You cannot complain bout sexism while also consistently generalizing men and calling them all disgusting pigs.

@AbbeyRhode

Thank you for Best Answer.

@originnone
I know this was a response to @IronHamster, but I thought I'd address it anyway.

I think you do need to think more about what I said in relation to masculine women, or at least women who would like to be more masculine, generally being the type of women who would be attracted to leadership roles, or to professions that would ordinarily be dominated by men. If this is the case, then of course these particular women are going to be less empathetic than some other women, who say aren't interested in being leaders. However, I still do believe that women aren't as compassionate or empathetic as you believe them to be. It does require empathy to mother children, but we know less women are having children now, and that is only one consideration. Outside of the relationship with children, what do we have to say that women are more compassionate? Especially ones who are attracted to power. Even if they didn't wish to be more masculine, they'd have to be in order to be able to fulfill their duties in those roles.

btw, maybe you should consider the female monarchs of Europe, as they were more likely to go to war than male monarchs. Many women, all over the world and going back thousands of years, have been brutal leaders.

@SW-User Fair points, but....I would say that by virtue of being a mother, those women who are...are far less likely to send other women's children to war. But I would submit that the women who have succeeded in leadership positions have all done it in a man's world. I'm saying....what if it were a woman's world. What if...instead of having to be a faux man (forgive me) we had an entire world with more feminine values and therefore more female leadership.

I'll look into the female monarchs....if nothing else it's an interesting thought.

@originnone I'm not sure how much women care about other women's children, but I think you're overestimating it for many of them. More importantly, women who are leaders are not mothers, because those two roles aren't compatible. I'd add that women in leadership positions are usually more wealthy too, and they tend to bond with their children less because they rely on others to engage with them and help provide their care. A female president or prime minister would have hardly any time with their children, and if they decide that is less bad than not fulfilling their leadership duties or keeping that role, what do they have that is truly feminine? They have managed to fulfill their biological purpose, but emotionally they have nothing to offer to their children, and they can't be distinguished from men who lead.


As I said above, power and femininity aren't compatible. If you have more feminine than masculine traits, you wouldn't want to lead.

@Selah That's cool. Any woman can be a hypocrite but no woman can grow a cock, balls, or Y chromosome. Peace.

@graphite Shut out or not noone is entitled to sex. Look at the definition of an incel.


If you're throwing shade at me I still get hit on.

@BritishFailedAesthetic
rly tho?

@SW-User You bet- believe it or not.

@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout

@ABCDEF7 The point is there is no wage gap.

@IronHamster Yes, In relative sense there is no wage gap.

@ABCDEF7 In what other sense do you perceive a wage gap between men and women?

@IamCuriousBabe
[/quote]
thank you for saying that 🤣

@SW-User Why can't men behave perfectly, like women? 🤣

@graphite In my experience as well as lots of other people's there is much more obnoxious and disturbing behaviour of (some) men toward women, than of women toward men.