Because freedom of thought is the product of conscious thinker's evolution
View 12 more replies »
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage
It doesn't matter, evolution never happened. I see that you're not a historian.
How long was it that the title “evolution “ was first used ?
It doesn't matter, evolution never happened. I see that you're not a historian.
greensnacks · F
Do you believe in the functions of mathematics?
2+2 means 4, no? I can calculate it. You can calculate it. A person from Papua New Guinea can calculate it. But, they need to know how to do basic mathematics to do that.
It's the same with the rest of the science. 90% of it.
Go master geology, rock formation, chemistry, physics, biology and most needed sciences and you'd maybe be convinced. Because you don't believe experts (independent or not) and the evidence they show.
2+2 means 4, no? I can calculate it. You can calculate it. A person from Papua New Guinea can calculate it. But, they need to know how to do basic mathematics to do that.
It's the same with the rest of the science. 90% of it.
Go master geology, rock formation, chemistry, physics, biology and most needed sciences and you'd maybe be convinced. Because you don't believe experts (independent or not) and the evidence they show.
Richard65 · M
A scientist and a priest are walking on a wet beach when they see hoof tracks in the sand. The scientist says, "Judging from all the evidence that is available to me, I say a horse has run along the beach and left those tracks, even though I did not witness the horse running by with my own eyes."
The priest replies, "There's also the possibility that a unicorn left those tracks."
The priest replies, "There's also the possibility that a unicorn left those tracks."
BlueSkyKing · M
Science's earliest roots can be traced to Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia around 3000 to 1200 BC.
What about the Chinese civilizations? They were way ahead in of technology without "the word of God."According to the Word of God, science has been around 3000 years earlier since the world began.
Cite the chapter and verse. Also anything in the bible that refers to methodology.
DocSavage · M
@BlueSkyKing
Forget it. If it’s not on a Ken Ham video, he doesn’t know it. You don’t him to read the thing do you?
Forget it. If it’s not on a Ken Ham video, he doesn’t know it. You don’t him to read the thing do you?
SomeMichGuy · M
lol
No, you got that wrong.
You need to read the wikipedia entry about "consilience"...
Evolution has that: multiple lines of research all pointing to the same conclusion.
No, you got that wrong.
You need to read the wikipedia entry about "consilience"...
Evolution has that: multiple lines of research all pointing to the same conclusion.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
OriginalDumbMan · 36-40
@SomeMichGuy if there was evolution on very large timescale, we would be seeing some species between monkey and human. As we see green leaves, dry leaves, and leaves in between green leaves and dry leaves.
SomeMichGuy · M
@OriginalDumbMan That's apples and oranges. Dry & wet leaves are not different species of leaves, meaning your example is specious...
And people unaccepting of evolution always think one arg will somehow undo it...which is why understanding consilience is so important...
But the claim was never like what you present.
And there have been other proto-humans, but sapiens--what a misnomer!--won out by being a superior adaptation...
And people unaccepting of evolution always think one arg will somehow undo it...which is why understanding consilience is so important...
But the claim was never like what you present.
And there have been other proto-humans, but sapiens--what a misnomer!--won out by being a superior adaptation...
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
kodiac · 22-25, M
Quote-All they have is a lot of nice drawings and art work, and artifacts that is either tampered with or, more times than not, misinterpreted.You described the bible and religion in general .
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@kodiac
Read the post again, you are sadly mistaken.
You described the bible and religion in general .
Read the post again, you are sadly mistaken.
DocSavage · M
true science shows a much younger earth according to the Word of God.
According to whom ? What’s your consensus ?
Bewilderbeeste · 70-79, M
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Bewilderbeeste
If people don't believe in you, it's called hate. It's the same with God.
They don't necessarily hate God, they just don't believe in him.
If people don't believe in you, it's called hate. It's the same with God.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
No, you can convince other people you exist, within a reasonable context. With little effort. God cannot be
No one can demonstrate god’s existence as described in the bible. Not even him.
As god is a contradiction to reality by definition.
No, you can convince other people you exist, within a reasonable context. With little effort. God cannot be
No one can demonstrate god’s existence as described in the bible. Not even him.
As god is a contradiction to reality by definition.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Why does technology use that terminology then, hypocritical and conflicting to use both
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment