@
LordShadowfire It is a free speech problem. If you didn't have a problem with free speech, & the proof being 4 years of suppression of anything the echo chamber disapproves of, why talk about integrity in not signing the petition. Someone with integrity would have stuck with the illegality of buying votes. But the OP talks about EXCHANGING ONE'S PRINCIPLES FOR MONEY. So the real problem is the CONTENT of the petition, not the illegality of buying votes.
Nor have you bothered to clear up the fact that he would have this tactic & defend the thesis that he didn't need it as 1A & 2A were well defended by cancellers & gun grabbers, as stupid as that argument would have been.
In short, as you people do, you didn't answer ANY righteous question of your position.
George Floyd was a violent carreer crim who was committing 5 felonies when he was killed, not murdered, RESISTING ARREST. So it's academic what the policeman's record was.
As for distractions, you're the people who call illegal aliens undocumented immigrants lol. You talk about apartheid but until VERY recently your most prestious schools with the most religious Communist professors PRACTICED IT. You use words either to distract or because you don't know what they mean. As evidenced by the paucity of sense in your arguments. And the fact that you call a riot either an almost peaceful protest that lasted 4 months, KILLED >3 DOZEN PEOPLE & damaged millions of $ in property, or 1 that lasted <24 hours, killed 1 person (that no one was upset about as she was a rioter), an "insurrection". This after maintaining the the GUN PARTY left all its guns at home for the "insurrection" lol.
So I'm not twisting you words. You refuse to stick to the proper problem.
