@
beckyromero "Oh, I get it. You will just let all the homes of people who actually LIVE in those forests that don't meet your criteria go up in smoke."
Hmm... first you post a YouTube clip where MSNBC's O'Donnell goes on and on about how impossible it is to do ANYTHING about the Cali wildfires, and then you complain that my common-sense plan won't cover EVERYTHING. 🙄
"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice. 🙄 🙄
"The Camp Fire in 2018, north of Sacramento, killed 85 people. Would Paradise be on your list for protection?"
Yes, indeed, Becky.
FYI, here is the specific list of the approximately 5000 CA municipalities I had in mind above. Paradise is on it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_municipalities_in_California
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laguna_Fire_(1993)
"Think your bulldozer could have stopped that fire?"
And Laguna is on that list as well.
And speaking of Laguna, from your reference:
"Prior to the Laguna Fire and the other concurrent wildfires in Southern California, there had been six years of drought conditions. These were followed by a wet winter in 1992–1993, which let grass and brush grow before it dried again in the hot summer of 1993. This left much dead and dry vegetation to burn.[3][2]:2
A proposed controlled burn to reduce the built-up fuels several years earlier had never been carried out." [boldface added]
And it seems that nothing significant has been done
in that regard in the 30-odd years since. 🙄 🙄 🙄
And no, my bulldozer would not have stopped the Laguna fire once it started, but state and local officials might have prevented it
before it started, if they had been even remotely competent.
P.S. Do try to bring your floundering arguments at least up to the level of your AI creation, which was pretty good. 🤭