Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why Do Skeptics Keep Believing In Evolution When There Is 0 Evidence For It?

Why is a good question? Why do they hate God so much that they decided not to believe in Him? They keep claiming that there is a mountain of evidence for evolution but fail to show it. All they have is a lot of nice drawings and art work, and artifacts that is either tampered with or, more times than not, misinterpreted.

Science's earliest roots can be traced to Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia around 3000 to 1200 BC. According to the Word of God, science has been around 3000 years earlier since the world began. In spite of the popular myth that the earth is 6.4 billion years old the skeptics keep pushing on everybody, true science shows a much younger earth according to the Word of God.

[media=https://youtu.be/rxIt0_keBF8]

[media=https://youtu.be/lPQNhMVSMy0]

[media=https://youtu.be/y23ap4bKSi0]

[media=https://youtu.be/Y3s2l97J1aU]

It's plain to see that the earth is nowhere near 10,000 years old let alone 6.4 billion years old. Science is a wonderful gift that God has given us and will always reveal the Truth that He has established before the foundations of the earth. Skeptics may laugh or mock or even ridicule, but they can't change the Truth of God to fit their agenda.
Top | New | Old
Richard65 · M
A scientist and a priest are walking on a wet beach when they see hoof tracks in the sand. The scientist says, "Judging from all the evidence that is available to me, I say a horse has run along the beach and left those tracks, even though I did not witness the horse running by with my own eyes."

The priest replies, "There's also the possibility that a unicorn left those tracks."
Richard65 · M
@SomeMichGuy I'm sniping at the anti science movement, like Godspeed. Christianity relies on faith, defined as belief without evidence. People believe in God, despite there being zero actual evidence for his existence. Science uses peer reviewed evidence and experiments and builds on knowledge already discovered. Believers simply believe without evidence. The allegory illustrated that fact. It's a solid allegory and exactly sums up the two ideas. The scientist builds on knowledge to understand a horse rode by. The man of faith holds onto the possibility that it might have been a unicorn, something for which no evidence exists.
@Richard65
Science is about what is measurable and repeatable, and I actually am traines in it and am not a creationist, "Bible is science", etc., person.

But to say that there is no evidence is not true.
Richard65 · M
@SomeMichGuy it is true. Faith is the bedrock of religious movements, such as Christianity. Jesus said, "have faith." Faith is defined as belief WITHOUT evidence. If you say evidence exists then you have no need of faith and your entire theological house of cards collapses. I was brought up in the faith. I just saw through it eventually. If you say evidence exists then you don't understand your belief system properly. Faith doesn't need evidence. That's the entire point.
Do you believe in the functions of mathematics?
2+2 means 4, no? I can calculate it. You can calculate it. A person from Papua New Guinea can calculate it. But, they need to know how to do basic mathematics to do that.

It's the same with the rest of the science. 90% of it.
Go master geology, rock formation, chemistry, physics, biology and most needed sciences and you'd maybe be convinced. Because you don't believe experts (independent or not) and the evidence they show.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage
I have no intention of showing you anything.

What are you afraid of Doc?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
calicuz · 56-60, M
There is zero evidence of God as well, so not believing in deities does not equal hate. I choose to believe in the Abrahamic God, but that doesn't make me right about anything.
DocSavage · M
Sound familiar
Science's earliest roots can be traced to Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia around 3000 to 1200 BC.
What about the Chinese civilizations? They were way ahead in of technology without "the word of God."

According to the Word of God, science has been around 3000 years earlier since the world began.
Cite the chapter and verse. Also anything in the bible that refers to methodology.
DocSavage · M
@BlueSkyKing
Forget it. If it’s not on a Ken Ham video, he doesn’t know it. You don’t him to read the thing do you?
lol

No, you got that wrong.

You need to read the wikipedia entry about "consilience"...

Evolution has that: multiple lines of research all pointing to the same conclusion.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
OriginalDumbMan · 36-40
@SomeMichGuy if there was evolution on very large timescale, we would be seeing some species between monkey and human. As we see green leaves, dry leaves, and leaves in between green leaves and dry leaves.
@OriginalDumbMan That's apples and oranges. Dry & wet leaves are not different species of leaves, meaning your example is specious...

And people unaccepting of evolution always think one arg will somehow undo it...which is why understanding consilience is so important...

But the claim was never like what you present.

And there have been other proto-humans, but sapiens--what a misnomer!--won out by being a superior adaptation...
NOS4R2 · 41-45
Why do people keep bait posting about things they previously bait posted about
Numerous times
Over as many years
Just to get the same arguments
Every time
Every post
?





No evolution apparently 😶
NOS4R2 · 41-45
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP its like watching a revolving door.
Im all for queries and questions, but something new might be nice
@NOS4R2 🤔 there might be something in what you say. If one is so predictable, then your contenders are going to adapt. Keep changing your game and you'll catch them flat-footed. I'm sure Sun Tzu said something like that
NOS4R2 · 41-45
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP i didn't know this. Now i need to look up Sun Tzu.
Thank you
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
kodiac · 22-25, M
Quote-All they have is a lot of nice drawings and art work, and artifacts that is either tampered with or, more times than not, misinterpreted.You described the bible and religion in general .
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@kodiac
You described the bible and religion in general .

Read the post again, you are sadly mistaken.
DocSavage · M
The bible claims the earth is flat. The same evidence against evolution supports it, if you believe in one you are bound by your faith to believe in the other.
Where’s you proof of a flat Earth ?, with your evidence for Creationism.
SW-User
There's so much evidence for evolution that the Catholic church accepted it years ago. Why don't you?
DocSavage · M
true science shows a much younger earth according to the Word of God.
According to whom ? What’s your consensus ?
WonderGirl · 41-45
And what about gravity? Don't get me started. 🤣
Because freedom of thought is the product of conscious thinker's evolution
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage
How long was it that the title “evolution “ was first used ?

It doesn't matter, evolution never happened. I see that you're not a historian.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
So tell me Mr History, this is one of the clay plates, from Genesis. Where does it mention evolution?
NOS4R2 · 41-45
@DocSavage they also didn't mention chemistry, neurons or even toenail fungus, so they mustn't exist either by his logic 😂
Just because you choose to ignore all the facts doesn't mean everyone else needs to as well.
Bewilderbeeste · 70-79, M
They don't necessarily hate God, they just don't believe in him.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Outside of this site , no one knows a single thing about your true self. And that is counting only this site. Imagine how many people must loathe you in reality.along with those that do know you personally.
I, prefer to stick with the idea of live and let live. Too much effort hating strangers. Of course, since god doesn’t live. That makes it all the more pointless.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage
Of course, since god doesn’t live.

You still haven't shown any support to that statement. The Truth of God is hated very much in this fallen world. As for these people on here, Doc, I do not hate them, including you. These people on here matter to me which is why I challenge them with the Truth that God has established before the foundations of the earth. You can make a mockery of it all you like but you need to know that your mockery comes from your distorted mind of hatred. Learn to love others as Jesus loves you. Good day to you.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
You still haven't shown any support to that statement
And I have no intention of doing so. God wants my belief, he’s the one that needs to convince me. As far as he and his kid are nothing more than fantasy characters. You have no evidence, you can’t prove anything, why should I provide it ? He’s not my god.
Science reveals you are wrong.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage
What you have is not truth

You've made your choice, Doc, all I can do is pray for you.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Fat lot of good that will do anyone. Prayer is nothing more than a magic spell without a wand. What you going to do, send a scripture from Harry Potter ?
DocSavage · M
You've made your choice,
Yes I have, despite , something that your religious belief would try to ban
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Why does technology use that terminology then, hypocritical and conflicting to use both
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage
How do you figure that , chowderhead ?

You have nothing to say. Good day to you.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
You’re the only that spends all your time saying nothing to begin with. What difference will it make. It’s not like you have a point to make.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
The bible isn’t science, and disproves its own creation myth.
Prove me wrong.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
NOS4R2 · 41-45
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout No no no, God needs gold candelabras, a credit card and a new Mercedes 😅

 
Post Comment