Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The DOJ asked the Court to unseal the Trump Search warrant?

That's rich, and weird as hell.

I'm not buying that it actually makes Garland "partisan" politically, but it's a great move for the prosecution bound by law and custom working against a potential criminal/suspect who's willing to lie about anything and everything and never be subjected to perjury.

We'll see how it plays out.

Edit: Transcript of Garland's remarks:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/11/us/politics/garland-fbi-trump-transcript.html
windinhishair · 61-69, M
Trump has three options:
1. Agree to the release of the documents.
2. Disagree with the release of the documents.
3. Release the documents himself.

None of the three are beneficial to Trump. He could release a version of the documents that changes factual information to his benefit, and tell his attorneys to oppose the release of the documents from the Court. This would be consistent with his propensity to lie bigly and tell the story he wants to tell without regard for fact. One would hope that should he choose this route, the Court would release the action documents so people can see his lies.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@MistyCee As you said earlier, Trump will do everything he can to stall proceedings. He's focused on making it to January when and if Republicans take the house, and he can use the GOP to obstruct and end many proceedings. That won't impact state indictments, but it could lessen pending federal charges.
SW-User
4. Release the Sharpie version

@windinhishair
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@SW-User His Cult would worship every bold stroke of the Sharpie.
SW-User
I think this article excerpt sums it up nicely.

The DOJ is a risk-averse body by nature, and the attorney general, Merrick Garland, has been especially timid and squeamish even by the standards of his office. He didn’t want to pursue what could look like a politically motivated prosecution of a political opponent; he didn’t want to annoy the sizeable minority of the US that sees Trump as a beloved, almost messianic figure.

It long looked as if the department would not have the stomach for a real investigation of Trump – that they would allow his crimes to go unanswered for fear of appearing too political. But the hearings surfaced new evidence, and brought new pressure to bear on the department – that of an outraged populace.

Even though a chunk of the country adores Trump, most Americans think he’s a corrupt crook. Nearly 60% said he should be prosecuted for the events of 6 January, according to a recent poll. Reports from the Justice Department’s own inquiry indicate that the investigation recently turned to Trump’s own role in the scheme to overturn the election by sending fake electors to Congress.

It’s possible that, to Garland, the worry about what it would look like if he tried to hold Trump accountable has finally been eclipsed by the worry about what it would look like if he didn’t.
SW-User
[image/video deleted]
@sunsporter1649
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@SW-User
SW-User
Ynotisay · M
Trump could release it. He could also argue against unsealing it. I don't see that happening. Transparency doesn't usually follow "the Fifth."
@Ynotisay Excellent point.
Northwest · M
This is the only card Garland has to play. The FBI tried to conduct the search under the radar screen. Trump publicized it.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
The Boston Globe is reporting tonight that some of the documents that were specifically being sought that Trump was holding on to deal with nuclear weapons. If true, his behavior could be treasonous. Hopefully his phone calls are being monitored.
Ynotisay · M
@windinhishair Just read that and my first thought, without being a conspiracy person, was him selling information. Maybe to NK, maybe to Russia and maybe the Saudi's. Wouldn't put it past him. He'd sell out anyone and anything if was of benefit to him. And now, given that he's a desperate rat, I could see the FBI needing to move quickly. Just a guess but...
BackyardShaman · 61-69, M
@windinhishair that’s been my gut instinct, I think he wanted to give the codes to Russia and then Russia could threaten us and try to force us into reinstating Trump as president, or blow us up.
BackyardShaman · 61-69, M
My first reaction was yes it’s really too weird and catering to the far right and their followers, but it’s likely a good move since it demonstrates the DOJ has nothing to hide here and Trump’s group would likely produce a fake warrant and list soon anyway.
@BackyardShaman Garland's playing a game I wish he didn't have to play, but it seems like a great move on his part and one that Trump will likely struggle with.

We'll see how it works out, but my guess is it may save lives in the shorter term since Trumpists have already started attacking and this may make it easier for the DOJ/Deep State/Government to defend itself.

It's scary, though, escalating things, when bloodshed and carnage is a tool one side embraced and the other is reluctant to go through.
SW-User
[image/video deleted]

[image/video deleted]


@sunsporter1649]
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@SW-User
SW-User
RedBaron · M
They did, but are you asking or telling us? Strange use of a question mark.
@RedBaron Yeah, it is, isnt it.
TexChik · F
I didn’t know Biden got served 😲
@TexChik 🤔
TexChik · F
@MistyCee you said “ liar” and Biden is the proven liar, called out by the MSM publicly
@TexChik 👌
Update:

https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/11/merrick-garland-calls-trumps-bluff/

Still waiting to see the pleadings and briefing schedule.
TexChik · F
They never made the document visible while serving it as required by law. I wouldnt doubt if they had to run back and write one and make a big deal about it to cover themselves. 🤷‍♀️
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
I also do not feel that it makes Garland partisan, per sé. I suspect he is doing it in order to avoid charges of partisanship. If everyone can see what is in the warrant, it is less likely that those who are crying witch hunt will continue to do so.
Ynotisay · M
@CorvusBlackthorne I think you're right and it's a wise decision. He's also pushing back on what his department is facing. It's IMPOSSIBLE for cult members to comprehend that some live their lives in service and facts.
@CorvusBlackthorne Yup, but Garland just put the burden back on Trump in terms of "proving" his crap about rougue FBI agents, partisan witch hunts, and even planting evidence.

I'm pleasantly surprised by Garland not sitting back and letting Trump lie to his slobbering inbred base without answer.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@MistyCee It has been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that ignoring Donald will not make him go away.

 
Post Comment