boudinMan · 61-69, M
the same thing happened to trump... deal with it.
View 50 more replies »
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Patriot96 I do. I'd show it to you, but I very much doubt you could see it with your head up his ass.
anythingoes477 · M
@boudinMan Right. Like how could we possibly think someone whose been convicted already of rape, multiple counts of state and federal fraud charges with his scam university...
convicted of IRS fraud for stealing every dime from a childrens cancer charity and a disabled veterans charity....bank and insurance fraud in NY State....and indicted 4 times...so far....
.for everything from election fraud, to violating the Espionage Act, to inciting insurrection against the United States...so he could name himself King....and facing mutiple RICO charges would ever do anything illegal enough to be impeached twice?
convicted of IRS fraud for stealing every dime from a childrens cancer charity and a disabled veterans charity....bank and insurance fraud in NY State....and indicted 4 times...so far....
.for everything from election fraud, to violating the Espionage Act, to inciting insurrection against the United States...so he could name himself King....and facing mutiple RICO charges would ever do anything illegal enough to be impeached twice?
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
Besides the audio tapes.
The millions$
The 20 shell companies
Video of him boasting about getting Ukrainian prosecutor fired.
The documents he as VP/senator has no right to have..
Nope.. he’s a good guy.. 🤓👍
The millions$
The 20 shell companies
Video of him boasting about getting Ukrainian prosecutor fired.
The documents he as VP/senator has no right to have..
Nope.. he’s a good guy.. 🤓👍
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@trollslayer Ya cared enough to reply and explain how it wasn't intentional didn't ya? 😆
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
@SumKindaMunster he just upset that republicans brought receipts..
unlike the last 6 years of TDS accusations
unlike the last 6 years of TDS accusations
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedaboutis it opposite day?
Captainjackass · 31-35, M
Their just doing it to appease their dwindling base of increasingly unsound followers. They know nothing will happen but just hope it will distract from their countless crimes.
Bumbles · 51-55, M
Zero evidence against Biden. It’s just to do Trump’s bidding.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Bumbles Tons of evidence. If you haven't seen it, then you are consuming media that confirms what you already believe. Challenge yourself. Read something that contradicts what you believe and see if you can rebut it.
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
Captainjackass · 31-35, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout as opposed to the guy who openly asked for help from enemy nations to stay in power and refused to show his taxes and made over a 100 million just by charging the secret service to watch him golf.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Vin53 I wonder, if you were legally prevented from saying "But but but Truuuuummmmmp" would you have any rebuttal at all? 🤔
akindheart · 61-69, F
huh?
PDXNative1986 · 36-40, MVIP
Your tax dollars are going to be pissed away on this inquiry, which is dead on arrival in the US senate because the democrats will never convict him. This is a pointless exercise in futility, and if you're a us tax payer, you're funding it, and ought to be outraged at it being waste fraud and abuse.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
redredred · M
Then why did he have four bogus email addresses to communicate with his own son?
akindheart · 61-69, F
@redredred and how many shell companies?? 23???
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
Oh he did plenty wrong. Use your critical thinking skills here and stop lazily letting the media tell you what to think.
smiler2012 · 61-69
@nedkelly 😆you mean old trafford ned lol
BohemianBabe · M
This is gonna backfire so gloriously.
carpediem · 61-69, M
Lots of people would disagree with you, but it doesn't even matter. The dems established the new protocol. Impeach the president if they're the other party and your party controls the House. I hear the dems whining now and it makes me laugh. Tough sh1t.
TrashCat · M
@carpediem "
That all you got? 😂
"It looks like" as opposed to actually inciting an insurrection and actually seeking political favors for aid and getting impeached twice. lol
What you need to do is turn off the fake news that tell you what yoy want yo hear and try listening to actual journalism.
And fyi, an impeachment inquiry is not an impeachment process 😂. In this case, it's pathetic desperatism
Dumbass
" That all you got? 😂
"It looks like" as opposed to actually inciting an insurrection and actually seeking political favors for aid and getting impeached twice. lol
What you need to do is turn off the fake news that tell you what yoy want yo hear and try listening to actual journalism.
And fyi, an impeachment inquiry is not an impeachment process 😂. In this case, it's pathetic desperatism
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
It's Hunter vs Trump because the nation really does hate that woke.
LeopoldBloom · M
@SumKindaMunster That's not what Ron DeSantis' lawyer called it in court. He defined it as the belief that there are systemic inequities in society along with a need to address them. He oughta know, DeSantis built his entire persona on anti-woke.
Do you think there are no systemic inequities in society? By "systemic," I mean inequities that may be unwittingly perpetuated by people who aren't necessarily bigoted personally. If you don't think these inequities exist, when did they end?
Do you think there are no systemic inequities in society? By "systemic," I mean inequities that may be unwittingly perpetuated by people who aren't necessarily bigoted personally. If you don't think these inequities exist, when did they end?
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@LeopoldBloom
So? How come when it is convenient and confirms what you already believe you take such things at face value, but if DeSantis said something you didn't agree with, you would call him a liar?
It's not consistent, it demonstrates you don't have critical thinking skills and just believe whatever is convenient to back up your existing beliefs.
Right now there is a strong anti White, anti Male, anti Conservative bias going through the pop culture right now, I don't think I would call it "systemic" more like a fad, but otherwise, no.
Likely ended in the 50's-80's with the civil rights movements, "great society", and the election of Barak Obama to the Presidency.
That's not what Ron DeSantis' lawyer called it in court. He defined it as the belief that there are systemic inequities in society along with a need to address them. He oughta know, DeSantis built his entire persona on anti-woke.
So? How come when it is convenient and confirms what you already believe you take such things at face value, but if DeSantis said something you didn't agree with, you would call him a liar?
It's not consistent, it demonstrates you don't have critical thinking skills and just believe whatever is convenient to back up your existing beliefs.
Do you think there are no systemic inequities in society? By "systemic," I mean inequities that may be unwittingly perpetuated by people who aren't necessarily bigoted personally
Right now there is a strong anti White, anti Male, anti Conservative bias going through the pop culture right now, I don't think I would call it "systemic" more like a fad, but otherwise, no.
Likely ended in the 50's-80's with the civil rights movements, "great society", and the election of Barak Obama to the Presidency.
LeopoldBloom · M
@SumKindaMunster Your definition of "woke" is tendentious. It would be like me saying opposition to woke means the person supports Nazism. The DeSantis lawyer's definition fits without going out of its way to insult anyone.
I figured you and I would disagree on systemic inequities, although, I appreciate that you recognize the "anti white, anti male, anti conservative bias" as a fad.
White people tend to think racism is less of a problem than Black people think it is. But if you think it ended in the 1950s before the Civil Rights Act was passed, your understanding of history is deficient. While Brown v. Board of Education ended legal school segregation, actual segregation did not end for decades. Same with the Civil Rights Act, which did not instantly end discrimination by magic.
Tim Wise has a good explanation of this.
https://medium.com/@timjwise/20-questions-for-those-who-deny-systemic-racism-781e62319ddc
I figured you and I would disagree on systemic inequities, although, I appreciate that you recognize the "anti white, anti male, anti conservative bias" as a fad.
White people tend to think racism is less of a problem than Black people think it is. But if you think it ended in the 1950s before the Civil Rights Act was passed, your understanding of history is deficient. While Brown v. Board of Education ended legal school segregation, actual segregation did not end for decades. Same with the Civil Rights Act, which did not instantly end discrimination by magic.
Tim Wise has a good explanation of this.
https://medium.com/@timjwise/20-questions-for-those-who-deny-systemic-racism-781e62319ddc
spjennifer · 61-69, T
Butt, but, Hunter's laptop! 🤪
smiler2012 · 61-69
@rad34556 why is mccarthy wasting his time in silly tit for tat with no evidence too back up the charge making himself look a fool
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
smiler2012 · 61-69
@SW-User sticks and stones may break my bones but a trumpsters name calling will never hurt me
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@smiler2012 So there is plenty of evidence. Enough to impeach? Not sure, but this is about weakening Biden for the eventual budget negotiations they kicked down the road a few months ago.
TrashCat · M
McCarthy and the klan need to have vote to move forward with an impeachment.
This is only an inquiry and they added that word because in their words, they have nothing.
Unlike when Trump was impeached twice and now faces numerous criminal indictments.
If you feel Biden should be impeached but trump shouldn't have been you should choke on a sweaty tranny hog
This is only an inquiry and they added that word because in their words, they have nothing.
Unlike when Trump was impeached twice and now faces numerous criminal indictments.
If you feel Biden should be impeached but trump shouldn't have been you should choke on a sweaty tranny hog