This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
swirlie · F
I think before we decide to raise the age of consent from 16 to 18, we must first ask ourselves WHY the age of consent (which refers strictly to acts of sex) was placed at 16 in the first place, yet the Age of Majority (which is the legal age of adulthood) is 18?
To raise the Age of Consent from 16 to 18 makes about as much sense as lowering the Age of Majority from 18 to 16.
Why are both ages not the same in either case?
Why was the age of consent allowed to be 16 if the girl in question cannot get married until she is 18, even if she was legally permitted to engage in acts of sexual intercourse when she was 16 and got pregnant as a result of providing her own legal consent to engage in those acts of sex?
To raise the Age of Consent from 16 to 18 makes about as much sense as lowering the Age of Majority from 18 to 16.
Why are both ages not the same in either case?
Why was the age of consent allowed to be 16 if the girl in question cannot get married until she is 18, even if she was legally permitted to engage in acts of sexual intercourse when she was 16 and got pregnant as a result of providing her own legal consent to engage in those acts of sex?