Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why didn't God create Adam and Eve to be perfect beings like himself?

Because he wanted to give Adam and Eve the freedom of choice to be who they want to be. But you can still give human beings the ability to choose who they are as perfect beings. God is a perfect being continually made choices. Poor ones if you ask me. So why didn't God create Adam and Eve to be perfect beings with the freedom of choice?
Maturebate · 70-79, M
Not wishing to offend but isn't this another reason to call it all BS.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
BibleData · M
Define perfect. With an example. Like, is a newborn baby perfect in the eyes of the parents?
redredred · M
@BibleData I provided you direct quotes that directly proved you in error. You denied you were in error despite clear evidence that you were and remain in error. I am very well qualified to judge your character in light of your obvious lack of integrity.
BibleData · M
@redredred [quote]I provided you direct quotes that directly proved you in error.[/quote]

But no. When you were corrected you ignored it. The word mistranslated as birds applies to fowl, which is archaic for any flying creature. Insect, bird, bat . Like cattle. From chattel. Not just cows but any movable property. Pigs, cows, sheep, slaves. You should try looking things up once in a while. It can be useful.
"All fiction is metaphor. Science fiction is metaphor. What sets it apart
from older forms of fiction seems to be its use of new metaphors, drawn from certain great dominants of our contemporary life -- science, all the sciences, and technology, and the relativistic and the historical outlook, among them.

Space travel is one of these metaphors; so is an alternative society, an
alternative biology; the future is another. The future, in fiction, is a metaphor."

― Ursula K. Le Guin, forward to [i]The Left Hand of Darkness[/i]
Entwistle · 56-60, M
Why has he let billions of people down the ages suffer and die rather than just forgive Adam and Eve?
Why did he create them knowing full well that they would sin before he even created them?
BibleData · M
@Entwistle [quote] The kid in your analogy may have a better life without it's criminal father.[/quote]

Its subjective, though, isn't it. A televangelist's kid may have a "better" life because of sin. The kid's life may have been better because of the crimes his father was committing. His life may have been better with his father in prison. It depends upon the situation.
BibleData · M
@Entwistle [quote]So god is fallible then?[/quote]

That's an interesting question. If you define fallible as capable of making mistakes or errors then who is going to be the judge of that? I've heard atheists say life as we know it, if created by God, was a mistake because they think life as we know it is what he intended. He regretted the flood of Noah's day.

God's inspired word, as given to the prophets, was infallible, but the translation of the Bible as we know it wasn't inspired so it isn't infallible.

The point with omniscience is that it is a religious or theological exaggeration of the truth. Most of modern day Christian and Jewish tradition is pagan nonsense adopted by apostate religion. The immortal soul, hell, all good people go to heaven, the cross, trinity, rapture, Christmas and Easter, as well as omnipotence, omnipresence and omnibenevolence is all silly nonsense not supported by the Bible.
Sharon · F
@BibleData [quote]He didn't know they would sin.[/quote]
According to the myth, he is supposed to be omniscient so he must have known.
GerOttman · 61-69, M
I don't know, I'll bet Eve was pretty perfect in that little fig leaf! Adam was probably an a##hole, it had to start somewhere.
helenS · 36-40, F
The only answer I have is gnostic: the world is flawed because its creator is flawed.
helenS · 36-40, F
@Heavenlywarrior No, "Pistis Sophia" was discovered in 1773 already. But there is a papyrus codex at Nag Hammadi which has an earlier, simpler Sophia.
Heavenlywarrior · 36-40, M
@helenS I’ll check it out.
helenS · 36-40, F
@Heavenlywarrior You might be interested in the book "The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity" by a certain Hans Jonas.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Gnostic-Religion-Hans-Jonas/dp/0807058017
The book contains perhaps the most competent scientific study on Gnosticism.
Adam and Eve was created prefect in every sense of t he word (mentally, emotionally, and physically. They were created with a free will. Sadly, they chose to do their own thing rather than obey God. God wanted them to willingly serve and worship Him. They lacked nothing, they had it all so there was no reason for them to disobey their Creator and Heavenly Father. Adam and Eve were created perfect with the prospect and opportunity of never dying.
PatKirby · M
Did you notice how although the Garden of Eden was a large place, the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was close to the Tree of Life?

God must've been saying you may freely pick from the Tree of Life but it is forbidden to pick from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil - with a wink, wink.

Get it? So they can get it over with already.
Convivial · 26-30, F
Too many assumptions in this question
ammelee · F
even the devil was thrown from heaven trying to be like God

and here he is telling us we can be gods

you have to know your place

be a good, less than perfect being
and reap the rewards
they are custom-made
pianoplayingsteve · 31-35, M
@ammelee Can you show me the part where the devil tried to be like god?
ammelee · F
In the temptation
he said
bow down and worship me
and I'll give you this world
pianoplayingsteve · 31-35, M
@ammelee When the devil tempted Jesus on the mountain?
Adstar · 56-60, M
God never created Adam and eve to be perfect b eings like Himself... He created them to play a part in fulfilling His eternal plan..

Having a freedom of choice gives one a genuine choice to either accept God as God or reject God.. You cannot have one without the other..
Heavenlywarrior · 36-40, M
Adam was androgynous at first until he split and became male and female. At that point he was more powerful than the sons of god
Heavenlywarrior · 36-40, M
@helenS I haven’t did. Much study on her so I’m not sure …. From what I know so far she was made as a seperate being not from him … that’s why she couldn’t be submissive
pianoplayingsteve · 31-35, M
@Heavenlywarrior Hey, man. You been reading Kabbalah, too?
Heavenlywarrior · 36-40, M
@pianoplayingsteve I need to … I think I have skimmed over it a couple times but wasn’t ready for it
Coz even God knew n still knows that in relative world, [i]Perfection[/i] can only be traced in the [i]man-made[/i] dictionary.

Buy or install one more just to feel empowered.
rayoflight · 46-50, M
I thought they sold toys 😏
pianoplayingsteve · 31-35, M
Hello, there. I’ve read the Torah, the Talmud, aswell as the zohar etc. A lot of people seem to think that the Old Testament is all there is to it when it comes to Jewish belief. In actual fact, the Old Testament is a tiny amount. It’s like playing a video game and ignoring any prequels, sequels, literature around it etc

For a quick answer I recommend Jordan Peterson’s biblical lectures, he is really good at taking ideas in the Bible that might seem absurd in the literal sense, or somehow wrong morally and gives a pretty good explanation of them. I could rewatch and talk you through it if you like.

‘So why didn't God create Adam and Eve to be perfect beings with the freedom of choice?’. The idea of ‘perfection’ is a subjective one. For someone to view even themselves as perfect, they would have to be judging themselves based on some external standard. In this case Yahweh. You cannot be perfect and also have freedom of choice as that freedom of conscience, expression etc will lead you to develop a different idea of what is perfect.

From both a biblical perspective,as well as a scientific one (how could everyone fit into one garden if they are all reproducing and never dying?) I think that the garden of Eden is meant to be seen as an allegory, brilliantly laid out in ‘’lecture: Biblical Series II: Genesis 1: Chaos & Order’ (Prof Jordan Peterson, 2017)

I don’t think they were meant to be perfect. Adam was not meant to have been allowed to eat meat, according to the Sanhedrin in 59b of the Talmud:

מיתיבי (בראשית א, כו) ורדו בדגת הים מאי לאו לאכילה לא למלאכה
The Gemara raises an objection to the assertion that eating meat was prohibited to Adam, from the verse: “And have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that creeps upon the land” (Genesis 1:28). What, is it not stated with regard to consumption, i.e., doesn’t this verse mean that people may eat the meat of animals? The Gemara answers: No, the verse is referring to using animals for labor.

However, this also happens:

מיתיבי היה ר' יהודה בן תימא אומר אדם הראשון מיסב בגן עדן היה והיו מלאכי השרת צולין לו בשר ומסננין לו יין הציץ בו נחש וראה בכבודו ונתקנא בו התם בבשר היורד מן השמים
The Gemara raises an objection from a baraita to the assertion that eating meat was prohibited to Adam: Rabbi Yehuda ben Teima would say: Adam, the first man, would dine in the Garden of Eden, and the ministering angels would roast meat for him and strain wine for him. The snake glanced at him and saw his glory, and was jealous of him, and for that reason the snake incited him to sin and caused his banishment from the Garden. According to this, evidently Adam would eat meat. The Gemara answers: There the reference is to meat that descended from heaven, which was created by a miracle and was not the meat of animals at all.

So, literally ‘don’t eat meat Adam! Oh I know you’ll like though, so here is some from heaven, it doesn’t count because it’s from heaven.’

As for eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil and then realising they were naked and wanting to cover up, seems a bit crazy right? Not if you look into it a bit more:

Yahweh punishes the transgression of eating the fruit by giving Eve pain in childbirth. This pain is caused by the fact that Homo sapiens developed a brain larger than the other primates, large enough to develop a sense of how actions can effect the future, mortality and so on. This results in a disproportionately large head which causes pain during delivery. In understanding mortality, you understand that you yourself are vulnerable physically, your body victim to damages from the external environment. And you wish to cover up to protect your vulnerability and so you become aware of your nakedness. At the same time that Adam becomes aware of his nakedness/vulnerability he comes aware that other humans (in this case eve) will also have vulnerabilities. Adam has a choice whether or not to exploit the vulnerabilities of Adam, and vice versa, and here arises the knowledge of good and evil.

In order for man to be the very creation god wanted, humans would have to be imperfect morally. Without a concept of evil there cannot be a concept of good. You’d have to be a robot clone in order to be this perfect semblance of god. Now of course, why even create humans in the first place, then? They seem to be doomed to just suffer and engage in evil acts toward one another. I think it’s an allegory of what Christianity teaches in general, just trying to be the best we can in a group dynamic. Gosh I’m going to go on forever, I’m really well versed in this sort of thing. In all societies, secular or religious, there will be a constant wrestle of allowing as much individual freedom as possible, whilst also trying to restrict any individual behaviours which may harm the group as a whole, as possible. In religion, certain individual behaviours seen as detrimental on a group level will be discouraged as ‘sin’. In a secular society this may be ‘hate speech’.

I’m well read in atheist works, i of course read ‘the god delusion’ by professor Richard Dawkins but then immediately read ‘the Dawkins delusion’ by professor alistair McGrath. The argument by Christopher Hitchens was that ‘god created us sick and demanded us to be better’. I understand the argument. However, I think this dynamic is true of any society. Your individual desires will always go against the group, it’s why often our desires are called ‘fantasies’. We are inheritantly going to be sinful in a religious context, and from a 21rst century secular context yes I’m sure deep down many of us are an ‘ist’ or a ‘phobe’, or generally just selfish. We have strong individual desires worked into us over millennia of evolution. We are the physical manifestation of our genes and are hardwired to get as many resources and mates and other powers required to propagate that dna. We experience things as individuals (hence both scientists and religious types anthropomorphise things as it makes them easier to understand) and expressions of that dna. However, with that increased brain size we learnt to form societies which require a code of good and evil and this brings us back to genesis.

I’m happy to chat about this.

Also see: Professor Jordan P Peterson’s biblical lecture series,

Professor Edward Dutton in videos where he mentions religion, race or woke.

Richard Dawkins ‘The Selfish Gene’

I could recommend more but people will attack me. As with religion, we need grand narratives that explain the world it simple terms, in narratives. And such models always need a group that is evil. So I’m sure some will call me negative names if I give all my sources so feel free to pm me.

 
Post Comment