Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

My foreign history is hazy. In the American civil war who was the goodies and who were the baddies?

Top | New | Old
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
It's impossible to tell no documents survive from the time. Particularly documents that would explicitly lay out that the civil war was about slavery and the right of slaver states to keep owning people as property.

Rather the only surviving documents of the civil war are statues of confederate generals, who I'm pretty sure were all great guys.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@CountScrofula
It's impossible to tell no documents survive from the time. Particularly documents that would explicitly lay out that the civil war was about slavery and the right of slaver states to keep owning people as property.

That is an inaccurate statement. You need to read about American history.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
@Diotrephes
In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.

Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth.

I love history!
Quimliqer · 70-79, M
It depends on your point of view regarding good and bad. The long and short of it is, confederates were fighting to leave the union And maintain slavery, the union fought to quell the separatist movement and remove slavery. The union won.
Quimliqer · 70-79, M
@MartinII Interesting, Missouri was a guerrilla state, being on the border of the two sides they didn’t identify as one or the other. To say Harry Truman was southern may be overreaching?
MartinII · 70-79, M
@Quimliqer I was referring to Lyndon B Johnson.
Quimliqer · 70-79, M
@MartinII President Harry S. Truman
On July 26, 1948, President Harry S. Truman signed a pair of executive orders, the combination of which banned racial segregation in the armed forces and federal civil service. This article offers context on this occurrence and explores its significance as the Coast Guard observes the 75th anniversary of their signing.

There’s a reluctance to let it go!!
Steve42 · 56-60, M
It depends on who's eyes you are looking. Over all I'd side with the North or the Yankees. Southerners used to call it the war of northern aggression.
kodiac · 22-25, M
The way it's been explained to me is it really wasn't only about slavery.,lincoln wanted to maintain federal control while the confederacy wanted control to be in the hand of the state
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
@Northwest Thst was so long, it was fun to delete. 😂
Northwest · M
@DazzaTheHutt
Thst was so long, it was fun to delete. 😂

You managed to delete the 1860 Republican Party Platform?

Silly. All you did was delete my post, thinking that SW'ers are like you: haven't figured out how to use Google yet.
Musicman · 61-69, MVIP
You had the Union, the Northern States and the Confederates, the Southern States. The Union wanted to abolish slavery and the Confederates wanted to keep it. The North had the majority of the industry and the South had the farms and Plantations. The South needed the labor. That's why they favored Slavery. Since the Union won history flavors the winner so the Union is the good guys. Both my mom's and dad's side of the family fought for the Union.
ProfessorPlum77 · 70-79, MVIP
Initially, the Civil War was fought because the South believed they had a right to secede while the North said they did not. As the war progressed, President Lincoln started to support the idea to abolish slavery.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@ProfessorPlum77
Initially, the Civil War was fought because the South believed they had a right to secede while the North said they did not. As the war progressed, President Lincoln started to support the idea to abolish slavery.

If Lincoln had lived he would have deported all Back people in America. He was not against slavery; he just didn't want it to spread to the new western territories, which is why he came up with the homestead program.

Slavery continued in a couple of Northern States after the end of the Civil War and for years after that in California.

BTW, slavery is still legal in America but some States have outlawed it.
ProfessorPlum77 · 70-79, MVIP
@Diotrephes According to the 13th Amendment, slavery is not legal in America.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@ProfessorPlum77
According to the 13th Amendment, slavery is not legal in America.

Your reading comprehension level is extremely low. please review the 13th Amendment =
"AMENDMENT XIII

Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/13th-amendment

"Section 6
Text of Section 6:
Slavery and Involuntary Servitude

There shall be no slavery in this state; nor involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crime."
https://ballotpedia.org/Article_I,_Ohio_Constitution

"Section 6
Text of Section 6:
“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crime, shall ever be tolerated in this state."
https://ballotpedia.org/Article_I,_North_Dakota_Constitution

"Emancipation on the Ballot
Why Slavery is Still Legal in America – And How Voters Can Take Action"
https://www.naacpldf.org/13th-amendment-emancipation/

"Yes, some forms of slavery are still technically legal in most U.S. states
Forced labor as punishment for crime is legal in many states due to an exception clause in the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution."
https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/government-verify/yes-some-forms-of-slavery-are-still-technically-legal-in-most-us-states-fact-check/536-d72971f9-6f8a-4912-8156-0f13826fdbdc
onewithshoes · 22-25, F
So many lives would have been spared had those who would have simply said 'Good riddance!' managed to prevail.😧
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
I'm going with the baddies being the ones who were fighting to keep slavery in effect.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@Richard65 And so you hate the Native Americans, Black Africans, Asians, etc. who all also owned slaves? I guess you simply hate everyone, eh?
GerOttman · 61-69, M
The real bad guys in the conflict was the main stream media of the time. Much like our current affairs, they had little interest in informing the public and a major stake in stoking fear and violence in order to enhance their bottom line. The good guys were the poor, ignorant, and innocent who dutifully followed their misguided loyalties into battle.

The media is not your friend...
Northwest · M
American Civil War? You mean the war of Northern Aggression.

Lidsay Graham can tell you all about it.
Cierzo · M
Like in most wars in the last two centuries, with a few exceptions like the Spanish Civil War, the good side lost and the evil one won
PalteseMalconFunch · 36-40, T
@Cierzo We were not the good side friendo
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
It seems that people are ignorant of the fact that slavery existed in some of the Northern States until December 6, 1865.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Dino11 · M
Anti Slavery-Good, the North
HannahSky · F
You can't figure it out?
@HannahSky It’s too close to call
SW-User
The South valued state rights over central government rights. This boiled down to their right to own, work, rape, torture and kill people for profit.
I love how some people are repling like I actually give a single shit about their history.

This is a joke, not a question.
kodiac · 22-25, M
@DazzaTheHutt Funny ha ha
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment