or the progressive momentum..
But Corporate greed linked to government and corruption of foreign governments squeezed in from the end of the Vietnam war and its got to the point where America is now feeding off its own people as much as overseas countries.😷
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
Well, having caused such mayhem, I will retire. Have a good election.

😀

(Still find the word "again" in the MAGA trope very questionable)
akindheart · 61-69, F
Harry Truman is my favorite president and i am a republican. I have visited his home and read just about everything about him. Why? he followed one of the most popular presidents in our country and one who did not want Harry. Harry took the reins and responsibility.

we have always been considered a super power. What we do in the US affects the rest of the world but due to bad decisions and horrible elections, we became a mockery. Take Biden for instance, he can't walk and talk at the same time. no one respects him and so foreign countries will use thatto their advantage.

Trump on the other hand means business. and the bad players know it
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@hippyjoe1955 As I explained, one poster implied that Donald Trump was respected around the world. I simply pointed out that such was not so in the British press.

Please, just go away and stop spoiling my evening.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@LesDawsonsPiano Define respected. We know that Biden is a joke. We know that Kackles is a joke. We know that Trudeau is a joke. We know that Macron is a joke we know that Starmer is a joke. Trump is not a joke. People take him seriously.
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@hippyjoe1955 Simoly put, I don't take him seriously at all. Not a documented liar.

Respect? A few people who I have known at a personal level. Why? They had empathy, had overcome a lot of personal problems, had reached out to help others.

Personally I don't read newspapers, only listen to the news headlines before switching channels.

Now just go away.
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
Must admit, I like the honesty of some of the MAGA's. Not afraid to mention "immigrants".

In the UK, more often than not, no one will actually admit to being "anti- immigrant". Oh no, not me!

😀
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@Reason10 Maybe if American had ever been "great" it would never have come to that.
Reason10 · 61-69, M
@LesDawsonsPiano It came to that because the unelected DemoNazis in power opened the borders for those criminals. It is KKKamala who is now giving them HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS of Fema funds, so they won't have to work and they can just sit back and violate election law.
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@Reason10 Why have you got the word "Reason" in your name?

😀
Convivial · 26-30, F
I think after the war... Winning is always a good moral boost and I believe things were good for most American citizens... Full employment, new industries and a sense of moral righteousness
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@Convivial I think more often than not vast numbers are always full of "a sense of moral righteousness"

😀
Convivial · 26-30, F
@LesDawsonsPiano that in itself is a three week discussion😜
LesDawsonsPiano · 70-79
@Convivial Just three weeks? I think we would need to get back to the Garden of Eden myth then start working our way forward.........
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Following WWI until the killing of JFK.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@jackjjackson so Jim Crow years?
Reason10 · 61-69, M
@LesDawsonsPiano Thank the DEmoNazis for that.
Reason10 · 61-69, M
@trollslayer
so Jim Crow years?

Created by DEmoNazis, after REPUBLICANS OVERTURNED SLAVERY?
HobNoblin · 36-40, MNew
It means removing the totalitarian rot that has set in. Bringing back the freedom we had bringing back American manufacturing. Taking our country back.
Force and might made you rulers of everyone. Force and might will end us for you. NATO uber alles! That's the only meaning.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
Compare the ascendancy of America in the 1950s to the degeneracy of America in the 2020s
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
The 90's for me but basically when people could live comfortably
SandWitch · 26-30, F
The term MAGA isn't something that was embraced through a somber remembering by the far-right of American politics, including Donald Trump himself; MAGA is in reference to a period in American history when the fake perception of wealth, prosperity ..and being the best at everything ..and America single-handedly winning WWII was flogged to the uneducated, unwary American public as being their reality, when none of it held any truth.

But truth doesn't sell politics in a wholesale Democratic Republic offering and the illusory place in time and space and near-history that MAGA is referring to, doesn't actually exist in the real world, anymore than the real world exists as Alice in Wonderland saw it as well, after she fell down the rabbit hole.

That book of Alice's adventures should really have been named "Alice in America" because both tales are interchangeable, meaning one in the same.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Reason10 As much as Jeb Bush was singularly unimpressive, he was at least what passes for a Republican in his day. Trump has turned that once proud political brand into a cuss word for anyone with ethics and a respect for the process ..Whatever rises from the Republican ashes will probably either choose a new name or go through some process to exorcise the MAGA ghosts..😷
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@hippyjoe1955
Who in their sane mind could ever support Kackles and the Tampon man knowing that she is a flatterer?

What kind of talk is that, hippyjoe? You've been peddling yourself as a church parishioner for as long as I've been at SW, yet you come on here groveling in the muck like Trump himself, pretending to be a MAGA movement supporter as you yell your Trump-supporting mantra across the border from Canada in hopes that they'll see you as one of their own. They don't hippyjoe, they don't.

You can't have it both ways hippyjoe; you either have to ditch that "church parishioner" candle you've been hiding behind, or you have to get into the mud and stay in there, but you can't have it both ways.
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@NativePortlander1970
Shut up


MistyCee
@SandWitch Very nicely written. I especially like the Lewis Carroll analogy.


whowasthatmaskedman
@SandWitch You know.. I never saw that until now. But you have a point.
Even though this was the opening introduction to a fictionalized cable series, it still speaks truth.
[media=https://youtu.be/wTjMqda19wk]
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment