The expansion had nothing to do with generating more matter
I feel that the underlying confusion you are exhibiting arises from your misconception of what you refer to as matter.
Originally I taught you that initially the universe was extremely hot and dense, allowing only quarks and electrons. A few millionths of a second later, quarks aggregated to produce protons and neutrons. Within minutes, these protons and neutrons combined into nuclei. As the universe continued to expand and cool, everything slowed down. It took 380,000 years for electrons to be trapped in orbits around nuclei, forming the first atoms. These were mainly helium and hydrogen, which are still by far the most abundant elements in the universe (emphases added)
Yet even now I see you writing "The expansion had nothing to do with generating more matter.”
Let me repeat... initially
Now you seem to be trying to equate that to the heat-death of the universe.
I’ve had cats that wandered around less than you. 😀
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow It’s standard procedure for him... he hops and skips and leaps and dodges and weaves and never, not ever, stands his ground to argue his claims. When blocked from his boltholes he simply obfuscates, runs away, lies low for a few days, then pops up elsewhere making the same discredited claims as previously made.
Everyone here is very familiar with his tedious tactics
First of all, no atheists believe something came from nothing. Secondly, it's you who believe in such shit since you believe God created universe from nothing and God himself had no creator. Congratulations, you proved yourself as ignorant.
@Kwek00 I guess you don't know that what she posted was exactly what I have been saying all along. As a star burns out it goes dark. Pretty simple. What completely baffles me is she posts what I just said to prove me wrong. She keeps proving me right with her posts. However the problem is with theories such as burned out stars is we have never seen one so we can't really say with absolute certainty what exactly will happen. In theory they become dark extremely dense (hard) matter. That is only a theory and only one such theory.
@Budwick Because this stupid fuck right here, can actually defend his claim on why you are a stupid fuck. That's the diffrence.
If I get a ticket from the staff out here, telling me not to tell you that you are a stupid fuck. I'll spam their pmg with quotes and fora posts you acted in. And I'll ask them the question: "Am I right, or not" and if they say I'm not right and they can substantiate why I'm not right... I'll personally appologies. But that's never going to happen, because we can just look up all the positions you held and how you defended them. However if they say: "it's against community guidelines", well, that's bad for me, but "community guidelines" doesn't make your replies less stupid.
Before earth there was something if you do research before you talk aloud of rubbish you won't look an idiot. the nebula was around before the earth or moon
@hippyjoe1955 A talking serpent? You believe a serpent actually spoke and tempted a woman? My reality and I suspect most other people's reality would suggest such a thing can't happen.. thus is never happened.
the old man strode to the front of the hall, shook the American by the hand and said - with passion - 'My dear fellow, I wish to thank you. I have been wrong these fifteen years.'
I don't think they claim to have arisen from nothing. The few I have spoken with don't believe in creation as it is depicted in the Bible. They lean more towards the theory of evolution from a scientific perspective.
Yes atheists argue that we came from nothing but I don't think that's the primary emphasis here. That's a side issue. They're arguing that you can't prove the existence of God. Hope this helps.
@newjaninev2 You got no class. You are just a bunch of misfiring neurons the result of a cosmic accident of no consequence whatsoever. Have a nice interlude and an even nicer flame out.
