Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Prematurely abandoning Bagram airport is a huge Biden error

Having one airport available make it easier to control for the Taliban and way worse for the poor Americans and Afghans that supported us still there.
Top | New | Old
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
The brass talking about how long they planned this disaster is not doing them any favors! Common sense dictates the removal of tactical equipment and "soft targets" prior to the withdrawal of fighting forces. It is beyond stupid.
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow
Biden is not taking direction from the Taliban you half wit. But he knows who he is dealing with.
Yeah! I'm a half wit! 😆
Wow.
@Oberon1 I give up. No point in trying to speak rationally with a religious zealot.
Quite an accomplishment and not easy to do. You beat pics into submission 😂😆😂 @Oberon1
Bagram isn't equipped for civilian flights

There's probably no place in Afghanistan that's equipped for civilian flights at the moment. Commercial airliners lack anti-missile defenses, lack bullet proof panels to protect the crews and vital systems, lack self-sealing fuel tanks. It's not because of the airports, it's because of the airplanes.

That said, the US has 200+ C17s, 300+ C130s, 1,000+ transport helicopters. There's no lack of military airplanes. Add to that the French, the British, etc.

Obviously citizens are nonnegotiable however Biden seems to be bailing on the “collaborators” kind of easily and quickly. @QuixoticSoul
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@jackjjackson Sounds like we're expecting to get about 50k out - we will see if Taliban can be incentivized to keep the flow going after we're officially out. If they piss us off too much, nothing preventing us from bombing some juicy concentrations of men and equipment once Americans are out of harm's way. Air strikes are easy enough for us to justify and carry out.
It will be a trade off I suppose. Eventually we will tire of bombing them. Wonder what will be in drone range after? @QuixoticSoul
carpediem · M
Bagram, as I understand it, was the most secure place in the entire damned country. Here's one reason:

On Wednesday afternoon, at a joint press conference, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley were asked about the decision to evacuate from Karzai International instead of Bagram. Lloyd didn’t address the question. Milley’s answer was a mouthful, but the bottom line is that there weren’t enough troops.

“If we were to keep both Bagram and the embassy going,” Milley said, that would require “a significant number of military forces,” so “you had to collapse one or the other.”

Milley also said the generals “estimated that the risk” of going out of Bagram or Karzai International “was about the same,” but he also acknowledged that President Biden did not leave enough troops for a scenario in which an evacuation was necessary to hold Bagram, protect the embassy, and protect Karzai International.

Milley said their mission was to keep the embassy open and get the level of “troops down to a 600–700 number.”


In other words...he screwed up.
No real American would commit these atrocities against its own citizens. Abandoning Afghani allies, screwing over the UK and France, as well as giving up billions of $$ in military assets and technology is gasoline on an already raging fire. Make no mistake, the sock puppet in chief, Beijing Buyden isn't the one pulling the strings here.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@QuixoticSoul I had no idea Kabul was that big
I’d figure 1-2 mill tops
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@AthrillatheHunt I got my numbers mixed up - it's 4.3 million. Not a small place.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@QuixoticSoul still double what I would have thought .
llamaboy · 36-40, M
" This is the greatest humiliation in the history of the United States " Donald J Trump
eli1601 · 70-79, M
@llamaboy Allowing an election to be stolen is worse.
wrule · F
I dont understand the reason for the Americans just fleeing from there without realizing the consequences.
@wrule

Try turning what you said around. Biden had to have known the consequences and chose to either ignore them or embrace them.

His comments about 20 years is too long and not wanting to pass it on to another president are pretty shallow.
wrule · F
@Heartlander From what I think, they just wanted to be out of Afghanistan come what may.
@wrule Yep, regardless of the consequences. But a quick peek at the casualty count over the past few years raises the questions: why suddenly the great rush? Why the pull-out without coordination with the Afghan government, and the Afghan military? Why did we coordinate with just the Taliban and not the people who we had been working with for 20 years?

More Americans are murdered in Chicago in just a single typical weekend than in an entire year in Afghanistan. We don't fix Chicago's crime problem by coordinating with the drug gangs and then suddenly pulling out the police and turning off the electricity at the police stations.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
Look at the map - evacuating people from Kabul to Bagram would be an even bigger mess, not to mention that Bagram isn't equipped for civilian flights, and we didn't have the manpower to keep it secured anyhow.

Everything went to shit when the ANA melted, but our choices were all crap at that point.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
They should extend the mission until they get everyone out!
@jackjjackson Again, you are the one making dire pronouncements and conspiracies with no evidence. That is on you.
Oberon1 · 61-69, M
@jackjjackson Every time these new democrats are exposed for the complete incompetents that they are, all their little followers get extra crazy with their 'acting out'. They know they are on the wrong side of history, and they know that their heroes are despicable villains. All they know how to do is lash out like the spoiled toddlers that they are.
@Oberon1 And like a child you think anyone on earth that doesn't worship Trumpy and the GOP are Democrats. 🤦‍♂️
This seems like sort of old news, which has already been debated and supposedly "explained" in terms of available manpower.

If we're going to rehash it, why not repackage it by showing other downsides to only having one way in and out, like this;

https://www.businessinsider.com/who-and-unicef-cant-get-humanitarian-aid-for-afghans-into-kabul-2021-8
@jackjjackson We abandoned Bagram in early July, and the decision has been knocked around a lot over the past week, including this one from 5 days ago which I had still starred.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/08/why-did-the-united-states-abandon-bagram-airfield/

As to the link, it points out that since there's only one way in and out of the country by air, aid is not getting in.

I'm not saying we should forget about mistakes at all, including the ones made by Biden, Trump, Obama and Bush, but at the moment, second guessing decisions made a month ago doesn't seem like the best use of our time compared to dealing with it's consequences.
No it does not. However no one in charge appears to be dealing with the co sequences in any helpful way. If I missed something, please let me know. Soldiers from most European countries have gone out of in Kabul streets and gotten their citizens out. Not us. @MistyCee
@jackjjackson Last I heard was there have been at least several helicopter missions, but no boots on the ground, so to speak.

I still think this stinks, but it appears to me like the US has cut another deal with the Taliban and is trying to live with it publicly, while perhaps working covertly to get people out.

What is happening now is not clear, really, nor is what will happen when the end of the month comes up and America has still not lived up to the deal and gotten all of its people out.

I'm not defending Biden here, or even attacking Trump, but it seems to me like what we've been doing with Afghanistan for a long time is lying down with dogs, and now we've got fleas.
I read a few fragments of reports about Bagram about the problems there. Like the security forces were pulled out first, and then it became impossible to rescue anyone else there because the airfield was longer secure.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@jackjjackson The Afghan higher ups were told that we were leaving Bagram, but the government was so dysfunctional at that point that the news never filtered down to the locals patrolling outside the perimeter who were taken completely by surprise, and thought that the crowd of looters that descended on the base were Taliban at first.

@Heartlander The ceremony stuff happens when you give a shit - and we’re long past giving a shit about Afghanistan. Nobody felt like giving speeches.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul Typical left-wing nut job, screw people, we don't care about human beings
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 lmao you goddamn hippie 🤣
TexChik · F
Wouldnt a few showers from some B1s and strafing by A10s creat enough of a window to get aircraft in there to get them all out ?
Couldn’t hurt except we can’t be sure friendlies wouldn’t be hit in the strafing. At some point a direct hit on the presidential palace could be fun. @TexChik
TexChik · F
@jackjjackson there are no friendlies there are there? The Taliban has executed them .
In the countryside maybe but not in Kabul yet and their are still some Americans and citizens of other countries about. @TexChik
graphite · 61-69, M
Biden Error. A bit redundant there.
Please don't pretend you understand strategy. It is embarrassing. Ever heard of divide and conquer? You want to make it easier on the opposition?
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@MarkPaul 🖕
[image/video deleted]
We have yet to learn who ordered the unannounced late-night pull-out and who turned off the lights.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
So we're all just going to ignore the fact that Donald Trump was heckling Joe for taking too long to abandon Afghanistan? That's pretty fucking typical of you losers.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@tindrummer The truth irritating you?
tindrummer · M
@sunsporter1649 please focus
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
Is that where Biden gets his geopolitical information? @MistyCee
@pianoplayingsteve That's exactly what the dummy did.

 
Post Comment