Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why Do Skeptics Keep Believing In Evolution When There Is 0 Evidence For It?

Why is a good question? Why do they hate God so much that they decided not to believe in Him? They keep claiming that there is a mountain of evidence for evolution but fail to show it. All they have is a lot of nice drawings and art work, and artifacts that is either tampered with or, more times than not, misinterpreted.

Science's earliest roots can be traced to Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia around 3000 to 1200 BC. According to the Word of God, science has been around 3000 years earlier since the world began. In spite of the popular myth that the earth is 6.4 billion years old the skeptics keep pushing on everybody, true science shows a much younger earth according to the Word of God.

[media=https://youtu.be/rxIt0_keBF8]

[media=https://youtu.be/lPQNhMVSMy0]

[media=https://youtu.be/y23ap4bKSi0]

[media=https://youtu.be/Y3s2l97J1aU]

It's plain to see that the earth is nowhere near 10,000 years old let alone 6.4 billion years old. Science is a wonderful gift that God has given us and will always reveal the Truth that He has established before the foundations of the earth. Skeptics may laugh or mock or even ridicule, but they can't change the Truth of God to fit their agenda.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Science reveals you are wrong.
OriginalDumbMan · 36-40
@SomeMichGuy science is just you know 0.01 percent of god
@OriginalDumbMan lmao!

If God created all, He created the rules we are uncovering.

There is no need to fear them.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@SomeMichGuy @OriginalDumbMan
Science reveals you are wrong.

How do you know I'm wrong when science points to God? After all, He's its Author.
@GodSpeed63 The fact that God reveals Himself in Creation I readily accept.

But the Bible is not, nor never was, a science text.

A vision seen by a non-scientist in around 1850 BC/BCE isn't a viable basis for science in detail.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@SomeMichGuy
But the Bible is not, nor never was, a science text

The Word of God is where man got his knowledge of science from.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@SomeMichGuy
No.

God was first to operate on a sleeping man, first to point out that life is in the blood, first to mention that cleanliness is next to Him when eating or caring for some else who is in need, first to demonstrate that a certain pitch of sound can break a stone wall, shall I go on?
@GodSpeed63 Lmao

And that is not what you claimed.

The Bible is not the origin of science.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@SomeMichGuy
Lmao

That's all you can do since you keep failing to support any of your claims. Good day to you.
@GodSpeed63 No, you never supported yours!

smh
OriginalDumbMan · 36-40
@SomeMichGuy God is unreachable through your five senses and is beyond your reasoning and understanding. Because god created you.
@OriginalDumbMan I think you should stick with your username.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
God says he’s not alive. You calling him a liar ?
Gods heart beat - none
Gods pulse -none god’s blood pressure-none
Gods body temperature-none
Gods body-none, etc, etc.
God could never meet all basic standards of life.
@DocSavage You are referring to physical life.
DocSavage · M
@SomeMichGuy
It’s the one we know. The one we have.
@DocSavage It's the one we can physically see and investigate, yes.

But you know what is meant by the other phrase (applied to God).
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@DocSavage
God say he’s not alive. You calling him a liar ?

No, just you, Doc.
DocSavage · M
[@GodSpeed63

Willing to prove it ?
Can you in fact deny that god does not meet any definition or standard of life known to exist ?
In fact, the only definition he does meet is, is the one, which you claim he doesn’t. That of a fictional character in a book.
Love that irony.
DocSavage · M
@SomeMichGuy
You are referring to physical life
We don’t have any other that can be demonstrated.
OriginalDumbMan · 36-40
@SomeMichGuy Can science explain or quantify consciousness?
@OriginalDumbMan I think you need to respond to @DocSavage, not me.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
What did I lie about ? You can give one reliable description of god. Not one that can be demonstrated. Height, weight, eye or hair color. Social security number. Shoe size. Zip code.No physical characteristics, not even a credit card, if god were called to testify in court, he wouldn’t qualify for habeas corpus.
Even science would be unable to validate his existence that would be physically, legally, or socially identifiable as god. Go ahead and prove me wrong.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@DocSavage
What did I lie about ?

You're lying to yourself and to others. This fallen world of ours has you so mixed up, you don't know whether you're coming or going. I've offered you plenty of chances to have a decent conversation with me about why you believe that evolution is true and to show me some evidence of what you believe is actually true and you wouldn't do it; or couldn't do it from where I'm standing. Try to understand this time, in this fallen world of ours there remains two facts, the lie of Satan, the Truth of God. It's up to you to decide who are you going to follow. As for me and my house, we will follow the Truth of God. He gave me a heart for the truth and changed my life for the better.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Try to understand this time, in this fallen world of ours there remains two facts, the lie of Satan, the Truth of God. It's up to you to decide who are you going to follow
What about the truth of what can be shown to be honest ? You do mankind a disservice by assuming there are only two choices in the world. The absolute worse sin regardless of who you worship or follow is willful , deliberate, ignorance. Self deception is pleasing to the ego, but destructive in the end.
What you have is not truth, it’s mindless faith. You know this,it’s why you’re afraid