Socialism is full democracy. It's democracy, not just of the government, but of all big corporations. That's what Marx and Engels meant when they said the workers should control the means of production.
@emiliya @emiliya Depends. The most authoritarian government of all time (SOMALIA) had almost no government at all. It was totally anarchist, run by warlords.
Wenn du Bärte magst! Mein Vater hatte immer einen dichten schwarzen Bart.
Kann er auch mein Daddy sein?
Marx ist trotzdem ein Schriftsteller von Fiktion, Märchen-Fiktion.
So oder so, die meisten seiner Kritikpunkte am Kapitalismus waren richtig. Ich bin nicht wirklich ein Marxist, ich bin nicht mit dem Kommunismus einverstanden. Aber der Sozialismus wäre ein gewaltiger Schritt nach oben gegenüber dem Kapitalismus.
All governments are authoritarian. Some are more authoritarian than others, for better reasons than others.
Wir sollten hier genau sein. Ja, alle Regierungen ergreifen Maßnahmen, die autoritärer Natur sein können, aber wirklicher Autoritarismus ist wenn es keine Demokratie gibt. Ich bin mit Gesetzen gegen Hassreden nicht einverstanden, aber nicht jedes Land mit Gesetzen gegen Hassreden ist autoritär.
More social democrat probably is best description of me. As a youngster j would say socialist and I'm still considerably to the left politically but I'm not so sure about Clause IV as I was then.
Original Clause IV text
To secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service.
Socialist is a word than MAGAts and extreme righties want to use to denigrate Democrats. Real democrats are not socialists. We are capitalists who believe that capitalism needs more controls because our existing laws favor the wealthy and unequally funnel money to them (who by the way own the lawmakers).
You only need one example to demonstrate that what I said is true: The top 144 individuals in America own more wealth than the bottom 155,000,000 people.
@emiliya @emiliya I don't know where I would place the line for "higher Income". I can tell you that when Donald Trump made multibillions and paid about $2.5M over 5 years that would definitely qualify as a higher income person not paying their fair share.
I don't have socialist ideas. I have liberal ideas.
@MoveAlong Congress does not want to do more about it. Do you think any good would come from it if they did? What would the government do with the additional money? The same as they currently do?
@MoveAlong What's WRONG with that statement is referring to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN folk (which make up the vast majority of America ) as extreme righties. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN is the ONLY centrists in America. The few radicals on the left think ANYTHING to the right of Che Guevara or Adolf Hitler is somehow extreme right wing.
I the sense that there are many social programs I believe should be the responsibility of the government, yes. I guess Social Democrat might be the closest definition, even though that is so rarely used a phrase here in the US. I believe it it the responsibility of the government to do for people what they cannot do for themselves.
if I think about it I guess I am. he works, I don't, he gives me money, a place to live, health care, food clothing and a car to drive. I clean house, cook and take care of the kids. maybe I should stop identifying as an American-Italian and relate as an Illegal alien
@saragoodtimes no, you are a stay home wife. Not the same. Socialism is a specific political philosophy that has become made into a position of hate for the radical right who have no idea why some socialism is part of modern society for it to function for the good of the people
No , we have some socialist type programs in the USA but we are still mainly capitalists Socialism to me is no private enterprise and the state owns or controls all means of production
@JimboSaturn communism follows socialism for sure, and for the record....
socialism is an economic and political system where all means of production are owned and controlled collectively or by the state, with the aim of eliminating private property and ensuring that goods and services are distributed based on need rather than profit. In this system, the government typically makes all decisions regarding production and distribution to promote equality and meet the basic needs of the population.
@FreeSpirit1 Where did you get that definition, because it's incorrect. Socialist countries all over the world have free markets and private enterprise. That IS NOT the definition of socialism.
Encourages complacency at best and pure lazy at its worst. As one quick comparison. Say in school the class is total socialism which means all get the same grade. The top ones start out working hard and score high but still receive the same grade as the under achievers and the ones who do nothing. So, some are getting fair grades for doing nothing and the ones working hard also get the same grade. So, finally you get little to no effort from anybody as why work hard and get the same outcome as ones who do nothing. Simple, also socialism will work until you run out of other people's money..
Hell, no! Socialism is a failed system that exploits the workers, and offers no hope of improvement or advancement, while enriching the few at the top.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. 3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. 4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. 5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. 8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. 9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country. 10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
This is from the original source, published in 1848.
It's not about what socialism is to any individual. Socialism does away with the concept of the individual.
https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/socialism.html
Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good.
We've seen examples of Socialism in the last century.
(Mods: Not ONE single insult here. Nothing personal whatsoever. Nothing racist. Just facts.)
@samueltyler2But socialism does not include mass murder, where did you find that in any dictionary?
Actually, history disagrees with that ignorant statement.
Just look at the UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Most frequently, the states and events which are studied and included in death toll estimates are the Holodomor and the Great Purge in the Soviet Union, the Great Chinese Famine and the Cultural Revolution in the People's Republic of China, and the Cambodian genocide in Democratic Kampuchea (now Cambodia). Estimates of individuals killed range from a low of 10–20 million to as high as 148 million.
