This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultAsking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

More and more covid-vaxed women are considering lying about their vax status as more men see them as an infertility risk

This is a flow on from the vacci-dating trend where women would not date men who elected not to get covid vaxed.

Now the script is being flipped because women are apparently starting to 'panic' about lost dating/partnering/family/marriage opportunities based on how men see covid-vax status as another roadblock to dating (due to the perception that one of the long-term effect of being Covid mRNA vaxed causes female infertility) and choose to use it as another reason to walk away from the dating scene and remain single.

As an aside, there are a couple of dating sites now that cater for so-called 'pureblood' (un covid vaxed) dating seekers. Dunno how genuine or functional they are as i've never tried them.

It's highly possible in retrospect that men lose fertility due to long term effects of covid mRNA vaxxing as well.

I doubt there are any studies on the topic of covid vaxes and human fertility.
Top | New | Old
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
Try this one for starters:

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/covid-infection-may-impair-male-fertility-vaccination-shows-no-effect-review-suggests

The study shows no meaningful connection between Covid vaccinations and fertility in either men or women. It does however point out that contracting coronavirus can impact negatively on the quality of semen . . as indeed does dying of the virus.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
zonavar68 · 56-60, M
@PatientlyWaiting25 Ha ha that's fair I suppose but your reaction does indicate a 'barring up' against the statements and a somewhat rejection of the proposed alternative reality.

I'm not dating anyway so I can say what needs to be said without fear of rejection anymore. Still I don't know if the science linking Covid vaxes to human (in)fertility has been studied at all. Doesn't help that the timeline is probably too short (since the vaxes have only been around since about 2022 in 'full tilt' deployment) to develop any sort of accurate, validated data set(s).
Softandsweet2 · 36-40, F
That’s all so damn stupid.
zonavar68 · 56-60, M
@Softandsweet2 I agree, but it's being reported in multiple places as a new ''retro fad" in the dating scene, and since I'm no longer in the dating scene I can only say that I was the target of vacci-dating 'hate' on dating sites from women (one of the many reasons I chose to walk away from dating), so flipping the script to push back seems like a logical thing that will eventually occur, even if not to a large degree.
swirlie · 31-35, F
@zonavar68
No it isn't being reported in multiple places, zonavar68. Just stop it.
zonavar68 · 56-60, M
Clearly you ladies are being triggered by it so it must be somewhat true. 8-) After all it was you ladies who created 'vacci dating' which led to dating sites adopting it as a profile option and the whole social vilification of anyone electing to be unvaxed effectively being excluded from social things including dating and relationships. Now the men are pushing back by starting to question women's covid vax status and declining to date women who are covid-vaxed there's a disconnect being exposed. Men are smart to question a person's vax status at early stages of getting to know someone before any intimacy happens.
MethDozer · M
Oh rucking nonsense. Whatever segment lf the population of men who choose partners based on fertility and women who are lying about this over a insignificant correlation is absolutely microscopic in any reality.


Who told you this shit?
zonavar68 · 56-60, M
@MethDozer Hence my comment at the end about whether studies have been done, and that male fertility is probably affected just as much. Vacci-dating was a massive thing in the last few years and I know since I got to feel the effects of it, but it wouldn't surprise me at all that men are doing it in reverse now.
MethDozer · M
@zonavar68 Yeah, with a marginal minority of lunatics.

The problem with looking online and at online communities fir trends is it makes fringe minorities seen to be exponentially more relevant and representative than they actually are in the real world.
zonavar68 · 56-60, M
@MethDozer Not really. Women weaponised 'vacci dating' against men en-masse from 2022 onwards (and this was facilitated in no small way by nearly all dating sites introducing a Covid vax status field in member profiles), so if the script is getting flipped to push back, I call that a Good Thing.

 
Post Comment