Top | Newest First | Oldest First
SW-User
They blocked you for being a grammar nazi, why does it matter? Why do you feel the need to correct their spelling as if it’s homework?
View 1 more replies »
SW-User
@ChipmunkErnie as is constant criticism if you struggle with spelling, grammar or English as second language. People come here to chat and post about different things. If all they get is people constantly correcting them I’d start blocking too. People who always feel the need to correct others is so much more annoying than the occasional spelling mistake
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@SW-User I try to be open-minded, particularly with people for whom English is obviously a second language.
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@SW-User The point is, that guy INSISTED that he was right about something when he was wrong, he argued and name-called me and then he blocked me. How much more annoying could that guy have been?
deadgerbil · 26-30
I remember learning that 'alot' wasn't a word in kindergarten lol
It's such a simple thing to Google and learn of, yet that person decided to be ignorant and nasty about it
It's such a simple thing to Google and learn of, yet that person decided to be ignorant and nasty about it
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@deadgerbil Same.
bijouxbroussard · F
@Bewilderbeeste If you corrected them, they were probably annoyed and embarrassed.
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@bijouxbroussard Yes, but that's no reason to block me.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
Because so many people have used it as a single word for SOOO long that they feel it's a word via popular usage? Or, from what i found online...
"This spelling of 'a lot' is frequent in informal writing but not generally accepted by arbiters of English usage. Others view it as a legitimate contraction. Some occurrences of alot in print may be typographical errors.
1993, The Columbia Guide to Standard American English calls alot “substandard” and notes that it is “increasingly found in informal correspondence and student writing” and “has as yet received no sanction in print except on the op-ed and sports pages.”
1996, The American Heritage Book of English Usage states that 'alot is still considered an error in print' but notes that standard words have formed by fusion of the article with a noun, such as another and awhile, and suggests the possibility that alot may, like them, eventually enter standard usage.
2004, Jack Lynch Guide to Grammar and Style (entry dated 2004) flatly states this to be a two-word expression.
2004, The Cambridge Guide to English Usage also compares alot to awhile. It states alot to be 'still regarded as nonstandard' and notes 50 appearances in the British National Corpus, 'almost entirely from three sources: e-mail, TV autocue data, and TV newscripts.' It suggests that some usages of alot in typewritten use are to be considered merely typos of the standard a lot though its appearance in handwriting and typescript is “more significant, as the shadow of things to come.”
"This spelling of 'a lot' is frequent in informal writing but not generally accepted by arbiters of English usage. Others view it as a legitimate contraction. Some occurrences of alot in print may be typographical errors.
1993, The Columbia Guide to Standard American English calls alot “substandard” and notes that it is “increasingly found in informal correspondence and student writing” and “has as yet received no sanction in print except on the op-ed and sports pages.”
1996, The American Heritage Book of English Usage states that 'alot is still considered an error in print' but notes that standard words have formed by fusion of the article with a noun, such as another and awhile, and suggests the possibility that alot may, like them, eventually enter standard usage.
2004, Jack Lynch Guide to Grammar and Style (entry dated 2004) flatly states this to be a two-word expression.
2004, The Cambridge Guide to English Usage also compares alot to awhile. It states alot to be 'still regarded as nonstandard' and notes 50 appearances in the British National Corpus, 'almost entirely from three sources: e-mail, TV autocue data, and TV newscripts.' It suggests that some usages of alot in typewritten use are to be considered merely typos of the standard a lot though its appearance in handwriting and typescript is “more significant, as the shadow of things to come.”
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@ChipmunkErnie That may be why you don't know anybody in Manchester.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@Bewilderbeeste Probably. I used to know a Scouser though, many years ago. Taught me the "local" language, though I've forgotten most of it by now.
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@ChipmunkErnie Scousers are a dictionary unto themselves. Lol :)
Rutterman · 46-50, M
Because they're probably too lazy or too certain of their infallibility to bother looking it up on the Internet, which of course would reveal who's the "dummy" on this.
In my experience, people will block you for anything. Doesn't matter what you say or how you act. Someone will always find reason to block you.
In my experience, people will block you for anything. Doesn't matter what you say or how you act. Someone will always find reason to block you.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Oneofthestormboys · 56-60, M
Hahaha!
There was a chap on the radio recently who admitted to correcting graffiti that had grammatical mistakes like misspelling and wrong apostrophe use - he carries a small can of red paint and physically corrects it because it drives him nuts. When the radio presenter pointed out that he was just as guilty of doing graffiti as the person who did it in the first place, he agreed and said that he couldn’t help himself and it was a compulsion of his. It was pretty funny!
I wouldn’t worry about correcting people - just let them willingly stumble through life being oblivious. Much less stressful!
I think that “Alot” might be a place name, but I’m not sure. I did look it up once to waste a bit of time 😂
There was a chap on the radio recently who admitted to correcting graffiti that had grammatical mistakes like misspelling and wrong apostrophe use - he carries a small can of red paint and physically corrects it because it drives him nuts. When the radio presenter pointed out that he was just as guilty of doing graffiti as the person who did it in the first place, he agreed and said that he couldn’t help himself and it was a compulsion of his. It was pretty funny!
I wouldn’t worry about correcting people - just let them willingly stumble through life being oblivious. Much less stressful!
I think that “Alot” might be a place name, but I’m not sure. I did look it up once to waste a bit of time 😂
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@Oneofthestormboys Correcting graffiti that had grammatical mistakes like misspelling and wrong apostrophe use is so normal it's unbelievable.
"When the radio presenter pointed out that he was just as guilty of doing graffiti as the person who did it in the first place, he agreed and said that he couldn’t help himself and it was a compulsion of his"
Was that radio presenter a Libra, by any chance? That sounds like a very Libran thing to say.
"When the radio presenter pointed out that he was just as guilty of doing graffiti as the person who did it in the first place, he agreed and said that he couldn’t help himself and it was a compulsion of his"
Was that radio presenter a Libra, by any chance? That sounds like a very Libran thing to say.
Gangstress · 41-45, F
This site i swear
Blocking someone for using correct English lmao 🤣
Blocking someone for using correct English lmao 🤣
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@Gangstress See, you've made a typo there but I recognise it as such. "Woud" should be "would". I do recognise a genuine typo when I see one, but when I see the same "typo" repeatedly on the same site it makes me wonder if it is a genuine typo.
Gangstress · 41-45, F
@Bewilderbeeste well spotted! My apologies, i normally reread when ive typed 😅 @Bewilderbeeste
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@Gangstress It's OK, Gangstress. I could tell what it was meant to be.
auris · M
Considering the nature of english it can be consider a word by now.
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@auris Why is it impossible? If we have no reason to accept a "word" as valid then we don't accept it. It's that simple.
auris · M
@Bewilderbeeste indeed such is the nature of english
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@auris Not the English I learned in school.
4meAndyou · F
You've embarrassed someone who is ignorant.
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@4meAndyou I wouldn't say I'm oversensitive. I know lots of people who are far more sensitive about things like this than I am.
4meAndyou · F
@Bewilderbeeste No, no, you've misunderstood. The person who blocked you was a tad oversensitive. Time to get over it now, don't you think?
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@4meAndyou I probably will when I stop receiving notifications for this post.
AuRevoir · 36-40, M
They probably meant allot… but didn’t understand the spelling of the word.. so you’re both right, and contextually you’re both wrong…
Lost in translation..
Lost in translation..
carpediem · 61-69, M
Does that bother you? How about the term "imma"? Short I assume for "I am going to". I see that used often. So what do we do with those people? Torture I'm thinking..... 🤔
helenS · 36-40, F
I remember a beautiful discussion of whether "onto" is a word... 😏
Some said it should be "on to"
Some said it should be "on to"
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@helenS Yes, "onto" is a valid word. "Alot" is not.
helenS · 36-40, F
@Bewilderbeeste Thank you! Appreciated 🌷
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@helenS You're welcome, Helen.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
I got called an idiot because I said the technically, Canadians are Americans since we live in the Americas. Although culturally we don't speak that way, it remains technically true.
She refused to believe that.
She refused to believe that.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@Bewilderbeeste I don't call it America either, but my point is that technically we could call ourselves american since Canada is in North America.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@Bewilderbeeste I thought it was Mooseland?
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@ChipmunkErnie I like the sound of that!
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
All they have to do is look it up. I know a user who would do such a thing.
HairbrushDiva · 31-35, F
People like that are just trolls.
JonLosAngeles66 · M
Grammar Nazis, right or wrong, bug me. When corrected I always say "Oh thanks. Everyone loves to be corrected"
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@JonLosAngeles66 Most British people tend to take words literally, it's the way we were educated.
JonLosAngeles66 · M
@Bewilderbeeste what about all the British poets?
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@JonLosAngeles66 They have what we call a poetic licence, but the average people in the street don't talk like poets, do they?
Disgustedman · 61-69, M
I don't know I used to use that word myself but then I looked up on the dictionary and it says nope you're supposed to say a lot. But some people can be so picky I mean whether you say a lot or alot all of us will we know what you mean you mean a lot of something
SW-User
Well, they would get mad because they always thought it was a word and maybe they felt like you were putting them down by correcting them. But as for blocking you over it, that's just silly.
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@SW-User Why would anyone "think" something is a word when it's not in the dictionary? Besides, that guy was the one putting me down, he called me a dummy. I didn't name-call him.
Slade · 56-60, M
Alot is not a word but slang that has become completely incorporated in the language
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@Slade I don't know about in Wolverhampton, but it hasn't become slightly incorporated in the language we speak in my neighbourhood.
HannahSky · F
Why write a post about something so trivial?
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@HannahSky Why answer it if it means that little to you?
HannahSky · F
@Bewilderbeeste clogs up the feed
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@HannahSky All the more reason to ignore it. The less you answer something the less it'll clog up the feed.
bijouxbroussard · F
You’re not wrong. They’re two words. But the fact that it was a hill they were willing to “die” on says much more about them than you.
Oneofthestormboys · 56-60, M
@bijouxbroussard That was so well put, and it made me chuckle!
Lilymoon · F
🤣 point and laugh at them lol
IamCuriousBabe · 51-55, F
happensalot
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
People nowadays are obsessed with "keeping negative energy" our of their lives, basically any little annoyance pisses them off out of proportion
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@MartinTheFirst Where I live we don't get pissed off by having our grammatical mistakes pointed out, we get pissed off by people mangling the English language in the first place. This is a case of priorities.
Monalisaa1986 · 36-40, F
A lot is a word
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@Monalisaa1986 "A lot" is two words. "Alot" is not a word.
Renaci · 36-40
Must be nice to have so few real problems one attacks innocuous wording.
Someone once said ad-ver-tis-ment instead of ad-ver-tiz-ment and I had to murder them.
Someone once said ad-ver-tis-ment instead of ad-ver-tiz-ment and I had to murder them.
Unquestioned · 70-79, M
You should be allotted time by SW as Chief Spelling Policeman.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@Unquestioned I'm sure he'd appreciate that allotment a lot.
This message was deleted by its author.
SW-User
@Missadventurous it's two words, "a lot"
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@Missadventurous It's not in my dictionary and my spellchecker doesn't recognise it. What does it mean? There's "allot" meaning to allocate or assign, but not "alot". If someone made that in a game of Scrabble I would definitely question it.
Bewilderbeeste · 61-69, M
@SW-User That's another matter altogether. If that guy simply failed to put a space between "a" and "lot", why didn't he tell me that instead of blocking me?