4meAndyou · F
I listened to an interview this morning with Dan Bongino, a former member of the Secret Service. He said that the Director of the Secret Service, Kimberly A. Cheatle, actually mocked a request for more Secret Service protection at Mara Lago, stating that, "I don't protect nightclubs". Bongino says this is not hearsay. He heard her say it himself.
She was also terribly concerned, according to Bongino, with the color of the ties worn by Secret Service protecting Trump. She did NOT want them to wear red ties, because she felt it was sending the wrong message.
She is also really concerned with filling the Secret Service with more women. So...more DEI.
She was also terribly concerned, according to Bongino, with the color of the ties worn by Secret Service protecting Trump. She did NOT want them to wear red ties, because she felt it was sending the wrong message.
She is also really concerned with filling the Secret Service with more women. So...more DEI.
eli1601 · 70-79, M
Can't trust them at all. Maybe local authorities, but the FBI will be in the lead. Watch how they twist the details over the next few weeks.
View 2 more replies »
independentone · M
@NativePortlander1970 It seems Trumps secret service detail is incompetent, can't even spot someone with a gun.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@independentone yes the incompetence is intentional
independentone · M
@MasterLee 🤷♂️
Carlam · 70-79, F
It's a complex issue. While many may express confidence in their abilities, skepticism about their impartiality based on historical precedents is understandable.
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
It wi.l be Russia, Rus, Russia
BittersweetPotato · 31-35, F
@Patriot96 Why Russia? Trump loves Putin.
AbbeyRhode · F
Nope. It would not be surprising to learn the shooter was one of them.
PatKirby · M
@AbbeyRhode
This method has been used since the Roman days, and well practiced by the mafia. It will come from someone you trust.
This method has been used since the Roman days, and well practiced by the mafia. It will come from someone you trust.
Ontheroad · M
"They"? Who precisely is "they" and exactly what did they do that you say "they" can't be trusted? Facts, verified facts from nonpartisan sources only, or it didn't happen.
Innuendo doesn't count as a fact,
Innuendo doesn't count as a fact,
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
NativePortlander1970 · 51-55
@SandWitch Go sit on your broom amd spin.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
I doubt it
PatKirby · M
No.
This message was deleted by its author.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Heartlander what are you saying? Why are assault type weapons needed by civilians? Don't give me the second amendment nonsense, we do not allow civilians to own grenade launchers, bazookers, etc.
@samueltyler2 So …. When will Democrats start this discussion by defining what makes a firearm a “assault weapon”? Give the American people a starting point.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Heartlander how is this for a start, although I have no idea what point you are tryin to make:
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+assault+weapon+webster%27s&sca_esv=4eb85616e0ca48d1&sxsrf=ADLYWIIcYSQJ5KSEdkSlt8n6_ZhbA7-z1A%3A1720998635729&source=hp&ei=61qUZpyhKort5NoP2pexwAk&oq=definition+asdault+weapon&gs_lp=EhFtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1ocCIZZGVmaW5pdGlvbiBhc2RhdWx0IHdlYXBvbioCCAEyBxAAGIAEGA0yBhAAGBYYHjIGEAAYFhgeMggQABgWGB4YDzIGEAAYFhgeMgYQABgWGB4yBhAAGBYYHjIGEAAYFhgeSMZZUKwNWJxBcAF4AJABAJgBjwGgAZoUqgEFMTIuMTO4AQHIAQD4AQGYAhqgAu8WqAIPwgIHECMYJxjqAsICBBAjGCfCAgoQIxiABBgnGIoFwgILEC4YgAQYsQMYgwHCAg4QLhiABBixAxiDARiKBcICERAuGIAEGLEDGNEDGIMBGMcBwgIOEAAYgAQYsQMYgwEYigXCAg4QLhiABBixAxjRAxjHAcICCBAAGIAEGLEDwgIFEAAYgATCAg8QIxiABBgnGIoFGEYY-QHCAgsQABiABBixAxiDAcICCBAuGIAEGLEDwgIKEAAYgAQYRhj5AcICCBAAGBYYChgewgIIEAAYCBgNGB7CAgoQABgIGA0YHhgPwgIMEAAYgAQYDRhGGPkBwgIGEAAYDRgewgIIEAAYDRgeGA_CAggQABgFGA0YHpgDGZIHBTEzLjEzoAfZ0QE&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+assault+weapon+webster%27s&sca_esv=4eb85616e0ca48d1&sxsrf=ADLYWIIcYSQJ5KSEdkSlt8n6_ZhbA7-z1A%3A1720998635729&source=hp&ei=61qUZpyhKort5NoP2pexwAk&oq=definition+asdault+weapon&gs_lp=EhFtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1ocCIZZGVmaW5pdGlvbiBhc2RhdWx0IHdlYXBvbioCCAEyBxAAGIAEGA0yBhAAGBYYHjIGEAAYFhgeMggQABgWGB4YDzIGEAAYFhgeMgYQABgWGB4yBhAAGBYYHjIGEAAYFhgeSMZZUKwNWJxBcAF4AJABAJgBjwGgAZoUqgEFMTIuMTO4AQHIAQD4AQGYAhqgAu8WqAIPwgIHECMYJxjqAsICBBAjGCfCAgoQIxiABBgnGIoFwgILEC4YgAQYsQMYgwHCAg4QLhiABBixAxiDARiKBcICERAuGIAEGLEDGNEDGIMBGMcBwgIOEAAYgAQYsQMYgwEYigXCAg4QLhiABBixAxjRAxjHAcICCBAAGIAEGLEDwgIFEAAYgATCAg8QIxiABBgnGIoFGEYY-QHCAgsQABiABBixAxiDAcICCBAuGIAEGLEDwgIKEAAYgAQYRhj5AcICCBAAGBYYChgewgIIEAAYCBgNGB7CAgoQABgIGA0YHhgPwgIMEAAYgAQYDRhGGPkBwgIGEAAYDRgewgIIEAAYDRgeGA_CAggQABgFGA0YHpgDGZIHBTEzLjEzoAfZ0QE&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp
BittersweetPotato · 31-35, F
Why wouldn't they be trusted? Do you think Biden did it?
eli1601 · 70-79, M
@BittersweetPotato More likely Jill or Hunter. Joe doesn't remember who Trump is from one day to the next.
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
@BittersweetPotato they also investigated the russia hoax and refused to ivestigate the hunter laptop. The fbi told news sources not to publish the story
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
Who would you propose as an alternative?
BohoBabe · M
@SunshineGirl Me. I should do the investigation.
@SunshineGirl History has shown that such investigations become either Cover-your-ass food fights or expose-your-political-opponents-ass food fights. Peek into practically any House or Senate investigation for examples. The upper management of the DOJ and FBI are political appointees, and members of congress are all politicians. Likewise our court systems. Judges are nominated and confirmed by politicians. Our adversarial systems elude fairness, so let biased entities perform independent investigations open to the public, and let the people believe for themselves. Isn’t that what happened with the JFK investigation? The result of which was mostly that the government can’t be completely trusted. It can’t be trusted to be completely transparent.
eMortal · M
Do you want a foreign government to investigate?
4meAndyou · F
This is so raw. I thought the Secret Service would begin the investigation? THEN the FBI.
justanothername · 51-55, M
Please show proof to support you baseless claims of the DOJ and FBI being corrupt.
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@justanothername
Yeah, you tell him!!!!
Yeah, you tell him!!!!
@justanothername For starters
: They the same people who called Hunter Biden’s laptop Russian misinformation.
: They the same people who called Hunter Biden’s laptop Russian misinformation.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Heartlander They would be the corrupt republicans.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SandWitch · 26-30, F
Actually, you're right. I think we should get the KGB over here and let them oversee the investigation.
SandWitch · 26-30, F
Neither can Trump be relied upon to tell the truth, so let's call it like it is!
@SandWitch it’s like when the county sheriff investigates a crime that happens at the county jail. The sheriff runs the county jail and is to some degree investigating him/herself. The DOJ/FBI works for Trump’s political opponent. The result of the investigation may influence the election results. The DOJ/FBI leadership has a vested interest in the incident.
NativePortlander1970 · 51-55
No






















