Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
1st amendment: Explicitly state that only living beings can have rights and that living being rights must supercede laws pertaining to concepts. A solid definition of what a living being is should be included. Yet must not stipulate any form of concept.

Just this one amendment would be so controversial, that it might cause a civil war on several fronts.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@LordShadowfire Using that reasoning it could be done. I don't trust people to not do such things.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@LordShadowfire You may be thinking that I am joking.

Just look to other religious states like Iran.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@DeWayfarer I definitely do not think you're joking. Thinking about the Evangelical Church, they would definitely pull that.

SatanBurger · 36-40, F
I think the president has full immunity, I'd change that. One person should not have total immunity. I'd also remove the Supreme Court and only have federal. I'd make laws that there has to be more representation for multiple groups, not just whites. I think us white people need representation but we already got that, other groups need it too.

Oh and felons can vote
An no confidence vote, which I believe some countries with prime ministers have, to basically kick the head out of office if they feel they're doing a poor job.

Also, the Prime Minister system seems pretty good right now, as the Senate seems to pick leaders that actually knows how the government works instead of someone with no knowledge other than a criminal Enterprise and PR can get the to White House.
Pfuzylogic · M
to never change the original Constitution and amendments. There is a reason we have red on our flag and it wasn’t given by some of those wanting to change what was already sacrificed for.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M
You are bound to all agreements, none of this I couldn't consent because it wasn't in my best interest stuff. If they want to declare that then they must adopt the title of a person with no agency status and will be barred from major financial decisions
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
First, I'd include universal suffrage for all genders and races from the very beginning; second I'd leave out that "bearing arms" bit, at least the way it's written/interpreted.
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
Term and age limits. Two terms, they're done. Reach seventy? Enjoy retirement. Electoral college? Gone! Politicians cannot trade securities. Districts drawn by a nonpartisan commission. No gerrymandering like today. And establish safeguards to curb out of control executives who ignore checks and balances. Require churches file audited financial statements like all other nonprofits do. Ban assault weapons.
Live free and just enjoy life
meJess · F
All the amendments
SomeIrishPerson · 31-35, M
Free ice crean every other tuesday
A commitment to peace.
Keeper · M
Strict term limits (two term max) and prohibiting the sale of stocks/trading during that period
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Keeper How about we go even further and prohibit them from selling anything during that period.
Keeper · M
@LordShadowfire no arguments here.

Public service should go back to exactly that. Not padding portfolios
Theyitis · 36-40, M
Assault weapons ban.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
"Any agent of any local, State, or Federal agency who violates any person's human or civil rights is guilty of a felony and will be sentenced to 30 years in prison without parole or being granted clemency or parole."
swirlie · 31-35
@Diotrephes
Does the bread and water include butter or margarine?
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@swirlie Of course! Whichever one the felon wants.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Compulsory voting, with 100% registration to vote done automatically😷
Allelse · 36-40, M
@whowasthatmaskedman And they can buy a sausage sandwich too.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@LordShadowfire Most joke candidates are taken care of here by a "deposit" scheme.If you get below a minimal number of votes, you stand to lose your money. 😷
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Allelse Yes. A fund raiser for local schools and charities😷
val70 · 51-55
Are you kidding? Rewrite that now?
Alyosha · 36-40, M
Profit controls and a maximum wage.
Term limits.
Get rid of the senate..
All they want is pork on top of whatever congress comes up with
Pfuzylogic · M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout
Australia does have a Senate but not a Congress. Isn’t your term “Parliament”?
JoyfulSilence · 51-55, M
All people shall be excellent to each other.

Or be exiled to Antarctica.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
Ranked choice voting.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@bijouxbroussard What is wrong with it? You'd get a first and second choice for president instead of having your choice roll over to a candidate you hate if your person drops out, so what's the problem?
@LordShadowfire In the Bay Area we always have multiple candidates, and I always know who I want to win; I don’t need a 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th choice. What often seems to happen is that nobody’s first choice wins, and we end up with someone nobody’s happy with.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@bijouxbroussard I'm just saying, if we'd had it in the presidential election in 2016, my vote for Jill Stein would have rolled over to Hillary instead. But I see your point.
gregloa · 61-69, M
No democrats
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Allelse · 36-40, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand What's racist about that?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Allelse · 36-40, M
@Diotrephes Ban them too, I think till you Americans can learn to behave, you're gonna have to start cutting your meat with a spoon.
swirlie · 31-35
A complete exclusion of American citizens from choosing the President of the United States, but instead that Presidential choice be made by the Leaders of all other Nations who do economic Trade with the USA.
No activist judges, all court officials must be apolitical, including lawyers.
Theyitis · 36-40, M
@NativePortlander1970 How would you enforce “no activist judges”? Seems to me it’s simply a matter of whether or not you agree with a judge that determines whether or not he gets labeled an activist.

 
Post Comment