@AthrillatheHunt I'm talking about bigotry, bigotry isn't confined to the right wing. The only person that brought in "right wing", is you Ahtrilla. Thanks for contributing nothing to this conversation, time to go back and sit on your fence.

@Kwek00 You said far right politicians . I wouldn’t have mentioned far right if you didn’t . And sitting on a fence gives one a good view of both sides of the fence.

@DeWayfarer You have poor reading comprehension and this is the last reply to you that I'll waste my time with 🤣

I don't dispute the fact of what you've posted, but none of that means he should be fighting against women! Women have XX chromosomes. He doesn't. He is a male, a man. Not a typical 'XY' man, maybe. But the presence of an extra chromosome doesn't make him a woman. His physical development after puberty, testosterone level, height, reach, power are all that of a man.

@helsbels She is not a male! You want to make her a male.

That is your own misconception!

You say you won't disagree. Yet you persist on going against what I replied.

@iamthe99 Not a single remark I’ve read is transphobic. Trans is fine. Be who you want. However, being trans does not give you the right to compete as a biological woman. That infringes on their right to competitive fairness.

Furthermore, why is it always competition against women? Why do women have to always get the short end of the stick? Notice the argument isn’t ever about biological women transitioning to become “male” and competing against biological men. Why, because they’d lose. There’s an inherent flaw in a one sided argument.

Thus, it’s not transphobia. It’s biological women’s rights that’s at issue.

@Adogslife You make too much sense to fit into today's PC world where individual "rights" or "beliefs" seem to HAVE to outweigh common sense or the rights of others.

@Adogslife that part ☝

@bijouxbroussard Generally understood to mean a DSD, of which there are several types (that exclusively affect either men or women - meaning only men have one particular DSD, while a woman would have another). At birth he may have to all intents and purposes have been observed and recorded to be female, and even bought up as such, but it would have become evident at puberty that this was incorrect. I've said before I have sympathy, but the right thing to do is not take advantage of that by using it to endanger women.

And on your second point, absolutely. It's entirely non-invasive and conclusive. All other boxers will be undergoing the same, so it's not like he's been singled out.

@bijouxbroussard It can happen, read about Erik Schinegger who competed as Erika until he discovered he was genetically male (and immediately anounced this and stopped competing)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Schinegger

@helsbels .Why don't you want scenarios like this? There was never a problem with Khelif in the first place. Khelif had competed in many competitions as a woman going back to 2018. It was never a problem. Why is it now? Has sport become too "woke" for you?

@iamthe99 Walk yourself through that question. Why would I not want women to get in to a boxing ring with men? 'It must be because I'm bigoted' 🙃

I'm starting to think you lot are just doing this for laughs

@helsbels Look, the fact remains that she was born and registered female, and no evidence that she has XY chromosomes has been published. The only "new evidence" is fevered speculation.

@WillaKissing Exactly!

@Thrust Cute insult 😁 Did you borrow it from your 1970s school bully or just your reflection this morning?

@iamthe99 sublime!

Once you put the 1000 pieces of your mirror back together, you too can see your relection again