Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A world ruled by men will always be in war, right?

World ruled by the rich with zero accountability will always have war
I think a world ruled by [u]humans[/u] will always be in war. I'm not convinced gender makes a difference.
@robingoodfellow conservatives. Un -leftists will always want war.
GeistInTheMachine · 31-35, M
When the chips are down, every race, gender, class, nationality, etc will turn on eachother. It's just a matter of degree. It's human nature. And that is already happening anyway.

Even on a "civil" level we kill eachother. And we have broken families that hate eachother.

I'm voting for the aliens.
@GeistInTheMachine there's a new mood of impatience with US war enforced global economic hegemony, but no appetite for becoming the enemy of the USA in war.
GeistInTheMachine · 31-35, M
@Roundandroundwego Russia didn't want to be the enemy.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
WildWings · 61-69, M
Yes
For some strange reason some men cannot exist without war. Israel is a prime examply. Throughout it's entire 75 year history it has always been fighting with somebody and now they are committing genocide.
@WildWings You clearly MISunderstood my downvote: it was intended for your comment. The remark about Iran, a truly terrorist nation and sponsor, was sarcastic.
Thank God and western technology for largely negating any effect of ther attack on Israel.
WildWings · 61-69, M
@LamontCranston So you want to defend Israel?
@WildWings You do realize that BEFORE Israel strikes ANYWHERE that they give the Civilians ample time to leave, yet hamas prevents it, thus being THE FAULT OF HAMAS, not Israel.
[media=https://youtu.be/zBmcrv-Qj94]
Philth · 46-50, M
Wow not at all manbashing, muchly.
I grew up in Thatcher's Britain and saw the dismantling of many State social provisions, followed by all-out war on those working in the traditional industries... Calling our coal miners "the enemy within" . A less humane Prime Minister is hard to imagine.
Most wars are initiated by men because most of the positions of power are held by men - and that's an entirely different argument. I was gutted to see Jacinda Ardern stand down.
WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M
Didn’t Catherine the Great start the war of Russo-Turkish War?
TheMinistry · 100+
You’ve never heard of Margaret Thatcher?
Mostly, yes...but the society of war mongering globalists has several female members.
Just ask Victoria Nuland.
Morvoren · F
We’re no more or less stable than them. There’s no reason to think it would be different.
DCGuy77 · 22-25
Sadly yes. Would love to see a change where women are given a chance to rule the world.
ididntknow · 51-55, M
Also women, Madeleine Albright, Victoria Nuland, just a couple of examples
Ferric67 · M
women war just as much
they're just smarter and savvier about it
I think the likelihood of war has much more to do with the number of democratic governments in the world.
eli1601 · 70-79, M
Yes and we have football (land acquisition) for the rare times we don't have war.

Edit: American football
Indianboy · M
Agree. I would love to see leaders of all nations in world as women- will be very interesting..
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
No. Just these particular ones.
BLP11520 · 61-69, M
Yes, it will never stop
DailyFlash · 56-60, M
Unfortunately
Biological sex won't make a difference, humanity is implicitly not a peace-loving species in general because is it not a rational or collective-minded species in general, it is the embodiment of tribalism, selfishness, and overconsumption above all else, no matter the direct or indirect consequences.

If we weren't, this [i][b]one planet[/b][/i] would not be carved up into myriad "countries" and languages. There would be zero borders and emotional preservation of this or that "culture" would never impede basic rational things like [i][b]communication[/b][/i].

Furthermore, broadly speaking, Eva Braun is no better than Adolph Hitler.


[u]https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men[/u]

[u]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_ancient_warfare[/u]

[u]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_women_warriors_in_folklore[/u]
I think it's safe to say that a world ruled by women would be doomed the moment two world leaders showed up at a diplomatic event wearing the same dress. (I'm kidding.)
jackieash · 26-30
@LordShadowfire or new hair do!
FeetAreFantastic · 41-45, M
Interesting question. Do you think a world ruled by women would have less war?
Don't be so sure, Hillary is a complete war hawk, she was ready to go to war with Putin over Syria.

 
Post Comment