What’s your verdicts on this ?

@4meAndyou There is even more good music, of [i]all[/i] genres of all ages from Mediaeval to now, that has [i]nothing [/i]to do with sex, violence or drugs, and has [i]nothing [/i]to do with [i]any[/i] religion. You can even enjoy sacred music for its own sake, without having to believe in its deity. (Christianity is not the only fruit...)

As for drugs, violence and sex outside marriage, the last cannot possibly equated with the first two, despite those who like to imagine they can rule other people's love-lives.

Whether films depicting any of these "normalise" the behaviour is an old debate; and works have fiction have depicted drugs, sex and violence since the Ancient Greeks. Usually, the "baddies" lose in the end; but I very much doubt any more than a small minority are influenced by silly films. More likely they are influenced by all-too-real violence and drugs around them or inflicted on them - including in the home.

Sex before marriage? Oh my God. How[i] dare [/i]a couple express their love for each other physically without some official permit first. Is kissing allowed? (The religious service is not the marriage formality. It is only a ceremony relevant only to couples of that faith - many couples marry in registry offices without any church-going.)


Thinking novels and films somehow "evil" because they are magic-fantasies is just laughable. A religious bigot who makes such an allegation unwittingly admits believing in wizards and magic, and thinking the work is a documentary! These stories are aimed mainly at children aged from about 8 upwards - fortunately, unless warped by foolish elders-but-not-betters, most children are perfectly capable of seeing them as enjoyable, pure fantasy.

Was Peter Pan a real boy? Does The Magisterium* really exist?I think the [i]Harry Potter [/i]novels and films have been victims of this sort of childish abuse - where and when did the self-appointed Guardians Of Others' Minds see real teenagers on broomsticks playing real versions of hockey in the air?


Most Christians [i]do[/i] lead good lives, and you [i]do not [/i]need be of [i]any[/i] religion to be good - but there are too many who profess to be "Christian" while being certainly [i]not[/i] good... including those tiny-minded "priests" who condemn anything enjoyable.

====

*Opaque central authority in Philip Pullman's [i]Dark Materials[/i] stories.

@Thinkerbell he used to team with King Kong Bundy as a villian tag team. My SIL knew him - said he was a great guy

@Thinkerbell


Poor guy only made it to 47 ☹️

@Slade

Yes, I looked him up... died of cancer. ☹️

@ArishMell
Check this out:

Biological Effects Of Electromagnetic Radiation ( Radiowaves And Microwaves) Defense Intelligence Agency 1976 Document
ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD

I wanted to post this research from the Defense Intelligence Agency from 1976 on the knowledge 50 years ago of the effects of microwave and radio frequency radiation. If it seems that what is going on now with humanity fits the description in these documents, is because it does. All symptoms we describe related to “Covid” can be induced by EMF frequency. I have written about this previously and also explained how scalar interferometry used on a population can program the electromagnetic and biophotonic cellular control mechanism to weaken immune resistance against a wide variety of assaults.
A Biophysical Understanding of Vaccine Shedding and Self-disseminating Vaccines in Populations Considering Scalar Interferometry - the Electromagnetic Harmonics That can Carry a Specific Disease or Healing Information Structure

We also know how WBAN can be used to induce Corona symptoms:
Scientific Study- Corona Is Technology And Frequency Induced! Effect of Coronavirus Worldwide through Misusing of Wireless Sensor Networks
In the below document exerpts, it is clear that accelerated aging, heart arrythmia, brain fog and even Voice to Skull mind control technologies, endocrine dysruptions, immune system downregulation, accelerated heart disease and atherosclerosis, dysfunctional carbohydrate metabolism, blood clotting disorders, and more all can be induced by EMF.
People continue to debate if 5G is harmful or exposure to their electronic devices contributes to their adverse health sympoms. The answer is yes. It is amazing how much symptom improvement can be achieved with diligent EMF mitigation.
It is important to understand microwaves and radiowaves have always been used in a weaponized way and have been for the last 50 years. Imagine how much more advanced military clandestine technology is compared to this document.

Summary:
Radio and microwaves have adverse health effects, everything else in scientific literature that claims the results are inconclusive, is propaganda. Understanding that our convenience technologies like cell phones, computers and the supporting wireless networks all have adverse health effects, is important to understand and to mitigate to support our survival in this war. Using ethernet cables instead of WIFI, minimizing cell phone exposure ( or even bettergetting rid of your smart phone all together), opposing 5G and above networks, getting out of the cities where the smartgrid is frying humanity with wide frequency ranges, getting rid of smart meters, minimizing blue tooth etc, etc… People want to be as up to date on technologies as they can. But the more you are, the more gridlocked you are into the control weapons systems that can make you ill.

@ArcAngel I see the article does not give the energy density responsible. Nor though I would not expect it to because it is basic knowledge, that the intensity falls by an inverse-square law.

Certainly you'd not want to be very close to a high-power transmitter: it would cook you! That was discovered by radar researchers during WW2. A 'phone though?

"get rid of your smart-'phone..." Easier said than done I'm afraid as commerce and to some extent various government agencies and public utilities want us to use them more and more widely, not as some sort of imagined "weapon" but for their administrative ease.

I don't have one! I did, about 5 years ago, for about 6 months, but it was such an awkward thing to carry and use, that I paid off the 2-year contract and sold it. I replaced it with a basic, speech-first, text second, 3G instrument on PAYG, and it's not linked to the Internet.

Nor do I use any Bluetooth or other radio-linked equipment, unless you count the central-heating thermostat, front doorbell, and the reversing-camera in my car! And I don't count them. (All are powered by AA cells, so extremely low signal strengths, and the thermostat is the only transmitter on all the time.)


I don't believe the direct "mind control" stuff. The manipulation is primarily commercial and does not need anything that sophisticated, just basic psychology. The advertising trade has always used that even without using any "ology" word.

As for the attempt to link radio-telephones to a viral disease... That is absurd and probably politically-inspired, though a link to cancer may be more credible. Even then it depends on signal intensity and dose rate. Radio frequencies are not ionising but can heat tissue - if powerful enough.

Still, they are right to suggest using r.f. transmitters as little as possible, and a lot of radio-link devices are not actually necessary for function if they can be replaced by cables, nor even to own!

@ArishMell

I don't have one! I did, about 5 years ago, for about 6 months, but it was such an awkward thing to carry and use, that I paid off the 2-year contract and sold it. I replaced it with a basic, speech-first, text second, 3G instrument on PAYG, and it's not linked to the Internet.

All I have is the inexpensive tracfone that you can get.

I don't believe the direct "mind control" stuff.

This is a very deep and detailed area; and you would have to do a LOT of research on it to
discover the truth about it.


As for the attempt to link radio-telephones to a viral disease... That is absurd and probably politically-inspired,

This woman is not political at all; her orientation is Spiritual.

Watch this:

https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/fluorescent-skin-in-c19-vaccinated#media-dfcc4c80-7f3a-4755-85cf-7750722a69fb

@Thinkerbell
Good point!

@Thinkerbell explains why Biden is there

@MarineBob Right!

@Domking
How do you interpret this?

Rev 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

@ArcAngel do not find any need to interpret - just leave it, scroll away.

@Domking
Remain ignorant.

@robingoodfellow Do these misery-guts condemn all the arts, or just music and films they don't like personally?

Are they saying it is wrong for mankind to create anything?

Can any of them explain their Talibanesque attitudes, or do they just try to hide behind the Bible?

@ArishMell there's always been this weird side of Abrahamic religion that conflates joy with evil. You're happy so you must be doing something wicked.
The burned 'witches' for dancing on a Sunday.

@robingoodfellow I think it's just power-play. The religions themselves don't conflate joy with evil, but they provide a ready excuse for petty little people who find their religion the only way they can exert any power over other people.

Witches were not burned anyway, at least not in Britain though I think it was more common on the Continent. They were usually hanged, but for being so-called "witches".

I don't know if there was ever any statute law against it but dancing on a Sunday might have attracted a torrent of abuse and hatred stoked up by dull-minded, fear-ridden sabbatarians.

These types even exalted the Tay Bridge Disaster in 1879, as God's punishment for travelling on a Sunday! (The bridge collapsed under a train, killing everyone on board, but hardly by God's hand. It was fundamentally weak by bad design and appallingly sloppy construction; and failed under the resultant of the train's weight and lateral load of a gale of a strength common in that region.)

@Carazaa
I'm always getting closer to God and I haven't owned a TV or gone to the
movies in over 20 years and I haven't listened to any worldly music in
over 20 years too. In fact, I never liked so called " pop " music; the music industry and hollywood are TOTALY Satanic. I have watched many Christian
videos, but lately I have discovered this amazing Pastor and now his videos
are the only ones I watch; maybe that is what you are picking up on
through the Spirit. Check out his site:

https://rumble.com/user/FGC

God bless you!
Scott

@Thinkerbell It may shock you to learn that we agree on that. I don't trust social media from a country like China, either.

@sascha There’s all sorts of interesting and funny things on there and it’s addictive. It’s more a distraction than anything else, however falling down it’s rabbit hole is easy so it pays to be aware.

@CrystalSkull Funny? What's funny?

I tried it several years ago, and thought it was very strange.

@sascha perhaps its algorithm has improved. You can find anything under the sun on there, science, art, philosophical ideas, news, humour, politics, food you name it. What I like is the footage everyday citizens from my own country post with regards to weather and traffic for example. The more you like a certain topic the more those topics will appear in your feed. It’s highly addictive so don’t bother…🙄😊 but yeah if you’re of a certain mindset in any spectrum it’s easy to get shit on your algorithm constantly. I wouldn’t use it as a reliable source.

@ArishMell
Spiritual music is fine; even King David was a musician and I used
to be too. If you have discernment, you can easily tell the difference
between Satanic and Godly music. It is the Satanic music that dominates the secular world which is about 90% of the world
sad to say.

@ArcAngel Why have you developed this idea that anything not directly sacred, is therefore evil, or the work of your "Satan"? What does it gain you to come over as a bitter misery-guts who hates humanity?.

I rather doubt that 90% of the world, if you mean society, is secular. It has to be secular administratively, in trade, etc, of course; but very large proportions of the populations are religious. They might not follow whatever is your faith, but that is not the point.

Did King David only ever play religious music - did that even exist in his time? Or did he also play music simply to be enjoyed, maybe even love-songs and dance music?

J.S. Bach wrote a lot of sacred music. Good? He also wrote a lot of secular music. Bad?

Elgar wrote his sublime [i]Dream of Gerontius [/i]as a religious fable. Good? He also wrote an equally gorgeous violin concerto. Bad?

''''''
Take these three simple love songs: [i]Greensleeves[/i] (from the 16C); [i]My love Is Like A Red Red Rose[/i] (19C) and [i]Anyone Who Had A Heart[/i] (20C). They are about human beings naturally falling in love. (Well, all right the third expresses the natural yearning to be in love.)

If you call innocent romances like those "Satanic", just because they are not hymns, you are saying it is "Satanic" for human beings to fall in love. Good thing that never caught on over 200 millennia ago, or none of could exist now! Which [i]you[/i] might think good, of course, but that says you think God Got It Wrong!

Luckily your God not only created us physically as part of life on Earth, and with it the human emotion called "Love" and the physiology necessary to continue our species.

He also gave us, men and women alike, the brains that contain the emotions, imagination, creativity and skills to be creative in turn, whether our creations are sacred or secular - and importantly, irrespective of any religious ideas we might choose to follow.

And that creativity expresses itself in so many ways. I agree some works are bad, in a "moral" sense, but you condemning [i]all[/i] non-religious arts as evil merely for being non-religious, merely says no-one should do anything you don't like personally.


If you think that God-given, human creativity to be wrong, you are saying your God has made a massive mistake.

Your proselytising on a "satanical" social-media site is hypocritical but essentially harmless. You won't convert anyone but might warn some not to fall into your trap of being so fearful and miserable.

I only hope you do not use your puritanical beliefs to bully anyone in real life though. That would be against God, as well as foolish and cowardly in purely human terms.

Try resuming music and learning to enjoy life again. You can still go to church on Sundays!

@ArishMell
@ArcAngel Why have you developed this idea that anything not directly sacred, is therefore evil, or the work of your "Satan"? What does it gain you to come over as a bitter misery-guts who hates humanity?.

I don't have bitter misery-guts nor do I hate humanity. I am trying to
save humanity by revealing the truth to them. You are really being
judgemental here coming up with ridiculous comments towards
me out of ignorance.



Did King David only ever play religious music - did that even exist in his time? Or did he also play music simply to be enjoyed, maybe even love-songs and dance music?

He played Spiritual music on the harp which was soothing and
peacefull; not sex drugs and rock and roll like today. And he did
dance before YHWH his Sustainer.

J.S. Bach wrote a lot of sacred music. Good? He also wrote a lot of secular music. Bad?

Bach was not always in the Spirit.

Elgar wrote his sublime Dream of Gerontius as a religious fable. Good? He also wrote an equally gorgeous violin concerto. Bad?

Not familiar with him so I can't comment on this one.

''''''
Take these three simple love songs: Greensleeves (from the 16C); My love Is Like A Red Red Rose (19C) and Anyone Who Had A Heart (20C). They are about human beings naturally falling in love. (Well, all right the third expresses the natural yearning to be in love.)

These are perfectly fine; like I said before, you can easily tell the
difference if you have discernment.


If you call innocent romances like those "Satanic", just because they are not hymns, you are saying it is "Satanic" for human beings to fall in love. Good thing that never caught on over 200 millennia ago, or none of could exist now! Which you might think good, of course, but that says you think God Got It Wrong!

I'm NOT saying that those are Satanic; you are really on my case
here. Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning?

Luckily your God not only created us physically as part of life on Earth, and with it the human emotion called "Love" and the physiology necessary to continue our species.

He said be fruitfull and multiply. YHWH has nothing against procreation; just fornication and adultury.

He also gave us, men and women alike, the brains that contain the emotions, imagination, creativity and skills to be creative in turn, whether our creations are sacred or secular - and importantly, irrespective of any religious ideas we might choose to follow.

Yes, but you must remember that the Spirit is at war with the
flesh. We need to seek the heavenly, not the earthly.

And that creativity expresses itself in so many ways. I agree some works are bad, in a "moral" sense, but you condemning all non-religious arts as evil merely for being non-religious, merely says no-one should do anything you don't like personally.

Use DISCERNMENT!

If you think that God-given, human creativity to be wrong, you are saying your God has made a massive mistake.

There is nothing wrong with human creativity if it serves God and
not Satan.

Your proselytising on a "satanical" social-media site is hypocritical but essentially harmless.

I'm not very happy about this site, but it is all I have.

You won't convert anyone but might warn some not to fall into your trap of being so fearful and miserable.

There are a FEW who get and that is the fulfilment of Scripture:

Matthew 7:14
Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and FEW there be that find it.

I only hope you do not use your puritanical beliefs to bully anyone in real life though. That would be against God, as well as foolish and cowardly in purely human terms.

I'm not bulling anyone; there you go again with your wild imagination
and your judgementalism.

Try resuming music and learning to enjoy life again. You can still go to church on Sundays!

I'm in prayer and study of the Sciptures every day and every night.

@Dacrowman The Chinese Communist Party.