Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Would you rather someone be very good with words or good with action and doing it?

Top | New | Old
AthrillatheHunt · 56-60, M
We all vote for people who are good w words.
BrandonWyatt36 · 41-45, M
Actions... HOWEVER... Before he Passed away my Cult Leader Boy Bray Wyatt from WWE Wrestling just had that "Voice" when he would get on the Microphone that got me "Under His Spell" and I become obsessed with him... Can't lie about that one... And got to see him live Twice at WWE live before he Passed away in Real life... R.I.P Bray Wyatt ❤❤❤
Sapio · 51-55, M
I like a bit of both tbh.
I always liked the phrase "action is better than words."
Actions. Anyone can be a sweet talker. Back it up, boo
Sutten · 41-45, F
Good with action and doing it.
exexec · 70-79, C
Action. I rarely believe anyone's words until I see or know about their actions.
Both, but much more in actions
MrSmartyPants · 46-50, M
If being very good with words means a high paying job as a best selling author, i'd pick that.
Both are important...

Not always you need things to be done. You just need to hear the right words to see other's perspective.
I appreciate both for different reasons.
My Nan always said "actions speak louder than words" and She was right 🤷🏻‍♀
LordShadowfire · 51-55, M
Action. I can talk all day.
AbbeyRhode · F
It depends. If we're talking about love, I enjoy hearing beautiful words, and as long as they are sincere, I'm happy.
But if we're talking about something that needs doing, I'd prefer him to actually fix the squeaky cabinet than just talk about it.
GoFish ·
just good in general
Yulianna · 26-30, F
that depends entirely on what i want from them...
moonlightlullaby · 46-50, F
Action. Anyone can put on a show with words and intellect.
GuyWithOpinions · 31-35, M
Depends what the situation is
obviously actions, with the caveat that they also need a bare minimum ability to ALSO communicate clearly with others; if there is a communication barrier it could actually derail the actions, e.g., if you're a rock star with actions but all you can do is grunt like a caveman, what is the likelihood much gets accomplished over time? you don't have to be eloquent or even grammatically correct, but if people think, e.g., you mean the opposite of what you're actually trying to convey, that is problematic
Magenta · F
Better with action / doing. Words can just be a performative noise.


 
Post Comment