They claim that all science is covered by the bible. Some people (whom I've now blocked because they veered into conspiracy theory) refer to this as "real science". Any genuine scientists are dismissed by these people as "being part of the government interference in our lives". We get the same over here on "news" channels like GB News, who have a history of attempting to undermine those who have studied the effects of climste change for real.

Climate deniers listen to experts.
Climate geniuses who talk down at everyone, listen to autistic Swedish girls who didn’t finish school..

Funny that I have noted exactly the opposite. Those who believe AGW are high school science types. They believe that somewhere there is an 'expert' who has. crunched all the numbers and therefore knows all the answers. Those who don't accept AGW tend to hold that experts are not to be bowed down to. A white lab coat means nothing to those who actually understand science. Science requires looking at the actual data and understanding where it fails to give an adequate picture. Take this summer where a small part of the US has hot weather therefore the entire globe is about to burn up. If you look at the average temperature across the entire US you find the numbers are well within statistical norms. Nothing to get excited about. That is the actual science not the fear pedaling we see from the clowns in the white coats.

@MrBrownstone, who blocks me, asks
The key point here is the RATE of change before humans began pumping CO2 into the atmosphere by the gigaton.

The global warming / climate change we're seeing in the last 100 or so years is MUCH different from anything measured in the glacial & sea sediment records covering the last 700,000 years. CO2 is rising 100x faster, and temps 10x faster.

"How is Today’s Warming Different from the Past?" https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/GlobalWarming/page3.php "As the Earth moved out of ice ages over the past million years, the global temperature rose a total of 4 to 7 degrees Celsius over about 5,000 years. In the past century alone, the temperature has climbed 0.7 degrees Celsius, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming."

How is today's CO2 increase different? https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide "The annual rate of increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past 60 years is about 100 times faster than previous natural increases, such as those that occurred at the end of the last ice age 11,000-17,000 years ago."

Fact is, anthropogenic global warming is accepted by a YUGE segment of the scientific community. Would you accept the consensus opinion of the American Physical Society AND the American Chemical Society? How about the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and at least 15 other national organizations of publishing scientists? See https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Global Warming vs. Climate Change
https://climate.nasa.gov/global-warming-vs-climate-change/

Climate change denial and uncertainty are more common in more rural and less prosperous regions and in countries more economically dependent on fossil fuels. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of climate change disbelief among the European population and have important implications for climate change mitigation efforts.

Rural and less prosperous regions tend to reflect lower educational achievement and a higher presence of religion.
Socioeconomic Roots of Climate Change Denial and Uncertainty among the European Population
https://academic.oup.com/esr/article/38/1/153/6333558; Where Climate Change Deniers Live


CLIMATE CHANGE
According to YouGov, Indonesia and the U.S. are the countries with the highest shares of climate change deniers. In a survey carried out in July and August, 21 percent of Indonesians and 19 percent of Americans said that climate change was not real or that humans weren't responsible. While only 3 percent of Indonesians said that climate change wasn't happening at all, that number was 5 percent in the U.S. The number of outright deniers was just as high in several countries in the survey, even though they scored lower on overall climate change denial.

Other countries with high rates of deniers were Saudi Arabia and Egypt, two more countries reliant on fossil fuels for exports or use at home. India, which shares rank four, is a notable example of a country dealing with fake news and the spread of conspiracy belief lately, which could have contributed to the result.
https://www.statista.com/chart/19449/countries-with-biggest-share-of-climate-change-deniers/


The More Education Republicans Have, the Less They Tend to Believe in Climate Change
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/14/upshot/climate-change-by-education.html

What caused the earth to cool before humans?

I know this: The sciences of climatology and meteorology are telling us about climate change 500 years from now and they can't even get a local hour to hour weather forecast right. 😂

@S33K3R says
Perhaps you could link us to, say, five such leading peer reviewed studies?

BTW, did you ever ask where does the money for climate denial come from? The US oil industry makes about $110 billion per year; coal another $20 billion. Big Oil spends $3.6 billion per year on advertising; a sum equal to about 8X the whole NSF climate budget. You're not naive enough to believe none of that money goes to propaganda, are you?

It doesn't take intelligence to parrot what they hear on tv or some random podcast

Willful ignorance is on the same level as science. No wonder this society is screwed.

Jim Hansen, a scientist when before Congress in 1988 and predicted NYC would be underwater in 20 years because of climate change and the “greenhouse effect”… This is why some don’t believe the bullshit. Kind of like the bullshit masks dopey liberals will be donning again soon.

coz they are dumb

They follow whetever their party says, since it furthers their conservative agenda, whether they believe it or not. Some of them probably do believe it privately.

{@spotpot] it is sad in a way where there ignorance and denial of this catastropic thing to our plant and all these people answer is too bury there head in the sand like ostriches

trump said it best in Utah on the campaign trail back in 2015.."i love uneducated people". Thats why they spread nothing but lies. Stupid people believe it.

Does anyone remember when the "experts" predicted another "Ice Age" ? Or when the "experts" said back in the 70s that the world would run out of oil in 20 or 30 years? Or Y2K? Or Armageddon? Or the Mayan calendar that said the world was going to end in 2012? I could go on and on! It's no wonder the latest doom and gloom by the current crop of "experts" doesn't have any credibility.

Some of them don't oppose the ecocide at all. They're not going to reason with you, they're going to persue killing the ecosystem as a nation.

Because they don't allow themselves to be brainwashed like the gloom and doom clowns.

@fanuc2013 asks Uhhh ... that's a right-wing myth, dude.

The facts about scientific cooling predictions:

Update: source https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/89/9/2008bams2370_1.xml

It follows, that the ignorant, will not believe what they do not understand

That’s a very broad, blanket, and ignorant statement

Is this a rhetorical question.

Education/knowledge and religion both use the same area of the brain so they are literally in direct competition with each other for the same resources. The more of one you have the less of the other you have. It's also why the two have historically been at each others throats for thousands of years. They ARE enemies of each other. But you can have people that are balanced between the two that will make claims such as theistic evolution.

Doctors Dunning and Kruger will be able to help you with that answer.