Top | Newest First | Oldest First
KingofPizza2 · 36-40, M
I mean really, at its core, morality is just an agreed-upon set of principles that, when adhered to, will promote harmonious living. Sometimes people get carried away with it and turn it into the opposite.
OggggO · 36-40, M
Honestly, I think anyone making such a claim is ridiculous. Even in a completely materialistic (in the philosophical sense, not the character flaw) worldview, it’s possible to observe human interaction, reason upon it, and devise a set of rules that promotes the behaviors and qualities one considers desirable. Different people will obviously come to different conclusions based on their individual experiences and priorities, but then that’s exactly what has already happened. Even among the various religions, few if any people are ever expected to achieve perfect knowledge.
@OggggO
[quote] it’s possible to observe human interaction, reason upon it, and devise a set of rules that promotes the behaviors and qualities one considers desirable[/quote]
Right? I've never understood this notion that if there is no divine accountability then you might as well rape, kill and steal to your heart's content.
[quote] it’s possible to observe human interaction, reason upon it, and devise a set of rules that promotes the behaviors and qualities one considers desirable[/quote]
Right? I've never understood this notion that if there is no divine accountability then you might as well rape, kill and steal to your heart's content.
CopperCicada · M
In my faith tradition, we argue the other way around.
People have an innate spiritual or ethical compass. They can't be alienated from that essential goodness. It can be covered up, scrambled-- but not removed.
If it weren't for that there would be no natural impulse for altruism and compassion.
There certainly would be no motivation for spiritual discipline, for religious experience.
So from my perspective, the person who claims only God can provide morality... has already exercised this innate and inalienable spiritual/moral/ethical compass to find God. Or whatever higher power or principle they have faith in.
Whether that innate spiritual or ethical compass is an innate construct of humanity or something given by a divine entity is another question.
People have an innate spiritual or ethical compass. They can't be alienated from that essential goodness. It can be covered up, scrambled-- but not removed.
If it weren't for that there would be no natural impulse for altruism and compassion.
There certainly would be no motivation for spiritual discipline, for religious experience.
So from my perspective, the person who claims only God can provide morality... has already exercised this innate and inalienable spiritual/moral/ethical compass to find God. Or whatever higher power or principle they have faith in.
Whether that innate spiritual or ethical compass is an innate construct of humanity or something given by a divine entity is another question.
@CopperCicada
Interesting. I'd generally agree with that. Although i would view the innate moral compass not as a product of anything spiritual but as a product of evolving as a social animal.
Interesting. I'd generally agree with that. Although i would view the innate moral compass not as a product of anything spiritual but as a product of evolving as a social animal.
CopperCicada · M
@Pikachu My personal belief is that our innate spiritual and moral compass is evolutionary and emergent.
Which is another place I disagree with the anti-science theists. Spiritual and ethical experience itself is emergent. It requires dependent origination, natural selection.
Or can be evolved out of existence.
Which is another place I disagree with the anti-science theists. Spiritual and ethical experience itself is emergent. It requires dependent origination, natural selection.
Or can be evolved out of existence.
SW-User
We are all individuals who know how we prefer to be treated. We don’t like to be slandered. We don’t like to be lied to. We like to be treated with kindness and thoughtfulness. We like to be respected. We don’t like to have our things stolen from us. We don’t like to be physically or mentally abused. We also prefer not to be murdered. Now, apply those and our many other preferences to how we want to be treated and assume that everyone else wants the same or similar. It doesn’t take fear of retribution from a god after we die to understand the basics of how to treat each other.
@SW-User
Very good answer.
Very good answer.
Dateless · 31-35, M
Well.. propaganda..
Religion is not a safe haven for morality.
Religion is not a safe haven for morality.
Animals don't tend to wantonly kill each other in wars. And can you really say it is because they are worshiping God? Except red ants vs black ants. They are racists.
View 2 more replies »
@OggggO I know I was being factitious. :P
OggggO · 36-40, M
@canusernamebemyusername Sorry, hard to tell from just text. Especially given the claims I’ve seen people make in earnest.
@OggggO I try to stay on the more lighthearted side even when I do have an opinion. lol Too much hate in the world.
sunrisehawk · 61-69, M
Morals are the result of God's commandments/religious instructions.
If a person doesn't believe in any creative force beyond physics, then morals would be based upon what is best for the individual and species...as reproduction and survival are the ultimate goals.
If a person doesn't believe in any creative force beyond physics, then morals would be based upon what is best for the individual and species...as reproduction and survival are the ultimate goals.
@sunrisehawk
You did try to answer the question and that's good. I'm just pointing out what i feel to be errors in the reasoning behind it.
My main contention is that morality (Without god) is determined by the individual and the benefits to an individual when it seems clear to me that in practice morality is an emergent property of a community.
You did try to answer the question and that's good. I'm just pointing out what i feel to be errors in the reasoning behind it.
My main contention is that morality (Without god) is determined by the individual and the benefits to an individual when it seems clear to me that in practice morality is an emergent property of a community.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Pikachu A smoothly functioning community tends to benefit the individual as well anyhow.
SW-User
Thought provoking but we are a different species from animals so if we evolved then that could be the reason why....a different branch that developed different brain cells with thinking abilities and somewhere down the line, man thought what if I invent the guilt trip...thinking how that could affect future generations.🤔
@SW-User
lol the guilt trip is certainly a powerful tool. Although i must point out that we are still animals.
lol the guilt trip is certainly a powerful tool. Although i must point out that we are still animals.
SW-User
True but a little bit more intelligent than them@Pikachu 😉
@SW-User
I suppose that depends how we define intelligence. But yes, according to human standards of intelligence we do tend (in most respects) to be more intelligent.
I suppose that depends how we define intelligence. But yes, according to human standards of intelligence we do tend (in most respects) to be more intelligent.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
Morality = a person or a groups, prejudice. Nothing more, nothing less.
Next question.
Next question.
SW-User
If religion and belief in God comforts others when in distress or in great need or likewise helps you live a better quality of life why would you judge? Just go about your ways as others do.