Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What motivates anti-vaxxers?

Poll - Total Votes: 30
An active desire to harm people
Rank stupidity
Easily led by bad people
Other - please suggest in responses
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
I recently had to block a user on here for spreading harmful disinformation on Covid-19 vaccinations - they claimed that "more people are killed by the vaccine than by guns".

This claim is patently false and easily refuted by looking at the extensive scientific literature on the topic (a sample of which is available here: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html).

Which got me thinking: what motivates people to spread this nonsense?
For those who claim the mRNA vaccines were "untested," they need to know a few facts.

First, around the world, on the order of 100 different efforts were started to make a Covid vaccine. Many of them were "viral vector vaccines" such as the Johnson & Johnson and the AstraZenica vaccines. Our own "Operation Warp Speed" actually funded five different vaccine efforts; only two made it thru testing and were authorized for use in the US (yes, we had three vaccines authorized; Moderna, Pfizer, and J&J, but Pfizer was NOT part of Op Warp Speed).

Second, in the developed world, all vaccines, like all pharmaceutical products, are rigorously tested in three phases (the last pharmaceutical to avoid the modern testing regime was thalidomide - look it up if you're unfamiliar). The testing is done by independent testing agencies, and is double blinded. That means that until the end of the test, nobody knows which subjects got the placebo and which got the drug in question. It's very difficult to cheat a proper double blind placebo controlled trial.

Third, the three vaccines authorized were tested first on animals, then on humans for efficacy and safety, that last is known as a Phase 3 trial and it's the most expensive and long lasting. The Moderna trial had about 30,000 test subjects; Pfizer 45,000; both roughly equally divided among control (placebo) groups and vaccine groups. The results were published in a peer-reviewed medical journal. Both of the mRNA vaccine trials showed 95% efficacy against the original form of Covid after two doses and several weeks; J&J showed (I think) about 75% after 1 dose. Nobody claimed 100%; nobody claimed instant protection.

Fourth, here are links to the published trial results:

[sep][sep][sep]

"Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine"
[b]https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2035389[/b]
[u]Conclusions[/u]
The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.)

[sep][sep][sep]

Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
[b]https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577[/b]

[u]Results[/u]
A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. ...

[u]Conclusions[/u]
A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)

[sep][sep][sep]

Moderna animal trials
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2024671

Pfizer animal trials
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03275-y

BTW, the first clinical trials of any sort of mRNA vaccine in humans were in 2014 & 2015. Animal trials started in 2012.

Further info available upon request.
LaLumieri · 51-55, F
@ElwoodBlues thank uou for this
Straylight · 31-35, F
The same as any conspiracy theory. They like the way it makes them feel to believe they’re ahead of the curve with insider knowledge.
I dont think covid vaccine refusals are antivaxxers in general. They just in particular dont want THAT vaccine.
joe438 · 61-69, M
@Subsumedpat yes, that’s true. Then when the efficacy isn’t what was promised and Fauci and other experts changed the story fro “It fully protects you” to “keeps your symptoms mild”, we look at the situation and realize that they really didn’t know what to expect. Granted, given the emergency situation that’s reasonable - but if the govt and experts had been honest with us there we’d be a lot better off.
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
@joe438 I dont remember them saying it would fully protect you, maybe they did and I just dont remember. I always some vaccines did like the polio or smallpox vaccines and others helped but dis not have full protection like the seasonal flu vax or the first shingles vax.
joe438 · 61-69, M
@Subsumedpat first the cdc said you can’t get sick: https://youtu.be/uKf8dVxOy0s?si=bPjNWwvw0-5KPJo4

Then they walked it back and clarified that no vaccine is 100%. I chalk it up to wanting to simplify complex matters to those of us that they consider unable to understand anything
I am not an anti vaxxer, but, I do understand people who do not trust the government or the pharmaceutical industry due to their shady track record. In North Carolina, one of the counties with the highest unvaccinated rate is Robeson county, which is primarily Native American. One can definitely understand their hesitation to believe the government in regards to anything they say.
@SheCallsMeCrushDaddy Yes, let's talk about counties. These graphs below summarize county results after 2021. As you may know, death certificates are filled out by county and city medical examiners; death cert summaries are posted on county websites. States and the feds also accumulate and post the stats, but it's hard to lie about deaths in a county when the county has already posted its results.


As you can see, the counties with lower vaccination rates also experienced higher death rates - overall death rates; not just Covid death rates. Also, the counties with lower vaccination rates tended to lean more heavily towards Trump in their 2020 voting. These are the facts.
akindheart · 61-69, F
@Snuffy1957 i second that
@ElwoodBlues yeah I wouldn’t doubt your statistics. But, the people I am speaking of….. the Native Americans……. They may not be privy to your statistics. All they know is how the government has lied to them in the past, so they have problems trusting the government now. Either party. And I really can’t blame them.
zonavar68 · 51-55, M
You need to be very careful to stop say 'anti-vaxxer' for anyone who chooses to specifically not get Covid jabs. That's not 'anti-vax'.

Most humans do not need Covid jabs as natural immune system response does the job better. Covid was weaponised to be used for accelerated wealth concentration amongst the elite, testing social control measures promoted by the UN/WHO/WEF, and testing fast-tracked experimental drugs that require a massive commercial profit return on investment.

Covid was never about human health. We were never all in this together.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@zonavar68 The bottom line is that the major covid vaccines work and are effective in reducing negative outcomes. You can choose to improve your chances of better health or not--that is completely up to you. For me, I choose to have the vaccine and regular boosters when they become available. And I take sensible precautions to avoid exposure. So far, I have not had covid. But my personal experience is not important compared to the net experience at a population level. Unless something changes, I will continue to maximize my likelihood of a healthy outcome. You have to do what you feel comfortable with.
zonavar68 · 51-55, M
@windinhishair That is all fair and valid. But of the people that get the drugs, do they really need them? This is the 'mirror juror' approach where you step back and say 'why did we choose to get this?'. I chose for myself not to get Covid jabs but I never dissed anyone for making a different choice. But the pro-covid-vax fraternity can't accept that people opted to make a free choice and not get the jabs because that undermines their position of 'medical superiority'. 8-) Because the blanket position was 'you must get the drugs or you will die' anything that doesn't support that is considered anti-establishment.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@zonavar68 The situation has changed significantly over time. At the beginning, we needed to do everything possible to minimize spread while we knew nothing about mortality. As the vaccines became available, it made sense to vaccinate as many people as possible when it was believed that spread could be significantly reduced. Later variants showed little difference in covid incidence between vaccinated and unvaccinated, though the vaccine always showed measurable protection against negative outcomes. Now that we have transitioned from pandemic to endemic, and much more is known, and there is little stigma in getting or not getting the vaccine.

As far as the question of "do they really need them?" the answer remains that yes, your chances of positive outcomes is improved with the vaccines, so it makes sense scientifically. But everyone must determine what their own risk tolerance is.
For those who claim that the mRNA vaccines have side effects, this is true, and not the whole story.

First the biggest side effect, in a small number of people, is an allergic reaction. And that is why vaccination locations have you stay around 15 min. That's plenty of time for a reaction to develop and for them to hit you with an epi-pen.

The long term risk of mRNA vaccines is a slight uptick in myocarditiis rates. myo- means muscle, card- is the heart; -itis means inflammation of.

[quote]The association between COVID-19 vaccination and increased incidences of cardiac-related disorders such as myocarditis has been described by several studies.12,28,29 Goddard et al.30 conducted a large study evaluating the incidence of cardiac side effects of the vaccine among 7 million people in the United States. They reported an incidence of 320 cases 1–98days after approximately 7 million vaccine doses.30[/quote]
[b]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402862/[/b]

320 cases in 7 million patients. That's 0.0046% And the myocarditis clears up over time. Odds of DEATH among the unprotected is 0.5%; odds of long covid are 5X higher.

In other words, a person has a 500x higher chance of long Covid than of temporary myocarditis from the vaccine.
Ontheroad · M
Willful ignorance.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Snuffy1957 You are free to make your own choices as long as they don't negatively impact others. But you are fooling yourself if you ignore the science, even if that is your choice to ignore it.
Ontheroad · M
@Snuffy1957 So, you just commented to say you don't care. Thans for making my point.
Snuffy1957 · 61-69, M
@Ontheroad
ACTUALLY I Do care... but society is so busy back stabbing and running down each other I just gave up :(
I guess that's the new " United We Stand" thing..
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
Let me guess; HippieJoe?
@JimboSaturn No - blocked that profile months ago. This was ididntknow.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@Adeptlinguist Judging from his posts, he is also a racist.
For those who claim that other diseases were mis-identified as Covid, they need to know a few facts.

Here in the table are US death numbers for the top ten causes of death for six years ending in 2020. Notice how there are 20% more deaths in 2020 than the average of the previous five years? Doing the math, that's about 500,000 excess deaths in 2020.

Notice how, in 2020, 345,000 of those 500,000 excess deaths are classified as Covid? Notice how almost all causes of death rose in 2020, including cancer & heart disease?
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2778234

If there's any validity to the claim that lots of deaths have been mis-classified as Covid, why did almost all causes of death increase in 2020? Wouldn't mis-classification produce a reduction in those other causes? The evidence says mis-classification is a red herring.

windinhishair · 61-69, M
@ElwoodBlues Not only do the data indicate that other deaths weren't mischaracterized as covid, they indicate the covid deaths were likely undercounted.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
I think people who believe in conspiracy theories like to believe they are somehow more enlightened than the average person. It is a form of rebellion from feeling alienated or something. Just like cult followers, they like to feel they are special.
The recognition it is our bodies. No one has the right to force me to take the " vaccine". I stand by my beliefs. And it was one of three reasons I left the healthcare profession. No debate necessary.
Snuffy1957 · 61-69, M
Yu do realise.. there still isn’t any long term safety data on your jabby jab.
You are the test dummies..
but I’m the dummy anti vaxxer!

Enjoy your VAIDS
Myocarditis
Strokes
Sudden death… etc etc 🤷🏻‍♂️
windinhishair · 61-69, M
Most of the anti-vaxxers have been misled by others, and are prone to believing in wacky conspiracy theories. But what's really exasperating is their refusal to make decisions based on hard data and science. They cannot be helped. This is why covid and long covid are now significantly impacting the deniers much more than those who have been vaccinated in the US.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@JimboSaturn Unfortunately, believing in conspiracies for someone like that is a way for them to avoid taking responsibility for their lives. If they can blame their problems on someone or something else, they don't have to exercise responsibility.
sladejr · 56-60, M
@windinhishair

[quote]deniers[/quote]

Talk about a cultist.

How many Fauci votive candles do you light?
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@sladejr People who refuse to believe in science can justifiably be called deniers, because they deny facts and data.
Starguy · 26-30, M
They just didn't want that vaccine, simple. A lot of them are still here with us today.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@Starguy That's fine but spreading misinformation is another matter.
Starguy · 26-30, M
@JimboSaturn Not all of them spread any information at all.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@Starguy I have no problem with them.
AlchemyFox · 36-40, F
I'm not making any claims. I'm not here to debate. I chose not to get the vaccine because it came out very quickly and I prefer to be cautious. See how it actually plays out. In saying that I took other precautions and have only had covid once.

I hear valid arguments from both sides, but the truth is it's personal choice. Unfortunately people make personal choices that affect others poorly no matter what they choose.
@AlchemyFox I'm not trying to draw you into a debate, but I'm curious. The first folks in the US to get vaccinated started in Jan 2021. Now, three years and hundreds of millions of doses later, have you seen how it plays out? Have you reached any conclusions as to the safety and/or efficacy of the vaccines?
AlchemyFox · 36-40, F
@ElwoodBlues Honestly no. All I've seen is conflicting evidence, which leads me to believe someone is being dishonest and from experience I've learned the ones dishonest generally have something to gain. I've opted for healthy lifestyle, hygiene and taking precautions. I also don't get a flu or pneumonia vaccine and have not had either of those in many years. The last time I had walking pneumonia I was vaccinated months before.

Not that I'm a medical professional or support either way, but for me I have had better luck without.

The one time I got covid, I got it from someone who was vaccinated.

So for now I'm sticking to what works. I'll adapt if necessary.
SW-User
Usually they got a brand new tin foil hat and want people to look at them
LaLumieri · 51-55, F
As a person who is dealing with COVID now I can't be thankful enough that I took my vaccinations because it could have been so much worse Especially after recently going through pneumonia I could have died but because I had my vaccines I had a good chance of getting through this. I understand the fear I work in the pharmaceutical industry. But for some people it was the best choice.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
I just looked at his profile. He is into all the conspiracies; total nut job.
hunkalove · 61-69, M
Fear and hate and needing to feel superior to others. And immense stupidity.
What’s interesting is that prior to COVID, most anti-vaxers were granola-munching, tree-hugging, organic hippie types. This is where people like RFK Jr. came from. Now of course they’ve been outnumbered by the QAnon/MAGA crowd.
joe438 · 61-69, M
@LeopoldBloom People opposed to taking untested experimental treatments come from all corners of the political spectrum.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Americans in general hate being told what to do.
Especially by their government !
And to some extent it's understandable.

If America is supposedly the land of the free, where's the freedom of choice in the Covid vaccine scenario ?

On that one you have to confront the likes of Trump; Fauci and co. who did their level best to fudge; prevaricate; and basically deny covids existence for so long; actively encouraged business travel to and from China, even after it was proven to be the source of it's outbreak; and then went into total denial about how serious it was; what the impact of having densely populated cities with major international airports; rail stations and underground networks meant for the spread of a virus over which they had no control.

Now ask yourself this.
How many Americans do you suppose caught and died from covid or the effects of covid where 'Pulmonary failure' or 'Heart failure' were recorded as the cause of death rather than covid itself ?

[b]Those[/b] are the stats. the world wants to see.
You should too.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Picklebobble2 You don't know what you are talking about. Stick with British politics, you're recall of American politics is inaccurate.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@SumKindaMunster yeah point proven yet again.
That's fine.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
As others have mentioned, being skeptical about the mRNA Covid 19 vaccines is a smart decision. Being against taking this specific vaccine and still being open to vaccinations in general does not make one an "anti vaxxer"

My impression is that this post is virtue signalling.

You aren't really asking, you are looking for others to agree and back you up.
zonavar68 · 51-55, M
@SumKindaMunster The pro-covid-vax camp has been doing virtue signalling since day 1 of lockdowns occuring.
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
They fell prey to a political trend then when people argue with them insisting they are wrong they just get more entrenched in their position. If you disagree then you should just be asking non accusing questions not telling them they are wrong. Social media is another reason. If you read anti vax posts or view anti vax you tube videos. That is all you are going to get.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
Of course he's a Trump cultist too/.
pentacorn · F
obstinate willful ignorance, straight up inability to science, or some just have an inherent fear of their governments and/or the pharmaceutical industry, which is valid in many cases, and deep-seated fears are very hard to overcome
Snuffy1957 · 61-69, M
My intense distrust of the Government
Renaci · 36-40
@Snuffy1957 You have a choice of 195 different governments. Pick one and move there.
Snuffy1957 · 61-69, M
@Renaci
I'll live where I want to without your advice Thank you
Morvoren · F
Contrarian angst I would say.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
zonavar68 · 51-55, M
Reverse question - what is the standard number of Covid jabs the US administrations are pushing people to get? 4 per year, meaning now they'd have to be to like 8 or 9 jabs?
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@zonavar68 I had the last life-saving jab in October, and I just read yesterday that people in my age group are being recommended for another booster this Spring, so that will be two worthwhile jabs in the last year. I receive every one that is recommended, based on the current science, and I think the next one will be my sixth.
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
Yet they were all vaccinated at birth!
Stupid ideas being circulated
joe438 · 61-69, M
@Strictmichael75 How many years of testing did those vaccines have, and what was the track record of those vaccines actually preventing illness?
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
@joe438 The Covid vaccine is based on the flu vaccines and a worldwide medical database shared by doctors
I know of nobody that had major problems with covid!
I am vaccinated and not the slightest problem
joe438 · 61-69, M
@Strictmichael75 Actually, they aren’t. Flu vaccines are made from deactivated or killed influenza viruses. That’s an age-old technique for producing vaccines. The COVID shots are based on mRNA and rely on your body seeing a protein that’s found on the COVID virus and reacting to that. It’s not based on a killed virus, but on a new, evolving technology.

I’m glad you aren’t having any issues from your shot. Many people are.
iamonfire696 · 41-45, F
Low intelligence level
Renaci · 36-40
To be honest it is actually a combination of all three. I know plenty of antivaxxers and they are stupid, easily lead and have a high desire to hurt others.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@AJS30 Are you OK? You clearly aren’t scientifically literate.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@AJS30 What a travesty it is to lose one's mind. Good luck to you in the future unencumbered by facts.

 
Post Comment