This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
I agree it's too young.
The only exception I'd make is for close in age relationships. No reason to charge a 17 year old for sleeping with a 16 year old.
The only exception I'd make is for close in age relationships. No reason to charge a 17 year old for sleeping with a 16 year old.
Yes. Think about it- an adult being able to sleep with a 16 year old is creepy.
There should be Romeo and Juliet laws though when the age is small enough- when my best mate was 18 he got his 16 year old girlfriend pregnant.
There should be Romeo and Juliet laws though when the age is small enough- when my best mate was 18 he got his 16 year old girlfriend pregnant.
@BritishFailedAesthetic Did you get that off the Transformers movie with Mark Wahlberg? California passed a bill that allows a ten year gap, meaning a 14 year old can "consent" with a 24 year old. I know what the screenshot and article says, but defense attorneys will run with it...
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/california/calif-governor-signs-bill-changing-sex-offender-law/2362200/
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/california/calif-governor-signs-bill-changing-sex-offender-law/2362200/
@NativePortlander1970 Obviously 24 and 14 is totally different and disgusting.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 51-55, M
Let's just say I wouldn't be against it being raised to 18 in my country and I don't know what is crucially different about the UK that it should remain at 16
bookerdana · M
Thirty Nine 😬 18 seems about right
Matt85 · 36-40, M
@bookerdana why thirty nine 😬
i am not really talking about me here, i dont really look at women past 33
i am not really talking about me here, i dont really look at women past 33
bookerdana · M
@Matt85 i think thirty nine is a ridiculous age of consent...18 just seems natural
Matt85 · 36-40, M
@bookerdana Oh right lol sorry I misunderstood. Yes 39 would be ridiculous.
YoMomma ·
Im thinking no consent allowed without official certification 😅
swirlie · F
I think before we decide to raise the age of consent from 16 to 18, we must first ask ourselves WHY the age of consent (which refers strictly to acts of sex) was placed at 16 in the first place, yet the Age of Majority (which is the legal age of adulthood) is 18?
To raise the Age of Consent from 16 to 18 makes about as much sense as lowering the Age of Majority from 18 to 16.
Why are both ages not the same in either case?
Why was the age of consent allowed to be 16 if the girl in question cannot get married until she is 18, even if she was legally permitted to engage in acts of sexual intercourse when she was 16 and got pregnant as a result of providing her own legal consent to engage in those acts of sex?
To raise the Age of Consent from 16 to 18 makes about as much sense as lowering the Age of Majority from 18 to 16.
Why are both ages not the same in either case?
Why was the age of consent allowed to be 16 if the girl in question cannot get married until she is 18, even if she was legally permitted to engage in acts of sexual intercourse when she was 16 and got pregnant as a result of providing her own legal consent to engage in those acts of sex?
Morvoren · F
No. Stop ruining people’s fun. Give us too many rules like that we’re end up like the Americans. Gormless godly late bloomers.
lol who cares, stop trying to regulate what naturally happens.
The age of consent is when a parent can approve marriage, not sex itself.
swirlie · F
@NativePortlander1970
Okay, understand now. First of all, you are talking about two different things here but referring to both of them as being one in the same. They are not.
Let's start with official definitions.
The Age of Consent is the minimum age for a person to consent to having sexual relations with another person who is at least of the age of consent.
The Age of Consent in the State of Nevada is 16.
That means a girl who resides in Nevada can provide consent for herself when it comes to her giving consent to having sex with someone else of legal age.
She cannot however, provide her own consent for her having sex with someone who has not yet reached the age of 16. If she violated that law, SHE would be charged with rape.
The Age of Consent therefore, refers strictly to acts of sex, nothing else.
The Age of Majority however, does not mean the same thing as The Age of Consent.
The Age of Majority is the age where a minor becomes an adult by law.
In the State of Nevada the Age of Majority is 18.
What this means is, any person who is UNDER the age of 18 in Nevada is still legally a minor, not an adult. Anyone who is a minor in the State of Nevada cannot get married until they reach the Age of Majority of 18. That is the law.
Your 16 year old girl in the example can therefore consent to having sex with someone who is also at least 16 years of age or older, but she cannot give consent to getting married until she turns 18, nor can her parents legally by-pass the Age of Majority law by consenting to her getting married BEFORE she turns 18.
Even if the girl is pregnant and became pregnant when she was 16 and legally provided consent to having sex with a guy who then got her pregnant, she cannot marry the guy until she turns 18 which also applies to him.
She would have to wait until she is 18 before she could actually get married, which would mean she'd be accompanied by her 2 year old on her wedding day.
In your example above, the girl's parents cannot give consent for a minor to get married, nor does that minor require her parent's consent for marriage once she turns 18 and instantly becomes a legal adult.
Okay, understand now. First of all, you are talking about two different things here but referring to both of them as being one in the same. They are not.
Let's start with official definitions.
The Age of Consent is the minimum age for a person to consent to having sexual relations with another person who is at least of the age of consent.
The Age of Consent in the State of Nevada is 16.
That means a girl who resides in Nevada can provide consent for herself when it comes to her giving consent to having sex with someone else of legal age.
She cannot however, provide her own consent for her having sex with someone who has not yet reached the age of 16. If she violated that law, SHE would be charged with rape.
The Age of Consent therefore, refers strictly to acts of sex, nothing else.
The Age of Majority however, does not mean the same thing as The Age of Consent.
The Age of Majority is the age where a minor becomes an adult by law.
In the State of Nevada the Age of Majority is 18.
What this means is, any person who is UNDER the age of 18 in Nevada is still legally a minor, not an adult. Anyone who is a minor in the State of Nevada cannot get married until they reach the Age of Majority of 18. That is the law.
Your 16 year old girl in the example can therefore consent to having sex with someone who is also at least 16 years of age or older, but she cannot give consent to getting married until she turns 18, nor can her parents legally by-pass the Age of Majority law by consenting to her getting married BEFORE she turns 18.
Even if the girl is pregnant and became pregnant when she was 16 and legally provided consent to having sex with a guy who then got her pregnant, she cannot marry the guy until she turns 18 which also applies to him.
She would have to wait until she is 18 before she could actually get married, which would mean she'd be accompanied by her 2 year old on her wedding day.
In your example above, the girl's parents cannot give consent for a minor to get married, nor does that minor require her parent's consent for marriage once she turns 18 and instantly becomes a legal adult.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
swirlie · F
@NativePortlander1970
What part of it do you not understand? Is it the definitions?
What part of it do you not understand? Is it the definitions?